Yes, a LOT of people have speculated about Brookhaven - But speculation is speculation.
We know who were charged with Security and clean-up from Sept 13, 2001 - ARA and SAIC, that are US MIC contractors that specialise in psychological operations, impact dynamics, weather research (hurricane Erin) and what else? Directed Energy Weapons.
They also wrote the science reports that made up the 10 000 page NIST report.
23 contractors to NIST to be specific - All who were defendants in Dr Wood's Qui-Tam whistleblower suit.
Most of them are also part of a big organisation that most ave not heard of - D.E.P.S.
- The DEW field in the US MIC and contractors currently is a $11 Billion industry.
We also have the Mysterious Flashes at the WTC Complex...
Dare I attempt to invoke a detail, planes do not penetrate walls as if said planes were MISSILES, the whole planes hitting the towers and leaving wing-shaped gashes, is a total fairy tale. . .
Thanks. This is well understood, and I'm sure you make far fewer mistakes than AI.
I have a good joke for you. See what Richard Gage says at 33:19 in the August 24 9/11 War Room (https://rumble.com/v6y5vc2-197.20250824-the-911-war-room.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a). But then see what he'd said only a few minutes earlier at 24:44. Get it? I think it's hilarious. He's only had twenty years to come up with proof that planes hit the towers!
Yes, here it's the freon tanks, last week at the War Room it was the no-planes issue, and I recently saw him also confess that he didn't know anything about the seismological evidence. But "Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition" – he's got that one at least (and at most).
Speaking of the War Room, why don't you show up today (https://911warroom.com/zoom/)? It starts in something over two hours as I write this. I heard you got banned from Boston 9/11 Truth for allegedly being rude, and I'd like to see video of your appearance(s) there if possible, though I can easily imagine how this would have happened if you started "rudely" suggesting that Gage and/or whoever was controlled opposition. I have to watch my tongue in the War Room or they'll throw me off there. I almost got kicked out when I sharply criticized David Chandler on his Pentagon bullshit. He still gives me the willies, but I don't say anything. I'll probably mention the Gage no-planes joke today, however.
I’ve seen a lot if not most of this. I don’t like noting the few typos in the articles’ comments (I’d hope you would delete these after seeing them) and would prefer to send the notes to you by email. I emailed you once to your Gmail address with a question about the 4 1/2-hour documentary that you made about 9/11 disinformation agents, but didn’t receive a reply.
I’m glad I didn’t mention the “joke” during today’s WarRoom call, as then they would have known that I was the one who tipped you to it – which they probably figured anyway.
hurricane Erin was faked on 9/11 to promote geoengineering and distract from the in coming and intensifying GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM..lets debate and not throw an izzy fit because you disagree
no evidence from weather stations that hurricane erin existed,the supposed track conveniently stayed clear of these stations...hurricane Gabrielle that followed the same path within a week later can be seen also on a satellite image off new york around 41 degree latitude north,the trailing edge of erin should have been seen in this image but wasnt there
Read Isaiah 9:9 if you want to understand what the towers represented and why the towers fell. They all quoted Isaiah 9:11 but they missed Isaiah 9:9. The towers of Babylon are pride & arrogance. This is what grows up out of our heads when we think highly of ourselves and put God down.
The Towers disintegrated into dust due to the use of exotic black-ops technology, and a descriptive term for it is a magnetic, electro gravitic, nuclear reaction, with little to no heat and without any ionising radiation. People also might call it LENR - a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction, without ionising radiation, or slang - "cold fusion."
Can you clarify your position on exactly how events played out? I just received the Dr. Judy woods book and will be reading. This is my understanding of your articles that I’ve read
1) planes did not hit towers
2) towers were dewed
3) was our government with involvement from others
I do not believe I have seen the motive? What was motive ?
In 2007, Dr Judy Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds filed two separate requests for correction to NIST for mistakes in the reports supplied by 23 contractors that made up the 10 000 page NIST report.
This made them whistleblowers.
Under data quality act they could then file their Qui-Tam whistleblower cases against these contractors for SCIENCE FRAUD.
Dr Wood took her case as high up as the US Supreme court in 2009 -
Due to not having support from the then, fledgling 9/11 "truther" movement, that formalised under the "Scholars for 9/11 truth" - by Jim Fetzer and Steven E. Jones there wasn't much public awareness of her case.
In the judges summation he stated - He is IGNORING the case by not listening to her case that has merit.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports.
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Your understanding of my articles that you have read, on all three points you are correct.
As for motive - One can only speculate and this is my take.
1. MONEY and POWER
2. The problem of outdated buildings, standing 110 stories tall, with an asbestos problem, that would cost more to clean up, as what it cost to build them in the first place.
3. The Port Authority just lost a 10 year battle in the courts with the insurance companies for covering the cost of removing the asbestos and shortly thereafter "Lucky Larry" signed a 99 year lease of the towers, with money he borrowed and made sure to take out terrorist insurance on the Twins and we all know what a massive payday he had 6 weeks later.
To think he also sued the aviation companies and won - what a dick he is...
4. The US was staring a recession in the eye and what better way to jumpstart the economy by starting up the war machine on a FAKE war on terror that lasted just over 20 years.
5. The FAKE war on terror, not only benefitted the US war machine but also a small little country in the middle east, that seems to own the US congress.
with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
To understand the disingenuous 9/11 truth movement - Download the two free e-books by Andrew Johnson, that I link at the bottom of all my articles and read this article.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
A Boeing 737 empty weighs around 41 tonnes. Loaded with fuel, cargo, and passengers, that might increase to 50 - 60 tonnes. When a 50 tonne flying object, being in effect a thin light-metal aluminum tube, meets a 500,000 ton steel-framed concrete building, there is only going to be one survivor. And it's not the 737.
Of course as we know there were no commercial jets hijacked or hitting anything that day.
Try explaining that to a normie that saw it happen on the television, like this UFO TV "celebrity" - Listen to our interaction on the X space and be sure to read his emotional meltdown in the comment section of the article.
Mike Bara UFO guru vs 9/11 Revisionist
When you have ET going home, with your brain in a jar, you are left with Mike Bara
Another PHENOMINALLY written article from 9/11 Revisionist!! Thank you for everything you've put out and especially for the heads up on the new Codex 9/11 documentary. These substacks are truly diamonds in the roughest of terrain. God bless you 🙏🏾
The USA and Israel did it as that’s what the evidence shows. Case closed. People get hung up on the how and can’t get around to the who did it portion. This post wreaks of pushing the blame to solely the USA government.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
You mean Tucker the shabbos goy controlled opposition red Kabbalah bracelet wearing shill? Lmao! The one who denied this being an inside job for years? And now he comes out to subtly suggest there could be a cover up because it’s so obvious no one can deny it at this point? The point I’m making is there is never going to be a new sham of an investigation and no admittance of what technology was used. To me it doesn’t matter as much as who did it and all the evidence I’ve read and watched over many years points to the USA and Israel. Anyone denying Israel’s involvement is either the stupidest person on the planet or yet another mis/disinformation shill and is part of the coverup. And you never broach or investigate this portion. Why is that? Any thinking person knows why. Whenever I see events like the USS Liberty, the King David Hotel, the Lavon Affair, 9/11, the 10/7 staged Hamas false flag, JFK assassination, etc I’m always skeptical of Israel and one is wise to be as history proves. And let’s not forget the days old false flag shooting in Minnesota where the alleged perpetrators father was a CIA agent for years. Oh and he wrote 6 million is not enough and other jewish slurs on his weapons and magazines yet he drives by the synagogues and targets a Catholic Church/school instead?! Absolutely comical that sheep believe this. More false flag shenanigans as usual.
Israel is the false flag king of this world along with the USA of course. Those are the 2 largest terrorist countries in this world by a long shot. Any time a false flag is carried out the defacto response from a critical thinking person should be Israel did it until proven otherwise. So I stand on my original statement that this post is yet another deflection from who was involved.
Seems you're too small brained to realise what technology was in play.
That cognitive dissonance and premeditated ignorance...
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
So, on the Israel connection - Go watch my documentary.
Why would I do that when I out kikes and their shabbos goys in the 9/11 truther movement? I’ve watched and read enough material over the years to know we’ve been lied to and that’s enough for me. It could have been controlled demolition along with DEW and maybe even tactical nukes in the basement. One or a combination of methods. But we will never know as our government is never going to allow a true investigation. I’m open to all theories and haven’t ruled out any except there were no planes used on that day or any of the attacks. And the I’ve ruled out Israel not being involved as that’s what the evidence shows.
Hi Norman, hope you are good…what do you make of this? Why doesn’t talk about DEW and focuses on explosions??? He is trying to divert attention from DEW? Thanks for all your work anyway xx
On that video with Stew Peters; at 0:37 we can see the topmost slab of the building start to fall, impacting the structure beneath it.
If DEW was involved, then it must have been directed from the sides, as the topmost slab remains intact as it's decent begins.
The lack of debris compared to the original size of the buildings is incredible.
Indeed it is incredible and that is why structural collapse in Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
Brookhaven National Laboratory. 60 miles north of the WTC at Upton NY on Long Island.
https://www.bnl.gov/science/
These guys are the experts on particle physics and do applied research " at the frontiers of science ". I bet they do:).
Yes, a LOT of people have speculated about Brookhaven - But speculation is speculation.
We know who were charged with Security and clean-up from Sept 13, 2001 - ARA and SAIC, that are US MIC contractors that specialise in psychological operations, impact dynamics, weather research (hurricane Erin) and what else? Directed Energy Weapons.
They also wrote the science reports that made up the 10 000 page NIST report.
23 contractors to NIST to be specific - All who were defendants in Dr Wood's Qui-Tam whistleblower suit.
Most of them are also part of a big organisation that most ave not heard of - D.E.P.S.
- The DEW field in the US MIC and contractors currently is a $11 Billion industry.
We also have the Mysterious Flashes at the WTC Complex...
Read more here: https://911revision.substack.com/p/mysterious-flashes-at-the-wtc-complex
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Dare I attempt to invoke a detail, planes do not penetrate walls as if said planes were MISSILES, the whole planes hitting the towers and leaving wing-shaped gashes, is a total fairy tale. . .
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
They key lays > The key lies
Thanx for that - I'll correct it.
Mistakes slip in, when English is your second language and you don't use a spell check or Ai to write your articles.
Thanks. This is well understood, and I'm sure you make far fewer mistakes than AI.
I have a good joke for you. See what Richard Gage says at 33:19 in the August 24 9/11 War Room (https://rumble.com/v6y5vc2-197.20250824-the-911-war-room.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a). But then see what he'd said only a few minutes earlier at 24:44. Get it? I think it's hilarious. He's only had twenty years to come up with proof that planes hit the towers!
Thanx! I'll check it out.
You'll love this - Prof David A, Hughes recounts his interaction with Gage as well.
Link: https://rumble.com/v6xfjjq-the-movement-of-911-truth-suppression-and-gaslighting.html
Yes, here it's the freon tanks, last week at the War Room it was the no-planes issue, and I recently saw him also confess that he didn't know anything about the seismological evidence. But "Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition" – he's got that one at least (and at most).
Speaking of the War Room, why don't you show up today (https://911warroom.com/zoom/)? It starts in something over two hours as I write this. I heard you got banned from Boston 9/11 Truth for allegedly being rude, and I'd like to see video of your appearance(s) there if possible, though I can easily imagine how this would have happened if you started "rudely" suggesting that Gage and/or whoever was controlled opposition. I have to watch my tongue in the War Room or they'll throw me off there. I almost got kicked out when I sharply criticized David Chandler on his Pentagon bullshit. He still gives me the willies, but I don't say anything. I'll probably mention the Gage no-planes joke today, however.
Gene Laratonda won’t even allow me into the room!
Warring AGAINST free speech, open discourse, and the truth of what really happened on 9/11
A War Room... Or a padded playroom, a safe space?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/cowards-for-911-truth
Participation in the 9/11 "WarRoom"
A quick update on warring AGAINST free speech, open discourse, and the truth
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/participation-in-the-911-warroom
Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives
A special presentation refuting 10 thermite points of contention against DEW on 9/11
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives
A 9/11 truther movement celebrity meltdown
Anatomy of a 9/11 Thermite Brainwashing Operation article had people fuming.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-911-truther-movement-celebrity
A 9/11 truther movement celebrity meltdown, take two
A call for the "truth" movement to come together, yet censorship remains
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-911-truther-movement-celebrity-1b7
I’ve seen a lot if not most of this. I don’t like noting the few typos in the articles’ comments (I’d hope you would delete these after seeing them) and would prefer to send the notes to you by email. I emailed you once to your Gmail address with a question about the 4 1/2-hour documentary that you made about 9/11 disinformation agents, but didn’t receive a reply.
Thank you again for sharing this - You'd like this edit.
Link: https://x.com/911Revisionist/status/1962242185430184393
I’m glad I didn’t mention the “joke” during today’s WarRoom call, as then they would have known that I was the one who tipped you to it – which they probably figured anyway.
hurricane Erin was faked on 9/11 to promote geoengineering and distract from the in coming and intensifying GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM..lets debate and not throw an izzy fit because you disagree
I take it you haven't read my article yet?
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001
no evidence from weather stations that hurricane erin existed,the supposed track conveniently stayed clear of these stations...hurricane Gabrielle that followed the same path within a week later can be seen also on a satellite image off new york around 41 degree latitude north,the trailing edge of erin should have been seen in this image but wasnt there
Erin was tracked by ten universities and NASA was doing experiments on it.
It's a provable fact - I suggest you read the article.
Read Isaiah 9:9 if you want to understand what the towers represented and why the towers fell. They all quoted Isaiah 9:11 but they missed Isaiah 9:9. The towers of Babylon are pride & arrogance. This is what grows up out of our heads when we think highly of ourselves and put God down.
The Towers disintegrated into dust due to the use of exotic black-ops technology, and a descriptive term for it is a magnetic, electro gravitic, nuclear reaction, with little to no heat and without any ionising radiation. People also might call it LENR - a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction, without ionising radiation, or slang - "cold fusion."
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
One can also bring in the esoteric by referencing interesting numerological symbology.
Watch - 9/11 Alchemy: A Big Idea - https://rumble.com/v4irvwr-911-alchemy-a-big-idea.html
Ephesians 5:11 - Have nothing to do with the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but expose them.
Galatians 4:16 - So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
The Lord has sent a message against Jacob, and it has fallen upon Israel.
All the people will know it— Ephraim and the dwellers of Samaria. With pride and arrogance of heart they will say:
“The bricks have fallen, but we will rebuild with finished stone; the sycamores have been felled, but we will replace them with cedars.”…
This was quoted after 9/// by 2-3 witneses in high places of our government.
"The government shall rest on His shoulders"
Lets compare spiritual things with spiritual wisdom.
The towers were horns of power.
They were Pride & Arrogance.
They had to fall.
What rose up after them?
One horn rose in their place.
Tower of Freedom.
Then you'll really appreciate what was put together in this documentary.
Watch - 9/11 Alchemy: A Big Idea - https://rumble.com/v4irvwr-911-alchemy-a-big-idea.html
Twin Towers of Babylon
Pride & Arrogance.
911 in Roman numerals is IXXI. Which may or may not be significant:).
Can you clarify your position on exactly how events played out? I just received the Dr. Judy woods book and will be reading. This is my understanding of your articles that I’ve read
1) planes did not hit towers
2) towers were dewed
3) was our government with involvement from others
I do not believe I have seen the motive? What was motive ?
Thanks
In 2007, Dr Judy Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds filed two separate requests for correction to NIST for mistakes in the reports supplied by 23 contractors that made up the 10 000 page NIST report.
This made them whistleblowers.
Under data quality act they could then file their Qui-Tam whistleblower cases against these contractors for SCIENCE FRAUD.
Listen to a 2007 presentation by the lawyer that represented them here: https://rumble.com/v6y237c-solving-911-councillor-jerry-v.-leaphart-2007.html
Dr Wood took her case as high up as the US Supreme court in 2009 -
Due to not having support from the then, fledgling 9/11 "truther" movement, that formalised under the "Scholars for 9/11 truth" - by Jim Fetzer and Steven E. Jones there wasn't much public awareness of her case.
In the judges summation he stated - He is IGNORING the case by not listening to her case that has merit.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports.
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Your understanding of my articles that you have read, on all three points you are correct.
As for motive - One can only speculate and this is my take.
1. MONEY and POWER
2. The problem of outdated buildings, standing 110 stories tall, with an asbestos problem, that would cost more to clean up, as what it cost to build them in the first place.
3. The Port Authority just lost a 10 year battle in the courts with the insurance companies for covering the cost of removing the asbestos and shortly thereafter "Lucky Larry" signed a 99 year lease of the towers, with money he borrowed and made sure to take out terrorist insurance on the Twins and we all know what a massive payday he had 6 weeks later.
To think he also sued the aviation companies and won - what a dick he is...
4. The US was staring a recession in the eye and what better way to jumpstart the economy by starting up the war machine on a FAKE war on terror that lasted just over 20 years.
5. The FAKE war on terror, not only benefitted the US war machine but also a small little country in the middle east, that seems to own the US congress.
with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
To understand the disingenuous 9/11 truth movement - Download the two free e-books by Andrew Johnson, that I link at the bottom of all my articles and read this article.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
I agree there was a small island nation involved but not in the Middle East. Look at how much British Petroleum gained from Iraq war.
I believe I asked before but have you read Dr. Mary’s Monkeys?
I have added it to my must read list - Just need to get the 24th anniversary behind me, as I'm super busy right now and will then work through it.
Thank you for the mention of the book.
Check out how she was killed.
A Boeing 737 empty weighs around 41 tonnes. Loaded with fuel, cargo, and passengers, that might increase to 50 - 60 tonnes. When a 50 tonne flying object, being in effect a thin light-metal aluminum tube, meets a 500,000 ton steel-framed concrete building, there is only going to be one survivor. And it's not the 737.
Of course as we know there were no commercial jets hijacked or hitting anything that day.
😀
Try explaining that to a normie that saw it happen on the television, like this UFO TV "celebrity" - Listen to our interaction on the X space and be sure to read his emotional meltdown in the comment section of the article.
Mike Bara UFO guru vs 9/11 Revisionist
When you have ET going home, with your brain in a jar, you are left with Mike Bara
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/mike-bara-ufo-guru-vs-911-revisionist
Another PHENOMINALLY written article from 9/11 Revisionist!! Thank you for everything you've put out and especially for the heads up on the new Codex 9/11 documentary. These substacks are truly diamonds in the roughest of terrain. God bless you 🙏🏾
The USA and Israel did it as that’s what the evidence shows. Case closed. People get hung up on the how and can’t get around to the who did it portion. This post wreaks of pushing the blame to solely the USA government.
Remember that interview between Catherine Austin Fitts and Tucker Carlson?
I suggest you read my breakdown of the discussion they had on breakthrough energy and how dangerous it is.
Catherine Austin Fitts & Breakthrough Energy
Weaponized Breakthrough Energy has been deployed, but no one wants to talk about it
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/catherine-austin-fitts-and-breakthrough
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go?
https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
You mean Tucker the shabbos goy controlled opposition red Kabbalah bracelet wearing shill? Lmao! The one who denied this being an inside job for years? And now he comes out to subtly suggest there could be a cover up because it’s so obvious no one can deny it at this point? The point I’m making is there is never going to be a new sham of an investigation and no admittance of what technology was used. To me it doesn’t matter as much as who did it and all the evidence I’ve read and watched over many years points to the USA and Israel. Anyone denying Israel’s involvement is either the stupidest person on the planet or yet another mis/disinformation shill and is part of the coverup. And you never broach or investigate this portion. Why is that? Any thinking person knows why. Whenever I see events like the USS Liberty, the King David Hotel, the Lavon Affair, 9/11, the 10/7 staged Hamas false flag, JFK assassination, etc I’m always skeptical of Israel and one is wise to be as history proves. And let’s not forget the days old false flag shooting in Minnesota where the alleged perpetrators father was a CIA agent for years. Oh and he wrote 6 million is not enough and other jewish slurs on his weapons and magazines yet he drives by the synagogues and targets a Catholic Church/school instead?! Absolutely comical that sheep believe this. More false flag shenanigans as usual.
Israel is the false flag king of this world along with the USA of course. Those are the 2 largest terrorist countries in this world by a long shot. Any time a false flag is carried out the defacto response from a critical thinking person should be Israel did it until proven otherwise. So I stand on my original statement that this post is yet another deflection from who was involved.
https://old.bitchute.com/video/ocbmGH819u5B/
Seems you're too small brained to realise what technology was in play.
That cognitive dissonance and premeditated ignorance...
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
So, on the Israel connection - Go watch my documentary.
You're welcome.
Link: https://rumble.com/v41za7k-911-and-israel-the-two-things-that-may-not-be-mentioned-together.html
LMAO. I’m not denying any sort of technology I’m just pointing out the fact Israel was involved.
Then go watch my documentary, dumbass...
Why would I do that when I out kikes and their shabbos goys in the 9/11 truther movement? I’ve watched and read enough material over the years to know we’ve been lied to and that’s enough for me. It could have been controlled demolition along with DEW and maybe even tactical nukes in the basement. One or a combination of methods. But we will never know as our government is never going to allow a true investigation. I’m open to all theories and haven’t ruled out any except there were no planes used on that day or any of the attacks. And the I’ve ruled out Israel not being involved as that’s what the evidence shows.
Hi Norman, hope you are good…what do you make of this? Why doesn’t talk about DEW and focuses on explosions??? He is trying to divert attention from DEW? Thanks for all your work anyway xx
I cannot speak for his intentions.
I have reached out to him on Telegram and X with no feedback from him.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Thanks Norman...I trust your judgment in these matters...have a great day anyway ✌️