9/11 "Truthers" vs. The Seismic Evidence
9/11 "Truthers" vs. The Seismic Evidence
No Primary or Secondary Waves Recorded
SEISMOLOGICAL OBSERVATION OF IMPACTS AND COLLAPSES AT WORLD TRADE CENTER - Prepared by Seismology Group Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades NY 10964 - Version of 9/14/01
Dr Judy Wood explains the vital link between 9/11 and seismic charts.
“That event was recorded by 13 seismic stations in five states — including one at Lisbon, N.H., 266 miles away. Again, Kim calculated that most of the energy did not reach the ground; it was mainly used up converting steel, concrete — and human beings — to dust”. Article
Now take this into consideration… See the problem?
If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to my PayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.
If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first article and work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.
Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.
And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.
Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:
9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 9/11 – Holding the Truth
The seismic evidence and the lack of destruction in the basement, as well as no damage to the “bathtub” were great convincers for me.
Let's assume everyone was wrong about the boots melting, explosions, and the molten steel being "hot", let's just debunk the thermal imaging. What disproves temperatures measured by various independent agencies?