It is a long podcast, close to 3 hours, but it’s important to give it a listening to, as we go deep into the 9/11 truth movement and the re-pivot of even more disinformation and propaganda, especially when it comes to the alleged planes on 9/11.
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
I don't have time --today-- to do a deep dive, but you're saying that the Dr. Wood "dustification" is not true? If that's what you're saying, then how is the almost complete destruction explained? It's not DEW's? I WILL try to get back to this soon and do allll the look/see of the info! I don't believe the "story" we were given. I'd like to know the real one. Thanks.
Oh, good! I’m glad to hear it, and I was ASKING, not thinking it to be so. I am relieved b/c I think she’s pretty awesome. I’ll try to get to your article today, but if not, remind me again, because I lose the place, doncha know. And do you agree, then, that this was maybe the first, or the first BIG, test of DEW’s?
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A. Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
(Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
1. None of the alleged planes hit their alleged targets.
2. All the alleged planes were still airborne after they allegedly crashed.
3. The flight dynamics and impact dynamics do not match for real planes hitting any target.
4. It's provable that there was no video fakery, or CGI involved.
5. It's provable that what people saw in the sky was 3D Volumetric Projection Tech (Project Blue Beam).
6. The Towers were turned to dust before they even reached the ground.
7. No bombs, thermite or nukes were in play.
8. ALL seven buildings with a WTC prefix were effected and destroyed.
9. Building 7 was NOT a conventional controlled demolition.
10. NIST and it's subcontractors were covering up the DEW evidence
11. The 9/11 "truth" movement and their talking heads are covering up DEW on 9/11
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
People are gullible, I agree, but having spent my life surrounding aviation, I have never seen so many ‘planes’ simply vanish without a trace. Never happens. Debris everywhere.
I had a discussion with a pilot in a Telegram group and here is what he had to say:
Pilot: "Retired airline captain, 33.5 years in aviation, Icelandic"
9/11 revisionist asking questions:
Airline Captain 😳😳😳
Do I have some questions for you 😊
1. Can a plane fly at between 494 and 586 mph at 1 368 feet?
2. Can a plane doing about the same speed in question 1 and come down horizontally with the ground and slice through 5 lampposts without disintegrating or changing course?
3. Can a plane basically disappear into the ground where EVERYTHING just disintegrates in such a manner that not a chair, shoe, any luggage, or any trace of the plane can be found?
Pilot: 9/11 revisionist asked: I try to give my opinion:
1. between 494-586 mph? Aircraft FAA approved manual of the planes I have worked on has speed limits in form of Indicated airspeed at these altitudes:
757: 350 KIAS (knots indicated speed) is 402 mph.
767: 360 KIAS is 414 mph.
These speeds are maximum - unless the system has been tampered with, above these speeds you will have an aural warning very loud all the time.
It is a real distraction even for a seasoned pilot.
To answer, I think these speeds would be much above the speed when something breaks (although Jet airplanes have a built-in margin for overspeed).
2. Difficult…, let’s say aircraft weight 100 tons, I would believe that 5 lampposts collision would not alter the airplanes course (impact force) however could there be a disaster following due to damages.
3. No
4. An airplane on these speeds, banking to change course, the G-forces would, in my opinion have the airplane break up.
9/11 revisionist:
Now, the examples I was giving was the official narrative about 9/11 - and those planes on 9/11 were making insane banking manoeuvres both "planes" "hitting the towers" and if you look at the banking the "plane" that hit the Pentagon apparently sliced through the lamppost and number 3 was the "plane" that crashed at Shanksville.
Do you think an aluminium could slice through those massive steel beams?
What is your opinion on the 9/11 narrative?
Pilot:
1. you can bank an airplane and continue to bank, as if going to Roll the airplane. I believe you cannot bank the plane to make a course change unless to overstress it at these speeds.
2. insane banking manoeuvres at these speeds - NO - Breaking
3. I mean No - it would be breaking.
9/11 revisionist: Regarding the official story of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon picture:
- No sliced off pieces of the plane found.
Pilot:
- Keep in mind I have only years of experience and a simulation to these extremities would only be a calculation.
- I think cannot be simulated as of now, as just a years ago, simulators were not having enough data to be able to do simulation, e.g., full stall (before always emphasised on avoiding full stalls.
- Full stalls must be practised, whether a light plane or a jet.
9/11 revisionist: Referring to the pictures of a plain hitting a massive concrete block at over 500mp/h
- And this is what we are supposed to believe?
- An aluminium plane slicing through solid steel beams leaving a hole like the roadrunner cartoons....
Pilot: I think i am of an opinion that is like yours
9/11 revisionist:
- I really like you.
- now we just need to get into WHAT happened to the 8 buildings at the world trade centre complex.
We are not making light of it my dear - Yet, just like covid was a trauma based event, an attack on human consciousness with people outsourcing their thinking to MSM - So was 9/11.
Only when you really get stuck into the 9/11 narratives and CRITICALLY look at what you were presented with, by government and the so called 9/11 "truther" movement - Will you be able to start seeing through the bamboozle.
If you can look at covid with such a critical eye - don't you think you owe it to those who lost their lives on American soil, and the 4 million plus people in the middle east?
You should really read some of my articles or if you have 1h to spare, watch the 1h video - 9/11 The Essential Guide - It will open your eyes to how much evil was on play on 9/11.
I must warn you - It is an immense mental shift and most aren't ready for it - So proceed with caution if you do decide to have your world view challenged.
After you mustered that - There is a book every person on earth should read.
@Bev - You're the type of person who would believe in obvious propaganda such as Nariyah's testimony of Iraqi soldiers ripping innocent babies from incubators and letting them die, which is an admitted hoax. If they still sold it as real, you would swallow it up like the little sheep you are.
No one is obligated to blindly believe the sob stories told about 9/11 and COVID-19, either. I don't feel the need to placate the feelings of the people implicated who I never even met or knew in any capacity. They're not obliged to listen to the opinions of people like myself who find their stories to be sketchy, at best. If they feel disrespected, that's their problem, not mine.
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
Bev, you need to start making peace with the fact that what you witnessed was an ILLUSION.
Adam Eisenberg was in the PentaCON on 9/11.... What didn't he see?
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defence Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
It shows what a deeply ingrained psychological operation 9/11 was.
An attack on human consciousness. A trauma based mind control event.
It also shows you that it does not matter how much evidence you can provide to make your point, but if a person suffers from cognitive dissonance, a person will fight tooth and nail to keep their misunderstanding of events or a world view intact.
A lot of people consider themselves truth seekers, yet they are unable to change their opinions or views when presented with information that contradict their beliefs.
That is the difference between a smart person and an indoctrinated person.
We saw it play out during covid and still there are people who are vax injured, claiming their injury stems from climate change.
WOW - so there was foreknowledge... As with the proof of insider trading and more.
That still does not prove anything.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
To me this sounds like Alex jones stuff meant to discredit our narrative, I think we have plenty of evidence of Israeli involvement. People need to know about the fake elevator techs from Israel w the port authority work permits. I don’t think missiles are supported by the way the towers fell, the damage would not be even, I think you’d get an immediate toppling.
The missles have nothing to do with the complete destruction of the buildings. They didn't really fall, because there was no impact, the parking garage underneath was intact and lower Manhattan didn't flood.
To me, it sounds like controlled opposition got you before you studied the forensic evidence. Shame.
Step 1 - Understand what happened to the whole WTC complex…
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
If Ryan Dawson doesn’t buy the holograph planes then neither do I. I know it was an inside job but there’s just no evidence this technology existed in 2001 or now. Not saying it’s impossible, just an occams razor situation
Ryan Dawson is an idiot and a disinformation peddler.
So, you're a follower and not a thinker?
You only parrot things people tell you to think?
Let's see if you have intellectual humility.
Read the article, watch the podcast and then watch the documentary and get back to me and let's see what your position would be, as you've obviously NOT done any of your own due diligence.
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research has looked into everything plane related and is of the opinion nothing solid hit the towers, as on the slow-mo of "Flight 175" impacting the South Tower, the impact dynamics show no impact...
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Think bout it this way. - Do you think the perps that planned 9/11, who knew THOUSANDS would be killed at the WTC, would care about an extra 200 or so people on 4 planes that weren't even a quester full?
Same for those killed at the PentaCON.
There is a popular term used during "war" - Collateral damage.
We DO know that they never made it home.
It still does not change the fact of what happened at the WTC, as the tech on display to molecularly disintegrate two 110 Story buildings and most of the buildings with a WTC prefix, needed a cover story for the show that was put on for those in the know.
I was a mechanical engineer for about 48 years. I was not a civil engineer but I do know how structures work. The density of the steel beams in the twin towers and even in building 7 for that matter, could not have disintegrated with 1800° jutual. The physics as you have mentioned don't add up. And like you said when the physics is eliminated for one day it appears that it only applies to Jews. Larry Silverstein and his brother were fixing to make a lot of money. And I watched his interview and he was supposed to go to a dermatologist that day and I mean the guys so full of shit it's coming out of his ears. It doesn't matter he's Trump's friend. And I don't even know if the old fuck is still alive. But doesn't matter to me they're all liars. They lie until they die. The propaganda that they use to spin other people they really believe that other folks listening to their horseshit believe it. People like you myself to evidence is clear it demands a verdict and the verdict says you motherfuckers are guilty. End of subject massage no doubt I don't care if they work with the CIA it still doesn't matter they destroyed the lives of nearly 3,000 people for all we know and the whole thing was a shit show. I love arguing with these morons who think this never happened. I tell them specifically look I will chew you up like a piece of bubble gum and spit you out of my mouth. I just don't understand how they choose, they choose, to be stupid
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I can't prove this conspiracy and I'm not alone with it. But, Directed Energy Weapons, DEWs seem to be able to create very high temperatures because there should have been several hundreds feet of debris instead of the anomaly of all the lack of steel on the ground. I'm sure there are technologies unknown to most people. I'm of the opinion that AI technology has actually been in control for decades, not just the last ten or so years. I do believe that frequency is all that's needed to tap into the graphene oxide nanoparticles in our bodies to control peoples health and even brain activity. Bio weapons are very advanced now. I no longer doubt most things I read about especially with the patents controlled by DARPA and HAARP. Our very Military Industrial Complex Pentagon
The DEW that was in operation on 9/11 creates little to no heat. The whole "extreme temperatures" at ground zero was, pardon the pun, a smoke screen.
In light with you wanting to learn more and wrap your head around what actually happened on 9/11, I suggest you listen to the following presentation and then watch the documentary...
I simply stated my opinion about Silverstein and the people who deliberately didn't show up for work. The 4000° f needed to completely melt steel is a statement of fact. There should have been over 400 ft of steel if it had not been melted.
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Exactly. So far, this Substack has it all correct to the best of my ability to see through the layers of bullsh*t myself. Fantastic source of photo and video evidence and discussions.
This is a hugely important concept that needs to be spread widely. In some other contexts, I've heard this concept referred to as the "Patriot Pacification Project." "The white hats are working on this." "Q is working on this." "Trump and 5D chess is working on this." "A law is going to be passed 'soon' that will revert our currency to metals-backed, and all kinds of good things will prevail -- 'just wait.'"
Thank you for sharing this & I definitely will check this out later when I have time & also share it.
I’m truly so shocked & disgusted how horribly evil our government/deep state really are & how long they have been harming innocent people & duping us citizens!
I feel stupid for not being wiser sooner about everything they have been doing.
And the pentagon... what a bunch of BS. It’s impossible for a plane to fly that low and slow. And where did THAT plane go? Obviously a DEW. It’s amazing and sad to me how blind people can be. So many things throughout history never happened.
Condemnation, without investigation is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
Actually the pentagon event was not a DEW (directed energy weapon), but it was an explosion coming from the area that they "renovated" just before. The video from the gas station, a set of still images in a series, is proving that. They changed and manipulated one of the images, so we must take that manipulated image out of the series. And then the remaining images show that there is an explosion by the wall, a streak of smoke going out over the lawn from the wall, and then there is the light and still black smoke coming up from the area outside the wall.
From their own material we know that there was no plane, no missile, not anything flying, no DEW (unless they had that inside of the pentagon), but there was an ordinary explosion by the wall out over the lawn.
Remember also all those pentagon staff walking on line looking for unwanted debris from the explosion. It is such a terrible thing to do if the event was real.
And the video with the "missile" hitting the pentagon is a very old stock video from a helicopter flying around the pentagon that someone has added white streak to.
I've seen the original myself. There are lots of them. Probably from the late 1970 or early 1980. At that time there was a driveway under the pentagon, it is removed now. You can see it to the right in the video.
If you enjoyed the article, you might want to listen to this discussion I had with 9/11 Planes Research - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
It is a long podcast, close to 3 hours, but it’s important to give it a listening to, as we go deep into the 9/11 truth movement and the re-pivot of even more disinformation and propaganda, especially when it comes to the alleged planes on 9/11.
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
Podcast: https://911revision.substack.com/p/when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives
I don't have time --today-- to do a deep dive, but you're saying that the Dr. Wood "dustification" is not true? If that's what you're saying, then how is the almost complete destruction explained? It's not DEW's? I WILL try to get back to this soon and do allll the look/see of the info! I don't believe the "story" we were given. I'd like to know the real one. Thanks.
I have no idea why you would think I'm critical of Dr Wood's work?
This must be the first article of mine that you've read?
I am a champion for what Dr Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds submitted to court in 2007.
You should listen to this presentation of mine...
Dismantling the theory of controlled demolition on 9/11
Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dismantling-the-theory-of-controlled
Oh, good! I’m glad to hear it, and I was ASKING, not thinking it to be so. I am relieved b/c I think she’s pretty awesome. I’ll try to get to your article today, but if not, remind me again, because I lose the place, doncha know. And do you agree, then, that this was maybe the first, or the first BIG, test of DEW’s?
First test of DEWS by the US military was in 1989 during the Panama Invasion.
Watch the 1992 documentary, The Panama Deception - It won an Academy Award for the excellent reporting.
Have you ever heard of DEPS?
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
The 9/11 TRUTH vs Stand-Down PSY-OPS
Make people believe that someone or some group external to themselves is going to "save" or "rescue" them
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-truth-vs-stand-down-psy-ops
You need to approach 9/11 with intellectual humility, otherwise you keep on staying stuck and you won't realise the black ops tech in play on the day;
Here is some homework to help you deepen your understanding;
Why Ace Baker's Video Fakery Compositing Theory Is Invalid
Independent Analysis of Ace Baker's Video Compositing Theory
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/why-ace-bakers-video-fakery-compositing
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
You need to listen to the following podcast with https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A. Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
O, dear - You've been drinking the deep state's coolaid served to you by the architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage.
You do know that the organisation and Richard Gage are cointelpro agents?
I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone
Link: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
Anatomy of a 9/11 Thermite Brainwashing Operation
I recently discovered the existence of an e-book from 2010
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-911-thermite-brainwashing
What came to your inbox? This article was written in 2023.
The only way you'd receive emails, is if you subscribed to this substack.
You comment makes no sense.
DEMedia is Propaganda, to whom is your comment directed to?
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
Nukes - The distraction behind door no 3
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
(Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
1. None of the alleged planes hit their alleged targets.
2. All the alleged planes were still airborne after they allegedly crashed.
3. The flight dynamics and impact dynamics do not match for real planes hitting any target.
4. It's provable that there was no video fakery, or CGI involved.
5. It's provable that what people saw in the sky was 3D Volumetric Projection Tech (Project Blue Beam).
6. The Towers were turned to dust before they even reached the ground.
7. No bombs, thermite or nukes were in play.
8. ALL seven buildings with a WTC prefix were effected and destroyed.
9. Building 7 was NOT a conventional controlled demolition.
10. NIST and it's subcontractors were covering up the DEW evidence
11. The 9/11 "truth" movement and their talking heads are covering up DEW on 9/11
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
Your crash course in understanding all 3 sites on 9/11:
9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
You seem to struggle, like so many others....
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
"People are gullible."
Speak for yourself. Not every mainstream tragedy is true. You're the epitome of what you accuse others of.
You're very funny....
People are gullible, I agree, but having spent my life surrounding aviation, I have never seen so many ‘planes’ simply vanish without a trace. Never happens. Debris everywhere.
I had a discussion with a pilot in a Telegram group and here is what he had to say:
Pilot: "Retired airline captain, 33.5 years in aviation, Icelandic"
9/11 revisionist asking questions:
Airline Captain 😳😳😳
Do I have some questions for you 😊
1. Can a plane fly at between 494 and 586 mph at 1 368 feet?
2. Can a plane doing about the same speed in question 1 and come down horizontally with the ground and slice through 5 lampposts without disintegrating or changing course?
3. Can a plane basically disappear into the ground where EVERYTHING just disintegrates in such a manner that not a chair, shoe, any luggage, or any trace of the plane can be found?
4. The link below – American Airlines flight 587 from 12 November 2001 – Is the assumptions in this video correct or false? - https://rumble.com/v4h4c7h-november-12-2001-the-crash-of-aa-flight-587-in-nyc.html
Pilot: 9/11 revisionist asked: I try to give my opinion:
1. between 494-586 mph? Aircraft FAA approved manual of the planes I have worked on has speed limits in form of Indicated airspeed at these altitudes:
757: 350 KIAS (knots indicated speed) is 402 mph.
767: 360 KIAS is 414 mph.
These speeds are maximum - unless the system has been tampered with, above these speeds you will have an aural warning very loud all the time.
It is a real distraction even for a seasoned pilot.
To answer, I think these speeds would be much above the speed when something breaks (although Jet airplanes have a built-in margin for overspeed).
2. Difficult…, let’s say aircraft weight 100 tons, I would believe that 5 lampposts collision would not alter the airplanes course (impact force) however could there be a disaster following due to damages.
3. No
4. An airplane on these speeds, banking to change course, the G-forces would, in my opinion have the airplane break up.
9/11 revisionist:
Now, the examples I was giving was the official narrative about 9/11 - and those planes on 9/11 were making insane banking manoeuvres both "planes" "hitting the towers" and if you look at the banking the "plane" that hit the Pentagon apparently sliced through the lamppost and number 3 was the "plane" that crashed at Shanksville.
Do you think an aluminium could slice through those massive steel beams?
What is your opinion on the 9/11 narrative?
Pilot:
1. you can bank an airplane and continue to bank, as if going to Roll the airplane. I believe you cannot bank the plane to make a course change unless to overstress it at these speeds.
2. insane banking manoeuvres at these speeds - NO - Breaking
3. I mean No - it would be breaking.
9/11 revisionist: Regarding the official story of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon picture:
- No sliced off pieces of the plane found.
Pilot:
- Keep in mind I have only years of experience and a simulation to these extremities would only be a calculation.
- I think cannot be simulated as of now, as just a years ago, simulators were not having enough data to be able to do simulation, e.g., full stall (before always emphasised on avoiding full stalls.
- Full stalls must be practised, whether a light plane or a jet.
9/11 revisionist: Referring to the pictures of a plain hitting a massive concrete block at over 500mp/h
- And this is what we are supposed to believe?
- An aluminium plane slicing through solid steel beams leaving a hole like the roadrunner cartoons....
Pilot: I think i am of an opinion that is like yours
9/11 revisionist:
- I really like you.
- now we just need to get into WHAT happened to the 8 buildings at the world trade centre complex.
- And that is going to warp your brain 😂😂🙈
Pilot:
- This is just the tip of the iceberg 😊
We are not making light of it my dear - Yet, just like covid was a trauma based event, an attack on human consciousness with people outsourcing their thinking to MSM - So was 9/11.
Only when you really get stuck into the 9/11 narratives and CRITICALLY look at what you were presented with, by government and the so called 9/11 "truther" movement - Will you be able to start seeing through the bamboozle.
If you can look at covid with such a critical eye - don't you think you owe it to those who lost their lives on American soil, and the 4 million plus people in the middle east?
You should really read some of my articles or if you have 1h to spare, watch the 1h video - 9/11 The Essential Guide - It will open your eyes to how much evil was on play on 9/11.
Link: https://rumble.com/v4b3ptu-911-the-essential-guide.html
I must warn you - It is an immense mental shift and most aren't ready for it - So proceed with caution if you do decide to have your world view challenged.
After you mustered that - There is a book every person on earth should read.
Dr Judy Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
@Bev - You're the type of person who would believe in obvious propaganda such as Nariyah's testimony of Iraqi soldiers ripping innocent babies from incubators and letting them die, which is an admitted hoax. If they still sold it as real, you would swallow it up like the little sheep you are.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
No one is obligated to blindly believe the sob stories told about 9/11 and COVID-19, either. I don't feel the need to placate the feelings of the people implicated who I never even met or knew in any capacity. They're not obliged to listen to the opinions of people like myself who find their stories to be sketchy, at best. If they feel disrespected, that's their problem, not mine.
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
All his interviews: https://rumble.com/v5jloul-adam-eisenberg-pentagon-whistleblower.html
You made your case very well.
Bev, you need to start making peace with the fact that what you witnessed was an ILLUSION.
Adam Eisenberg was in the PentaCON on 9/11.... What didn't he see?
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
His interviews: https://rumble.com/v5jloul-adam-eisenberg-pentagon-whistleblower.html
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
Getting The 9/11 Truther Plane Propaganda In Focus
Podcast: https://911revision.substack.com/p/when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives
Read these two articles and listen to the podcast and Face Reality...
9/11 Planes: 3D VIPT vs Video Fakery and CGI
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-3d-volumetric-image-projection
Illusion of Reality and the 9/11 Planes
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/illusion-of-reality-and-the-911-planes
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/mark-conlon-on-there-being-no-planes-on-9-11
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
What people saw, videographed and took pictures of was an ILLUSION…
Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11
Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/going-in-search-of-planes-in-nyc
O, what a silly person you are.
Yet, you seem to forget about the cover up...
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
How many of my articles from the past two years have you actually read?
Not many I assume...
I highly recommend you watch the following documentary, it’s only 1h 30 minutes.
Link: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
Also read this article.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Arguing about the death numbers is irrelevant to what happened to 7 buildings.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
It's not might have that DEWs have been used....
It's an IRREFUTABLE FACT.
You sure like quoting that Lenin line. I see why.
And you seem to have no intellectual humility and you've been hoodwinked by architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage.
You have the humidity to accept you've been bamboozled by the 9/11 "truth" movement?
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defence Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
Video: https://rumble.com/v6rm9n1-nano-thermite-does-not-exist.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11:
1. POOR Problem solving skills
2. Group Think (Peer Pressure, running with the herd)
3. They just can't handle the implications (they wish it weren't true)
You live in a time where your perception is being managed.
Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily.
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness.
Nope, I rely on the testimonies of pilots and people who can actually think.
You should really work on your critical thinking skills and even go read a physics book or two….
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
ColdAss is clearly a troll, an idiot or both. Just ban him/her/it.
Interactions like these are important.
It shows what a deeply ingrained psychological operation 9/11 was.
An attack on human consciousness. A trauma based mind control event.
It also shows you that it does not matter how much evidence you can provide to make your point, but if a person suffers from cognitive dissonance, a person will fight tooth and nail to keep their misunderstanding of events or a world view intact.
A lot of people consider themselves truth seekers, yet they are unable to change their opinions or views when presented with information that contradict their beliefs.
That is the difference between a smart person and an indoctrinated person.
We saw it play out during covid and still there are people who are vax injured, claiming their injury stems from climate change.
On TV
So it must be real
We all?
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
Hologram just like project bluebeam
https://substack.com/@anonymousmediagroup/note/c-120537127?r=1n82mw
WOW - so there was foreknowledge... As with the proof of insider trading and more.
That still does not prove anything.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Hardly an intelligent opinion for straws penetrate plywood in hurricanes...!
🎯
How few people actually get all of these things right. This ‘Stack is a rare gem.
So … is he saying the planes are holograms or something?
The ones that disappeared cleanly into buildings? Yeah, those are probably hologram-cloaked missiles.
To me this sounds like Alex jones stuff meant to discredit our narrative, I think we have plenty of evidence of Israeli involvement. People need to know about the fake elevator techs from Israel w the port authority work permits. I don’t think missiles are supported by the way the towers fell, the damage would not be even, I think you’d get an immediate toppling.
but what do I know, I’m still on JFK
The missles have nothing to do with the complete destruction of the buildings. They didn't really fall, because there was no impact, the parking garage underneath was intact and lower Manhattan didn't flood.
To me, it sounds like controlled opposition got you before you studied the forensic evidence. Shame.
Step 1 - Understand what happened to the whole WTC complex…
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
If Ryan Dawson doesn’t buy the holograph planes then neither do I. I know it was an inside job but there’s just no evidence this technology existed in 2001 or now. Not saying it’s impossible, just an occams razor situation
Ryan Dawson is an idiot and a disinformation peddler.
So, you're a follower and not a thinker?
You only parrot things people tell you to think?
Let's see if you have intellectual humility.
Read the article, watch the podcast and then watch the documentary and get back to me and let's see what your position would be, as you've obviously NOT done any of your own due diligence.
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research has looked into everything plane related and is of the opinion nothing solid hit the towers, as on the slow-mo of "Flight 175" impacting the South Tower, the impact dynamics show no impact...
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
Do you have any information about what happened to the real planes/passengers since they obviously didn’t crash as propagandized?
Think bout it this way. - Do you think the perps that planned 9/11, who knew THOUSANDS would be killed at the WTC, would care about an extra 200 or so people on 4 planes that weren't even a quester full?
Same for those killed at the PentaCON.
There is a popular term used during "war" - Collateral damage.
We DO know that they never made it home.
It still does not change the fact of what happened at the WTC, as the tech on display to molecularly disintegrate two 110 Story buildings and most of the buildings with a WTC prefix, needed a cover story for the show that was put on for those in the know.
For a better understanding of the planes, if this article wasn't clear enough for you, read the following articles and watch the podcast.
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
9/11 Planes: 3D VIPT vs Video Fakery and CGI
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-3d-volumetric-image-projection
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
I was a mechanical engineer for about 48 years. I was not a civil engineer but I do know how structures work. The density of the steel beams in the twin towers and even in building 7 for that matter, could not have disintegrated with 1800° jutual. The physics as you have mentioned don't add up. And like you said when the physics is eliminated for one day it appears that it only applies to Jews. Larry Silverstein and his brother were fixing to make a lot of money. And I watched his interview and he was supposed to go to a dermatologist that day and I mean the guys so full of shit it's coming out of his ears. It doesn't matter he's Trump's friend. And I don't even know if the old fuck is still alive. But doesn't matter to me they're all liars. They lie until they die. The propaganda that they use to spin other people they really believe that other folks listening to their horseshit believe it. People like you myself to evidence is clear it demands a verdict and the verdict says you motherfuckers are guilty. End of subject massage no doubt I don't care if they work with the CIA it still doesn't matter they destroyed the lives of nearly 3,000 people for all we know and the whole thing was a shit show. I love arguing with these morons who think this never happened. I tell them specifically look I will chew you up like a piece of bubble gum and spit you out of my mouth. I just don't understand how they choose, they choose, to be stupid
Give these articles a read through...
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Up until you defended Silverstein and his money is when you lose my respect and many others respect.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go?
I can't prove this conspiracy and I'm not alone with it. But, Directed Energy Weapons, DEWs seem to be able to create very high temperatures because there should have been several hundreds feet of debris instead of the anomaly of all the lack of steel on the ground. I'm sure there are technologies unknown to most people. I'm of the opinion that AI technology has actually been in control for decades, not just the last ten or so years. I do believe that frequency is all that's needed to tap into the graphene oxide nanoparticles in our bodies to control peoples health and even brain activity. Bio weapons are very advanced now. I no longer doubt most things I read about especially with the patents controlled by DARPA and HAARP. Our very Military Industrial Complex Pentagon
The DEW that was in operation on 9/11 creates little to no heat. The whole "extreme temperatures" at ground zero was, pardon the pun, a smoke screen.
In light with you wanting to learn more and wrap your head around what actually happened on 9/11, I suggest you listen to the following presentation and then watch the documentary...
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
I simply stated my opinion about Silverstein and the people who deliberately didn't show up for work. The 4000° f needed to completely melt steel is a statement of fact. There should have been over 400 ft of steel if it had not been melted.
9/11 Evidence presented by Prof David A. Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
No one defends Silverstein. He has nothing to do with the physics.
Exactly. So far, this Substack has it all correct to the best of my ability to see through the layers of bullsh*t myself. Fantastic source of photo and video evidence and discussions.
The 9/11 TRUTH vs Stand-Down PSY-OPS
Make people believe that someone or some group external to themselves is going to "save" or "rescue" them
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-truth-vs-stand-down-psy-ops
This is a hugely important concept that needs to be spread widely. In some other contexts, I've heard this concept referred to as the "Patriot Pacification Project." "The white hats are working on this." "Q is working on this." "Trump and 5D chess is working on this." "A law is going to be passed 'soon' that will revert our currency to metals-backed, and all kinds of good things will prevail -- 'just wait.'"
Heading to your article now.
Thank you for sharing this info, truly appreciate it.
HI Sheila - You might want to have a look at the presentation I did recently
Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives
Thank you for sharing this & I definitely will check this out later when I have time & also share it.
I’m truly so shocked & disgusted how horribly evil our government/deep state really are & how long they have been harming innocent people & duping us citizens!
I feel stupid for not being wiser sooner about everything they have been doing.
Thanx again❣️
And the pentagon... what a bunch of BS. It’s impossible for a plane to fly that low and slow. And where did THAT plane go? Obviously a DEW. It’s amazing and sad to me how blind people can be. So many things throughout history never happened.
Seems this whole article went over your head...
The PentaCon on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Condemnation, without investigation is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon whistleblower
While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.
In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.
All his interviews here: https://rumble.com/v5jloul-adam-eisenberg-pentagon-whistleblower.html
Check out my article on the PentaCon as well as the "Phantom warfare" article...
Actually the pentagon event was not a DEW (directed energy weapon), but it was an explosion coming from the area that they "renovated" just before. The video from the gas station, a set of still images in a series, is proving that. They changed and manipulated one of the images, so we must take that manipulated image out of the series. And then the remaining images show that there is an explosion by the wall, a streak of smoke going out over the lawn from the wall, and then there is the light and still black smoke coming up from the area outside the wall.
From their own material we know that there was no plane, no missile, not anything flying, no DEW (unless they had that inside of the pentagon), but there was an ordinary explosion by the wall out over the lawn.
Remember also all those pentagon staff walking on line looking for unwanted debris from the explosion. It is such a terrible thing to do if the event was real.
I take it you've yet to read my PentaCon article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Will do.
By the way, here is a link to the explosion by the wall video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpnIaxHgj1Q
And the video with the "missile" hitting the pentagon is a very old stock video from a helicopter flying around the pentagon that someone has added white streak to.
I've seen the original myself. There are lots of them. Probably from the late 1970 or early 1980. At that time there was a driveway under the pentagon, it is removed now. You can see it to the right in the video.
Please read my PentaCon article.... https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
And this one: https://911revision.substack.com/p/my-last-911-plane-article-promise
Then explain the fluctuation of the earth's magnetic field for all 7 events on 9/11...