Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives
A special presentation refuting 10 points of contention against DEW on 9/11
Please read this article before watching the presentation I did on 10.02.2024.
It seems like Gene Laratonda might just give us some time to discuss DEW, as he graciously let MES and I have a moment to speak at the end of his February 4, War room podcast.
Get the popcorn. Below follows my presentation - It was 4 hours long, refuting the following 10 points put forth against DEW being the mechanism of destruction on September 11, 2001.
I dissect all 10 points he raises to try and refute DEW, which you can read about in this book.
Let’s go!
This is the initial background on 9/11 and then perception management.
Timestamp 5 min 30
Below is the points raised against DEW, discussed in my previous article, with my reply and reference to Dr Wood’s book and the discussion in the presentation with a timestamp for the full 4 hours broken down…
1.) Debris Pile Height: The claim of a too-low debris pile is debunked by recognizing that 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints.
Chapter 9 - Pages 171 to 196 (Timestamp 35 min23 to 57:30)
2.) Damage to Core Box Columns: DEW would need precise targeting features, making it implausible for the observed straight and horizontal breaks in core columns.
Chapter 12 - Pages 247 to 256 (Two important videos to watch - this one and this one)
Timestamp 57:30 to 1h12:33
3.) Fall of the "Spire": The assertion that steel "turned to dust" is challenged by the spire falling after being "shaken," likely by explosive charges.
Chapter 8 - Pages 131 to 169
Timestamp 1h12:33 to 1h31:30
4.) "Toasted" Tops of Vehicles: Damage to vehicles is explained by partially unignited thermite falling through the air, not by DEW.
Chapter 11 - Pages 213 to 246 (Also discussed in my article)
Timestamp 1h31:30 to 1h48:30
5.) Once-Molten Iron Microspheres: The presence of molten iron spheres is explained by thermitic materials, not addressed by the DEW hypothesis.
Chapter 15 - Page 321 to 339 (Can find some videos here)
Timestamp 1h48:30 to 1h54:32
6.) Molten Metal: DEW cannot explain observations of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 with temperatures exceeding those from jet fuel or office fires.
Chapter 17 - Pages 349 to 394
Timestamp 1h54:32 to 2h13:23
7.) Active, Unignited Nano-Thermite: Discovery of nano-thermite in the dust supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis, not explained by DEW.
Chapter 7 - Pages 122 to 130 (Also touched on in my two articles, here and here)
Timestamp 2h13:23 to 2h21:08
8.) Persistent Extreme Heat: High temperatures at Ground Zero contradict DEW proponents' denial of such temperatures.
Chapter 13 - Pages 257 to 296 (Also touched on in my two articles, here and here)
Timestamp 2h21:08 to 2h47:56
9.) Craters Observed in WTC 5 and 6: Holes in WTC 5 and 6 are attributed to falling steel, not exotic weaponry as suggested by DEW proponents.
Chapter 10 - Pages 197 to 212
Timestamp 2h47:56 to 3h08:15
10.) Eyewitness Accounts of Multiple Explosions and Building 7: Numerous eyewitness accounts align with controlled demolition, not explained by the DEW hypothesis.
Chapter 7 - Pages 95 to 130 (Also touched on in my two articles, here and here)
Timestamp 3h08:15 to 3h23:07 (Building 7 mentioned as well)
Then for some closing thoughts…
Timestamp 3h23:07 to 3h56:15
Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book full of evidence.
And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.
Free PDF downloads: 9/11 – Finding the Truth & 9/11 – Holding the Truth
Very thorough! I do hope this gets to Gene and Richard :)
Very interesting.