Again - The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden is Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Judy Wood.
Maybe you should get pissed at architects for an engineered truth and specifically the truth traitor and FRAUDSTER, Richard Gage...
Every single person that supports them, funds them, talks about a conventional controlled demolition and thermite are the cuckolded, along with the nuke pushers...
All of it started with the formation in 2005 of the "Scholars for 9/11 truth."
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
O, the important questions were answered, but the COINTELPRO infiltrated 9/11 "truth" movement was installed to move good intentioned truth seekers AWAY from finding the truth.
The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Read their court filings.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Dismantling the 9/11 Collapse & Controlled Demolition Theories
Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative
I've been sharing info about what happened on 9/11 with him on X, the work of John Hutchison and Lt Col Tom E. Bearden for a while now and he's slowly inching toward realising his research cannot discount looking at the events of September 11, 2001.
Nope - but just looking at his substack article and the comments under the same video as posted on Rumble, where you linked to a BitChute channel, already raises red flags...
If I recall, the only timestamped video of any of the "hijackers" on 9/11 was early in the AM in Maine. Two of the "hijackers" drove up to Maine from Boston and took a connecting flight back to Boston to hijack a plane. Makes no sense.
All the other photos have no timestamp, therefore they could be from any day. These men had taken several flights before 9/11.
But to think, they've been dropping Easter Eggs since the 1950's - To listen to Dean Warwick's testimony in my David Icke article about the dustification of buildings in the 1950's and it being mentioned in Tin Tin comics in the 1950's - https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-911-thought-experiment
One must look at "sci-fi" movies in a different light, as most of those ideas come from "people in the know" writing "fiction novels", just so they can "tell" people of what they do...
I've seen an interview with Boyd Bushman, an engineer at Lockheed Martin talking about his antigravity research in the early 1980's and how he was very interested in the anti-gravity of the Hutchison effect from the 1970's...
So, maybe the "UFO's" we see are actually man made and not always some sort of advanced 3D volumetric projection technology?
Put on that tinfoil hat and what if the "faked moon landing" was intentionally done, in that way as to put us off thinking space travel is not at all possible...
Maybe there are aliens - I don't always know what to believe, but Andrew Johnson's research into the subject is rather interesting - He'll be doing a podcast with Jerm Warfare on 2 April, so I'm looking forward to hear what he has to say, as I haven't dabbled in that part of the research, as I've been knee deep in 9/11 for the last 24 months...
THANK YOU!!!! Reposting this into my Lahaina post, if it's ok?? Dr. Wood was always my hero:)) Just feel INCREDIBLY, TOTALLY STUPID, that trained as a physicist, for YEARS, never even heard of Nikola Tesla, except for the magnetic unit.!!! It is just stunning, how the educational system can blind the minds of humans.
But, you are conscious and awake enough to see that indoctrination. I love people who wake up. It takes courage. ❤️ I have a very hard time with those who insist they "know" while completely oblivious to their brainwashing.
Didn’t two of the planes disappear? Not in the buildings but elsewhere? Also what about the flight attendant that said “It’s a frame.”
Also that interview with the mother who was a flight attendant but said her son called her. She was smiling through the whole interview. Did some get put in a witness protection program? Didn’t some people board those planes? What about the guy that said Let’s Roll? I mean I know it was staged but the wife ended up without a husband. What happened to him?
Please work through the articles I shared and the video interviews with people who have been researching everything on the planes, the FOIA requests, the recordings and more for over 14 years - Unfortunately, you need to do the homework to wrap your head around the various layers of the cover up and misdirection...
I remember in October of 2006 seeing on YT a video from a news room with a radar screen in the background. Both planes had already hit the towers, but there it was in the middle of the radar screen, flight UA175.
Good post. Any idea as to what is flying in front of the of the bld. at 6:31 in video 2? Also in Video 3 the background lights flashing red, blue yellow starts around 2:30 - some electrical type interference.
On another note I did a subscription - but it does not look to be activated on your end- you may want to check on that. Thanks
Good post. Any idea as to what is flying in front of the of the bld. at 6:31 in video 2? Also in Video 3 the background lights flashing red, blue yellow starts around 2:30 - some electrical type interference.
On another note I did a subscription - but it does not look to be activated on your end- you may want to check on that. Thanks
Thank you for the pledge, but unfortunately substack's application that allows pledges does not do link up to my country... When it does, then pledges could be activated, but I do not think it will happen anytime soon.
In the bottom of the email you receive, you'll find the links to the alternatives, with the buy me a coffee button...
I cancelled the pledge and used the coffee. If you get the chance can you check out my comment - [for some reason my comment posted twice - problems with other SS sites today]. Thanks.
I think about those people on the upper floors gathering close to the WTC windows before the total destruction event happens. At first I thought they were grasping for air to breath. Now that I know much more about molecular disassociation could it be that those windows were the only place they could hang onto because the material inside the building was disassociating and there was no solid floor to stand on.
I pray you're Right. That their jig is up. Thank you for all this work and insight. I was living in NYC when 911 happened. So many lives were destroyed. People in the buildings, yes, but many who knew too much as well. Look after yourself. Every keystroke you make is gleaned and cataloged for future use. I know you know. Though we don't live in fear.
Yes. These scriptures are what it means (in part) to follow Jesus. He did the same. Too many people have been conditioned to think exposing and truth telling are distasteful which is a lie. Of course we then have to stand in the face of their hatred.
Jesus had no hesitation in calling them out and teaches us to do the same. He keeps His own close. I'm so glad you know all this. If harm comes He made it clear it's for very good reason and not to fear being integral to God's plan.
Which does not mean we sit back passively and let the SHTF with no resistance any more than Jesus did. How wonderful to be an active part of His legacy here on earth.
where their disingenuousness is pointed out by long time volunteers of the organisation.
Also, sorry to break it to you, but the independent forensic investigation into 9/11 was already done - Architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage just don’t want you to know about it…
Read these articles to get yourself up to speed.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Raytheon was testing its petawatt laser on the world trade center towers. They registered their patents soon afterwards.
The petawatt laser vaporized all of the moisture in the concrete, which is why the buildings turned to dust and the people were vaporized too. That's why so many of them talk about getting hot. They were literally being cooked by raytheon’s petawatt laser test.
Some images show a plane flying around the buildings. The laser was mounted on the nose cone of the plane.
Dr Wood refers to the phenomena as a "Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reaction", very similar to L.E.N.R. - Low Energy Nuclear Reaction, without ionising radiation, or the slang for the process, "cold fusion".
Read more here...
Secret Super Weapons, UFO's & 9/11
Scalar Waves, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions
You call it speculation without doing any research, that's not very scientific of you.
My research on this topic comes from several highly trustworthy resources. People who actually do research and who questioned how thousands of bodies could have simply disappeared and that doesn't count the ones that were crushed when the buildings fell or thrown into new york city landfills.
Petawatt lasers have been in use since the late 1990s.
And unless someone is free of political or other bias, no one who gives an opinion on what actually happened in 9/11 is trustworthy.
Are you aware that over 10,000 people who were present at ground zero on 9/11 or within weeks afterwards , have died of thyroid cancer from radiation exposure?
How did that happen if airplanes flying into buildings brought the buildings down, which we all know is a lie.
Let me state first - with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
Now, let me address your comments;
How many of my articles have you read and have you read Dr Wood's book or her court filings?
"My research on this topic comes from several highly trustworthy resources." - Like whom?
Petawatt lasers might have been around, yet does not mean it is the destructive mechanism. Also stating it came from a plane, what proof do you have?
From 1985 RF (Radio Frequency) Weaponry: Also known as Directed Energy weapons (DEW), this CNN investigative report was 40 years ago.
Re: thyroid cancers are attributed to the dust that people inhaled and the ongoing fuming, due to ongoing metal transmutation, remember the "smoke for 100 days?"
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
“Let me state first - with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!” —> Proceeds to deliver said bigger picture. You are awesome, man.
When steel is exposed to extreme heat from thermite, it turns into droplets that are sent flying through the air several yards. In short, being inside the building was like being shot at with a hundred shotguns with white hot pellets. I guess those who were standing far enough away, and close enough to a windo that would open, made their choice on how to die. Horrific.
When concrete is exposed to the same extreme heat, it turns into pyroclastic clouds.
Also, the survivors in Stairwell B of the North Tower is your proof of no molten metal, thermite or bombs gong off in the buildings.
16 Survivors (“9/11 surfer” included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another.
The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris - POOF the building is gone into a HUGE DUST cloud.
Watch the documentary: The Miracle of Stairway B (2006)
The Forgotten Firefighters of Stairwell B of the North Tower
Firefighters Raul Angulo and Erik Lawyer explained the holes in the narrative on Redacted, yet they are withholding important evidence about their fellow firefighters.
"Also, the survivors in Stairwell B of the North Tower is your proof of no molten metal, thermite or bombs gong off in the buildings."
So, I shouldn't believe my lying eyes that saw orange colored liquid falling from the towers? ....., and I shouldn't believe my lying ears when they heard firemen saying they had to change boots very often because the ground they were walking on was so hot it melted the rubber soles?
Nor should I believe my lying ears and eyes when a fireman said "....just like a controled demolition. You know, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom!"?
Is that it?
Let me guess..... The next thing you're going to tell me is that the five dancing Israelis were actualy Ayrabs, because Israel had nothing to do with 9/11. Right?
Again - The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden is Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Judy Wood.
Maybe you should get pissed at architects for an engineered truth and specifically the truth traitor and FRAUDSTER, Richard Gage...
Every single person that supports them, funds them, talks about a conventional controlled demolition and thermite are the cuckolded, along with the nuke pushers...
All of it started with the formation in 2005 of the "Scholars for 9/11 truth."
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
The 9/11 TRUTH vs Stand-Down PSY-OPS
Make people believe that someone or some group external to themselves is going to "save" or "rescue" them
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-truth-vs-stand-down-psy-ops
O, the important questions were answered, but the COINTELPRO infiltrated 9/11 "truth" movement was installed to move good intentioned truth seekers AWAY from finding the truth.
The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Read their court filings.
Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:
1. 9/11 Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Dismantling the 9/11 Collapse & Controlled Demolition Theories
Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative
Presentation: https://rumble.com/v6td6ld-dismantling-the-theory-of-controlled-demolition-on-911.html
Unfortunately, there is still a level or two that you need to go deeper.
I suggest reading the work here on substack, by 9/11 Planes Research.
He was intensely involved in the production of the following documentary, which I suggest you make time for to watch, asap.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
You might want to make time to listen to this interview with Dr Morgan Reynolds.
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
I've been sharing info about what happened on 9/11 with him on X, the work of John Hutchison and Lt Col Tom E. Bearden for a while now and he's slowly inching toward realising his research cannot discount looking at the events of September 11, 2001.
Here is a thought experiment on the Collapse / Demolition of the towers https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-911-thought-experiment
Here is a short 15 minute clip from my 2h discussion of Building 7 - https://rumble.com/v4kukif-building-7-the-great-big-bamboozle.html
Full presentation here: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-conversation-regarding-building
Nope - but just looking at his substack article and the comments under the same video as posted on Rumble, where you linked to a BitChute channel, already raises red flags...
Rumle link: https://rumble.com/v4jywk0-brave-tv-mar-18-2024-911-the-greatest-trick-with-terral.html
Substack article: https://terral.substack.com/p/dr-jason-dean-interviews-terral-on-a38
It's not separate takes - There is truth and then there is disinformation...
I'm 45 minutes in... Struggling to keep listening to his drivel.
This Terral Croft guy is not sharing truthful facts -A LOT of disinformation.
You'd know that if you've been reading all my articles from day one.
You can start your first seep dive here:
The PentaCon on 9/11
When even a missile did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
What about the people on the planes?
Make some time to read the following and watch the interview and the documentary.
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
which planes?
I get what you're saying but I wonder what are those videos of the 'hijackers' going through security. They look authentic.
Assuming these are genuine, What happened after the security screening point?
Also, it's still quite a lot of people to fake across the three 'flights'....not to mention their family members.
They can't all be fake/agents, right?
You need to go through Mark Conlon's work - He discusses it in detail.
He's been researching all the "plane" angles for 14 years.
Website: https://911planesresearch.blogspot.com
If I recall, the only timestamped video of any of the "hijackers" on 9/11 was early in the AM in Maine. Two of the "hijackers" drove up to Maine from Boston and took a connecting flight back to Boston to hijack a plane. Makes no sense.
All the other photos have no timestamp, therefore they could be from any day. These men had taken several flights before 9/11.
And read these and work through everything shared.
9/11 The Plane / No Plane debate settled.
Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-the-plane-no-plane-argument
Where did the planes go on 9/11
The FBI and NTSB have no records to prove that plane wreckage was found
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/where-did-the-planes-go-on-911
The Plane Physics on 9/11
The planes DID NOT bring down the towers
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-impossible-plane-physics-on-911
All I could think of when I was going through the material in your links and the videos you have on Rumble is:
If they did THIS in 2001, what can possibly be their capabilities over TWO DECADES later...
Indeed, it's rather scary isn't it...
But to think, they've been dropping Easter Eggs since the 1950's - To listen to Dean Warwick's testimony in my David Icke article about the dustification of buildings in the 1950's and it being mentioned in Tin Tin comics in the 1950's - https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-911-thought-experiment
Then how they "show" us in Hollywood: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-alchemy-hollywood-and-dustification
Did you read this: https://911revision.substack.com/p/americas-electromagnetic-and-dew
One must look at "sci-fi" movies in a different light, as most of those ideas come from "people in the know" writing "fiction novels", just so they can "tell" people of what they do...
The 5h interview with Col John Alexander and what he did in the black ops for over 30 years, is mind bending - https://rumble.com/v4dkj53-col.-john-alexander-black-ops-hidden-tec-military-applications-and-911.html
Star Trek's "warp drive"?
Could be possible - LOL, who knows..
I've seen an interview with Boyd Bushman, an engineer at Lockheed Martin talking about his antigravity research in the early 1980's and how he was very interested in the anti-gravity of the Hutchison effect from the 1970's...
So, maybe the "UFO's" we see are actually man made and not always some sort of advanced 3D volumetric projection technology?
Put on that tinfoil hat and what if the "faked moon landing" was intentionally done, in that way as to put us off thinking space travel is not at all possible...
Maybe there are aliens - I don't always know what to believe, but Andrew Johnson's research into the subject is rather interesting - He'll be doing a podcast with Jerm Warfare on 2 April, so I'm looking forward to hear what he has to say, as I haven't dabbled in that part of the research, as I've been knee deep in 9/11 for the last 24 months...
He did write some free e-books on the subject - https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/free-pdf-books/
I've uploaded the Boyd Bushman interview for you - https://rumble.com/v4k5joe-antigravity-research-boyd-bushman-engineer-at-lockheed-martin-speaks-out.html
Much appreciated 🙏
THANK YOU!!!! Reposting this into my Lahaina post, if it's ok?? Dr. Wood was always my hero:)) Just feel INCREDIBLY, TOTALLY STUPID, that trained as a physicist, for YEARS, never even heard of Nikola Tesla, except for the magnetic unit.!!! It is just stunning, how the educational system can blind the minds of humans.
Work through my article:
9/11, Tesla & the Military Industrial Complex Weapon Technology
What did Tesla have available for the MIC in 1943?
Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-tesla-and-the-military-industrial
But, you are conscious and awake enough to see that indoctrination. I love people who wake up. It takes courage. ❤️ I have a very hard time with those who insist they "know" while completely oblivious to their brainwashing.
Didn’t two of the planes disappear? Not in the buildings but elsewhere? Also what about the flight attendant that said “It’s a frame.”
Also that interview with the mother who was a flight attendant but said her son called her. She was smiling through the whole interview. Did some get put in a witness protection program? Didn’t some people board those planes? What about the guy that said Let’s Roll? I mean I know it was staged but the wife ended up without a husband. What happened to him?
Please work through the articles I shared and the video interviews with people who have been researching everything on the planes, the FOIA requests, the recordings and more for over 14 years - Unfortunately, you need to do the homework to wrap your head around the various layers of the cover up and misdirection...
I remember in October of 2006 seeing on YT a video from a news room with a radar screen in the background. Both planes had already hit the towers, but there it was in the middle of the radar screen, flight UA175.
Here is 9/11 Planes Research's articles on Flight 175 - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/t/united-175
This is one of the things I never knew or understood before I found Judy Wood: just how many people jumped/fell to the ground.
Good post. Any idea as to what is flying in front of the of the bld. at 6:31 in video 2? Also in Video 3 the background lights flashing red, blue yellow starts around 2:30 - some electrical type interference.
On another note I did a subscription - but it does not look to be activated on your end- you may want to check on that. Thanks
Good post. Any idea as to what is flying in front of the of the bld. at 6:31 in video 2? Also in Video 3 the background lights flashing red, blue yellow starts around 2:30 - some electrical type interference.
On another note I did a subscription - but it does not look to be activated on your end- you may want to check on that. Thanks
Hi Jewel
Thank you for the pledge, but unfortunately substack's application that allows pledges does not do link up to my country... When it does, then pledges could be activated, but I do not think it will happen anytime soon.
In the bottom of the email you receive, you'll find the links to the alternatives, with the buy me a coffee button...
I cancelled the pledge and used the coffee. If you get the chance can you check out my comment - [for some reason my comment posted twice - problems with other SS sites today]. Thanks.
Yeah - Africa has been "offline" for 3 days - My countries general election is 2 months away...
I think about those people on the upper floors gathering close to the WTC windows before the total destruction event happens. At first I thought they were grasping for air to breath. Now that I know much more about molecular disassociation could it be that those windows were the only place they could hang onto because the material inside the building was disassociating and there was no solid floor to stand on.
The work you have done through the years, has been inspirational - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK4QLT3MqM0&t=2338s
it has been an honour just be to be able to interact with you.
There is a shift coming - Get my personal email from MES....
The official counter narrative talking heads have ALL been coming at me on private emails this week... I'll send you everything.
They are running SCARED. Their jig is up...
I pray you're Right. That their jig is up. Thank you for all this work and insight. I was living in NYC when 911 happened. So many lives were destroyed. People in the buildings, yes, but many who knew too much as well. Look after yourself. Every keystroke you make is gleaned and cataloged for future use. I know you know. Though we don't live in fear.
God Bless you.
Two of my favourites;
Ephesians 5:11 - Have nothing to do with the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but expose them.
Galatians 4:16 - So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
Yes. These scriptures are what it means (in part) to follow Jesus. He did the same. Too many people have been conditioned to think exposing and truth telling are distasteful which is a lie. Of course we then have to stand in the face of their hatred.
Jesus had no hesitation in calling them out and teaches us to do the same. He keeps His own close. I'm so glad you know all this. If harm comes He made it clear it's for very good reason and not to fear being integral to God's plan.
Which does not mean we sit back passively and let the SHTF with no resistance any more than Jesus did. How wonderful to be an active part of His legacy here on earth.
Because - ALL THINGS WORK TO THE GLORY OF GOD.
I am a member of architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. There’s much evidence of collusion and deception. They need a new investigation.
You’re unfortunately part of a COINTELPRO infiltrated and run organisation.
Feel free to read the comments of this article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-911-thermite-brainwashing
where their disingenuousness is pointed out by long time volunteers of the organisation.
Also, sorry to break it to you, but the independent forensic investigation into 9/11 was already done - Architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage just don’t want you to know about it…
Read these articles to get yourself up to speed.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
September 11, 2001 - An Essential Guide (2024)
Sept 11, 2001 has been and still is a 23 year long PSYOP.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/september-11-2001-an-essential-guide
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
And where are those black boxes? https://odysee.com/@thisweekinfascism:3/Dan-Rather-Says-Flight-Recorder-RECOVERED-From-Ground-Zero:8
Reason they couldn't play the tape of Giuliani holding what was to be one of the black boxes, never happened...
Read the following articles and watch the interview;
Where did the planes go on 9/11?
The FBI and NTSB have no records to prove that plane wreckage was found belonged to any 4 of the alleged planes.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/where-did-the-planes-go-on-911
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
Raytheon was testing its petawatt laser on the world trade center towers. They registered their patents soon afterwards.
The petawatt laser vaporized all of the moisture in the concrete, which is why the buildings turned to dust and the people were vaporized too. That's why so many of them talk about getting hot. They were literally being cooked by raytheon’s petawatt laser test.
Some images show a plane flying around the buildings. The laser was mounted on the nose cone of the plane.
Unfortunately that is pure speculation...
Dr Wood refers to the phenomena as a "Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reaction", very similar to L.E.N.R. - Low Energy Nuclear Reaction, without ionising radiation, or the slang for the process, "cold fusion".
Read more here...
Secret Super Weapons, UFO's & 9/11
Scalar Waves, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/secret-super-weapons-ufos-and-911
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Dr Wood presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
You call it speculation without doing any research, that's not very scientific of you.
My research on this topic comes from several highly trustworthy resources. People who actually do research and who questioned how thousands of bodies could have simply disappeared and that doesn't count the ones that were crushed when the buildings fell or thrown into new york city landfills.
Petawatt lasers have been in use since the late 1990s.
And unless someone is free of political or other bias, no one who gives an opinion on what actually happened in 9/11 is trustworthy.
Are you aware that over 10,000 people who were present at ground zero on 9/11 or within weeks afterwards , have died of thyroid cancer from radiation exposure?
How did that happen if airplanes flying into buildings brought the buildings down, which we all know is a lie.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43673-021-00004-5
Let me state first - with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
Now, let me address your comments;
How many of my articles have you read and have you read Dr Wood's book or her court filings?
"My research on this topic comes from several highly trustworthy resources." - Like whom?
Petawatt lasers might have been around, yet does not mean it is the destructive mechanism. Also stating it came from a plane, what proof do you have?
From 1985 RF (Radio Frequency) Weaponry: Also known as Directed Energy weapons (DEW), this CNN investigative report was 40 years ago.
Link: https://rumble.com/v4hnblk-1985-cnn-multi-part-investigative-report-rf-radio-frequency-weaponry.html
I take it you are also aware of the "Hutchison Effect" and his experiments with metals?
Give this a read;
Directed Energy Weapon development
A short history on “science fiction” technology hidden in the real world since the 1960's.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/steven-greers-disclosure-and-energy
Mysterious Flashes at the WTC Complex
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/mysterious-flashes-at-the-wtc-complex
Re: thyroid cancers are attributed to the dust that people inhaled and the ongoing fuming, due to ongoing metal transmutation, remember the "smoke for 100 days?"
The 100 days of "smoke" at ground zero.
The COLD rubble pile at the World Trade Center...
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-100-day-fuming-and-molecular
I think you will enjoy this documentary, as your interest is in energy.
I'd love to hear your thoughts;
9/11 Alchemy: Free Energy & Free Thinking
Link: https://rumble.com/v4iysuh-911-alchemy-free-energy-and-free-thinking.html
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
“Let me state first - with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!” —> Proceeds to deliver said bigger picture. You are awesome, man.
When steel is exposed to extreme heat from thermite, it turns into droplets that are sent flying through the air several yards. In short, being inside the building was like being shot at with a hundred shotguns with white hot pellets. I guess those who were standing far enough away, and close enough to a windo that would open, made their choice on how to die. Horrific.
When concrete is exposed to the same extreme heat, it turns into pyroclastic clouds.
Unfortunately the whole premise of thermite was started on a LIE.
Listen to Prof Hughes in this video: https://rumble.com/v6xa43w-a-911-movement-away-from-truth.html
Also, the survivors in Stairwell B of the North Tower is your proof of no molten metal, thermite or bombs gong off in the buildings.
16 Survivors (“9/11 surfer” included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another.
The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris - POOF the building is gone into a HUGE DUST cloud.
Watch the documentary: The Miracle of Stairway B (2006)
The Forgotten Firefighters of Stairwell B of the North Tower
Firefighters Raul Angulo and Erik Lawyer explained the holes in the narrative on Redacted, yet they are withholding important evidence about their fellow firefighters.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-forgotten-firefighters-of-stairwell
I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone
Link: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
"Also, the survivors in Stairwell B of the North Tower is your proof of no molten metal, thermite or bombs gong off in the buildings."
So, I shouldn't believe my lying eyes that saw orange colored liquid falling from the towers? ....., and I shouldn't believe my lying ears when they heard firemen saying they had to change boots very often because the ground they were walking on was so hot it melted the rubber soles?
Nor should I believe my lying ears and eyes when a fireman said "....just like a controled demolition. You know, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom!"?
Is that it?
Let me guess..... The next thing you're going to tell me is that the five dancing Israelis were actualy Ayrabs, because Israel had nothing to do with 9/11. Right?
All your points covered in my article;
WTC Molten Metal: Fact or Fiction?
Analysis of the Evidence at Ground Zero
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wtc-molten-metal-fact-or-fiction