Sadly, because people believe the mainstream narrative that was given to them they can never see past the truth physical science behind what occurred and has occurred in many places in our country and others. There's no doubt in my mind that the military industrial complex possesses these weapons that are literally incomprehensible. To be able to completely remove a human being into thin air with these type of weapons demonstrates that nuclear weapons are a fucking joke‼️ In my opinion, and I am entitled to it, there is no such thing as a weapon of mass destruction called a nuclear bomb‼️
The force behind this nuclear weapon is called fear‼️ If nuclear weapons were real and launched running from it would be ludicrous. Running directly to it would be the best way to go. But once again, this is my personal opinion, if you don't like it, you know what you can do⁉️ As far as these weapons used on the twin towers it is undoubtedly a weapon that manipulates anything appearing to be solid. Unbelievable technology and I don't think that it was created. I believe beyond a doubt it was discovered and now is in the hands of some very vile wicked pieces of shit‼️
"To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence..." - Dr Judy Wood
Dr. Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials.
She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.
Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics, 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).
Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics.
Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.
In this presentation, Judy Wood talks about her book “Where Did the Towers Go?”
The book is the culmination of years of work and study that she’s been presenting on her website DoctorJudyWood.com about the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11/01.
She has been tracking and collecting many of the anomalies witnessed on that day and found evidence for a strange effect related to the work of John Hutchison called “The Hutchison Effect.”
Topics Discussed: forensics, interference energy, John Hutchison, hurricane Erin, tornados, towers turning to dust, anomalies, strange effects, physics, WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, WTC4, WTC5, WTC6, WTC7, NIST, classified technology, The Billiard Ball Example and more.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Yes, agreed - I feel that Corbett is a form of opposition. Although, he does bring up information that I have read in the past and understand to be truthful. Also there are valid points in the following of the dough. Aside from his words, I have been following this since the day (911) we were told yet another series of untruths. You have also played a large part in my most recent past several years of information received. Thank you for all you have put into offering the truth to the public. I will delete my comment. Thank you!
I was a HUGE fan of Corbett and had reminders set to watch everything he put out, but doing my research into the 9/11 "truth" movement and various talking heads, taking on 9/11, I now take everything most of them say with a soup spoon of salt.
“Most do not know they still are being affected by a trauma based, psychological operation. September 11, 2001 was an attack on human consciousness. Put on your critical thinking cap and challenge what you think you know.”
Unfortunate, most continue not to realize they continue to be played by the same psychological operation on many fronts.
Fuk a dustification. I saw a video of a building demolition the other day and the building fell to pieces into dust just like the WTC towers, it's normal. No DEWs, just explosives.
You see, Sean, the reason you’re so uninformed, is because you knee jerk comments, and you don’t do the due diligence to understand what is being presented to you, and if you bothered to listen to the presentation Bob Greenyer gave, you’d be more informed.
Also, here is some more suggested educational reading for you to do.
Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
I've done the due diligence of watching the towers collapse and watching another building collapse in a conventional demolition that was just as dustified using conventional explosives.
I appreciate this potentially short-circuits your entire narrative and raison d-étre.
I don't know how much of the building structure was turned to dust and how much remained in a very compressed form—there were certainly a lot of steel beams left in the piles of wreckage for one, which were of course quickly extracted and shipped out for recycling in China without the possibility of doing a forensic metallurgical analysis on them, or testing for instance for explosive residue.
It's my understanding, and it completely concords with all the physical evidence and timing of the collapses that we can see, that a relatively new demolition technique was used on the buildings of thermite shearing of suporting columns, followed by the detonation of small squib explosives down the building to dislodge the columns and cause them to collapse in near free fall. It took something like half an hour after the impacts for the towers to suddenly collapse—in that half hour, there was clear video evidence of fountains of bright orange molten steel streaming from the buildings in column locations, followed by what appeared to be a cascading sequence of small explosions down the buildings, which then collapsed just behind the explosions. It was only necessary to set up shearing thermite charges every 3 floors or 10 m where the girder box columns joined together—cut through the joints and blow them out and the buildings will collapse more or less in their own footprints. There appear also to have been some initial explosions at the times of alleged impact in the basement areas of the buildings—this was picked up as seismic activity by a university some miles away.
Sean, let me help you with your misconceptions, as you really have not done much research into 9/11, and it's rather obvious that you AGAIN knee-jerked an uninformed opinion, as you did not read the articles I linked in my previous reply to you. So much for being a truth seeker, eh? You'd just rather cling to your BELIEFS, instead of facing the facts, as well as the fact that you've been bamboozled by the drivel Richard gage sells. Tell me, how much money have you donated to him? You should ask for your money back.
Here is some additional reading for you to do...
Richard Gage Calls Out 9/11 Revisionist – But He Just Debunked Himself
Gage cites Dr Judy Wood’s pages to attack her — those exact pages destroy Gage's claims.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
I would agree relative to pieces of structure and debris existing after any controlled demolition - but in WTC there should be pieces of the floor trusses in the debris - there were no floor trusses or pieces of the floor trusses in the debris, but there was tons and tons of dust- this observation was from multiple sources- so what happened to the floor trusses and how does controlled demolition explain how all of them turned to dust- Bob suspects they were transmuted into dust along with the floor slabs on top of them
Great summary. I would add the photos of twisted/curled steel columns in WTC debris and how this behavior cannot be caused by compression failure, tension failure, heat, chemical reaction or combined compression/bending plus how this result (I.e. twisted/curled steel columns) relates to LENR experimental evidence - analysis of these twisted/curled column samples with a SEM could be added to the to-do list since some of these are still in plain sight as I understand
Re: "The perfect crime is one that nobody can even conceive of, a crime that is so 'outside the box' that you can commit the crime in front of the whole world on live TV and nobody will be able to even register what happened."
i believe 9/11 wasn't necessarily an event so out-of-the-box, as it was a deep manipulation of the collective psyche of humanity, that then prevented what actually happened, from even being conceived. Seeking answers to how it was done, through a reductionist approach of advanced physics explanations, misses the point and in effect, distances this manipulation even farther.
The psychological effect pertains to the observer observing the event w/in their own situational construct (reality), while science seeks to eliminate the observer entirely and make the object stand on its own as a reductionism (i.e. exotic energy acting on matter causing never-before-seen phenomena).
Dr. Judy Wood did an amazing thing in how she initially approached the event on 9/11 w/in her own situational context, which was the opposite of a reductionism. As she describes her experience, she had been sleeping and took the announcement she had just heard on media of planes hitting buildings, as a joke. This enabled her to retain her creative evaluation abilities whereby when she saw video of the planes hitting the towers, she perceived it w/in a context of a Bugs Bunny cartoon where Wile E Coyote runs into a solid wall leaving a hole in the shape of himself.
Meanwhile most people watching the same event on TV, did not perceive the blatant incongruity that planes made of light materials would never disappear completely into a solid building with no part of them whatsoever falling off to the ground. Not only did they not perceive this on 9/11, but quite amazingly after almost 25 years, this simple truth is still not a fact in common knowledge.
This deep manipulation of collective reality through superimposing a cartoon reality on the NYC landscape keeps the whole lie of 9/11 in place. If there had been no video of planes disappearing into solid buildings plus of those solid 100-story buildings then turning almost completely to fine dust while in free fall, i don't think the lie could have been maintained for as long as it has. It's almost that this lie about how reality works while watching the event on TV and not picking up on the incongruities, while collectively agreeing amongst each other that there was nothing weird about how this all happened, enabled the whole Patriot Act to be ushered in, because it was like a psychotic break from reality, that then leads to paranoid delusions of persecution (and thus works to maintain the cover story of terrorists in planes).
We may come closer to explaining how the crime was perpetrated by advanced physics explanations, but in the sequence of good, better and perfect crimes, i would add -- a diabolical crime is one that changes society's perception of the very nature of reality itself, such that it prevents what actually was done, from being seen as the crime that it was, other than as an absurd cover story.
Also Petra, a whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
First of all that was a little wink wink, a little joke and that's all it was...
Second of all, your answer to my comment proves my point ...
I joined and stayed with the 911 truth movement, I even have my T-shirt, for a long time, but all I saw was you are wrong I'm right, ego everywhere, nobody listening to one another and basically fighting for the largest ego... 25 years later we're still at it, as if the people that did this would be brought to justice?!?
Rothschild are laughing so hard at us that they put THE TRUTH on their own timeline...
2001: On September 11th the attack on the World Trade Center is orchestrated by Israel with the complicity of Britain and America, under the orders of the Rothschilds as a pretext for removing the liberty of people worldwide in exchange for security,
... here comes the LIE ...
just as happened with the Reichstag fire in Germany where the citizens were lied to in order to give up liberty for security.
Nope. The Zionist Jews set the Reichstag aflame deliberately.
They also will use the attacks to gain control of the few nations in the world who don't allow Rothschild central banks and so less than one month after these attacks, US forces attack Afghanistan, one of only 7 nations in the world who don't have a Rothschild controlled central bank.
And no one seems to want to admit to themselves, a whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
This is way above my level, so I have a stupid question. Were the floors constructed with copper BECAUSE they planned on taking these buildings down before they were even built? Or is it more like, "Hmm, why would they use copper in the floors, this is weird but not intentionally malevolent"?
I'm hoping to record a conversation with Bob Greenyer, in the not too distant future, where I'm planning to have a really dumbed down conversation about all of this, as he makes my brain hurt too, LOL.
Well, a small plane just hit the tallest building in Beijing. Made a hole, that's about it. No collapses. No fires. Parts of the plane destructed and dropped to earth. As they do. So when a passenger jet weighing say 75 tons - an aluminum tube, basically - hits a 500,000 ton steel and concrete structure, who exactly is the survivor in this event? 😀
Sadly, because people believe the mainstream narrative that was given to them they can never see past the truth physical science behind what occurred and has occurred in many places in our country and others. There's no doubt in my mind that the military industrial complex possesses these weapons that are literally incomprehensible. To be able to completely remove a human being into thin air with these type of weapons demonstrates that nuclear weapons are a fucking joke‼️ In my opinion, and I am entitled to it, there is no such thing as a weapon of mass destruction called a nuclear bomb‼️
The force behind this nuclear weapon is called fear‼️ If nuclear weapons were real and launched running from it would be ludicrous. Running directly to it would be the best way to go. But once again, this is my personal opinion, if you don't like it, you know what you can do⁉️ As far as these weapons used on the twin towers it is undoubtedly a weapon that manipulates anything appearing to be solid. Unbelievable technology and I don't think that it was created. I believe beyond a doubt it was discovered and now is in the hands of some very vile wicked pieces of shit‼️
Read my article..
America's Electromagnetic and DEW Program
The program has been running for decades, they've just been lying about it.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/americas-electromagnetic-and-dew
That's my opinion of Judy Wood also, a rare female in engineering, whose technical description of the event I felt was sorely lacking.
O, and endowe us with your credentials Sean...
WHO is Dr Judy Wood?
"To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence..." - Dr Judy Wood
Dr. Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials.
She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.
Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics, 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).
Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics.
Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.
In this presentation, Judy Wood talks about her book “Where Did the Towers Go?”
The book is the culmination of years of work and study that she’s been presenting on her website DoctorJudyWood.com about the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11/01.
She has been tracking and collecting many of the anomalies witnessed on that day and found evidence for a strange effect related to the work of John Hutchison called “The Hutchison Effect.”
Topics Discussed: forensics, interference energy, John Hutchison, hurricane Erin, tornados, towers turning to dust, anomalies, strange effects, physics, WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, WTC4, WTC5, WTC6, WTC7, NIST, classified technology, The Billiard Ball Example and more.
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
9/11 Jersey Girl’s THIRD Bombshell Open Letter: Half-Truths Are Still Whole Lies
Patricia Casazza to Richard Gage & 9/11 Truth Leaders: End the Half-Truths Now!
Open Letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girl-drops-third-open
Corbett has done some great work, but on 9/11 he has a blind spot.
Give my article a read through.
The Corbett Report & Secret Weapons Technology
The meaning of 9/11 Truth and evidence that shall not be discussed
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-corbett-report-and-secret-weapons
Yes, agreed - I feel that Corbett is a form of opposition. Although, he does bring up information that I have read in the past and understand to be truthful. Also there are valid points in the following of the dough. Aside from his words, I have been following this since the day (911) we were told yet another series of untruths. You have also played a large part in my most recent past several years of information received. Thank you for all you have put into offering the truth to the public. I will delete my comment. Thank you!
Blessings ~
No need to delete your comment...
I was a HUGE fan of Corbett and had reminders set to watch everything he put out, but doing my research into the 9/11 "truth" movement and various talking heads, taking on 9/11, I now take everything most of them say with a soup spoon of salt.
“Most do not know they still are being affected by a trauma based, psychological operation. September 11, 2001 was an attack on human consciousness. Put on your critical thinking cap and challenge what you think you know.”
Unfortunate, most continue not to realize they continue to be played by the same psychological operation on many fronts.
Blessings ~
Fuk a dustification. I saw a video of a building demolition the other day and the building fell to pieces into dust just like the WTC towers, it's normal. No DEWs, just explosives.
You see, Sean, the reason you’re so uninformed, is because you knee jerk comments, and you don’t do the due diligence to understand what is being presented to you, and if you bothered to listen to the presentation Bob Greenyer gave, you’d be more informed.
Also, here is some more suggested educational reading for you to do.
Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
I've done the due diligence of watching the towers collapse and watching another building collapse in a conventional demolition that was just as dustified using conventional explosives.
I appreciate this potentially short-circuits your entire narrative and raison d-étre.
I don't know how much of the building structure was turned to dust and how much remained in a very compressed form—there were certainly a lot of steel beams left in the piles of wreckage for one, which were of course quickly extracted and shipped out for recycling in China without the possibility of doing a forensic metallurgical analysis on them, or testing for instance for explosive residue.
It's my understanding, and it completely concords with all the physical evidence and timing of the collapses that we can see, that a relatively new demolition technique was used on the buildings of thermite shearing of suporting columns, followed by the detonation of small squib explosives down the building to dislodge the columns and cause them to collapse in near free fall. It took something like half an hour after the impacts for the towers to suddenly collapse—in that half hour, there was clear video evidence of fountains of bright orange molten steel streaming from the buildings in column locations, followed by what appeared to be a cascading sequence of small explosions down the buildings, which then collapsed just behind the explosions. It was only necessary to set up shearing thermite charges every 3 floors or 10 m where the girder box columns joined together—cut through the joints and blow them out and the buildings will collapse more or less in their own footprints. There appear also to have been some initial explosions at the times of alleged impact in the basement areas of the buildings—this was picked up as seismic activity by a university some miles away.
Sean, let me help you with your misconceptions, as you really have not done much research into 9/11, and it's rather obvious that you AGAIN knee-jerked an uninformed opinion, as you did not read the articles I linked in my previous reply to you. So much for being a truth seeker, eh? You'd just rather cling to your BELIEFS, instead of facing the facts, as well as the fact that you've been bamboozled by the drivel Richard gage sells. Tell me, how much money have you donated to him? You should ask for your money back.
Here is some additional reading for you to do...
Richard Gage Calls Out 9/11 Revisionist – But He Just Debunked Himself
Gage cites Dr Judy Wood’s pages to attack her — those exact pages destroy Gage's claims.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/richard-gage-calls-out-911-revisionist
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
The Unanswered 2011 Nanothermite Challenge: A Chemical Engineer’s Call for Scientific Rigor in 9/11 Research
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/exposed-the-911-nanothermite-myth
2025 - Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition.
Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
I would agree relative to pieces of structure and debris existing after any controlled demolition - but in WTC there should be pieces of the floor trusses in the debris - there were no floor trusses or pieces of the floor trusses in the debris, but there was tons and tons of dust- this observation was from multiple sources- so what happened to the floor trusses and how does controlled demolition explain how all of them turned to dust- Bob suspects they were transmuted into dust along with the floor slabs on top of them
Great summary. I would add the photos of twisted/curled steel columns in WTC debris and how this behavior cannot be caused by compression failure, tension failure, heat, chemical reaction or combined compression/bending plus how this result (I.e. twisted/curled steel columns) relates to LENR experimental evidence - analysis of these twisted/curled column samples with a SEM could be added to the to-do list since some of these are still in plain sight as I understand
Indeed, you are correct.
The photos of twisted / curled steel columns in WTC debris and it's behaviour proves it further.
I included them in my presentation to Mick Harrison a few weeks back, when Bob and I were presenting.
Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/evidence-of-free-energy-technology
Re: "The perfect crime is one that nobody can even conceive of, a crime that is so 'outside the box' that you can commit the crime in front of the whole world on live TV and nobody will be able to even register what happened."
i believe 9/11 wasn't necessarily an event so out-of-the-box, as it was a deep manipulation of the collective psyche of humanity, that then prevented what actually happened, from even being conceived. Seeking answers to how it was done, through a reductionist approach of advanced physics explanations, misses the point and in effect, distances this manipulation even farther.
The psychological effect pertains to the observer observing the event w/in their own situational construct (reality), while science seeks to eliminate the observer entirely and make the object stand on its own as a reductionism (i.e. exotic energy acting on matter causing never-before-seen phenomena).
Dr. Judy Wood did an amazing thing in how she initially approached the event on 9/11 w/in her own situational context, which was the opposite of a reductionism. As she describes her experience, she had been sleeping and took the announcement she had just heard on media of planes hitting buildings, as a joke. This enabled her to retain her creative evaluation abilities whereby when she saw video of the planes hitting the towers, she perceived it w/in a context of a Bugs Bunny cartoon where Wile E Coyote runs into a solid wall leaving a hole in the shape of himself.
Meanwhile most people watching the same event on TV, did not perceive the blatant incongruity that planes made of light materials would never disappear completely into a solid building with no part of them whatsoever falling off to the ground. Not only did they not perceive this on 9/11, but quite amazingly after almost 25 years, this simple truth is still not a fact in common knowledge.
This deep manipulation of collective reality through superimposing a cartoon reality on the NYC landscape keeps the whole lie of 9/11 in place. If there had been no video of planes disappearing into solid buildings plus of those solid 100-story buildings then turning almost completely to fine dust while in free fall, i don't think the lie could have been maintained for as long as it has. It's almost that this lie about how reality works while watching the event on TV and not picking up on the incongruities, while collectively agreeing amongst each other that there was nothing weird about how this all happened, enabled the whole Patriot Act to be ushered in, because it was like a psychotic break from reality, that then leads to paranoid delusions of persecution (and thus works to maintain the cover story of terrorists in planes).
We may come closer to explaining how the crime was perpetrated by advanced physics explanations, but in the sequence of good, better and perfect crimes, i would add -- a diabolical crime is one that changes society's perception of the very nature of reality itself, such that it prevents what actually was done, from being seen as the crime that it was, other than as an absurd cover story.
Also Petra, a whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia, MSM and the 9/11 "truth" movement, for 20 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
Here comes Judy Wood again …
Rather close minded comment to post.
You should really try to challenge yourself and listen to the physics that thermal or kinetic mechanisms cannot explain.
Whilst you muster up the courage to do that, here is some educational reading for you to do.
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
Thanks for sharing. that is all I do.
First of all that was a little wink wink, a little joke and that's all it was...
Second of all, your answer to my comment proves my point ...
I joined and stayed with the 911 truth movement, I even have my T-shirt, for a long time, but all I saw was you are wrong I'm right, ego everywhere, nobody listening to one another and basically fighting for the largest ego... 25 years later we're still at it, as if the people that did this would be brought to justice?!?
Rothschild are laughing so hard at us that they put THE TRUTH on their own timeline...
2001: On September 11th the attack on the World Trade Center is orchestrated by Israel with the complicity of Britain and America, under the orders of the Rothschilds as a pretext for removing the liberty of people worldwide in exchange for security,
... here comes the LIE ...
just as happened with the Reichstag fire in Germany where the citizens were lied to in order to give up liberty for security.
Nope. The Zionist Jews set the Reichstag aflame deliberately.
They also will use the attacks to gain control of the few nations in the world who don't allow Rothschild central banks and so less than one month after these attacks, US forces attack Afghanistan, one of only 7 nations in the world who don't have a Rothschild controlled central bank.
And no one seems to want to admit to themselves, a whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
This is way above my level, so I have a stupid question. Were the floors constructed with copper BECAUSE they planned on taking these buildings down before they were even built? Or is it more like, "Hmm, why would they use copper in the floors, this is weird but not intentionally malevolent"?
The copper was in the steel...
I'm hoping to record a conversation with Bob Greenyer, in the not too distant future, where I'm planning to have a really dumbed down conversation about all of this, as he makes my brain hurt too, LOL.
They used “weathering steel” by design, in a setting that had no conceivable weather exposure. So yes this is an extremely important question.
https://www.xometry.com/resources/materials/weathering-steel/
Well, a small plane just hit the tallest building in Beijing. Made a hole, that's about it. No collapses. No fires. Parts of the plane destructed and dropped to earth. As they do. So when a passenger jet weighing say 75 tons - an aluminum tube, basically - hits a 500,000 ton steel and concrete structure, who exactly is the survivor in this event? 😀
I created an educational video about the China plane crash, which has already been scrubbed off YouTube for "hate speech"...
Video: https://rumble.com/v7buwme-china-plane-crash-physics.html