Questions for the 9/11 "truther" talking heads.
Why can't they answer basic questions?
We have established organisations calling for a new independent study of WHAT happened to 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001 and they have been at it for over 16 years, all whilst pleading for money at every chance they get. What have the donors got in exchange for their donations? What questions have they answered and are they any closer to really getting to the bottom of the question of WHAT actually happened?
What is the response if you ask them a simple question in 2023?
In the above video, Wayne H. Coste, was discussing his 2023 paper – “The Case for Propelled Demolition at the Twin Towers”, with David Chandler and Richard Gage in attendance, that has not been peer reviewed by anyone, made some explosive statements which was not refuted by David Chandler or Richard Gage.
He confirmed, NO molten metal in the core columns and they have no answer how the steel core columns were destroyed and the steel must have just disappeared and they may never know. Really? After 16 years of “intense” investigation, thousands of dollars in donations by the followers of these “truther” organisations and this is your best explanation? What have you been doing these last 16 years?
It’s always interesting to see how defensive these 9/11 “truther” talking heads can become when confronted with tough questions and the following interactions with Alex Jones is rather telling…
Then what happens if you ask the “International Center for 9/11 Justice” questions on why they aren’t really searching for justice? After all you don’t just nit pick evidence do you? They might want to rebrand to “International center for 9/11 Justice Suppression”.
Maybe they should listen to the most accurate description you can find on WHAT happened at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 seeing they have no answers after 16 years.
Maybe they should be gifted this book, that will most definitely answer all these difficult questions they cannot answer. After all this book is the ONLY independent forensic study that has been done on WHAT happened to those buildings on 9/11.
Why can’t this book be ignored, well because it formed the basis for a 2007 whistleblower Qui-Tam case against NISTS subcontractors, who were tasked with the cleanup and security at ground zero and compiling reports for the 10 000 page NIST Report, for SCIENCE FRAUD and which went up as high as the US Supreme Court in 2009.
Question: “Why does the 9/11 “truther” movement talking heads NOT want you to know about this?”
What does this book contain that they are so afraid of?
Then the question arises, what do people realise AFTER they’ve stopped listening to the 9/11 “truther” talking heads and actually have read this scary book?
What happens to you once you start asking these 9/11 “truther” talking heads about this?
To recap have a look at this informative little screenshot from the series “9/11 Observable Evidence”.
It seems the 9/11 “truther” talking heads are the glass jar, keeping the truth seekers contained, in order for them not to EVER know that there is no jar after a couple of days… One can see this happen with every good intentioned truth seeker that gets taken in by these poo-ba organisations.
If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to my PayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet, I’ll really appreciate it.
If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first article and work your way through all 79 of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.
Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.
And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.
Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:
You are doing a great job with words, videos and the little graphics showing how counterintelligence works! 👍🏽👏🏽. Getting used to the idea of counter-ops and learning how to see them is such an important part of the whole learning.
It seems like the main people leading the "serious" counter ops frequently have the same personal energetic countenance. There's often very little normal human personalness, but a lot of intelligence. These people are very smart and can stand in front of an audience and relay a mindful of information without wavering, but there's a normal humanity missing in that process that you see with other people. You can feel it and see it in the difference between the way Dr Judy Wood and Richard Gage talk. For example I see this similarity between Richard Gage and Robert Malone, and in the UFO space Steven Greer (although I'm not sure if he's counter op). Then of course there are the wacky counter op leaders like Alex Jones. "Wacky" counter-op leaders serve to keep people away from true information, "serious" counter-up leaders serve to draw people into partial truths only, or the wrong information, and keep them busy there.
Flea Circus