15 Comments
User's avatar
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

I withdrew My consent from that psychopathic legal/governmental system...

Dear AnyOne, I Am Not in Your Jurisdiction (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/dear-anyone-i-am-not-in-your-jurisdiction

Expand full comment
Ken OC's avatar

There are always controlled operatives to make you look in the wrong places and misdirect you and confuse the truth.

Expand full comment
anto's avatar

In my opinion they used a hybrid method to "burn down" the towers.

For example.

Every day Securacom/Stratesec agents went around all the floors with bomb-sniffing dogs trained to detect any type of explosive. (Marvin P., George W. Bush's younger brother, had been responsible for Securacom/Stratesec, a company that provided security for the entire building complex, until 2000; the CEO was Wirt Walker III, the president's first cousin.) Without any official statement and for no apparent reason, Securacom/Stratesec eliminated surveillance with bomb-sniffing dogs on Thursday 6 September 2001.

On Saturday morning, 8 September, officially to modernize the internet cables, the electricity was disconnected to both towers and to building 7, until 2pm on Sunday 9. The two towers were invaded by hundreds of hard-working and silent people (it was later discovered that at least some of them were bomb disposal experts). Some noticed the tiny cylinders attached to the 244 pillars, over 1000 small cylinders, sealed on the outside and with a crack on the side that coincided with the surface of the column, each of which contained thermite, a substance with incendiary power. A cylinder loaded with super thermite, which is an explosive product, was applied to some selected pillars.

Source: "Burning down 9/11" by Franco Fracassi.

I haven't looked into your research yet, but after seeing what they did in the pandemic, I'm no longer surprised by anything... I'll get into the matter... Thank you!

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Thank you for sharing your opinion.

I do want to save you some time, as there is no need to work through my 82 articles if you do the following 5 things....

1. Watch this 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY&t=33s

2. Watch this 2018 documentary: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html

3. Read this book: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com

4. Also read this book: 9/11 Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf

5. And this book: 9/11 Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf

I hope you'll keep an open mind, as your world view and your view on the "trusted experts" in the 9/11 "truther" movement is about to be shattered, as it was for me....

Expand full comment
anto's avatar

Thanks for the advice!

Time runs away in every direction...

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

And this recent article will also save you a LOT of research time...

9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline

Expand full comment
Morten Nielsen's avatar

Can you please make an overview of your almost 100 articles here? An overview with hyperlinks to each article.

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Here are 3 important articles;

WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?

The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings

9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline

September 11, 2001 - An Essential Guide (2024)

Sept 11, 2001 has been and still is a 23 year long PSYOP.

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/september-11-2001-an-essential-guide

Expand full comment
Stephen Carter's avatar

It's hard to really put your finger on what really happened unless you look at other events before & after. My conclusion is this was a splinter group within one of the several US domestic intelligence agencies that did this to demonize an outside 'aggressor' & turn the US outward to focus on external threat(s). Basically America attacked itself on 9/11. Also it fits the total absence of a debris pile at the base of the Twin Towers. A new kind of weapon was used that turns debris to dust instantly as the destruction is occurring.

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Indeed…

Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.

The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.

The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.

The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.

Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.

Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html

Expand full comment
cacwb's avatar

Hi- I realize that I am reading this post more than 2 years after you first posted it. And I am very much looking forward to reading many of your other posts. But I have one criticism from the get-go. You said, "Today people want you to toe the line and not question anything and if you disagree with someone, they either resort to name calling, hateful stereotyping and end up having a green / blue haired, woke, soy boy snowflake melt down and they try and cancel you without actually taking the time to re-investigate the beliefs they hold." You probably shouldnt accuse people of name-calling and stereotyping and follow that up with name-calling and stereotyping ( ie., "green / blue haired, woke, soy boy snowflake")

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

I started my substack at least 3 years after debating many, many, many people in 9/11 debate forums and I'm giving a descriptive analogy of how the people act.

I look forward to reading your comments, as you work through my 130 articles to date.

More coming soon...

Expand full comment
Miss Possum's avatar

I’m so disappointed in these students from my Alma Mater, GMU. While GMU has expanded into a world-class research university, the students at Mason and other universities have dumbed down by design. If we don’t understand the past, we are condemned to repeat it. These students don’t have the fire to learn in their own accord. I graduated in 1983, couldn’t sit at a computer and have knowledge at our fingertips. We went to our professors, libraries for knowledge. We often went to the Library of Congress for the day, for fun or research. We were taught in high school to be curious, some of our parents also instilled a sense of curiousity in us. How sad this is, I wonder how much these students know about Pearl Harbor, the Kennedy assasination or early space flight and Operation Paperclip.

I’m sure these kids do well in their courses; I don’t think they are stupid, just taught to accept only what they are told.

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

I concur with your disappointment.

As a non-US citizen that knows more about what is going on in the US, I was appalled to see just how little they know about what happened on 9/11 and then also the implications it had for the world and especially the geopolitical implications, not too mention the 20 year long FAKE war on terror, due to this false flag...

Then the biggest aspect of why I'm doing what I'm doing is the technology involved to pull off 9/11 - From 3D Volumetric projections to a technology that can turn skyscrapers to dust in mid air... Then let's not get into the COINTELPRO operation, that is masquerading as the 9/11 "truth" movement, with truth-traitors and fraudsters, like Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage, architects for an engineered truth, the International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression - The alt media talking heads that seem not to do their due diligence when investigating 9/11 and NOT having Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Judy Wood on their podcasts. Even Curt Weldon is suspect.

Exposed: The 9/11 Truth Movement Talking Heads

Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage, Niels Harrit and Kevin Ryan, just to name a few

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/exposed-the-911-truth-movement-talking

September 11 Evidence: Don't talk about Judy

Curt Weldon asked about Dr Judy Wood and his answer is telling

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/september-11-evidence-dont-talk-about

Dismantling the theory of controlled demolition on 9/11

Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dismantling-the-theory-of-controlled

Catherine Austin Fitts & Breakthrough Energy

Weaponized Breakthrough Energy has been deployed, but no one wants to talk about it

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/catherine-austin-fitts-and-breakthrough

with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!

Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.

Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".

Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.

Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.

And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.

You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.

In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!

Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!

Official narrative – Jet fuel.

Option behind door no 1 – explosives,

door no 2 – thermite,

door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.

Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)

There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;

1. Problem solving skills

2. Group Think

3. They just can't handle the implications

Expand full comment
Miss Possum's avatar

Wow! Thank you for sharing so much with me. I know a lot of the information will me new to me, I plan to start going through it tonight.

Expand full comment