Personally I do not like to speculate and Dr Wood also does not go into where the "weapon" could have been. The evidence points to the use of some COLD DEW was used that relied on field effects.
What we do know is the two US MIC subcontractors, ARA and SAIC, were in charge of ground zero's cleanup and also wrote the technical reports that were part of the 10 000 page NIST report, along with 21 other subcontractors.
What does ARA and SAIC specialise in? Well, psychological operations, impact studies, weather manipulation and DEW. They are also part of a big club, most don't know even exists...
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
There's some good points made here such as "Where did the core columns go?"
The concrete floors can be pulverized and blown outwards but you would expect to see more of the core column material at the base. We only really see parts of the outer shell spread out everywhere.
You guys still have to prove the existence of DEWs capable of what happened on 9/11. Are you saying that this was beamed down from an orbital platform in 2001?
In 2023, I suspect that we have a weaponized orbital platform in NASA's Artemis moon vehicle. This could be loaded with rods that are guided to any target on Earth, but that's still a far cry from EM energy beam weapons.
Hey 911 have you tried connecting with Eric Coppolino. You are probably aware of the great work he does on the No Viruses issue. There are so many similiarities between the two issues with regard to gatekeepers. I know he's had Richard Gage on a couple of times. I listened to some of the discussion he had with Richard a few weeks ago. Judy Woods came up but was dismissed almost immediately by Richard. I'd really like to think that Eric would entertain you/Andrew in a respectful manner given his history.
Good luck, it would be great to see it happen. He also recently did a long chat with jeranism about flat earth and was very respectful and open minded throughout. I'm not sure he was convinced, but then, i'm not sure that I am on flat earth either.
Interesting reading here. I have a few questions. What of the US Lawrence Livermore Labs 1990s developed nano scale thermitic explosives found in WTC dust? And their explosive by products? What of all the WTCs melted and boiled metals?
Were any "hijackers" body parts, DNA, etc ever recovered from any of the plane sites?
Then listen to this presentation by an Aerospace Engineer, given to Boston 9/11 in August 2024 discussing the UNANSWERED thermite challenge to AE911 and Steven E. Jones: https://youtu.be/3B7wYNhnUrw
Then after listening to the following presentation, you will find contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". – Prof David A, Hughes
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
US LL Labs nanoscale thermitic explosive were found in WTC dust, same profile, same explosive by products. And as the Utah prof says, the calorimeter does not lie.
Then listen to this presentation by an Aerospace Engineer, given to Boston 9/11 in August 2024 discussing the UNANSWERED thermite challenge to AE911 and Steven E. Jones: https://youtu.be/3B7wYNhnUrw
I encountered a professor who was also reluctant to discuss his evidence by himself. Those who can't discuss it themselves are not to be trusted.
As was stated, the calorimeter cannot lie. The profile of the unexploded particles of nanothermite matched the US LL Labs profile. Who dumped all the huge volume of the explosive by products into WTC dust and mixed them so intimately, something ONLY the explosions that brought down the 3 towers could have done.
You are doing a great job with words, videos and the little graphics showing how counterintelligence works! 👍🏽👏🏽. Getting used to the idea of counter-ops and learning how to see them is such an important part of the whole learning.
It seems like the main people leading the "serious" counter ops frequently have the same personal energetic countenance. There's often very little normal human personalness, but a lot of intelligence. These people are very smart and can stand in front of an audience and relay a mindful of information without wavering, but there's a normal humanity missing in that process that you see with other people. You can feel it and see it in the difference between the way Dr Judy Wood and Richard Gage talk. For example I see this similarity between Richard Gage and Robert Malone, and in the UFO space Steven Greer (although I'm not sure if he's counter op). Then of course there are the wacky counter op leaders like Alex Jones. "Wacky" counter-op leaders serve to keep people away from true information, "serious" counter-up leaders serve to draw people into partial truths only, or the wrong information, and keep them busy there.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Personally I do not like to speculate and Dr Wood also does not go into where the "weapon" could have been. The evidence points to the use of some COLD DEW was used that relied on field effects.
What we do know is the two US MIC subcontractors, ARA and SAIC, were in charge of ground zero's cleanup and also wrote the technical reports that were part of the 10 000 page NIST report, along with 21 other subcontractors.
These 23 subcontractors were all sued by Dr Wood, in her 2007 qui-tam whistleblower case for science fraud. Court filings: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
What does ARA and SAIC specialise in? Well, psychological operations, impact studies, weather manipulation and DEW. They are also part of a big club, most don't know even exists...
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
You might want to watch the following video and read the article...
9/11 & WSFM – Weird Science and Frickin’ Magic
Video: https://rumble.com/v4sjni5-911-and-wsfm-weird-science-and-frickin-magic.html
Secret Super Weapons, UFO's & 9/11
Scalar, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/secret-super-weapons-ufos-and-911
There's some good points made here such as "Where did the core columns go?"
The concrete floors can be pulverized and blown outwards but you would expect to see more of the core column material at the base. We only really see parts of the outer shell spread out everywhere.
You guys still have to prove the existence of DEWs capable of what happened on 9/11. Are you saying that this was beamed down from an orbital platform in 2001?
In 2023, I suspect that we have a weaponized orbital platform in NASA's Artemis moon vehicle. This could be loaded with rods that are guided to any target on Earth, but that's still a far cry from EM energy beam weapons.
We should ask these guys...
DEPS - The Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Thanks. I'll take a look at it.
Hey 911 have you tried connecting with Eric Coppolino. You are probably aware of the great work he does on the No Viruses issue. There are so many similiarities between the two issues with regard to gatekeepers. I know he's had Richard Gage on a couple of times. I listened to some of the discussion he had with Richard a few weeks ago. Judy Woods came up but was dismissed almost immediately by Richard. I'd really like to think that Eric would entertain you/Andrew in a respectful manner given his history.
Could you possibly send me a link to the interview and contact details for Eric Coppolino?
Here is the link for the video -
https://planetwaves.fm/richard-gage-interview/
Email -
efc@chironreturn.org
Or maybe message him direct via Substack -
https://substack.com/@planetwavesfm
Good luck, it would be great to see it happen. He also recently did a long chat with jeranism about flat earth and was very respectful and open minded throughout. I'm not sure he was convinced, but then, i'm not sure that I am on flat earth either.
Interesting reading here. I have a few questions. What of the US Lawrence Livermore Labs 1990s developed nano scale thermitic explosives found in WTC dust? And their explosive by products? What of all the WTCs melted and boiled metals?
Were any "hijackers" body parts, DNA, etc ever recovered from any of the plane sites?
The Nano scale thermitic explosive story is b/s...
Please study the thermite related information on this blog page: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
Then listen to this presentation by an Aerospace Engineer, given to Boston 9/11 in August 2024 discussing the UNANSWERED thermite challenge to AE911 and Steven E. Jones: https://youtu.be/3B7wYNhnUrw
Then after listening to the following presentation, you will find contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". – Prof David A, Hughes
Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
An 1h documentary explanation PROVING thermite CANNOT be the destructive mechanism: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
US LL Labs nanoscale thermitic explosive were found in WTC dust, same profile, same explosive by products. And as the Utah prof says, the calorimeter does not lie.
Stop knee-jerking and go do the homework you've been given.
Please study the thermite related information on this blog page: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
Then listen to this presentation by an Aerospace Engineer, given to Boston 9/11 in August 2024 discussing the UNANSWERED thermite challenge to AE911 and Steven E. Jones: https://youtu.be/3B7wYNhnUrw
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
An 1h documentary explanation PROVING thermite CANNOT be the destructive mechanism: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition
I encountered a professor who was also reluctant to discuss his evidence by himself. Those who can't discuss it themselves are not to be trusted.
As was stated, the calorimeter cannot lie. The profile of the unexploded particles of nanothermite matched the US LL Labs profile. Who dumped all the huge volume of the explosive by products into WTC dust and mixed them so intimately, something ONLY the explosions that brought down the 3 towers could have done.
You’re knee-jerking again - Go do your homework given.
The onus is on you, 911R. I never assert things that I cannot fully describe and provided evidence for.
How do you explain the many WTCs melted and boiled metals, including WTCs' 1, 2 & 7 M & B structural steel?
AGAIN, calorimeters do not lie, but people sure do.
It was not 'thermite' it was nano scale thermitic explosives - big difference. The same ones that LL Labs developed in the 1990s.
Flea Circus
You are doing a great job with words, videos and the little graphics showing how counterintelligence works! 👍🏽👏🏽. Getting used to the idea of counter-ops and learning how to see them is such an important part of the whole learning.
It seems like the main people leading the "serious" counter ops frequently have the same personal energetic countenance. There's often very little normal human personalness, but a lot of intelligence. These people are very smart and can stand in front of an audience and relay a mindful of information without wavering, but there's a normal humanity missing in that process that you see with other people. You can feel it and see it in the difference between the way Dr Judy Wood and Richard Gage talk. For example I see this similarity between Richard Gage and Robert Malone, and in the UFO space Steven Greer (although I'm not sure if he's counter op). Then of course there are the wacky counter op leaders like Alex Jones. "Wacky" counter-op leaders serve to keep people away from true information, "serious" counter-up leaders serve to draw people into partial truths only, or the wrong information, and keep them busy there.
Thanx for the feedback, much appreciated...
On Greer, well - Sorry to disappoint you - Give this a read through...
Secret Super Weapons, UFO's & 9/11
Scalar Waves, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions
Read my article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/secret-super-weapons-ufos-and-911
Directed Energy Weapon development
A short history on “science fiction” technology hidden in the real world since the 1960's.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/steven-greers-disclosure-and-energy
And a last read through....
Alex Jones, Charlie Sheen, Tucker Carlson & 9/11
Two Camp 2 Talking Heads and an Actor Failing at Presenting 9/11 Truth
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/alex-jones-charlie-sheen-tucker-carlson
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
The 9/11 Plane & No Plane debate settled
Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-the-plane-no-plane-argument