Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
90 Minutes that will change the way you look at the destruction at the WTC on 9/11.
"To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence..." - Dr Judy Wood
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
The issue with video is the more you download and upload and download and upload, the video loses quality. That is what happened with this video.
In the original video there was, what seemed to be a "ball" of some kind heading towards the tower. It was clearly visible.
I just don't have a link to the video where it is discussed and shown, so I'll add that link later to my answer, as I have it in my library.
Many years ago, Richard D Hall did his 3D analysis of Flight 175 and it allowed him to debunk the CGI narrative once and for all.
In his discussion with Andrew Johnson, Mark Conlon and Dr Morgan Reynolds, they were all of the opinion that the backdrop of the Hudson river affected how the "plane" was picked up by the video camera, making most of the projection disappear.
All the other videos had the clear blue sky for a backdrop, that made the illusion more stable.
You also need to realise, between 2005 and 2010, a number of people edited flight 175 out of the videos, to help push the bullshit "no plane" narrative, with videos showing no plane, in order to fully push the video fakery / CGI nonsense.
Wow, what an excellent investigative report! Well done sir! In my humble opinion, Curt Weldon is completely intellectually dishonest, period. Can’t be trusted. He’s the government insider to infiltrate the 911 communities to report their findings. Why would we ever need the assistance of a government lackey! I think we should apply Occam’s razor with Richard Gage and his intellectually dishonesty concerning Dr. woods. Thx for sharing.
Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defence Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
I remember the entire nano thermite discussion put forward by a college professor. It’s turned out he was another “Curt Weldon” creating a false narrative, going in directions that were misleading, misdirected, away from real research. Also From what I remember, they tried to say it was an accumulation of thermite that was causing those red hot fires in the basement that the fireman couldn’t extinguish. I truly appreciate your efforts to inform the sheep.
Thanks for correcting my assumption bro 😃truly. I like speaking truth not narratives that turn out to be lies pushed on me. Makes us all look bad and turns off the sheeple looking for the truth. I’m all in on being corrected, I can only grow from my mistakes.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
I too believe directed energy was used on 911, but I doo ok have a question for you. There are many eyewitness (or you might say earwitness) testimonies on the day of the attacks by people inside the buildings saying they heard multiple loud explosions that sounded like detonations going off throughout all different floors of the towers prior to their collapse. What do you make of this? Does directed energy do this? The dustification is the biggest proof to me of directed energy use, but the explosions prior seem to also point to controlled demolition. A good friend of my grandfather’s worked on the Star Wars program in the 80’s which turned into the beginnings of the directed energy weapons program. And so I am familiar with how it works, but I am sincerely curious if you think both directed energy and controlled demolition may have both been used, or if there is a component of directed energy that I have never heard of that caused loud explosions to happen prior to dustification??
She discusses the sounds of explosions in quite some detail.
Luckily I have also written two articles on the sounds of explosions, thus I would suggest you read them so long, and then also make time to listen to Dr Wood's 2012 presentation, that changed my outlook on the events at the WTC on 9/11.
I have another question. I’ve read that almost immediately after the towers were dustified, cleanup was organized and the dust and rubble was taken to China. Have you heard of this? I think this could be an important part of the puzzle because a planned attack using directed energy would leave its fingerprint in the remains (to those who know how to analyze / test the molecular vaporization of the dust and rubble). Is that why they so quickly sent the debris to China of all places? To get rid of evidence that could prove directed energy was used? We all know that the perpetrators are part of a global operation and that China is firmly their template for the rest of the world…and that that would be a perfect place to disappear the evidence??
Then on September 13, 2001 - The site was locked down for journalists and citizens and NO pictures or video was allowed to be taken by anyone.
Thus allowing the US MIC contractors to fully control the narrative that was fed to the MSM, including the bullshit story of high heat, fires and more at the site, as they had to run cover-stories to explain the ongoing transmutation of metals, "fuming", that looked like smoke, rising up from the debris for close to 100 days.
It's important to differentiate between "Hot DEW" and "Cold DEW" - the tech. that destroyed the WTC generates little to no heat, whereas in the Maui and California fires, it's a bit different - with much more evidence of heat, but anomalous fires.
It's important not to speculate and mix together different bits of evidence because it looks similar.
Some folks do this to a much greater extent.
The other important evidence to study is that relating to Hurricane Erin on 9/11.
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
10 universities and NASA tracking it and actually confirming they were doing experiments with it, isn't hard data?
Even the official data from National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figures & Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW-CIMSS) showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 2001, isn't enough for you?
I knew you would reply something along these lines. You are way too uneducated and uncritical. I am not going to waste any time debating with you. My comment was for other readers.
The reason you cannot look at the truth of 9-11, is because you would have to admit, it wasn't a small band of rogue towelheads with a cell phone, a laptop and a couple box cutters, but a globally organized cartel of the wealthiest and most powerful people on the planet.
You'd have to recognize them as the very ancient Nephilim pedivore narcissistic psychopathic hedonistic parasitic trillionare bankster class, consolidating more wealth and power, more control, to usher in their transhumanist digital technocracy, and their great culling, and great reset.
You'd have to admit, planet earth is captured by this interloping alien species of perpetual evil, with no regard for humans at all. You'd have to admit they want us dead, and they want planet earth all to themselves.
That's why the full implications of 9-11 can never bee looked at.
I think there is a strong possibility that the demolition was conducted using a number of different techniques including thermite, explosives, and DEW. It doesn’t have to be one or the other.
I like and loosely follow Tucker Carlson but his take on 911 leads me to believe he is controlled opposition. He continues with the lame theory that the US intelligence had inside knowledge of the attack and of the hijackers activities.
I think that anyone who has spent any time on this topic has dismissed the high jacker narrative as total psyop.
Thanks, that’s a good article. The hard part is what do I do about Tucker. He is not dumb so I have to conclude that he knowingly is concealing the real conspiracy. I once thought about writing to him about but I then I realized that if I know, then he knows. I have also noted that there is no apparent route to contact him, which to me is an indicator of controlled opposition.
Taking all of this into consideration I would have to conclude that the apparent shift against Israel is just another part of the plan. Maybe another false flag where Israel will be destroyed and the real 3rd world war begins.
In our fear, I guess we are expected to total world control. Most of us any way.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
9/11 Rev, can you give me your take on this one:
Another News Helicopter Was Filming the Second Tower Before the Invisible ! Plane Hit It https://old.bitchute.com/video/i9NlardEWMue [56seconds]
I know we spoke before of holographic projections for the planes, but from this angle there isn't one. Thoughts?
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
90 Minutes that will change the way you look at the destruction at the WTC on 9/11.
Watch it now: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
"To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence..." - Dr Judy Wood
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
I saw that clip, it’s beyond a smoking gun!
Check out my answer to TriTorch
Wicked!
The issue with video is the more you download and upload and download and upload, the video loses quality. That is what happened with this video.
In the original video there was, what seemed to be a "ball" of some kind heading towards the tower. It was clearly visible.
I just don't have a link to the video where it is discussed and shown, so I'll add that link later to my answer, as I have it in my library.
Many years ago, Richard D Hall did his 3D analysis of Flight 175 and it allowed him to debunk the CGI narrative once and for all.
In his discussion with Andrew Johnson, Mark Conlon and Dr Morgan Reynolds, they were all of the opinion that the backdrop of the Hudson river affected how the "plane" was picked up by the video camera, making most of the projection disappear.
All the other videos had the clear blue sky for a backdrop, that made the illusion more stable.
You also need to realise, between 2005 and 2010, a number of people edited flight 175 out of the videos, to help push the bullshit "no plane" narrative, with videos showing no plane, in order to fully push the video fakery / CGI nonsense.
9/11 Planes: 3D VIPT vs Video Fakery and CGI
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-3d-volumetric-image-projection
Good to know and interesting, thank you
I've uploaded the clip and discussion to my FB page.
Link: https://www.facebook.com/NormanSwanepoelTheRevisionist/videos/1749198122364388
Dam! I did not know these facts!
Wow, what an excellent investigative report! Well done sir! In my humble opinion, Curt Weldon is completely intellectually dishonest, period. Can’t be trusted. He’s the government insider to infiltrate the 911 communities to report their findings. Why would we ever need the assistance of a government lackey! I think we should apply Occam’s razor with Richard Gage and his intellectually dishonesty concerning Dr. woods. Thx for sharing.
Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defence Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
Video: https://rumble.com/v6rm9n1-nano-thermite-does-not-exist.html
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
I remember the entire nano thermite discussion put forward by a college professor. It’s turned out he was another “Curt Weldon” creating a false narrative, going in directions that were misleading, misdirected, away from real research. Also From what I remember, they tried to say it was an accumulation of thermite that was causing those red hot fires in the basement that the fireman couldn’t extinguish. I truly appreciate your efforts to inform the sheep.
There were NO FIRES in the basements and the rubble pile was COLD.
The 100 days of "smoke" at ground zero.
The COLD rubble pile at the World Trade Center...
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-100-day-fuming-and-molecular
The mostly EMPTY basements of the Twin Towers.
Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-mostly-empty-basements-of-the
Revisiting the basements of the WTC.
Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-basements-of-the-wtc
Thanks for correcting my assumption bro 😃truly. I like speaking truth not narratives that turn out to be lies pushed on me. Makes us all look bad and turns off the sheeple looking for the truth. I’m all in on being corrected, I can only grow from my mistakes.
Watch Dr Wood's presentation, study her book and then you'll KNOW what happened at the WTC.
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Patrick seems to be quite interested in Dr. Woods’ work, hopefully he will have her on his show.
I too believe directed energy was used on 911, but I doo ok have a question for you. There are many eyewitness (or you might say earwitness) testimonies on the day of the attacks by people inside the buildings saying they heard multiple loud explosions that sounded like detonations going off throughout all different floors of the towers prior to their collapse. What do you make of this? Does directed energy do this? The dustification is the biggest proof to me of directed energy use, but the explosions prior seem to also point to controlled demolition. A good friend of my grandfather’s worked on the Star Wars program in the 80’s which turned into the beginnings of the directed energy weapons program. And so I am familiar with how it works, but I am sincerely curious if you think both directed energy and controlled demolition may have both been used, or if there is a component of directed energy that I have never heard of that caused loud explosions to happen prior to dustification??
Todd - Does everything that goes bang, mean it's a bomb?
What happens when you put a raw egg, that's still in it's shell, in a microwave for too long?
It explodes... Does that mean the egg was a bomb?
I take it you've never listened to this presentation of Dr Wood?
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
She discusses the sounds of explosions in quite some detail.
Luckily I have also written two articles on the sounds of explosions, thus I would suggest you read them so long, and then also make time to listen to Dr Wood's 2012 presentation, that changed my outlook on the events at the WTC on 9/11.
Was every BOOM on 9/11 a bomb?
Not everything that goes boom is a bomb.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/was-every-boom-a-bomb-on-911
The Sounds of Explosions on 9/11
Was every BOOM a BOMB?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-explosions-on-911
Thank you!! Listening right now…
I have another question. I’ve read that almost immediately after the towers were dustified, cleanup was organized and the dust and rubble was taken to China. Have you heard of this? I think this could be an important part of the puzzle because a planned attack using directed energy would leave its fingerprint in the remains (to those who know how to analyze / test the molecular vaporization of the dust and rubble). Is that why they so quickly sent the debris to China of all places? To get rid of evidence that could prove directed energy was used? We all know that the perpetrators are part of a global operation and that China is firmly their template for the rest of the world…and that that would be a perfect place to disappear the evidence??
The shipping off to China is a lame talking point for the lack of rubble, that was reported on, on September 12, 2001 by ABC....
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
Then on September 13, 2001 - The site was locked down for journalists and citizens and NO pictures or video was allowed to be taken by anyone.
Thus allowing the US MIC contractors to fully control the narrative that was fed to the MSM, including the bullshit story of high heat, fires and more at the site, as they had to run cover-stories to explain the ongoing transmutation of metals, "fuming", that looked like smoke, rising up from the debris for close to 100 days.
The 100 days of "smoke" at ground zero.
The COLD rubble pile at the World Trade Center...
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-100-day-fuming-and-molecular
…like how they they locked down Lahaina after…
In a way, possibly...
It's important to differentiate between "Hot DEW" and "Cold DEW" - the tech. that destroyed the WTC generates little to no heat, whereas in the Maui and California fires, it's a bit different - with much more evidence of heat, but anomalous fires.
It's important not to speculate and mix together different bits of evidence because it looks similar.
Some folks do this to a much greater extent.
The other important evidence to study is that relating to Hurricane Erin on 9/11.
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001
Huricane Erin - How can we know if that story was bluf like the airplanes were?
Read my article and see why hurricane Erin isn't bluff...
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001
I don't see any evidence in your article that Huricane Erin and it's path was real. We need hard verifiable evidence before we can know.
10 universities and NASA tracking it and actually confirming they were doing experiments with it, isn't hard data?
Even the official data from National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figures & Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW-CIMSS) showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 2001, isn't enough for you?
Bro, really - Your comment is stupid!
I knew you would reply something along these lines. You are way too uneducated and uncritical. I am not going to waste any time debating with you. My comment was for other readers.
The reason you cannot look at the truth of 9-11, is because you would have to admit, it wasn't a small band of rogue towelheads with a cell phone, a laptop and a couple box cutters, but a globally organized cartel of the wealthiest and most powerful people on the planet.
You'd have to recognize them as the very ancient Nephilim pedivore narcissistic psychopathic hedonistic parasitic trillionare bankster class, consolidating more wealth and power, more control, to usher in their transhumanist digital technocracy, and their great culling, and great reset.
You'd have to admit, planet earth is captured by this interloping alien species of perpetual evil, with no regard for humans at all. You'd have to admit they want us dead, and they want planet earth all to themselves.
That's why the full implications of 9-11 can never bee looked at.
This comes close...
Explained: The Planning, Execution & Ongoing Cover-Up of 9/11
Video: https://rumble.com/v7doi2a-explained-the-planning-of-911.html
I think there is a strong possibility that the demolition was conducted using a number of different techniques including thermite, explosives, and DEW. It doesn’t have to be one or the other.
I like and loosely follow Tucker Carlson but his take on 911 leads me to believe he is controlled opposition. He continues with the lame theory that the US intelligence had inside knowledge of the attack and of the hijackers activities.
I think that anyone who has spent any time on this topic has dismissed the high jacker narrative as total psyop.
You should read my 5 part series on Tucker's drivel... Start with the 4th installment;
The Tucker Carlson 9/11 Files | Ep 4
An Alternative Media Talking Head's Mission in Uncovering 9/11 Truth Gone Wrong
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-tucker-carlson-911-files-ep-4
Thanks, that’s a good article. The hard part is what do I do about Tucker. He is not dumb so I have to conclude that he knowingly is concealing the real conspiracy. I once thought about writing to him about but I then I realized that if I know, then he knows. I have also noted that there is no apparent route to contact him, which to me is an indicator of controlled opposition.
Taking all of this into consideration I would have to conclude that the apparent shift against Israel is just another part of the plan. Maybe another false flag where Israel will be destroyed and the real 3rd world war begins.
In our fear, I guess we are expected to total world control. Most of us any way.
Bin Laden is on video saying how well everything went.
Anyone beliving Osama had something to do with 9/11, is part of the reason, why there is still a cover-up.