This video shows Galen Winsor eating uranium, something he did hundreds of times to show it is safe and fears are exaggerated by the energy industry.
Galen Hulet Winsor (June 4, 1926 - July 19, 2008) was an American chemist and nuclear plant safety manager who publicly denounced strict controls on atomic energy, arguing, among other things, that there has been a conspiracy by an energy cartel to misinform the public about the dangers of radioactive materials, which he proposed are largely harmless, extending to include claims that the 1979 partial meltdown of a reactor at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station (TMI-2) in Pennsylvania did not occur and the event was fabricated to stoke public fears, and that programs for the apparent disposal of radioactive waste are used by criminal elements to dispose of human bodies. His lectures on the matter were funded by the American Opinion Speakers Bureau, a committee of the John Birch Society.
It reminds me of the 2020 election fraud where people to this day still say, "There's no evidence!" It seems to hang on what people will admit is actual evidence of something. It's too easy to say, "I don't accept that as evidence" or "that's a hoax" especially in a time when deep fakes have been virtually perfected. That said, it just seems to hit a wall when people have to consider their own government as criminal because it's too BIG, it's too hard to know what to do about it because gov't pervades everything in our lives.
I can very well dig the concept that the towers were destroyed on purpose, & there are some strange features to the whole scene, that is ( just in part) the fact that the rubble pile was short in comparison to an estimate of what it should have been, However, the leap from intentional demolition - TO - there is some sort of technology that could yield FREE ENERGY . . . oops,
this is VERY difficult to justify. Really . . there is NO "Free Lunch" not to mention "Free Energy"
Where did the towers go is a conclusive body of evidence that eliminates a structural failure (collapse) or a controlled demolition by any thermal or kinetic mechanism...
Never mind the anomalies with buildings 3, 4, 5 and 6 - O, don't forget the Bankers Trust building and the other numerous anomalies...
No it doesn't. You cannot simply believe what is put forward as evidence.
The towers were already quite empty before they came down. Does WTC-7's rubble look sky high when it comes down?
"Where did the towers go?" is simply propaganda. They used smoke to create the illusion of dust.
Who brought the towers down? Controlled Demolition Inc (CDI) who holds world records in large building destructions brought them down, that's who. Why would they use a method that had never been tested before on large buildings? It makes no sense. Simon Shack asks the same question as I did - I didn't copy him and he didn't copy me, we both asked the question independently: why would they use an untested method when the tested method works absolutely fine?
But the most important element of 9/11 isn't HOW they brought they buildings down, it's the fact that that it was really just a demolition job cum massive anti-terror exercise pushed out as a real event where the death and injury and plane crashes were faked.
It's just so simple.
And what you're doing is propagating second-level propaganda ... that the perps WANT you to be propagating.
You referencing Simon Shack, now proves to me you're a waste of my time.
You seem NOT to be able to grasp the technology in play on 9/11 and until you read these books, you'll be, in my opinion a part of the disinformation peddlers - https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
I don't give a fuck how the buildings came down, OK?
That is distraction.
The key point is that death and injury were staged and the evidence for that is in abundance - it's everywhere you turn from nonsensical firefighter testimonies to reporters outside hospitals saying "no injured" to alleged injured that in no shape or form look as if they've been injured by the destruction of 110-storey towers to ludicrous miracle survivor stories and on and on.
You are completely impervious to this truth despite having not one piece of evidence to present that contradicts it.
Oh dear, you are so going down the wrong rabbit-hole. You simply have no idea about how they push out multiple streams of propaganda to mislead and misdirect and you take what is purported evidence as gospel when it is clearly faked.
"I even entertained the nuke theory for a while, but new it was bunk, due to the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the north tower, as just one flaw to the nuke theory."
Why would you believe the "16 survivors in Stairwell B" story without clear evidence? What says it's real? I'll tell you what says Pasquale Buzzelli's miracle survivor story isn't real - it's clearly a load of nonsense because it defies the rules of reality. https://youtu.be/DZMpXlxQ024
You cannot respond to the fact that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE ALLEGED 118 FIREFIGHTER "ORAL" HISTORIES is completely nonsensical - I bet they had a big laugh over the fact that the "oral" histories are completely devoid of any evidence of their orality in that there is not a single recording even though we have hundreds of hours of recordings from the moon landings 1969-1972 between the astronauts and mission control.
When your hypothesis cannot respond to clear contradiction of it you need to change it, that's what the scientific method says. You must change your hypothesis when there is contradiction.
118 completely nonsensical firefighter "oral" histories means they must have been faked and if they were faked (along with all the other evidence that supports the hypothesis) it means that the part of the story about 3,000 dying and 6,000 being injured is a complete falsity.
How about this from Simon Shack. Why does NIST give different times from the towers coming down from the actual times we see in the footage? That's an interesting one isn't it? He believes the footage of the twin towers is faked ... and I think he may well be right. If the twin towers came down using standard CD methods then it might be a bit too obvious ... and they love duping us anyway.
You harp on 118 testimonies - There are way more than that...
Math Easy Solutions downloaded and combined all 500 PDFs of 9/11 firefighters, paramedics, and EMT witness testimony from the NY Times archive and combined them into a searchable 7,058 page PDF! I suggest you go study it - https://1drv.ms/b/s!As32ynv0LoaIirAetue35QI7OqdiLw
You referencing Simon Shack, now proves to me you're a waste of my time.
You seem NOT to be able to grasp the technology in play on 9/11 and until you read these books, you'll be, in my opinion a part of the disinformation peddlers - https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
Every single one of the 118 firefighter testimonies is nonsensical to the point that their authenticity is completely undermined. (No doubt the others are as well, however, you don't need to look at every single piece of evidence to make a case, only the amount that is required to make it.)
This clear proof of fakery Revelation-of-the-Method style is one of the numerous pieces of evidence that show that death and injury were staged.
What was the most important alleged crime of 9/11?
It wasn't lying about buildings or planes ... it was killing and injuring people ... but the evidence shows it didn't happen.
To date NO ONE could - Because it's irrefutable EVIDENCE. You cannot argue against evidence.
Until you can debunk it, you'll be, in my opinion a part of the disinformation peddlers.
You fall in the same category of muddlers up like Shack, Gage, Fetzer, Pommer, Chandler, Coste, Cole, Alex jones, Steven E. Jones, James Corbett, Ted Walter, Gene Laratonda, architects for an engineered truth and the International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression.
The world needs to recognize that Directed Energy Weapons have been around for decades and were used on 9/11.
About 3,000 American people were murdered by the perpetrators in order to launch unfounded wars that murdered over 4 million innocent people.
We the American people, via the consent of the governed, are ultimately responsible for the actions of the UNITED STATES / United States / US FedGov.
We the People have to stand up and peacefully, resolutely fix the problem.
The same underlying technology demonstrated on 9/11 can be used to peacefully power the world with free energy or shatter it to pieces like a 1,000 mile diameter asteroid impact.
BTW, there are no nuclear weapons only energy plants
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/spooks-with-nukes
IS NUCLEAR DEADLY!!??
Scientist eats uranium. - Galen Winsor 1982
This video shows Galen Winsor eating uranium, something he did hundreds of times to show it is safe and fears are exaggerated by the energy industry.
Galen Hulet Winsor (June 4, 1926 - July 19, 2008) was an American chemist and nuclear plant safety manager who publicly denounced strict controls on atomic energy, arguing, among other things, that there has been a conspiracy by an energy cartel to misinform the public about the dangers of radioactive materials, which he proposed are largely harmless, extending to include claims that the 1979 partial meltdown of a reactor at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station (TMI-2) in Pennsylvania did not occur and the event was fabricated to stoke public fears, and that programs for the apparent disposal of radioactive waste are used by criminal elements to dispose of human bodies. His lectures on the matter were funded by the American Opinion Speakers Bureau, a committee of the John Birch Society.
https://hatch.kookscience.com/wiki/Galen_Winsor
Video: https://odysee.com/@wonderingwhatif:b/Is-nuclear-deadly:c
"FREE ENERGY" - LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reaction)
Video: https://odysee.com/@wonderingwhatif:b/Summary-of-Andrea-Rossi's-E-cat--The-Mother-Of-All-Black-Swan-Events:c
Summary of Andrea Rossi's E cat The Mother Of All Black Swan Events
A brief summary of significant events involving Andrea Rossi's E-cat. Includes interviews of the scientists who have tested it and their test results.
This video covers:
The E-cat commercial 1 megawatt reactor product introduction
The initial E-cat demonstrations in 2011
The 32 day E-cat test, 2014
The one year test 2015-2016
The $89 million dollar lawsuit, 2017
The Stockholm presentation, 2017
Below are links to the video clips and web sites mentioned the video:
The inventor, Andrea Rossi's pages:
https://ecat.com/
http://www.rossilivecat.com/
Books about the E-cat:
https://animpossibleinvention.com/
http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/author..
.
The 2011 demonstrations:
https://ecat.com/ecat-videos
https://ecat.com/ecat-videos/page/2
https://ecat.com/ecat-videos/page/3
The Lugano Report, 32 day E-cat test
http://amsacta.unibo.it/4084/
Peer review of Lugano Report by Mike McKubre
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemaga..
.
The Stockholm Presentation 2017 (condensed)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KkYM..
.
other videos:
More Hanno Essan and Sven Kullander
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_co..
.
It reminds me of the 2020 election fraud where people to this day still say, "There's no evidence!" It seems to hang on what people will admit is actual evidence of something. It's too easy to say, "I don't accept that as evidence" or "that's a hoax" especially in a time when deep fakes have been virtually perfected. That said, it just seems to hit a wall when people have to consider their own government as criminal because it's too BIG, it's too hard to know what to do about it because gov't pervades everything in our lives.
I can very well dig the concept that the towers were destroyed on purpose, & there are some strange features to the whole scene, that is ( just in part) the fact that the rubble pile was short in comparison to an estimate of what it should have been, However, the leap from intentional demolition - TO - there is some sort of technology that could yield FREE ENERGY . . . oops,
this is VERY difficult to justify. Really . . there is NO "Free Lunch" not to mention "Free Energy"
.
how about "FREE HUEY "?
Then how about reading - Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
After you go through the conclusive body of evidence presented, it's irrefutable.
"wheredidthetowersgo" isn't conclusive evidence.
Where did the towers go is a conclusive body of evidence that eliminates a structural failure (collapse) or a controlled demolition by any thermal or kinetic mechanism...
Never mind the anomalies with buildings 3, 4, 5 and 6 - O, don't forget the Bankers Trust building and the other numerous anomalies...
Maybe you should read the book?
Here is the link again: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
No it doesn't. You cannot simply believe what is put forward as evidence.
The towers were already quite empty before they came down. Does WTC-7's rubble look sky high when it comes down?
"Where did the towers go?" is simply propaganda. They used smoke to create the illusion of dust.
Who brought the towers down? Controlled Demolition Inc (CDI) who holds world records in large building destructions brought them down, that's who. Why would they use a method that had never been tested before on large buildings? It makes no sense. Simon Shack asks the same question as I did - I didn't copy him and he didn't copy me, we both asked the question independently: why would they use an untested method when the tested method works absolutely fine?
But the most important element of 9/11 isn't HOW they brought they buildings down, it's the fact that that it was really just a demolition job cum massive anti-terror exercise pushed out as a real event where the death and injury and plane crashes were faked.
It's just so simple.
And what you're doing is propagating second-level propaganda ... that the perps WANT you to be propagating.
You referencing Simon Shack, now proves to me you're a waste of my time.
You seem NOT to be able to grasp the technology in play on 9/11 and until you read these books, you'll be, in my opinion a part of the disinformation peddlers - https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
For more information check out Andrew Johnson’s research go to http://CheckTheEvidence.com
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11;
1. 9/11 – Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 – Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
I don't give a fuck how the buildings came down, OK?
That is distraction.
The key point is that death and injury were staged and the evidence for that is in abundance - it's everywhere you turn from nonsensical firefighter testimonies to reporters outside hospitals saying "no injured" to alleged injured that in no shape or form look as if they've been injured by the destruction of 110-storey towers to ludicrous miracle survivor stories and on and on.
You are completely impervious to this truth despite having not one piece of evidence to present that contradicts it.
Pick one, Psychological warfare, or Spiritual warfare . . . whatever, there is a battle for the hearts & minds of mortals on-going . . .
Oh dear, you are so going down the wrong rabbit-hole. You simply have no idea about how they push out multiple streams of propaganda to mislead and misdirect and you take what is purported evidence as gospel when it is clearly faked.
"I even entertained the nuke theory for a while, but new it was bunk, due to the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the north tower, as just one flaw to the nuke theory."
Why would you believe the "16 survivors in Stairwell B" story without clear evidence? What says it's real? I'll tell you what says Pasquale Buzzelli's miracle survivor story isn't real - it's clearly a load of nonsense because it defies the rules of reality. https://youtu.be/DZMpXlxQ024
You cannot respond to the fact that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE ALLEGED 118 FIREFIGHTER "ORAL" HISTORIES is completely nonsensical - I bet they had a big laugh over the fact that the "oral" histories are completely devoid of any evidence of their orality in that there is not a single recording even though we have hundreds of hours of recordings from the moon landings 1969-1972 between the astronauts and mission control.
When your hypothesis cannot respond to clear contradiction of it you need to change it, that's what the scientific method says. You must change your hypothesis when there is contradiction.
118 completely nonsensical firefighter "oral" histories means they must have been faked and if they were faked (along with all the other evidence that supports the hypothesis) it means that the part of the story about 3,000 dying and 6,000 being injured is a complete falsity.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911
How about this from Simon Shack. Why does NIST give different times from the towers coming down from the actual times we see in the footage? That's an interesting one isn't it? He believes the footage of the twin towers is faked ... and I think he may well be right. If the twin towers came down using standard CD methods then it might be a bit too obvious ... and they love duping us anyway.
https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2416382#p2416382
You harp on 118 testimonies - There are way more than that...
Math Easy Solutions downloaded and combined all 500 PDFs of 9/11 firefighters, paramedics, and EMT witness testimony from the NY Times archive and combined them into a searchable 7,058 page PDF! I suggest you go study it - https://1drv.ms/b/s!As32ynv0LoaIirAetue35QI7OqdiLw
Some are discussed in this article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-explosions-on-911
You referencing Simon Shack, now proves to me you're a waste of my time.
You seem NOT to be able to grasp the technology in play on 9/11 and until you read these books, you'll be, in my opinion a part of the disinformation peddlers - https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
For more information check out Andrew Johnson’s research go to http://CheckTheEvidence.com
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11;
1. 9/11 – Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 – Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
There are only 118 firefighter testimonies.
Every single one of the 118 firefighter testimonies is nonsensical to the point that their authenticity is completely undermined. (No doubt the others are as well, however, you don't need to look at every single piece of evidence to make a case, only the amount that is required to make it.)
This clear proof of fakery Revelation-of-the-Method style is one of the numerous pieces of evidence that show that death and injury were staged.
What was the most important alleged crime of 9/11?
It wasn't lying about buildings or planes ... it was killing and injuring people ... but the evidence shows it didn't happen.
Petra - You're a waste of my time.
If you're so certain - I await your debunk of the evidence presented in this book: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
I also await your debunk of the evidence presented to the US Supreme court in 2009: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
To date NO ONE could - Because it's irrefutable EVIDENCE. You cannot argue against evidence.
Until you can debunk it, you'll be, in my opinion a part of the disinformation peddlers.
You fall in the same category of muddlers up like Shack, Gage, Fetzer, Pommer, Chandler, Coste, Cole, Alex jones, Steven E. Jones, James Corbett, Ted Walter, Gene Laratonda, architects for an engineered truth and the International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression.
The world needs to recognize that Directed Energy Weapons have been around for decades and were used on 9/11.
About 3,000 American people were murdered by the perpetrators in order to launch unfounded wars that murdered over 4 million innocent people.
We the American people, via the consent of the governed, are ultimately responsible for the actions of the UNITED STATES / United States / US FedGov.
We the People have to stand up and peacefully, resolutely fix the problem.
The same underlying technology demonstrated on 9/11 can be used to peacefully power the world with free energy or shatter it to pieces like a 1,000 mile diameter asteroid impact.