Great points. What is the best counter explanation you have heard as to where all the material went? Im imagining its something about tons of explosives that ejected material outwardly as the destruction occurred
Give this article and presentation a look see, it's a great overview of the evidence...
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
O, the go to for Richard Gage is: It was ejected sideways as far as 600 feet....
Slight problem though.... If you look 600 feet in all directions, the buildings across the street had nothing on their roofs and the Liberty plaza sphere wasn't buried under rubble, after TWO x 110 story buildings "collapsed".
But Gage won't ever show you pictures to prove his statements - You just gotta believe him and when you challenge him on it, he plays dumb...
The other favourite for people are - The rubble fell into the basements...
Now the basements were 7 stories deep - HTF does 110 stories of steel fit into 7 basement floors...
You also have the 16 survivors of the North Tower, between floors 2 and 22, although the "9/11 surfer" that was on the 22nd floor, landed on a ledge, about 5 flights up in the remnant of stairwell b....
The hum dinger is: The basements were only slightly damaged! Most of the cars in the parking garages were driven out from where they were parked! Most of the shops looked like they did on Sept 10.... Just covered in dust... My two basement articles covers and debunks the b/s narrative of the "basements were full of rubble".
The mostly EMPTY basements of the Twin Towers.
Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble.
Yes, paper everywhere and only 1 of approximately 45 000 filing cabinets were found in the basement level mall, in Tom and Jerry's - with file folders and unburnt money inside, after the cabinet shrivelled up to the size of a basketball...
On can easily get caught up with speculation and then one really starts to move away from the irrefutable empirical evidence, that should be used to wake people up to WHAT happened to the towers...
I have published one speculative article and it could lend weight to your question....
David Rockefeller the mastermind behind the 9/11 crime?
A lot of people are certain David Rockefeller is behind 9/11
The WHAT *is* speculative, though. There is nothing tangible left, so the more clues that can be dug up from the past, the better. The design and function of the building is important.
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Humans are mostly docile, trust-machines. It's not in their nature to distrust their shepherds. Via staged traumatic events, the sheep have been forced to believe they're being cared for and protected. They will not shed their security without being forced in some way.
100% correct. Even these two psychologists can't break their cognitive dissonance after being victims of neuro-linguistic selling techniques during the formative years of the 9/11 "truth" movement...
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11
An email discussion with Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists
Exactly. And I would bet that they fall in that order as well. I would also suspect that almost 50-60% of people make it to the 3rd tier and forget about it or can't act on it. Almost as if they have been conditioned to ignore their own intuition and survival instinct, to the extent it's almost always safer to subcontract that aspect of their lives to so-called experts or other human beings in positions of authority.
_My feeling on authority is_, there is no way any person could have it and not become perverted by it.
Now that we know they have this dark technology for many decades …. I think many past events need to be reevaluated going back perhaps to the late 80’s early 90’s. They created HAARP in Alaska in the mid 90’s. So they obviously had the technology prior to this in a smaller scale.
Some things that come to mind include a re-look at world events where political figures were harmed in past suspicious events. Some plane crashes come to mind. Including JFK Jr crash. Everything is suspect now looking back.
Hopefully someone writes about this analyzing where this tech/energy could of been the real weapon.
Great points. What is the best counter explanation you have heard as to where all the material went? Im imagining its something about tons of explosives that ejected material outwardly as the destruction occurred
Give this article and presentation a look see, it's a great overview of the evidence...
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
Prof David A, Hughes – An 1h Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence in 2024
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
Im totally on board with that 👍 was more wondering what creative ways you've heard people try explain away the lack of 200' tall pile of debris
O, the go to for Richard Gage is: It was ejected sideways as far as 600 feet....
Slight problem though.... If you look 600 feet in all directions, the buildings across the street had nothing on their roofs and the Liberty plaza sphere wasn't buried under rubble, after TWO x 110 story buildings "collapsed".
But Gage won't ever show you pictures to prove his statements - You just gotta believe him and when you challenge him on it, he plays dumb...
The other favourite for people are - The rubble fell into the basements...
Now the basements were 7 stories deep - HTF does 110 stories of steel fit into 7 basement floors...
You also have the 16 survivors of the North Tower, between floors 2 and 22, although the "9/11 surfer" that was on the 22nd floor, landed on a ledge, about 5 flights up in the remnant of stairwell b....
The hum dinger is: The basements were only slightly damaged! Most of the cars in the parking garages were driven out from where they were parked! Most of the shops looked like they did on Sept 10.... Just covered in dust... My two basement articles covers and debunks the b/s narrative of the "basements were full of rubble".
The mostly EMPTY basements of the Twin Towers.
Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-mostly-empty-basements-of-the
Revisiting the basements of the WTC.
Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-basements-of-the-wtc
I'm sure many offices had ' indestructible safes', wherefore are they ?
Dust. Blowin' in the wind
But the paper inside of them blew through downtown Manhattan!
Yes, paper everywhere and only 1 of approximately 45 000 filing cabinets were found in the basement level mall, in Tom and Jerry's - with file folders and unburnt money inside, after the cabinet shrivelled up to the size of a basketball...
Do you ever wonder if the buildings were built a certain way just for this event?
Honestly, I dunno...
On can easily get caught up with speculation and then one really starts to move away from the irrefutable empirical evidence, that should be used to wake people up to WHAT happened to the towers...
I have published one speculative article and it could lend weight to your question....
David Rockefeller the mastermind behind the 9/11 crime?
A lot of people are certain David Rockefeller is behind 9/11
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-the-mastermind
The WHAT *is* speculative, though. There is nothing tangible left, so the more clues that can be dug up from the past, the better. The design and function of the building is important.
But we know where the evidence points to....
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
But no tangible evidence.
Ricky - Now you are starting to worry me....
There is a LOT of tangible evidence, pointing to what Dr Wood concluded...
Have you watched this presentation yet?
Prof David A, Hughes – An 1h Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence in 2024
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
I know all of this. Still no evidence of how it was pulled off.
Humans are mostly docile, trust-machines. It's not in their nature to distrust their shepherds. Via staged traumatic events, the sheep have been forced to believe they're being cared for and protected. They will not shed their security without being forced in some way.
100% correct. Even these two psychologists can't break their cognitive dissonance after being victims of neuro-linguistic selling techniques during the formative years of the 9/11 "truth" movement...
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11
An email discussion with Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/psychology-of-resistance-to-truth
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Exactly. And I would bet that they fall in that order as well. I would also suspect that almost 50-60% of people make it to the 3rd tier and forget about it or can't act on it. Almost as if they have been conditioned to ignore their own intuition and survival instinct, to the extent it's almost always safer to subcontract that aspect of their lives to so-called experts or other human beings in positions of authority.
_My feeling on authority is_, there is no way any person could have it and not become perverted by it.
People who struggle with tier three are victims of premeditated ignorance...
Prof David A, Hughes – An 1h Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence in 2024
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
Now that we know they have this dark technology for many decades …. I think many past events need to be reevaluated going back perhaps to the late 80’s early 90’s. They created HAARP in Alaska in the mid 90’s. So they obviously had the technology prior to this in a smaller scale.
Some things that come to mind include a re-look at world events where political figures were harmed in past suspicious events. Some plane crashes come to mind. Including JFK Jr crash. Everything is suspect now looking back.
Hopefully someone writes about this analyzing where this tech/energy could of been the real weapon.
You need to read Dr Wood's book: Where did the towers go?
You will also enjoy these two articles....
Secret Super Weapons, UFO's & 9/11
Scalar, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/secret-super-weapons-ufos-and-911
David Icke's disinformation on 9/11
Why did David backtrack on his 2002 book?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-icke-on-911
All about the consequences of the truth for any reality experienced in life! Let's get with the program - Intermission is nearly completed...