It is a long podcast, close to 3 hours, but it’s important to give it a listening to, as we go deep into the 9/11 truth movement and the re-pivot of even more disinformation and propaganda, especially when it comes to the alleged planes on 9/11.
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
I don't have time --today-- to do a deep dive, but you're saying that the Dr. Wood "dustification" is not true? If that's what you're saying, then how is the almost complete destruction explained? It's not DEW's? I WILL try to get back to this soon and do allll the look/see of the info! I don't believe the "story" we were given. I'd like to know the real one. Thanks.
Oh, good! I’m glad to hear it, and I was ASKING, not thinking it to be so. I am relieved b/c I think she’s pretty awesome. I’ll try to get to your article today, but if not, remind me again, because I lose the place, doncha know. And do you agree, then, that this was maybe the first, or the first BIG, test of DEW’s?
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Did I ever say there were no people on the planes and that people did not die?
Truth seekers biggest blind spot is their cognitive dissonance and NOT wanting to take on points that might shatter their world view. Stop being so shortsighted and challenge yourself.
Do you even know who the companies involved with the clean up, security and writing the scientifically fraudulent 10 000 page NIST Report?
Two main companies - ARA and SAIC (of 23 in total) - What do they specialise in?
Physiological operations, weather modification and more - You should go read up on them.
You do agree that NIST Report was riddled with science fraud?
The 9/11 Commission investigation and report - That did did not even mention Building 7?
Remember when 9/11 commissioner Joe Lieberman was asked about Building 7 he said the following - "WTC 7 Did Not Happen, I Do Not Support A New 9/11 Investigation".
Do you even know of the two whistleblower cases of 2007 against NIST for science fraud or that one of these cases were filed with the US Supreme court in 2009?
When you ask ALL of the 9/11 "truthers" about these cases they ALL deny any knowledge of it. As recently as Sept 5 2023 I asked Richard Gage about these cases and he DENIED knowing about them, yet in 2011 when confronted he was talking about these cases - I have it on VIDEO - So why would he LIE?
Why would Ted Walter, International Center for 9/11 Justice (Formed Jan 2023) ALSO deny having any knowledge of these cases - This I too have on video - He worked for Richard Gage for 8 years, whilst Richard Gage was still affiliated with architects for an engineered truth.
Again I state....
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11:
1. POOR Problem solving skills
2. Group Think (Peer Pressure, running with the herd)
3. They just can't handle the implications (they wish it weren't true)
You live in a time where your perception is being managed.
Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily.
People are gullible, I agree, but having spent my life surrounding aviation, I have never seen so many ‘planes’ simply vanish without a trace. Never happens. Debris everywhere.
I had a discussion with a pilot in a Telegram group and here is what he had to say:
Pilot: "Retired airline captain, 33.5 years in aviation, Icelandic"
9/11 revisionist asking questions:
Airline Captain 😳😳😳
Do I have some questions for you 😊
1. Can a plane fly at between 494 and 586 mph at 1 368 feet?
2. Can a plane doing about the same speed in question 1 and come down horizontally with the ground and slice through 5 lampposts without disintegrating or changing course?
3. Can a plane basically disappear into the ground where EVERYTHING just disintegrates in such a manner that not a chair, shoe, any luggage, or any trace of the plane can be found?
Pilot: 9/11 revisionist asked: I try to give my opinion:
1. between 494-586 mph? Aircraft FAA approved manual of the planes I have worked on has speed limits in form of Indicated airspeed at these altitudes:
757: 350 KIAS (knots indicated speed) is 402 mph.
767: 360 KIAS is 414 mph.
These speeds are maximum - unless the system has been tampered with, above these speeds you will have an aural warning very loud all the time.
It is a real distraction even for a seasoned pilot.
To answer, I think these speeds would be much above the speed when something breaks (although Jet airplanes have a built-in margin for overspeed).
2. Difficult…, let’s say aircraft weight 100 tons, I would believe that 5 lampposts collision would not alter the airplanes course (impact force) however could there be a disaster following due to damages.
3. No
4. An airplane on these speeds, banking to change course, the G-forces would, in my opinion have the airplane break up.
9/11 revisionist:
Now, the examples I was giving was the official narrative about 9/11 - and those planes on 9/11 were making insane banking manoeuvres both "planes" "hitting the towers" and if you look at the banking the "plane" that hit the Pentagon apparently sliced through the lamppost and number 3 was the "plane" that crashed at Shanksville.
Do you think an aluminium could slice through those massive steel beams?
What is your opinion on the 9/11 narrative?
Pilot:
1. you can bank an airplane and continue to bank, as if going to Roll the airplane. I believe you cannot bank the plane to make a course change unless to overstress it at these speeds.
2. insane banking manoeuvres at these speeds - NO - Breaking
3. I mean No - it would be breaking.
9/11 revisionist: Regarding the official story of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon picture:
- No sliced off pieces of the plane found.
Pilot:
- Keep in mind I have only years of experience and a simulation to these extremities would only be a calculation.
- I think cannot be simulated as of now, as just a years ago, simulators were not having enough data to be able to do simulation, e.g., full stall (before always emphasised on avoiding full stalls.
- Full stalls must be practised, whether a light plane or a jet.
9/11 revisionist: Referring to the pictures of a plain hitting a massive concrete block at over 500mp/h
- And this is what we are supposed to believe?
- An aluminium plane slicing through solid steel beams leaving a hole like the roadrunner cartoons....
Pilot: I think i am of an opinion that is like yours
9/11 revisionist:
- I really like you.
- now we just need to get into WHAT happened to the 8 buildings at the world trade centre complex.
We are not making light of it my dear - Yet, just like covid was a trauma based event, an attack on human consciousness with people outsourcing their thinking to MSM - So was 9/11.
Only when you really get stuck into the 9/11 narratives and CRITICALLY look at what you were presented with, by government and the so called 9/11 "truther" movement - Will you be able to start seeing through the bamboozle.
If you can look at covid with such a critical eye - don't you think you owe it to those who lost their lives on American soil, and the 4 million plus people in the middle east?
You should really read some of my articles or if you have 1h to spare, watch the 1h video - 9/11 The Essential Guide - It will open your eyes to how much evil was on play on 9/11.
I must warn you - It is an immense mental shift and most aren't ready for it - So proceed with caution if you do decide to have your world view challenged.
After you mustered that - There is a book every person on earth should read.
@Bev - You're the type of person who would believe in obvious propaganda such as Nariyah's testimony of Iraqi soldiers ripping innocent babies from incubators and letting them die, which is an admitted hoax. If they still sold it as real, you would swallow it up like the little sheep you are.
No one is obligated to blindly believe the sob stories told about 9/11 and COVID-19, either. I don't feel the need to placate the feelings of the people implicated who I never even met or knew in any capacity. They're not obliged to listen to the opinions of people like myself who find their stories to be sketchy, at best. If they feel disrespected, that's their problem, not mine.
Bev, you need to start making peace with the fact that what you witnessed was an ILLUSION.
Adam Eisenberg was in the PentaCON on 9/11.... What didn't he see?
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
No, I wasn't there to witness anything hit the Pentagon, and likely neither were you, Bev. And even if I did see a plane hit the building, that doesn't mean it was Flight 77. People could've really seen anything passing as a passenger jet hit the Pentagon. Only the government knows what it really was, and I feel no reason to believe they told the truth about that.
You've yet to explain anomalies such as the D.C.C. radar data showing a completely different flight path and the plane debris having never been identified via serial numbers as belonging to AA77, all of which poses serious questions for the official narrative spun about the plane. So far, the government has never cleared those loose ends up.
The only "real" evidence connecting what happened at the Pentagon with Flight 77 is the dubious forensic identification of the victims made by the government. I say dubious because human DNA cannot survive the reportedly harsh conditions inside the building for extensive periods of time.
And the stories of the people alleged to have been onboard Flight 77 aren't empirical evidence of anything, since people can make-up details about them to sell a certain narrative. The same can be said for news reports and even government publications. They're often just as reliable as any internet blog or gossip column, which is not very much. They certainly don't prove they died at the Pentagon in a plane crash.
And speaking of witnessing it first-hand, Bev, I'm sure you've read the eyewitness accounts of those who claimed to have seen the plane hit the Pentagon and the aftermath, right?
Well, I have, and they include hilarious details such as seeing people inside the plane as it flew past them at 530+ mph (impossible), it hitting the ground first before hitting the building (didn't happen), and one even claimed it cart-wheeled into the building (no physical evidence of that, either). I also know of your son, who you claim had witnessed the attack with his naked eyes. You can ask him if he also saw people inside the plane before it crashed, or any of the other details I mentioned.
There are also accounts from first responders who said they saw charred human bodies strapped onto plane seats, which is unlikely considering the plane was supposed to have turned into confetti from hitting a concrete structure at over 530 mph and human bodies aren't composed of the strongest materials known to man. They also supposedly found intact IDs from the plane, another miracle than one doesn't always come across from burning crash sites. Remember the magic passport of Satam al-Suqami at the WTC?
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
You’re disregarding the fact the so many people saw it happen and many more on the TV. That’s not ‘Groupthink’ you fool.
On the other hand, conspiracy theorists rely on groupthink within their sub-culture. You need people who will believe anything you say without question.
It shows what a deeply ingrained psychological operation 9/11 was.
An attack on human consciousness. A trauma based mind control event.
It also shows you that it does not matter how much evidence you can provide to make your point, but if a person suffers from cognitive dissonance, a person will fight tooth and nail to keep their misunderstanding of events or a world view intact.
A lot of people consider themselves truth seekers, yet they are unable to change their opinions or views when presented with information that contradict their beliefs.
That is the difference between a smart person and an indoctrinated person.
We saw it play out during covid and still there are people who are vax injured, claiming their injury stems from climate change.
And how do you know this to be true, Bev? Are you in touch with the families? Did you see people die in the events in person and not on your TV screen? It's possible that some people may have died and suffered injuries/illnesses as a result of the 9/11 attacks, but I don't buy the claim that almost 3,000 people died that day. There's no hard evidence proving that many people died. Remember who gave us the numbers: the same people that created the overall dubious official 9/11 narrative. The fact that many of these people don't appear in public death records or SSDI is telling, IMO. It also explains the claim that 1,100 "dead" couldn't be accounted for.
Since when were my inquiries concerning 9/11 casualties about the buildings, anyway? It's not like I don't already know their destruction wasn't what the mainline gov't and "truther" narratives are selling them to be. And I am open to the possibility that "DEWs" might've been used to facilitate their destruction.
Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defence Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Questioning everything about the attacks - including the alleged casualties - is not "dishonoring" anyone's memory. In fact, I believe it's the complete opposite.
And talking to people who were allegedly there doesn't prove anything because people can lie or distort their stories. If they cannot or will not verify their claims with bona fide evidence or their narratives have too many holes in them, no one should be expected to take them seriously.
And how do you know I wasn't alive back then? You don’t know who I am. And even if I wasn't alive when it happened or paid much attention at the time, that doesn't give you the right to be so condescending to me for not believing everything they show and spew from their lying lips.
Not everything the news and the government reports and shows is the truth. I have seen my fair share of 9/11 media from mainstream and alternative networks and I don't find much of them to be credible or believable. At best, they're half-truths. And most of them seldom question the deaths reported.
But if you still want to immerse yourself in emotional stories and visuals disseminated by corporate and state propaganda outlets, be my guest. Just don't stick your schnoz in other people's business and tell them how wrong they are for not seeing things as you do, implying they're retarded children in the process.
The articles I did read from you are pretty interesting and compelling. Bear in mind that I've only became acquainted with your work in the past couple months, so I obviously wouldn't have read every single thing you posted in the past two years. Plus, I have a lot on my plate in my personal life, so I don't always have ample time to read your material. And I also listened to some of Judy Wood's presentations, such as this one:
My working theory is that the "planes" themselves were disguised DEWs used to simulate the catastrophes that happened in New York and D.C. I'd imagine that such technology isn't limited to the form of ordinary "space lasers" ejected from satellites outside the earth's atmosphere.
What kind of evidence would you accept if you won’t accept millions of eye-witnesses all describing the same thing, and hundreds of videos, and live TV footage?
To me this sounds like Alex jones stuff meant to discredit our narrative, I think we have plenty of evidence of Israeli involvement. People need to know about the fake elevator techs from Israel w the port authority work permits. I don’t think missiles are supported by the way the towers fell, the damage would not be even, I think you’d get an immediate toppling.
The missles have nothing to do with the complete destruction of the buildings. They didn't really fall, because there was no impact, the parking garage underneath was intact and lower Manhattan didn't flood.
To me, it sounds like controlled opposition got you before you studied the forensic evidence. Shame.
Step 1 - Understand what happened to the whole WTC complex…
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
If Ryan Dawson doesn’t buy the holograph planes then neither do I. I know it was an inside job but there’s just no evidence this technology existed in 2001 or now. Not saying it’s impossible, just an occams razor situation
Ryan Dawson is an idiot and a disinformation peddler.
So, you're a follower and not a thinker?
You only parrot things people tell you to think?
Let's see if you have intellectual humility.
Read the article, watch the podcast and then watch the documentary and get back to me and let's see what your position would be, as you've obviously NOT done any of your own due diligence.
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research has looked into everything plane related and is of the opinion nothing solid hit the towers, as on the slow-mo of "Flight 175" impacting the South Tower, the impact dynamics show no impact...
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
I was a mechanical engineer for about 48 years. I was not a civil engineer but I do know how structures work. The density of the steel beams in the twin towers and even in building 7 for that matter, could not have disintegrated with 1800° jutual. The physics as you have mentioned don't add up. And like you said when the physics is eliminated for one day it appears that it only applies to Jews. Larry Silverstein and his brother were fixing to make a lot of money. And I watched his interview and he was supposed to go to a dermatologist that day and I mean the guys so full of shit it's coming out of his ears. It doesn't matter he's Trump's friend. And I don't even know if the old fuck is still alive. But doesn't matter to me they're all liars. They lie until they die. The propaganda that they use to spin other people they really believe that other folks listening to their horseshit believe it. People like you myself to evidence is clear it demands a verdict and the verdict says you motherfuckers are guilty. End of subject massage no doubt I don't care if they work with the CIA it still doesn't matter they destroyed the lives of nearly 3,000 people for all we know and the whole thing was a shit show. I love arguing with these morons who think this never happened. I tell them specifically look I will chew you up like a piece of bubble gum and spit you out of my mouth. I just don't understand how they choose, they choose, to be stupid
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I can't prove this conspiracy and I'm not alone with it. But, Directed Energy Weapons, DEWs seem to be able to create very high temperatures because there should have been several hundreds feet of debris instead of the anomaly of all the lack of steel on the ground. I'm sure there are technologies unknown to most people. I'm of the opinion that AI technology has actually been in control for decades, not just the last ten or so years. I do believe that frequency is all that's needed to tap into the graphene oxide nanoparticles in our bodies to control peoples health and even brain activity. Bio weapons are very advanced now. I no longer doubt most things I read about especially with the patents controlled by DARPA and HAARP. Our very Military Industrial Complex Pentagon
The DEW that was in operation on 9/11 creates little to no heat. The whole "extreme temperatures" at ground zero was, pardon the pun, a smoke screen.
In light with you wanting to learn more and wrap your head around what actually happened on 9/11, I suggest you listen to the following presentation and then watch the documentary...
I simply stated my opinion about Silverstein and the people who deliberately didn't show up for work. The 4000° f needed to completely melt steel is a statement of fact. There should have been over 400 ft of steel if it had not been melted.
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
The "no planes" bit was the very first thing to pop-up for me, because planes don't penetrate skyscraper walls "like a hot knife through butter" Therefore, the airliners used as weapons story is obviously bogus.
WOW - so there was foreknowledge... As with the proof of insider trading and more.
That still does not prove anything.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
You moron. They are both cellulose. Even if your story is true there is no difference in the Mohs hardness scale. Empty your aluminium beer can and throw it at the fridge and see if it turns to dust. To be correct your freezer across the room has to turn to dust also.
Thank you for sharing this & I definitely will check this out later when I have time & also share it.
I’m truly so shocked & disgusted how horribly evil our government/deep state really are & how long they have been harming innocent people & duping us citizens!
I feel stupid for not being wiser sooner about everything they have been doing.
And the pentagon... what a bunch of BS. It’s impossible for a plane to fly that low and slow. And where did THAT plane go? Obviously a DEW. It’s amazing and sad to me how blind people can be. So many things throughout history never happened.
Actually the pentagon event was not a DEW (directed energy weapon), but it was an explosion coming from the area that they "renovated" just before. The video from the gas station, a set of still images in a series, is proving that. They changed and manipulated one of the images, so we must take that manipulated image out of the series. And then the remaining images show that there is an explosion by the wall, a streak of smoke going out over the lawn from the wall, and then there is the light and still black smoke coming up from the area outside the wall.
From their own material we know that there was no plane, no missile, not anything flying, no DEW (unless they had that inside of the pentagon), but there was an ordinary explosion by the wall out over the lawn.
Remember also all those pentagon staff walking on line looking for unwanted debris from the explosion. It is such a terrible thing to do if the event was real.
And the video with the "missile" hitting the pentagon is a very old stock video from a helicopter flying around the pentagon that someone has added white streak to.
I've seen the original myself. There are lots of them. Probably from the late 1970 or early 1980. At that time there was a driveway under the pentagon, it is removed now. You can see it to the right in the video.
Condemnation, without investigation is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
Well, start with the people who covered it up - The 23 NIST subcontractors that wrote reports that made up the 10 000 page NIST report - That's who Dr Wood sued in 2007.
They're part of a club most people don't know about....
The people who planned 9/11 had no problem with the massive amount of people that will potentially die at the world trade center. So, one can think that 4 planes, that was only a third full, would not bee too much extra collateral damage, no?
Now, there are major discrepancies with the alleged phone calls, as well as the passenger manifesto's as well.
Then again, if they wanted to kill them, the simpler way would've been to simply crash their planes as reported. If they're willing to fake the plane crashes, there's also a chance that at least some of the plane deaths were faked. It's also likely that they used the names of already dead people for this project.
I haven't heard about Rebekah Roth in a while, but she claims to have been a stewardess for 30 years and determined from anomalies in the phone calls that the planes were landed at an air force base with the passengers forced to make phone calls at gun point and then gassed to death, the planes recycled and their liveries wiped.
That alleged “mother” of Mark Bingham is so very creepy. She is supposed to have lost her son the day before, yet she smiles and laughs the whole way through the interview, in a horrifying way.
I agree with you! Everyone handles grief differently but that was definitely weird. Seeing this again brought back memories of the first time seeing it and I thought the same way then!
When later asked why her son did so, Alice claimed that was the way Mark would sometimes introduce himself to her and those he knew.
To me, that explanation comes off as a desperate attempt to stymie any inquiry that brings up details which are harder to explain away. But hey, what do I know?
Mom, Alice Hoglan Is "Delighted" On The Sept 12, Today Show
The duper's delight is an emotional boost, or thrill, that some people get when they successfully cheat or deceive another person or organization. (Smiling)
The rush they enjoy can lead them to repeat their dishonesty, even when there's no reward other than the high itself.
WOW - so there was foreknowledge... As with the proof of insider trading and more.
That still does not prove anything.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
I have read all the evidence and understand it however there is a flaw with the CGI planes . Tom McGuiness was the co-pilot of Flight 11 that hit the north tower who died with all his passengers. My neighbor was friends with his wife. Please look up Tom McGuiness/Portsmouth Christian Academy/Boston. There you will find the story.
If you enjoyed the article, you might want to listen to this discussion I had with 9/11 Planes Research - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
It is a long podcast, close to 3 hours, but it’s important to give it a listening to, as we go deep into the 9/11 truth movement and the re-pivot of even more disinformation and propaganda, especially when it comes to the alleged planes on 9/11.
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
Podcast: https://911revision.substack.com/p/when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives
I don't have time --today-- to do a deep dive, but you're saying that the Dr. Wood "dustification" is not true? If that's what you're saying, then how is the almost complete destruction explained? It's not DEW's? I WILL try to get back to this soon and do allll the look/see of the info! I don't believe the "story" we were given. I'd like to know the real one. Thanks.
I have no idea why you would think I'm critical of Dr Wood's work?
This must be the first article of mine that you've read?
I am a champion for what Dr Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds submitted to court in 2007.
You should listen to this presentation of mine...
Dismantling the theory of controlled demolition on 9/11
Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dismantling-the-theory-of-controlled
Oh, good! I’m glad to hear it, and I was ASKING, not thinking it to be so. I am relieved b/c I think she’s pretty awesome. I’ll try to get to your article today, but if not, remind me again, because I lose the place, doncha know. And do you agree, then, that this was maybe the first, or the first BIG, test of DEW’s?
First test of DEWS by the US military was in 1989 during the Panama Invasion.
Watch the 1992 documentary, The Panama Deception - It won an Academy Award for the excellent reporting.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
Did I ever say there were no people on the planes and that people did not die?
Truth seekers biggest blind spot is their cognitive dissonance and NOT wanting to take on points that might shatter their world view. Stop being so shortsighted and challenge yourself.
Do you even know who the companies involved with the clean up, security and writing the scientifically fraudulent 10 000 page NIST Report?
Two main companies - ARA and SAIC (of 23 in total) - What do they specialise in?
Physiological operations, weather modification and more - You should go read up on them.
You do agree that NIST Report was riddled with science fraud?
The 9/11 Commission investigation and report - That did did not even mention Building 7?
Remember when 9/11 commissioner Joe Lieberman was asked about Building 7 he said the following - "WTC 7 Did Not Happen, I Do Not Support A New 9/11 Investigation".
Do you even know of the two whistleblower cases of 2007 against NIST for science fraud or that one of these cases were filed with the US Supreme court in 2009?
When you ask ALL of the 9/11 "truthers" about these cases they ALL deny any knowledge of it. As recently as Sept 5 2023 I asked Richard Gage about these cases and he DENIED knowing about them, yet in 2011 when confronted he was talking about these cases - I have it on VIDEO - So why would he LIE?
Why would Ted Walter, International Center for 9/11 Justice (Formed Jan 2023) ALSO deny having any knowledge of these cases - This I too have on video - He worked for Richard Gage for 8 years, whilst Richard Gage was still affiliated with architects for an engineered truth.
Again I state....
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11:
1. POOR Problem solving skills
2. Group Think (Peer Pressure, running with the herd)
3. They just can't handle the implications (they wish it weren't true)
You live in a time where your perception is being managed.
Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily.
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness.
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
"People are gullible."
Speak for yourself. Not every mainstream tragedy is true. You're the epitome of what you accuse others of.
You're very funny....
I think they were talking to Bev, not to you. Bev was the one who said that quote.
People are gullible, I agree, but having spent my life surrounding aviation, I have never seen so many ‘planes’ simply vanish without a trace. Never happens. Debris everywhere.
I had a discussion with a pilot in a Telegram group and here is what he had to say:
Pilot: "Retired airline captain, 33.5 years in aviation, Icelandic"
9/11 revisionist asking questions:
Airline Captain 😳😳😳
Do I have some questions for you 😊
1. Can a plane fly at between 494 and 586 mph at 1 368 feet?
2. Can a plane doing about the same speed in question 1 and come down horizontally with the ground and slice through 5 lampposts without disintegrating or changing course?
3. Can a plane basically disappear into the ground where EVERYTHING just disintegrates in such a manner that not a chair, shoe, any luggage, or any trace of the plane can be found?
4. The link below – American Airlines flight 587 from 12 November 2001 – Is the assumptions in this video correct or false? - https://rumble.com/v4h4c7h-november-12-2001-the-crash-of-aa-flight-587-in-nyc.html
Pilot: 9/11 revisionist asked: I try to give my opinion:
1. between 494-586 mph? Aircraft FAA approved manual of the planes I have worked on has speed limits in form of Indicated airspeed at these altitudes:
757: 350 KIAS (knots indicated speed) is 402 mph.
767: 360 KIAS is 414 mph.
These speeds are maximum - unless the system has been tampered with, above these speeds you will have an aural warning very loud all the time.
It is a real distraction even for a seasoned pilot.
To answer, I think these speeds would be much above the speed when something breaks (although Jet airplanes have a built-in margin for overspeed).
2. Difficult…, let’s say aircraft weight 100 tons, I would believe that 5 lampposts collision would not alter the airplanes course (impact force) however could there be a disaster following due to damages.
3. No
4. An airplane on these speeds, banking to change course, the G-forces would, in my opinion have the airplane break up.
9/11 revisionist:
Now, the examples I was giving was the official narrative about 9/11 - and those planes on 9/11 were making insane banking manoeuvres both "planes" "hitting the towers" and if you look at the banking the "plane" that hit the Pentagon apparently sliced through the lamppost and number 3 was the "plane" that crashed at Shanksville.
Do you think an aluminium could slice through those massive steel beams?
What is your opinion on the 9/11 narrative?
Pilot:
1. you can bank an airplane and continue to bank, as if going to Roll the airplane. I believe you cannot bank the plane to make a course change unless to overstress it at these speeds.
2. insane banking manoeuvres at these speeds - NO - Breaking
3. I mean No - it would be breaking.
9/11 revisionist: Regarding the official story of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon picture:
- No sliced off pieces of the plane found.
Pilot:
- Keep in mind I have only years of experience and a simulation to these extremities would only be a calculation.
- I think cannot be simulated as of now, as just a years ago, simulators were not having enough data to be able to do simulation, e.g., full stall (before always emphasised on avoiding full stalls.
- Full stalls must be practised, whether a light plane or a jet.
9/11 revisionist: Referring to the pictures of a plain hitting a massive concrete block at over 500mp/h
- And this is what we are supposed to believe?
- An aluminium plane slicing through solid steel beams leaving a hole like the roadrunner cartoons....
Pilot: I think i am of an opinion that is like yours
9/11 revisionist:
- I really like you.
- now we just need to get into WHAT happened to the 8 buildings at the world trade centre complex.
- And that is going to warp your brain 😂😂🙈
Pilot:
- This is just the tip of the iceberg 😊
You idiot. The Jews murdered them elsewhere. Too easy.
We are not making light of it my dear - Yet, just like covid was a trauma based event, an attack on human consciousness with people outsourcing their thinking to MSM - So was 9/11.
Only when you really get stuck into the 9/11 narratives and CRITICALLY look at what you were presented with, by government and the so called 9/11 "truther" movement - Will you be able to start seeing through the bamboozle.
If you can look at covid with such a critical eye - don't you think you owe it to those who lost their lives on American soil, and the 4 million plus people in the middle east?
You should really read some of my articles or if you have 1h to spare, watch the 1h video - 9/11 The Essential Guide - It will open your eyes to how much evil was on play on 9/11.
Link: https://rumble.com/v4b3ptu-911-the-essential-guide.html
I must warn you - It is an immense mental shift and most aren't ready for it - So proceed with caution if you do decide to have your world view challenged.
After you mustered that - There is a book every person on earth should read.
Dr Judy Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
@Bev - You're the type of person who would believe in obvious propaganda such as Nariyah's testimony of Iraqi soldiers ripping innocent babies from incubators and letting them die, which is an admitted hoax. If they still sold it as real, you would swallow it up like the little sheep you are.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
No one is obligated to blindly believe the sob stories told about 9/11 and COVID-19, either. I don't feel the need to placate the feelings of the people implicated who I never even met or knew in any capacity. They're not obliged to listen to the opinions of people like myself who find their stories to be sketchy, at best. If they feel disrespected, that's their problem, not mine.
Read these two articles and listen to the podcast and Face Reality...
9/11 Planes: 3D VIPT vs Video Fakery and CGI
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-3d-volumetric-image-projection
Illusion of Reality and the 9/11 Planes
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/illusion-of-reality-and-the-911-planes
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/mark-conlon-on-there-being-no-planes-on-9-11
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
You have the nerve to call others gullible, Bev. You are the definition of it.
Bev, you need to start making peace with the fact that what you witnessed was an ILLUSION.
Adam Eisenberg was in the PentaCON on 9/11.... What didn't he see?
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
His interviews: https://rumble.com/v5jloul-adam-eisenberg-pentagon-whistleblower.html
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
Podcast: https://911revision.substack.com/p/when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives
No, I wasn't there to witness anything hit the Pentagon, and likely neither were you, Bev. And even if I did see a plane hit the building, that doesn't mean it was Flight 77. People could've really seen anything passing as a passenger jet hit the Pentagon. Only the government knows what it really was, and I feel no reason to believe they told the truth about that.
You've yet to explain anomalies such as the D.C.C. radar data showing a completely different flight path and the plane debris having never been identified via serial numbers as belonging to AA77, all of which poses serious questions for the official narrative spun about the plane. So far, the government has never cleared those loose ends up.
The only "real" evidence connecting what happened at the Pentagon with Flight 77 is the dubious forensic identification of the victims made by the government. I say dubious because human DNA cannot survive the reportedly harsh conditions inside the building for extensive periods of time.
And the stories of the people alleged to have been onboard Flight 77 aren't empirical evidence of anything, since people can make-up details about them to sell a certain narrative. The same can be said for news reports and even government publications. They're often just as reliable as any internet blog or gossip column, which is not very much. They certainly don't prove they died at the Pentagon in a plane crash.
You made your case very well.
And speaking of witnessing it first-hand, Bev, I'm sure you've read the eyewitness accounts of those who claimed to have seen the plane hit the Pentagon and the aftermath, right?
Well, I have, and they include hilarious details such as seeing people inside the plane as it flew past them at 530+ mph (impossible), it hitting the ground first before hitting the building (didn't happen), and one even claimed it cart-wheeled into the building (no physical evidence of that, either). I also know of your son, who you claim had witnessed the attack with his naked eyes. You can ask him if he also saw people inside the plane before it crashed, or any of the other details I mentioned.
There are also accounts from first responders who said they saw charred human bodies strapped onto plane seats, which is unlikely considering the plane was supposed to have turned into confetti from hitting a concrete structure at over 530 mph and human bodies aren't composed of the strongest materials known to man. They also supposedly found intact IDs from the plane, another miracle than one doesn't always come across from burning crash sites. Remember the magic passport of Satam al-Suqami at the WTC?
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
All his interviews: https://rumble.com/v5jloul-adam-eisenberg-pentagon-whistleblower.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11:
1. POOR Problem solving skills
2. Group Think (Peer Pressure, running with the herd)
3. They just can't handle the implications (they wish it weren't true)
You live in a time where your perception is being managed.
Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily.
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness.
You’re disregarding the fact the so many people saw it happen and many more on the TV. That’s not ‘Groupthink’ you fool.
On the other hand, conspiracy theorists rely on groupthink within their sub-culture. You need people who will believe anything you say without question.
Nope, I rely on the testimonies of pilots and people who can actually think.
You should really work on your critical thinking skills and even go read a physics book or two….
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
ColdAss is clearly a troll, an idiot or both. Just ban him/her/it.
Interactions like these are important.
It shows what a deeply ingrained psychological operation 9/11 was.
An attack on human consciousness. A trauma based mind control event.
It also shows you that it does not matter how much evidence you can provide to make your point, but if a person suffers from cognitive dissonance, a person will fight tooth and nail to keep their misunderstanding of events or a world view intact.
A lot of people consider themselves truth seekers, yet they are unable to change their opinions or views when presented with information that contradict their beliefs.
That is the difference between a smart person and an indoctrinated person.
We saw it play out during covid and still there are people who are vax injured, claiming their injury stems from climate change.
You fucking moron. Have you not seen Jew special effects in a movie. This very day young Elvis will be performing in Vegas in holographic form
And how do you know this to be true, Bev? Are you in touch with the families? Did you see people die in the events in person and not on your TV screen? It's possible that some people may have died and suffered injuries/illnesses as a result of the 9/11 attacks, but I don't buy the claim that almost 3,000 people died that day. There's no hard evidence proving that many people died. Remember who gave us the numbers: the same people that created the overall dubious official 9/11 narrative. The fact that many of these people don't appear in public death records or SSDI is telling, IMO. It also explains the claim that 1,100 "dead" couldn't be accounted for.
Arguing about the death numbers is irrelevant to what happened to 7 buildings.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Since when were my inquiries concerning 9/11 casualties about the buildings, anyway? It's not like I don't already know their destruction wasn't what the mainline gov't and "truther" narratives are selling them to be. And I am open to the possibility that "DEWs" might've been used to facilitate their destruction.
It's not might have that DEWs have been used....
It's an IRREFUTABLE FACT.
You sure like quoting that Lenin line. I see why.
And you seem to have no intellectual humility and you've been hoodwinked by architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage.
You have the humidity to accept you've been bamboozled by the 9/11 "truth" movement?
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defence Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
Video: https://rumble.com/v6rm9n1-nano-thermite-does-not-exist.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Questioning everything about the attacks - including the alleged casualties - is not "dishonoring" anyone's memory. In fact, I believe it's the complete opposite.
And talking to people who were allegedly there doesn't prove anything because people can lie or distort their stories. If they cannot or will not verify their claims with bona fide evidence or their narratives have too many holes in them, no one should be expected to take them seriously.
And how do you know I wasn't alive back then? You don’t know who I am. And even if I wasn't alive when it happened or paid much attention at the time, that doesn't give you the right to be so condescending to me for not believing everything they show and spew from their lying lips.
Not everything the news and the government reports and shows is the truth. I have seen my fair share of 9/11 media from mainstream and alternative networks and I don't find much of them to be credible or believable. At best, they're half-truths. And most of them seldom question the deaths reported.
But if you still want to immerse yourself in emotional stories and visuals disseminated by corporate and state propaganda outlets, be my guest. Just don't stick your schnoz in other people's business and tell them how wrong they are for not seeing things as you do, implying they're retarded children in the process.
Yet, you seem to forget about the cover up...
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
I haven't forgotten anything. Nor am I closed to any possible scenarios that you suggest.
How many of my articles from the past two years have you actually read?
Not many I assume...
The articles I did read from you are pretty interesting and compelling. Bear in mind that I've only became acquainted with your work in the past couple months, so I obviously wouldn't have read every single thing you posted in the past two years. Plus, I have a lot on my plate in my personal life, so I don't always have ample time to read your material. And I also listened to some of Judy Wood's presentations, such as this one:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dk36RllEL6VK
My working theory is that the "planes" themselves were disguised DEWs used to simulate the catastrophes that happened in New York and D.C. I'd imagine that such technology isn't limited to the form of ordinary "space lasers" ejected from satellites outside the earth's atmosphere.
I highly recommend you watch the following documentary, it’s only 1h 30 minutes.
Link: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
Also read this article.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
What kind of evidence would you accept if you won’t accept millions of eye-witnesses all describing the same thing, and hundreds of videos, and live TV footage?
What people saw, videographed and took pictures of was an ILLUSION…
Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11
Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/going-in-search-of-planes-in-nyc
Like I said, I hope you’re enjoying yourself because that’s the only benefit that could come from this. You’re wasting your life.
O, what a silly person you are.
You were looking at an illusion you fucking retard.
🎯
How few people actually get all of these things right. This ‘Stack is a rare gem.
So … is he saying the planes are holograms or something?
The ones that disappeared cleanly into buildings? Yeah, those are probably hologram-cloaked missiles.
To me this sounds like Alex jones stuff meant to discredit our narrative, I think we have plenty of evidence of Israeli involvement. People need to know about the fake elevator techs from Israel w the port authority work permits. I don’t think missiles are supported by the way the towers fell, the damage would not be even, I think you’d get an immediate toppling.
but what do I know, I’m still on JFK
The missles have nothing to do with the complete destruction of the buildings. They didn't really fall, because there was no impact, the parking garage underneath was intact and lower Manhattan didn't flood.
To me, it sounds like controlled opposition got you before you studied the forensic evidence. Shame.
Step 1 - Understand what happened to the whole WTC complex…
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
If Ryan Dawson doesn’t buy the holograph planes then neither do I. I know it was an inside job but there’s just no evidence this technology existed in 2001 or now. Not saying it’s impossible, just an occams razor situation
Ryan Dawson is an idiot and a disinformation peddler.
So, you're a follower and not a thinker?
You only parrot things people tell you to think?
Let's see if you have intellectual humility.
Read the article, watch the podcast and then watch the documentary and get back to me and let's see what your position would be, as you've obviously NOT done any of your own due diligence.
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research has looked into everything plane related and is of the opinion nothing solid hit the towers, as on the slow-mo of "Flight 175" impacting the South Tower, the impact dynamics show no impact...
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
For a better understanding of the planes, if this article wasn't clear enough for you, read the following articles and watch the podcast.
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
9/11 Planes: 3D VIPT vs Video Fakery and CGI
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-3d-volumetric-image-projection
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
I was a mechanical engineer for about 48 years. I was not a civil engineer but I do know how structures work. The density of the steel beams in the twin towers and even in building 7 for that matter, could not have disintegrated with 1800° jutual. The physics as you have mentioned don't add up. And like you said when the physics is eliminated for one day it appears that it only applies to Jews. Larry Silverstein and his brother were fixing to make a lot of money. And I watched his interview and he was supposed to go to a dermatologist that day and I mean the guys so full of shit it's coming out of his ears. It doesn't matter he's Trump's friend. And I don't even know if the old fuck is still alive. But doesn't matter to me they're all liars. They lie until they die. The propaganda that they use to spin other people they really believe that other folks listening to their horseshit believe it. People like you myself to evidence is clear it demands a verdict and the verdict says you motherfuckers are guilty. End of subject massage no doubt I don't care if they work with the CIA it still doesn't matter they destroyed the lives of nearly 3,000 people for all we know and the whole thing was a shit show. I love arguing with these morons who think this never happened. I tell them specifically look I will chew you up like a piece of bubble gum and spit you out of my mouth. I just don't understand how they choose, they choose, to be stupid
Give these articles a read through...
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Up until you defended Silverstein and his money is when you lose my respect and many others respect.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go?
I can't prove this conspiracy and I'm not alone with it. But, Directed Energy Weapons, DEWs seem to be able to create very high temperatures because there should have been several hundreds feet of debris instead of the anomaly of all the lack of steel on the ground. I'm sure there are technologies unknown to most people. I'm of the opinion that AI technology has actually been in control for decades, not just the last ten or so years. I do believe that frequency is all that's needed to tap into the graphene oxide nanoparticles in our bodies to control peoples health and even brain activity. Bio weapons are very advanced now. I no longer doubt most things I read about especially with the patents controlled by DARPA and HAARP. Our very Military Industrial Complex Pentagon
The DEW that was in operation on 9/11 creates little to no heat. The whole "extreme temperatures" at ground zero was, pardon the pun, a smoke screen.
In light with you wanting to learn more and wrap your head around what actually happened on 9/11, I suggest you listen to the following presentation and then watch the documentary...
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
I simply stated my opinion about Silverstein and the people who deliberately didn't show up for work. The 4000° f needed to completely melt steel is a statement of fact. There should have been over 400 ft of steel if it had not been melted.
9/11 Evidence presented by Prof David A. Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
No one defends Silverstein. He has nothing to do with the physics.
The "no planes" bit was the very first thing to pop-up for me, because planes don't penetrate skyscraper walls "like a hot knife through butter" Therefore, the airliners used as weapons story is obviously bogus.
Except that we all saw it happen.
On TV
So it must be real
We all?
And millions of eye-witnesses.
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
What the fuck? You have seen a movie before haven’t you?
What part of advanced hologram technology is difficult to understand?
Hologram just like project bluebeam
https://substack.com/@anonymousmediagroup/note/c-120537127?r=1n82mw
WOW - so there was foreknowledge... As with the proof of insider trading and more.
That still does not prove anything.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Hardly an intelligent opinion for straws penetrate plywood in hurricanes...!
You moron. They are both cellulose. Even if your story is true there is no difference in the Mohs hardness scale. Empty your aluminium beer can and throw it at the fridge and see if it turns to dust. To be correct your freezer across the room has to turn to dust also.
Thank you for sharing this info, truly appreciate it.
HI Sheila - You might want to have a look at the presentation I did recently
Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives
Thank you for sharing this & I definitely will check this out later when I have time & also share it.
I’m truly so shocked & disgusted how horribly evil our government/deep state really are & how long they have been harming innocent people & duping us citizens!
I feel stupid for not being wiser sooner about everything they have been doing.
Thanx again❣️
And the pentagon... what a bunch of BS. It’s impossible for a plane to fly that low and slow. And where did THAT plane go? Obviously a DEW. It’s amazing and sad to me how blind people can be. So many things throughout history never happened.
Check out my article on the PentaCon as well as the "Phantom warfare" article...
Actually the pentagon event was not a DEW (directed energy weapon), but it was an explosion coming from the area that they "renovated" just before. The video from the gas station, a set of still images in a series, is proving that. They changed and manipulated one of the images, so we must take that manipulated image out of the series. And then the remaining images show that there is an explosion by the wall, a streak of smoke going out over the lawn from the wall, and then there is the light and still black smoke coming up from the area outside the wall.
From their own material we know that there was no plane, no missile, not anything flying, no DEW (unless they had that inside of the pentagon), but there was an ordinary explosion by the wall out over the lawn.
Remember also all those pentagon staff walking on line looking for unwanted debris from the explosion. It is such a terrible thing to do if the event was real.
I take it you've yet to read my PentaCon article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Will do.
By the way, here is a link to the explosion by the wall video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpnIaxHgj1Q
And the video with the "missile" hitting the pentagon is a very old stock video from a helicopter flying around the pentagon that someone has added white streak to.
I've seen the original myself. There are lots of them. Probably from the late 1970 or early 1980. At that time there was a driveway under the pentagon, it is removed now. You can see it to the right in the video.
Please read my PentaCon article.... https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
And this one: https://911revision.substack.com/p/my-last-911-plane-article-promise
Then explain the fluctuation of the earth's magnetic field for all 7 events on 9/11...
Where did it go? It hit the Pentagon.
Seems this whole article went over your head...
The PentaCon on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
No it didn’t because I didn’t read it.
You’re not a good source of information. Every link you post is bollocks. Ever hear of Occam’s razor?
Condemnation, without investigation is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
All his interviews here: https://rumble.com/v5jloul-adam-eisenberg-pentagon-whistleblower.html
No it didn’t you fucking moron. You don’t even have a photo of that
"Don't step on wing". So damn fragile.
Dr. Wood is a BADASS.
Holy endeavor finding the truth, who did this
Who dunnit?
Well, start with the people who covered it up - The 23 NIST subcontractors that wrote reports that made up the 10 000 page NIST report - That's who Dr Wood sued in 2007.
They're part of a club most people don't know about....
D.E.P.S.
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
So what happened to the people who were on the planes? Were they all just gathered up and eliminated?
The people who planned 9/11 had no problem with the massive amount of people that will potentially die at the world trade center. So, one can think that 4 planes, that was only a third full, would not bee too much extra collateral damage, no?
Now, there are major discrepancies with the alleged phone calls, as well as the passenger manifesto's as well.
It is thoroughly discussed here: https://rumble.com/v516cko-911-plane-passenger-lists-and-phone-calls.html
Then again, if they wanted to kill them, the simpler way would've been to simply crash their planes as reported. If they're willing to fake the plane crashes, there's also a chance that at least some of the plane deaths were faked. It's also likely that they used the names of already dead people for this project.
I haven't heard about Rebekah Roth in a while, but she claims to have been a stewardess for 30 years and determined from anomalies in the phone calls that the planes were landed at an air force base with the passengers forced to make phone calls at gun point and then gassed to death, the planes recycled and their liveries wiped.
Please go read this substack and you'll find that there are serious issues with what Rebekah Roth is pushing...
9/11 Planes Research
Link: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
They were murdered elsewhere. Jesus Christ what is wrong with you? All the Jews had to do to murder them was to fly high and depressurise the cabins
Your black pill jew issue makes you seem really mentally unstable.
That alleged “mother” of Mark Bingham is so very creepy. She is supposed to have lost her son the day before, yet she smiles and laughs the whole way through the interview, in a horrifying way.
I agree with you! Everyone handles grief differently but that was definitely weird. Seeing this again brought back memories of the first time seeing it and I thought the same way then!
Yes! And whoever introduces themselves to their own mother using their full name? Loll
When later asked why her son did so, Alice claimed that was the way Mark would sometimes introduce himself to her and those he knew.
To me, that explanation comes off as a desperate attempt to stymie any inquiry that brings up details which are harder to explain away. But hey, what do I know?
Mark Conlon, 9/11 Planes Research has delved into Mark Bingham a bit...
Did Mark Bingham Board United 93?
An Independent Investigation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/did-mark-bingham-board-united-93
Who is Gerald "Mark" Bingham?
An Independent Investigation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/who-is-gerald-mark-bingham
My videos on Mark's mom;
Mom, Alice Hoglan Is "Delighted" On The Sept 12, Today Show
The duper's delight is an emotional boost, or thrill, that some people get when they successfully cheat or deceive another person or organization. (Smiling)
The rush they enjoy can lead them to repeat their dishonesty, even when there's no reward other than the high itself.
Link: https://rumble.com/v4rvzpe-flight-93-shanksville-mark-binghams-mom.html
~al jebr~
(the reunion of fragments)
The patriots haven’t sussed it yet
But embusques’ smirk on their TV Sets
Was the missing piece of the jigsaw jets:
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
Podcast: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-truth-movement-planes-propaganda
Here is some more fuel for you.
By Dr Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds ...the people who originally filled a Qui Tam against NIST for their fraudulent 911 official investigation.
nomoregames.net
www.drjudywood.com
Thanx. Here are the direct links to their cases…
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/where-did-the-towers-go-by-dr-judy-wood/
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:
1. 9/11 Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
Aye...the evidence is overwhelming, but the average punter has not the deductive ability or the courage to deal with it.
She was a path breaker. But really she was a Jew nuclear denialist. That’s where her head was at
"A Jew nuclear denialist" ...What do you mean?
This Greame bird Guy is mentally unstable...
100% an inside job, but what does that say about the power certain groups of people have over us? Frightening.
You need to listen to this….
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
Podcast: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-truth-movement-planes-propaganda
https://substack.com/@anonymousmediagroup/note/c-120537127?r=1n82mw
WOW - so there was foreknowledge... As with the proof of insider trading and more.
That still does not prove anything.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Hopefully you’re enjoying yourself because otherwise you’re wasting your life.
You seem to struggle, like so many others....
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
No no. The issue is you are a moron. Deep state attacks almost always involve magicians tricks
There were no planes. It was all CGI.
I have read all the evidence and understand it however there is a flaw with the CGI planes . Tom McGuiness was the co-pilot of Flight 11 that hit the north tower who died with all his passengers. My neighbor was friends with his wife. Please look up Tom McGuiness/Portsmouth Christian Academy/Boston. There you will find the story.
CGI is a cover story to keep people away from realising the “planes” people saw were 3D Volumetric Projection Technology…
The the people and the planes were collateral damage.
What do you think they did with the people? I did see that they possibly gassed the people??
One can only speculate...
What we do know, the alleged calls are impossible. The flight dynamics are impossible. The crash dynamics are impossible.
Give this podcast with 9/11 Planes Research and I, a listening to.
We cover all of your questions.
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
Podcast: https://911revision.substack.com/p/when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives
Ok thank you
Um, no - CGI was another level of the cover up of the 3D Volumetric Projection Technology in play... Here, go read this and listen to the podcast...
9/11 Planes: 3D VIPT vs Video Fakery and CGI
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-3d-volumetric-image-projection
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
Maybe CGI. But as the years have gone by the hologram theory keeps getting better.
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911