9/11 is what woke me up. It was so obviously a cover-up operation afterward that it was impossible to deny that "humans" from own government were at least partially culpable.
Considering the dustification, it's interesting to note the tuning fork girders of the towers.
It also occurred to me the other day the weird coincidence of the popularity of the Wu-Tang Clan (WTC) in that era, from NYC. Must have been part of the ritual.
Gee, 🤔 I wonder if the ACTUAL 9/11 TRUTH will EVER be Officially Acknowledged 😒⁉️ Most us ALREADY realize that the narrative …THEY… tried to SELL us doesn’t work, for several reasons, but most compelling is, …ummm, the basic Laws of PHYSICS‼️ 🙄 It would be nice if one day Americans were given ALL the FACTS about this major life-altering tragic event 🤨. And, 🤔 DID the DOD ever determine where that $2.3 Trillion went, ya’ know that Rumsfeld mentioned they couldn’t track the day before on 9/10..? 😞 Just wondering…
Our entire history is a pack of lies, from the founders, to the ‘great’ Lincoln and the lies about the Civil War, to JFK, to 9/11, to COVID. There will never be an official reckoning for any of this. Just look at what Kash said about the Epstein ‘suicide’ a couple of days ago. All we can really do is learn the truth ourselves.
Unfortunately add 9/11 to the ever growing list of government lies: JFK, C19, Oklahoma City Bombing, Moon Landing, MLK, Sandyhook, Clinton “Coincidences”, Epstein, “Prez Biden”, Vaxschemes, J6, fluoride, All Wars, Russian collusion, Hunter Laptop, LA Shooting, USS Liberty, etc.
'' it would be nice if one day Americans were given ALL the FACTS about this major life-altering tragic event 🤨.'''' all is in plein view!!! Stop watching Tee vee is all what is needed althoug nee l don't think so. Doom to the end.
I feel grateful to have only woken up during the convid operation because I’d hate to have been a 9-11 truther prior to 2020. This is mainly because I know I would have been one of those wide eyed passionate truthers who would try and convince everyone I met of all the inconsistencies & how it was an inside job etc. etc. but also because I know now that a lot of the theories I would have been telling people would have been total garbage fed to me by the controlled truth movement.
For me, waking up fully to how pretty much everything projected on to our screens is a lie was like being released from a magic spell. Once the spell was breaking all I needed was one clip in a Mark Passio presentation from a Judy Wood presentation showing the spire turning to dust & it hit me as clear as day that of course she was right. The buildings turned to dust right in front of our eyes and yet whilst under the spell we can’t see it.
I don’t try to wake up zombies any longer as it’s pointless but if I’m engaging with anybody who is showing signs of genuine curiosity the first thing I will tell them about 9-11 if it comes up is that the twin towers were turned to dust using a hidden technology & then I’ll show them the slowed down spire video & the full speed collapse videos
Maybe it’s too much for newbies but I think it’s the most important factor about what happened that day & once the scales fall from your eyes you don’t need to do hours of research you just need to clear your head of all the programming, watch the collapse videos & use your god given common sense
One of the biggest problems is that truth seekers have been conditioned NOT to count past 3, because once you do and look at all the anomalies, the controlled demolition and thermite narrative falls flat on it's face.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
The first part discusses the psyop and the second part, is where the artist talks about the boxes.
The boxes were given to them for free, where they illegally built the balcony out of the tower window….
BB-18 is a power distribution bus for electrical fuses, as in the fuse box that electricity goes through in a house or building, to prevent short-circuits.
They're produced by the Littelfuse company. It's not a bomb fuse, LOL.
So, you need to be open to the idea that those boxes were given to them to push the explosive narrative…
Rebekah Roth pushed a lot of that bullshit with her fictional books, but I am not sure whether someone started it before her.
She was later ousted as a possible government spook.
We know the military industrial complex is involved. That was obvious to ALL of us on September 12, 2001. Idrael did 911. Okay I’ll give you a bone. The US did so as well.
I never said know Jews died on 911. Why give a strawmab argument? I said ISRAHELL did 911. Why deny that? Keep tap dancing for that shitty settler colony of psychopathic chosen ones who stole Palestine.
I already did. Please read my response. I said “let me give you a bone….”. Too bad. Admit that Israel at least partook in the human sacrifice. At least admit that much.
I will openly defy your instruction to avoid the material cited. I turned on my hearing aids but had trouble hearing the demolition of building 7. Must need new batteries. My brain needs new batteries. I think you shorted them out.
Remember the scores of DEM Senators who voted against Bobby Kennedy’s confirmation. They are either incompetent or secretly on board with depopulation and truncated life spans.
Senator Hickenlooper, ostensibly an educated man, needled
Bobby for his willingness to listen to a different narrative. How dare he!
What a flop 9/11 was. Only 3000 plus truncated lives. I guess we have to count the Iraq war. The pandemic response was more successful. About 2M in the US … short term. Lots more to come.
The real bioweapon was not the pathogen (yes there was one … a flop in itself). The shots were so-so. The real bioweapon was the combined shots plus hospital protocol in the hands of hospital administrators, staff, media and military. Doing better. What’s next? Global poisoning well in progress.
“I will openly defy your instruction to avoid the material cited.”
Thank you for pointing out, people like YOU are the problem.
with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I hope you did not misunderstand me. Your instruction to avoid the books mentioned was tongue in cheek. So, yes I’ll look into it. Just as the planes could not have penetrated the steel skeleton, the steel beams could not have melted, I took your point just now that conventional demolitions are not silent.
I’d like to hear more about free energy. Work is done for free on metal plates close in proximity. The Casimir effect. But it is very tiny. Perhaps more has been done expanding on what the vacuum can do for us. Or perhaps electric currents induced in a coil pushing magnets apart, working against gravity. What engineering has been done? If there are such solutions how can they not have been implemented? Just asking.
Sorry, my bad - tongue in cheek / sarcasm sometimes goes lost in text...
With regards to your further questions, I highly recommend you watch the following documentary, as it covers a lot of free energy as well as metal transmutation.
Did you know in 1941 scientists managed to turn small amounts of mercury into gold?
I read Judy Wood's book cover to cover without stopping. She understands and proved exactly what happened. A technology that we are told does not exist was used to destroy property and murder people on American soil. I still don't understand WHY only the buildings designated WTC were demolished. Has that been established and I missed it?
A politician asking questions.....Tucker Carlson ....all big question marks or maybe not at all....They still think airliners hit buildings....all contolled op BS.
Thank you for these!! I will watch them all. And I do believe that directed energy was used to bring down and dustify both towers and building seven. And I do understand how the thermite story doesn’t hold up as there was not nearly enough discovered at the sites nor was the rubble pile nearly large enough…because the buildings were duatified. My question though is: should there have been discovered, or was there discovered to be metal / steel dust in large amounts at the scene? Or would directed energy just basically evaporate or vaporize the metal dust created from the dustification of the structures? Is that how directed energy works? Or is the fingerprint of the directed energy and the dustification found in the metal dust left over? Or am I not understanding correctly the after effects of directed energy on steel framed structures.
Btw I’m not trying to disprove you. I’m agreeing with you and wanting to understand more. Sincerely, Todd
To begin with, the dust samples analysed by Nels Harrit and Steven E. Jones, was based on flawed science, thus for them to say there was thermitic material in the dust, is b/s.
Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defence Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
What was found in the dust samples were iron rich micro-spheres, which Jones tries to attribute to thermite, which is incorrect, as it is a telltale sign of metal transmutation that happens in a strong magnetic field;
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
When describing what happened on 9/11, there was no pulverisation, no vaporisation as the two words’ meanings lead you to make the incorrect assumptions of the process - nothing crashed on top of one another, so no pulverisation.
The process had hardly any heat, thus you cannot state vaporisation, as it implies heat.
Dr Wood coined the term “dustification” as it is a new process we witnessed on September 11, 2001.
The way Dr Wood came to her conclusion is the sum of her independent forensic investigation of the observable evidence, that allowed her to come to an irrefutable conclusion, that the towers did not suffer a structural failure (collapse), or a controlled demolition, using any thermal or kinetic mechanism.
Someone has the ability to direct energy, in order to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
I watched a video you directed me to regarding the use of hurricanes as source for energy used during these DEW attacks I.e. 911, Maui Lahaina fire, etc..
in trying to understand this next level of how these weapons work to generate energy, and I am wanting to understand correctly what I watched. Is the take-away that HAARP is used to stimulate and then direct hurricanes for the purpose of using, as part of the DEW formula, for creating/ harnessing nature’s energy and then directing it as a weapon of cold fusion destruction? Am I understanding this correctly? Or is this still a theory of how it works?
I suggest you remember George Bush ordering the release of a dozen mossad agents who where arrested by NYPD who where set up in 3 different locations recording the 911 attack.
I suggest you look at the isreali who had 2 insurance policies on the buildings he didn't own and got paid from both.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
The first part discusses the psyop and the second part, is where the artist talks about the boxes.
The boxes were given to them for free, where they illegally built the balcony out of the tower window….
BB-18 is a power distribution bus for electrical fuses, as in the fuse box that electricity goes through in a house or building, to prevent short-circuits.
They're produced by the Littelfuse company. It's not a bomb fuse, LOL.
So, you need to be open to the idea that those boxes were given to them to push the explosive narrative…
Rebekah Roth pushed a lot of that bullshit with her fictional books, but I am not sure whether someone started it before her.
She was later ousted as a possible government spook.
And then there's Iraq The same Prime Minister of Israel Wanted Iraq attacked Which is why Bush attacked Iraq which supposedly had nothing to do with 911.
The American military gave them cover by running drone Exercises With explained why the aircraft with the drone controls were up in the sky at the same time.
Probably. Unfortunately. They'll burn. Liar, liar, pants on fire...
He lied when he said that 9/11 families were demanding him to act.
9/11 is what woke me up. It was so obviously a cover-up operation afterward that it was impossible to deny that "humans" from own government were at least partially culpable.
Considering the dustification, it's interesting to note the tuning fork girders of the towers.
It also occurred to me the other day the weird coincidence of the popularity of the Wu-Tang Clan (WTC) in that era, from NYC. Must have been part of the ritual.
Hmmm...interesting about the WTC - Never have I heard of them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBwAxmrE194
Yes, I thought as much. Thank you! Blessings ~
All of these government,”representatives “ are paid off puppets who can NEVER be trusted!!!
Yes, this was my thought: Being paid to "Bark up the wrong tree."
Some have been MK Ulta’d knowingly. Others perhaps unknowingly.
Gee, 🤔 I wonder if the ACTUAL 9/11 TRUTH will EVER be Officially Acknowledged 😒⁉️ Most us ALREADY realize that the narrative …THEY… tried to SELL us doesn’t work, for several reasons, but most compelling is, …ummm, the basic Laws of PHYSICS‼️ 🙄 It would be nice if one day Americans were given ALL the FACTS about this major life-altering tragic event 🤨. And, 🤔 DID the DOD ever determine where that $2.3 Trillion went, ya’ know that Rumsfeld mentioned they couldn’t track the day before on 9/10..? 😞 Just wondering…
Our entire history is a pack of lies, from the founders, to the ‘great’ Lincoln and the lies about the Civil War, to JFK, to 9/11, to COVID. There will never be an official reckoning for any of this. Just look at what Kash said about the Epstein ‘suicide’ a couple of days ago. All we can really do is learn the truth ourselves.
Unfortunately add 9/11 to the ever growing list of government lies: JFK, C19, Oklahoma City Bombing, Moon Landing, MLK, Sandyhook, Clinton “Coincidences”, Epstein, “Prez Biden”, Vaxschemes, J6, fluoride, All Wars, Russian collusion, Hunter Laptop, LA Shooting, USS Liberty, etc.
Sad..
La la la land.
'' it would be nice if one day Americans were given ALL the FACTS about this major life-altering tragic event 🤨.'''' all is in plein view!!! Stop watching Tee vee is all what is needed althoug nee l don't think so. Doom to the end.
These people are controlled. If you know their name, they're in the game.
I feel grateful to have only woken up during the convid operation because I’d hate to have been a 9-11 truther prior to 2020. This is mainly because I know I would have been one of those wide eyed passionate truthers who would try and convince everyone I met of all the inconsistencies & how it was an inside job etc. etc. but also because I know now that a lot of the theories I would have been telling people would have been total garbage fed to me by the controlled truth movement.
For me, waking up fully to how pretty much everything projected on to our screens is a lie was like being released from a magic spell. Once the spell was breaking all I needed was one clip in a Mark Passio presentation from a Judy Wood presentation showing the spire turning to dust & it hit me as clear as day that of course she was right. The buildings turned to dust right in front of our eyes and yet whilst under the spell we can’t see it.
I don’t try to wake up zombies any longer as it’s pointless but if I’m engaging with anybody who is showing signs of genuine curiosity the first thing I will tell them about 9-11 if it comes up is that the twin towers were turned to dust using a hidden technology & then I’ll show them the slowed down spire video & the full speed collapse videos
Maybe it’s too much for newbies but I think it’s the most important factor about what happened that day & once the scales fall from your eyes you don’t need to do hours of research you just need to clear your head of all the programming, watch the collapse videos & use your god given common sense
One of the biggest problems is that truth seekers have been conditioned NOT to count past 3, because once you do and look at all the anomalies, the controlled demolition and thermite narrative falls flat on it's face.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
Ok so it might be as you say. But why have you not stated that Israel did it?
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Been researching it since Sept 12 2001. Israel did it. Just stop. Its been almost 24 years. You had the time to discover what others concluded.
The whole Israel connection and everyone losing their minds over it, is a wonderful distraction for the intellectually lazy.
To keep people from realising the US Military industrial Complex’s involvement in the events on 9/11 and especially the black-ops technology involved.
Let’s address some of the disinformation pertaining to the “Israelis”.
Let's start with the "artists", Gelatin & “the E-Team” in the one tower, shall we...
Were they Israeli, or Austrian?
Watch the video….
https://rumble.com/v659g91-the-artists-gelatin-and-the-e-team.html
The first part discusses the psyop and the second part, is where the artist talks about the boxes.
The boxes were given to them for free, where they illegally built the balcony out of the tower window….
BB-18 is a power distribution bus for electrical fuses, as in the fuse box that electricity goes through in a house or building, to prevent short-circuits.
They're produced by the Littelfuse company. It's not a bomb fuse, LOL.
So, you need to be open to the idea that those boxes were given to them to push the explosive narrative…
Rebekah Roth pushed a lot of that bullshit with her fictional books, but I am not sure whether someone started it before her.
She was later ousted as a possible government spook.
Listen to this: https://rumble.com/v6r6zxm-rebekah-roth-exposed-methodical-illusion-turned-methodical-deception.html
There is truth in that there was some foreknowledge by some, but the conspiracy theory that no Jews died on 9/11, is just that - A conspiracy theory.
We know the military industrial complex is involved. That was obvious to ALL of us on September 12, 2001. Idrael did 911. Okay I’ll give you a bone. The US did so as well.
I never said know Jews died on 911. Why give a strawmab argument? I said ISRAHELL did 911. Why deny that? Keep tap dancing for that shitty settler colony of psychopathic chosen ones who stole Palestine.
Revert back to my first comment and wrap your head around the US government killing it's own, instead of pointing the finger at someone else.
That is the basic shortcoming of most truthers and distraction tactics that have been employed to get the attention away from the US government.
Place your anger where it's due - On home soil.
I already did. Please read my response. I said “let me give you a bone….”. Too bad. Admit that Israel at least partook in the human sacrifice. At least admit that much.
I will openly defy your instruction to avoid the material cited. I turned on my hearing aids but had trouble hearing the demolition of building 7. Must need new batteries. My brain needs new batteries. I think you shorted them out.
Remember the scores of DEM Senators who voted against Bobby Kennedy’s confirmation. They are either incompetent or secretly on board with depopulation and truncated life spans.
Senator Hickenlooper, ostensibly an educated man, needled
Bobby for his willingness to listen to a different narrative. How dare he!
What a flop 9/11 was. Only 3000 plus truncated lives. I guess we have to count the Iraq war. The pandemic response was more successful. About 2M in the US … short term. Lots more to come.
The real bioweapon was not the pathogen (yes there was one … a flop in itself). The shots were so-so. The real bioweapon was the combined shots plus hospital protocol in the hands of hospital administrators, staff, media and military. Doing better. What’s next? Global poisoning well in progress.
Looking for a coherent view. Thanks!
“I will openly defy your instruction to avoid the material cited.”
Thank you for pointing out, people like YOU are the problem.
with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
I hope you did not misunderstand me. Your instruction to avoid the books mentioned was tongue in cheek. So, yes I’ll look into it. Just as the planes could not have penetrated the steel skeleton, the steel beams could not have melted, I took your point just now that conventional demolitions are not silent.
I’d like to hear more about free energy. Work is done for free on metal plates close in proximity. The Casimir effect. But it is very tiny. Perhaps more has been done expanding on what the vacuum can do for us. Or perhaps electric currents induced in a coil pushing magnets apart, working against gravity. What engineering has been done? If there are such solutions how can they not have been implemented? Just asking.
Thanks for your dedication.
Sorry, my bad - tongue in cheek / sarcasm sometimes goes lost in text...
With regards to your further questions, I highly recommend you watch the following documentary, as it covers a lot of free energy as well as metal transmutation.
Did you know in 1941 scientists managed to turn small amounts of mercury into gold?
9/11 Alchemy: Free Energy & Free Thinking
Link: https://rumble.com/v4iysuh-911-alchemy-free-energy-and-free-thinking.html
I read Judy Wood's book cover to cover without stopping. She understands and proved exactly what happened. A technology that we are told does not exist was used to destroy property and murder people on American soil. I still don't understand WHY only the buildings designated WTC were demolished. Has that been established and I missed it?
A politician asking questions.....Tucker Carlson ....all big question marks or maybe not at all....They still think airliners hit buildings....all contolled op BS.
…so was there a large amount of steel dust collected at the dustification sites?
Let's start with the scientifically flawed paper trying to make the case for thermite.
Did you know that paper is bullshit?
Listen to this discussion, exposing Steven E. Jones and Niels Harrit:
The scientifically disproven 9/11 thermite theory
Video: https://rumble.com/v5vz3th-the-scientifically-disproven-911-thermite-theory.html
Exposed: The 9/11 Truth Movement Talking Heads
Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage, Niels Harrit and Kevin Ryan, just to name a few
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/exposed-the-911-truth-movement-talking
Then what was found at ground zero? This article will help you understand where the buildings went;
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Thank you for these!! I will watch them all. And I do believe that directed energy was used to bring down and dustify both towers and building seven. And I do understand how the thermite story doesn’t hold up as there was not nearly enough discovered at the sites nor was the rubble pile nearly large enough…because the buildings were duatified. My question though is: should there have been discovered, or was there discovered to be metal / steel dust in large amounts at the scene? Or would directed energy just basically evaporate or vaporize the metal dust created from the dustification of the structures? Is that how directed energy works? Or is the fingerprint of the directed energy and the dustification found in the metal dust left over? Or am I not understanding correctly the after effects of directed energy on steel framed structures.
Btw I’m not trying to disprove you. I’m agreeing with you and wanting to understand more. Sincerely, Todd
Hi Todd
To begin with, the dust samples analysed by Nels Harrit and Steven E. Jones, was based on flawed science, thus for them to say there was thermitic material in the dust, is b/s.
Have a listen to this explanation from Dr. Denis Rancourt: https://rumble.com/v3ujhqh-911-and-thermite-busted.html
Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defence Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
Have a listen: https://rumble.com/v6rm9n1-nano-thermite-does-not-exist.html
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
What was found in the dust samples were iron rich micro-spheres, which Jones tries to attribute to thermite, which is incorrect, as it is a telltale sign of metal transmutation that happens in a strong magnetic field;
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
Have a listen: https://rumble.com/v53eodh-bob-greenyer-911-no-thermite-no-little-neutron-bomb-or-jet-fuel-required..html
When describing what happened on 9/11, there was no pulverisation, no vaporisation as the two words’ meanings lead you to make the incorrect assumptions of the process - nothing crashed on top of one another, so no pulverisation.
The process had hardly any heat, thus you cannot state vaporisation, as it implies heat.
Dr Wood coined the term “dustification” as it is a new process we witnessed on September 11, 2001.
The way Dr Wood came to her conclusion is the sum of her independent forensic investigation of the observable evidence, that allowed her to come to an irrefutable conclusion, that the towers did not suffer a structural failure (collapse), or a controlled demolition, using any thermal or kinetic mechanism.
Someone has the ability to direct energy, in order to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
Direct or control - where it goes, what it does.
9/11: Understanding WHAT happened
Have a listen to the explanation: https://rumble.com/v627qr2-911-understanding-what-happened.html
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Thank you so much. Makes sense to me.
This part specifically answers my question:
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
Have a listen: https://rumble.com/v53eodh-bob-greenyer-911-no-thermite-no-little-neutron-bomb-or-jet-fuel-required..html
Thank you THANK YOU!!
Just uploaded;
Fraudulent 9/11 evidence presented by Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage and AE911
Link: https://rumble.com/v6u8uar-fraudulent-911-evidence-presented-by-steven-e.-jones-richard-gage-and-ae911.html
Thanks!! Will watch.
I have another question:
I watched a video you directed me to regarding the use of hurricanes as source for energy used during these DEW attacks I.e. 911, Maui Lahaina fire, etc..
in trying to understand this next level of how these weapons work to generate energy, and I am wanting to understand correctly what I watched. Is the take-away that HAARP is used to stimulate and then direct hurricanes for the purpose of using, as part of the DEW formula, for creating/ harnessing nature’s energy and then directing it as a weapon of cold fusion destruction? Am I understanding this correctly? Or is this still a theory of how it works?
The mossad carried out the 911 attacks with the help of the American government.
I suggest you read the following articles...
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
I suggest you remember George Bush ordering the release of a dozen mossad agents who where arrested by NYPD who where set up in 3 different locations recording the 911 attack.
I suggest you look at the isreali who had 2 insurance policies on the buildings he didn't own and got paid from both.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
The whole isreali cabinet was there to see it in person including bb the Prime Minister and the head of the mossad.
The whole Israel connection and everyone losing their minds over it, is a wonderful distraction for the intellectually lazy.
To keep people from realising the US Military industrial Complex’s involvement in the events on 9/11 and especially the black-ops technology involved.
Let’s address some of the disinformation pertaining to the “Israelis”.
Let's start with the "artists", Gelatin & “the E-Team” in the one tower, shall we...
Were they Israeli, or Austrian?
Watch the video…. https://rumble.com/v659g91-the-artists-gelatin-and-the-e-team.html
The first part discusses the psyop and the second part, is where the artist talks about the boxes.
The boxes were given to them for free, where they illegally built the balcony out of the tower window….
BB-18 is a power distribution bus for electrical fuses, as in the fuse box that electricity goes through in a house or building, to prevent short-circuits.
They're produced by the Littelfuse company. It's not a bomb fuse, LOL.
So, you need to be open to the idea that those boxes were given to them to push the explosive narrative…
Rebekah Roth pushed a lot of that bullshit with her fictional books, but I am not sure whether someone started it before her.
She was later ousted as a possible government spook.
Listen to this: https://rumble.com/v6r6zxm-rebekah-roth-exposed-methodical-illusion-turned-methodical-deception.html
There is truth in that there was some foreknowledge by some, but the conspiracy theory that no Jews died on 9/11, is just that - A conspiracy theory.
And then there's Iraq The same Prime Minister of Israel Wanted Iraq attacked Which is why Bush attacked Iraq which supposedly had nothing to do with 911.
You can only benefit by expanding you limited thinking by listening to this thought experiment.
Link: https://rumble.com/v6q7pk8-operative-exposes-the-911-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
And then we had Obama. Financed trained trained supported ISIS Along with Israel Some of the senior members of ISIS where actually Israelis.
You can only benefit by expanding you limited thinking by listening to this thought experiment.
Link: https://rumble.com/v6q7pk8-operative-exposes-the-911-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
The American military gave them cover by running drone Exercises With explained why the aircraft with the drone controls were up in the sky at the same time.
Why the remote takeover of planes on 9/11 is IMPOSSIBLE
Avionics technician exposes the impossibilities of remotely taking-over a commercial aircraft way back in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/why-the-remote-takeover-of-planes
You can only benefit by expanding you limited thinking by listening to this thought experiment.
Link: https://rumble.com/v6q7pk8-operative-exposes-the-911-illusion.html
Watch the video from the American pilots ass where they show you the drone control modules installed on the outside of both aircraft fuselage.
It's already been solved the criminals who did it were the Israeli mossad
You can't prove it...
The first step is to take on the 23 NIST subcontractors, who are part of a big club you don't know about...
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden.
Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Yes just a coincidence the Israeli happened to take out 2 insurance policies on the buildings he didn't own the week before.
People always do that from Israel.
You really lack any critical thinking skills...
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
It's more than a connection they did it they killed 3000 Americans and tried to make it look like someone else did it.
Nope, America did it, made it look like it was Muslims / Saudi’s and the “dem djoos did it” I the 2nd level of the cover-up…
You can only benefit by expanding you limited thinking by listening to this thought experiment.
Link: https://rumble.com/v6q7pk8-operative-exposes-the-911-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp