Why the remote takeover of planes on 9/11 is IMPOSSIBLE
Avionics technician exposes the impossibilities of remotely taking-over a commercial aircraft way back in 2007
I suggest people take the time to read this important preface in full, before reading and studying the critical analysis paper which I have linked to at the end of this article.
As I’ve mentioned in previous 9/11 plane related articles, I have noticed a re-pivot of the 9/11 ‘truth” movement to now come in and start to try and resurrect the talking point of ‘remote controlled planes” on September 11, 2001 after 9/11 Planes Research got great exposure on the Jerm Warfare podcast, who has also had Dr Piers Robinson on his podcast in the past.
Once people realised the impossible physics of commercial airliners flying at over 500mp/h at sea level, as we were shown on TV, and numerous commercial jet pilots raising the alarm of the impossibilities, a contingency plan had to be put into play to keep truth seekers at bay and not to realise what the real truth is of what people on the ground saw in the sky of New York City and what they took pictures and video of.
The first layer of the cover-up was CGI planes and video fakery. Discussed here.
The second layer of the cover-up is the remote controlled planes narrative.
I suggest you also have a look at the writing on this subject by 9/11 Planes Research, as it explains very important additional background information in relation to my article.
I also suggest reading my article: The disingenuous search for 9/11 Justice.
It will give you additional background to the ‘International Center for 9/11 Justice”.
But here is a quick question asked in 2023 and listen to the responses of Ted Walter.
Further background is needed on the other promoters of the remote controlled plane conspiracy theory and that is my interaction with Captain Dan Hanley, 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers. It seems he has not heard of Capt. Russ Wittenberg? (1 minute)
Did you notice what Capt. Russ Wittenberg said? “The aircraft would literally fall out of the sky”.
Captain Dan Hanley and I had a conversation in 2024 on a X space, wherein – He admitted that I know more about flight dynamics, what various aeronautical engineers have said in the past, pilots that actually flew the planes that are alleged to have crashed on 9/11.
So, that is a sheepish way of admitting he is KNOWINGLY busy sharing disinformation. Many others have also taken him on, but he shuts the conversation down when he is exposed. (16 minutes)
As a last quick video breakdown of the International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression on getting the 9/11 planes propaganda in focus. (16 minutes)
My article linked in the video: A 9/11 truther movement celebrity meltdown
Prof David A. Hughes’ article mentioned in the video.
Now without further a do - The 2007, 25 page technical paper proving just how impossible it is for a plane to be remotely controlled or to be turned into a drone.
Remote Takeover on 9/11: A Critical Analysis
“I'm an Aviation Maintenance Technician/Avionics Technician for a major US airline.
I've been in this industry for 11 years and working on airliners for 7 of those.
I have extensive experience on both aircraft types used on 9/11, doing both routine maintenance(767 overhaul for two and a half years) as well as non-routine maintenance, ie troubleshooting and repair.
I've worked on pretty much every system on the 757/767.
My main areas of experience are the Electrical System, Autoflight System, Navigation System, Communications System, Indicating and Warning Systems.
I also have a good bit of modification experience installing such systems as: Predictive Windshear, Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning, Inertial Reference System, Fuel Tank Transient Suppression(known as the TWA 800 mod), Passenger Entertainment, post-911 Secure Cockpit Door Modifications, as well as dozens of smaller modifications usually brought on by FAA Airworthiness Directives.
Most of these modifications require a major wiring rework and installation of new wiring and equipment.
I believe my avionics background, specifically my 767 experience, qualifies me to talk about what it takes to turn a 757/767 into a drone and the major difficulties of doing so.”
Read or download the full paper here.
Interestingly, none of 9/11 Planes Research’s evidence seems worthy of coverage by the International Center For 9/11 Justice.
Considering Dr Piers Robinson was following my Substack and that of 9/11 Planes Research, there was not even contact made, or an invite to present ALL of 9/11 Planes Research’s evidence, considering the Center considers itself interested in the 9/11 planes area of studies.
It leaves one with the only conclusion, the International Center for 9/11 Justice is part of a stand-down psyop.
If this is my first 9/11 “plane” article you’ve read, you missed a few:
Great poem by Rob Dubya - Ghosts In The Flight - Don't believe your eyes
Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.
If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to my PayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.
If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first article and work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.
Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.
And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.
Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:
9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 9/11 – Holding the Truth
Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on X and check out my Rumble channel.
Excellent work as always