There's some good points made here such as "Where did the core columns go?"
The concrete floors can be pulverized and blown outwards but you would expect to see more of the core column material at the base. We only really see parts of the outer shell spread out everywhere.
You guys still have to prove the existence of DEWs capable of what happened on 9/11. Are you saying that this was beamed down from an orbital platform in 2001?
In 2023, I suspect that we have a weaponized orbital platform in NASA's Artemis moon vehicle. This could be loaded with rods that are guided to any target on Earth, but that's still a far cry from EM energy beam weapons.
Hey 911 have you tried connecting with Eric Coppolino. You are probably aware of the great work he does on the No Viruses issue. There are so many similiarities between the two issues with regard to gatekeepers. I know he's had Richard Gage on a couple of times. I listened to some of the discussion he had with Richard a few weeks ago. Judy Woods came up but was dismissed almost immediately by Richard. I'd really like to think that Eric would entertain you/Andrew in a respectful manner given his history.
Good luck, it would be great to see it happen. He also recently did a long chat with jeranism about flat earth and was very respectful and open minded throughout. I'm not sure he was convinced, but then, i'm not sure that I am on flat earth either.
When it comes to how this technology was utilized on 9/11, I suspect that it was done from inside the buildings affected. Remember that the Twin Towers had routine maintenance/renovation done prior to the attacks (just like the Pentagon), so it's likely DEWs were installed inside them to make way for the buildings' demise without relying mainly on explosives or incendiaries to bring them down. Where they were kept was likely in the empty or understaffed floors of the buildings, probably near or in the impact points.
Personally I do not like to speculate and Dr Wood also does not go into where the "weapon" could have been. The evidence points to the use of some COLD DEW was used that relied on field effects.
What we do know is the two US MIC subcontractors, ARA and SAIC, were in charge of ground zero's cleanup and also wrote the technical reports that were part of the 10 000 page NIST report, along with 21 other subcontractors.
What does ARA and SAIC specialise in? Well, psychological operations, impact studies, weather manipulation and DEW. They are also part of a big club, most don't know even exists...
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
It would be interesting to see if those same subcontractors worked at the WTC complex before 9/11, not just after. That might answer how they managed to pull this off.
Interesting reading here. I have a few questions. What of the US Lawrence Livermore Labs 1990s developed nano scale thermitic explosives found in WTC dust? And their explosive by products? What of all the WTCs melted and boiled metals?
Were any "hijackers" body parts, DNA, etc ever recovered from any of the plane sites?
Then listen to this presentation by an Aerospace Engineer, given to Boston 9/11 in August 2024 discussing the UNANSWERED thermite challenge to AE911 and Steven E. Jones: https://youtu.be/3B7wYNhnUrw
Then after listening to the following presentation, you will find contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". – Prof David A, Hughes
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
US LL Labs nanoscale thermitic explosive were found in WTC dust, same profile, same explosive by products. And as the Utah prof says, the calorimeter does not lie.
Then listen to this presentation by an Aerospace Engineer, given to Boston 9/11 in August 2024 discussing the UNANSWERED thermite challenge to AE911 and Steven E. Jones: https://youtu.be/3B7wYNhnUrw
I encountered a professor who was also reluctant to discuss his evidence by himself. Those who can't discuss it themselves are not to be trusted.
As was stated, the calorimeter cannot lie. The profile of the unexploded particles of nanothermite matched the US LL Labs profile. Who dumped all the huge volume of the explosive by products into WTC dust and mixed them so intimately, something ONLY the explosions that brought down the 3 towers could have done.
There's some good points made here such as "Where did the core columns go?"
The concrete floors can be pulverized and blown outwards but you would expect to see more of the core column material at the base. We only really see parts of the outer shell spread out everywhere.
You guys still have to prove the existence of DEWs capable of what happened on 9/11. Are you saying that this was beamed down from an orbital platform in 2001?
In 2023, I suspect that we have a weaponized orbital platform in NASA's Artemis moon vehicle. This could be loaded with rods that are guided to any target on Earth, but that's still a far cry from EM energy beam weapons.
We should ask these guys...
DEPS - The Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Thanks. I'll take a look at it.
Hey 911 have you tried connecting with Eric Coppolino. You are probably aware of the great work he does on the No Viruses issue. There are so many similiarities between the two issues with regard to gatekeepers. I know he's had Richard Gage on a couple of times. I listened to some of the discussion he had with Richard a few weeks ago. Judy Woods came up but was dismissed almost immediately by Richard. I'd really like to think that Eric would entertain you/Andrew in a respectful manner given his history.
Could you possibly send me a link to the interview and contact details for Eric Coppolino?
Here is the link for the video -
https://planetwaves.fm/richard-gage-interview/
Email -
efc@chironreturn.org
Or maybe message him direct via Substack -
https://substack.com/@planetwavesfm
Good luck, it would be great to see it happen. He also recently did a long chat with jeranism about flat earth and was very respectful and open minded throughout. I'm not sure he was convinced, but then, i'm not sure that I am on flat earth either.
When it comes to how this technology was utilized on 9/11, I suspect that it was done from inside the buildings affected. Remember that the Twin Towers had routine maintenance/renovation done prior to the attacks (just like the Pentagon), so it's likely DEWs were installed inside them to make way for the buildings' demise without relying mainly on explosives or incendiaries to bring them down. Where they were kept was likely in the empty or understaffed floors of the buildings, probably near or in the impact points.
Personally I do not like to speculate and Dr Wood also does not go into where the "weapon" could have been. The evidence points to the use of some COLD DEW was used that relied on field effects.
What we do know is the two US MIC subcontractors, ARA and SAIC, were in charge of ground zero's cleanup and also wrote the technical reports that were part of the 10 000 page NIST report, along with 21 other subcontractors.
These 23 subcontractors were all sued by Dr Wood, in her 2007 qui-tam whistleblower case for science fraud. Court filings: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
What does ARA and SAIC specialise in? Well, psychological operations, impact studies, weather manipulation and DEW. They are also part of a big club, most don't know even exists...
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
It would be interesting to see if those same subcontractors worked at the WTC complex before 9/11, not just after. That might answer how they managed to pull this off.
You might want to watch the following video and read the article...
9/11 & WSFM – Weird Science and Frickin’ Magic
Video: https://rumble.com/v4sjni5-911-and-wsfm-weird-science-and-frickin-magic.html
Secret Super Weapons, UFO's & 9/11
Scalar, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/secret-super-weapons-ufos-and-911
Thanks.
Interesting reading here. I have a few questions. What of the US Lawrence Livermore Labs 1990s developed nano scale thermitic explosives found in WTC dust? And their explosive by products? What of all the WTCs melted and boiled metals?
Were any "hijackers" body parts, DNA, etc ever recovered from any of the plane sites?
The Nano scale thermitic explosive story is b/s...
Please study the thermite related information on this blog page: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
Then listen to this presentation by an Aerospace Engineer, given to Boston 9/11 in August 2024 discussing the UNANSWERED thermite challenge to AE911 and Steven E. Jones: https://youtu.be/3B7wYNhnUrw
Then after listening to the following presentation, you will find contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". – Prof David A, Hughes
Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
An 1h documentary explanation PROVING thermite CANNOT be the destructive mechanism: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
US LL Labs nanoscale thermitic explosive were found in WTC dust, same profile, same explosive by products. And as the Utah prof says, the calorimeter does not lie.
Stop knee-jerking and go do the homework you've been given.
Please study the thermite related information on this blog page: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
Then listen to this presentation by an Aerospace Engineer, given to Boston 9/11 in August 2024 discussing the UNANSWERED thermite challenge to AE911 and Steven E. Jones: https://youtu.be/3B7wYNhnUrw
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
An 1h documentary explanation PROVING thermite CANNOT be the destructive mechanism: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition
I encountered a professor who was also reluctant to discuss his evidence by himself. Those who can't discuss it themselves are not to be trusted.
As was stated, the calorimeter cannot lie. The profile of the unexploded particles of nanothermite matched the US LL Labs profile. Who dumped all the huge volume of the explosive by products into WTC dust and mixed them so intimately, something ONLY the explosions that brought down the 3 towers could have done.
You’re knee-jerking again - Go do your homework given.
The onus is on you, 911R. I never assert things that I cannot fully describe and provided evidence for.
How do you explain the many WTCs melted and boiled metals, including WTCs' 1, 2 & 7 M & B structural steel?
AGAIN, calorimeters do not lie, but people sure do.
It was not 'thermite' it was nano scale thermitic explosives - big difference. The same ones that LL Labs developed in the 1990s.