9/11 Truth's Protective Layers Unmasked
The cover-up and the vast network continuing to suppress the real 9/11 truth
On Saturday 27 April MES (Math Easy Solutions) had me back on to discuss the 9/11 cover-up and the vast network that continues to this day to suppress the uncomfortable truth of 9/11.
This is a talk contains talking points I would have given to the 9/11 War Room, Boston 9/11, TAP, Colorado 9/11 and the International Center for 9/11 Justice suppression, although a lot shorter version, not discussing the disinformation, but more on the evidence they do not want to discuss or deny having heard about.
All these groupies that think architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage’s thermite or bomb narrative is a truthful account of what the destruction mechanism of the Towers were, have yet to work through their own game against themselves, namely premeditated ignorance.
The plan was to be allowed to give them a presentation during April, but it was denied, in order to introduce them to EVIDENCE. Evidence they were taught NOT to look at, evidence MOST people don’t even know of and to also reach those who end up in their chat rooms, that are being set up to believe provable, absolute hogwash, with regards to explosives, thermite or nukes being used on September 11, 2001.
Currently these old guard leaders all suffer from Premeditated Ignorance… We’ll get to the definition later in the presentation…
I’ll be approaching this talk from a perception management angle, as well as sharing evidence of why explosives, thermite or nukes weren’t in play and towards the end of the talk, we’ll show some interactions with these “9/11 truther celebrities” where they fail dismally to answer basic questions, as well as being able to see how they discount EVIDENCE their theories cannot explain. It was a long one, so I decided to break it up into shorter digestible sections with bullet points of the points discussed.
Intro, housekeeping and a very important question;
Why is talking about 9/11 is still so important over 23 years later?
Just before the 21st anniversary of 9/11, college students were asked what they know of the events of September 11. The answers will SHOCK you, as it did me.
Part 1 - Some points to ponder;
AI video - What happens when you have an AI build you a short movie around key points of the events of 9/11, whilst using a hypothetical 2024 scenario?
Perception Management – Underwriter labs & fires too intense?
James Corbett and his blind spot with regards to Sept 11, 2001
Dave VonKleist - 9/11 In Plane Site
- ARA and SAIC never mentioned in his docci
- The Boston 9/11 clip where Dave Vonkleist discusses the 9/11 truth movement
Architects for an engineered truth and perception management
9/11 Surfer, Pasquale Buzelli and 15 other survivors in the North Tower 1.
Part 2 - The difference between evidence and theory;
A conclusive body of evidence vs a theory or hypothesis.
Nobel Prize winner John Clauser on “The difference between Observable Truth and Perception of Truth”.
Are you willing to be challenged on your worldview and 9/11?
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11 - having “9/11truthers” look in the mirror
Who is Andrew Johnson?
Dr Wood and the FAQ 44 points.
Part 3 - Showing the disinformation being peddled;
Gene Laratonda, 9/11 play room, 10 points of contention against DEW.
Mark Conlon’s work: 9/11 Plane Research.
Building 7 - NOT A seismologist – 2023 Chandler and Gage.
Jesse Ventura takes on Alex Jones with the truth of the events on 9/11
“Propelled demolition” demolished – Wayne Coste and David Chandler.
Blinded by the light – Wayne Coste levelled with the ground, just like Tower 2.
Part 4 - Deep dive into proving the disinformation:
Fetzer on Dr Steven E. Jones and how much thermite would be needed?
Fetzer – The towers turned to dust.
Fetzer is Team Judy - 2007 interview.
Fetzer turns on Judy – Who got to you?
TAP interview with Gage in 2023, why lie?
Ted Walter – International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression
Ted Walter and Russel Brand, the Building 7 reality cut.
The Gene Laratonda’s playroom meltdown.
In closing;
What is a true, TRUTH SEEKER?
Hopefully these “9/11 truthers” start revisiting the beliefs they hold.
If you like reading my articles and listening to my jabbering and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to my PayPal, as substack does not release payments to my country yet, I’ll really appreciate it.
If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first article and work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.
Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.
And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.
Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:
Wowee, didn't know Icke went frum DEW-land ta "I dunno" land (how Icky!) after the other guy died--nor 'bout Fetzer. But yup, death threats do seem ta do wonders ta glue jaws shut...
Methinks whoever is wuz charge of the original dis-info campaign had to round up a few stray wild horses... same team workin' overtime--but how? Direct threats? De-monitizin'? ('er demonizin'!) Lawfare?
CLEARLY when folks are over the target spooks emerge ta skeer 'em away.
Not sure about Corbett--he's gotta lotta blinders an' seems too smart to narrow his vista so sharply--for example, he doesn't seem ta wanna talk about some of the truly dystopian nano tech in the clot shots an' the killbox control grid that others (Dr. Ana, Maria Zee, Todd Callender, Sabrina Wallace) are exposin'. Question is--are the blinders his own or did the same folks that "go after" these others write him a prescription?
The AI viddo's "ain't bad" an' they certainly tell the story better than many who "won't go there"--but (bein' vellly wary of all AI), I'm sure a real live human bean doin' the same "shorts" would'a done far better--better not, of course, quicker. Some generic clips applied were far less compellin' than the real live stuff that still is nab-able online. Many examples--but heck the green holograms shot is lame--it's hardly as convincin' as some stuff I've seen online like the giant chinese dragons that swoop down at'cha at football games where folks duck--to make folks really understand how good the tech is, you'd use a far more convincin' image. I believe ya always would need a real-live human bean ta make the "best" choices--I'm biased of course. Also, there's a little too much of a canned feelin' ta the narration--wull doi, it's AI after all--but that type of authoritative--even while postulatin'--official BBC (or the US equivalent / History Channel type) narration has a hermetic feelin'--cain't quite put my finger on it but it's limiting-- I like hearin' real people! And of course... AI kin insert it's own agendas, subliminal stuff (flickers, messages, underlyin' sound tracks like in "Leave the World...") I dunno whut--into "its own" creations -- AI has no vision...mebbe that too is a thing--like seein' far more vast and exciting potential of usin' this tech to HELP mankind, I feel the options are so limitless that such a staid modestly hopeful clip couldn't encompass the full wonder of it...I mean if ya think 'bout it--it's stunnin' info-- Like I say when I call customer service on jus' bout anything--"Get me a human!" --just a few thoughts but again, it's impressive for what it is...
Just bookmarked the full viddeoy ta "digest" over time... otherwise it's all a treasure trove here! again, happy fer the belated discovery of this great stack!
Corbett is a strange one. He's done good work on Gates, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, banksters, globalists, media capture, and so one. No doubt he's a researcher of note. But science and physics and DEWs seem above his pay grade. He can't wrap his skull around the concept. 911 was both a false flag and an inside job. Corbett's done a lot of deep diving into the alleged Muslim " hijackers ". But we know this is a red herring and a dead end street. There were no planes hijacked on 911 by anyone, Muslim or not. No planes hit any towers or the Pentagon nor did a passenger jet crash into a field in Pennsylvania. That's all a deflection, part of the coverup. The so-called " hijackers " were just phoney baloney Rent-A-Terrorist dumb Mossad-handled patsies. Most are still alive. Bin Laden was a CIA asset by many accounts. Sounds about right. He actually dindu nuffin. Al Qaeda? More like al-CIA duh.
Corbett just doesn't seem to get it. He's not in the same intellectual league as Dr Wood, that's for sure.