It reminds me of the 2020 election fraud where people to this day still say, "There's no evidence!" It seems to hang on what people will admit is actual evidence of something. It's too easy to say, "I don't accept that as evidence" or "that's a hoax" especially in a time when deep fakes have been virtually perfected. That said, it just seems to hit a wall when people have to consider their own government as criminal because it's too BIG, it's too hard to know what to do about it because gov't pervades everything in our lives.
I can very well dig the concept that the towers were destroyed on purpose, & there are some strange features to the whole scene, that is ( just in part) the fact that the rubble pile was short in comparison to an estimate of what it should have been, However, the leap from intentional demolition - TO - there is some sort of technology that could yield FREE ENERGY . . . oops,
this is VERY difficult to justify. Really . . there is NO "Free Lunch" not to mention "Free Energy"
Oh dear, you are so going down the wrong rabbit-hole. You simply have no idea about how they push out multiple streams of propaganda to mislead and misdirect and you take what is purported evidence as gospel when it is clearly faked.
"I even entertained the nuke theory for a while, but new it was bunk, due to the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the north tower, as just one flaw to the nuke theory."
Why would you believe the "16 survivors in Stairwell B" story without clear evidence? What says it's real? I'll tell you what says Pasquale Buzzelli's miracle survivor story isn't real - it's clearly a load of nonsense because it defies the rules of reality. https://youtu.be/DZMpXlxQ024
You cannot respond to the fact that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE ALLEGED 118 FIREFIGHTER "ORAL" HISTORIES is completely nonsensical - I bet they had a big laugh over the fact that the "oral" histories are completely devoid of any evidence of their orality in that there is not a single recording even though we have hundreds of hours of recordings from the moon landings 1969-1972 between the astronauts and mission control.
When your hypothesis cannot respond to clear contradiction of it you need to change it, that's what the scientific method says. You must change your hypothesis when there is contradiction.
118 completely nonsensical firefighter "oral" histories means they must have been faked and if they were faked (along with all the other evidence that supports the hypothesis) it means that the part of the story about 3,000 dying and 6,000 being injured is a complete falsity.
How about this from Simon Shack. Why does NIST give different times from the towers coming down from the actual times we see in the footage? That's an interesting one isn't it? He believes the footage of the twin towers is faked ... and I think he may well be right. If the twin towers came down using standard CD methods then it might be a bit too obvious ... and they love duping us anyway.
BTW, there are no nuclear weapons only energy plants
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/spooks-with-nukes
It reminds me of the 2020 election fraud where people to this day still say, "There's no evidence!" It seems to hang on what people will admit is actual evidence of something. It's too easy to say, "I don't accept that as evidence" or "that's a hoax" especially in a time when deep fakes have been virtually perfected. That said, it just seems to hit a wall when people have to consider their own government as criminal because it's too BIG, it's too hard to know what to do about it because gov't pervades everything in our lives.
I can very well dig the concept that the towers were destroyed on purpose, & there are some strange features to the whole scene, that is ( just in part) the fact that the rubble pile was short in comparison to an estimate of what it should have been, However, the leap from intentional demolition - TO - there is some sort of technology that could yield FREE ENERGY . . . oops,
this is VERY difficult to justify. Really . . there is NO "Free Lunch" not to mention "Free Energy"
.
how about "FREE HUEY "?
Pick one, Psychological warfare, or Spiritual warfare . . . whatever, there is a battle for the hearts & minds of mortals on-going . . .
Oh dear, you are so going down the wrong rabbit-hole. You simply have no idea about how they push out multiple streams of propaganda to mislead and misdirect and you take what is purported evidence as gospel when it is clearly faked.
"I even entertained the nuke theory for a while, but new it was bunk, due to the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the north tower, as just one flaw to the nuke theory."
Why would you believe the "16 survivors in Stairwell B" story without clear evidence? What says it's real? I'll tell you what says Pasquale Buzzelli's miracle survivor story isn't real - it's clearly a load of nonsense because it defies the rules of reality. https://youtu.be/DZMpXlxQ024
You cannot respond to the fact that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE ALLEGED 118 FIREFIGHTER "ORAL" HISTORIES is completely nonsensical - I bet they had a big laugh over the fact that the "oral" histories are completely devoid of any evidence of their orality in that there is not a single recording even though we have hundreds of hours of recordings from the moon landings 1969-1972 between the astronauts and mission control.
When your hypothesis cannot respond to clear contradiction of it you need to change it, that's what the scientific method says. You must change your hypothesis when there is contradiction.
118 completely nonsensical firefighter "oral" histories means they must have been faked and if they were faked (along with all the other evidence that supports the hypothesis) it means that the part of the story about 3,000 dying and 6,000 being injured is a complete falsity.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911
How about this from Simon Shack. Why does NIST give different times from the towers coming down from the actual times we see in the footage? That's an interesting one isn't it? He believes the footage of the twin towers is faked ... and I think he may well be right. If the twin towers came down using standard CD methods then it might be a bit too obvious ... and they love duping us anyway.
https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2416382#p2416382