Thank you for this information! I just got my copy of Dr. Woods book and I'm looking forward to reading it! I figured that 9/11 had numerology involved! It's my understanding that the "powers that shouldn't be" use occulted knowledge with Gematria and numerology to do and plan their dirty work! I'm gonna watch that second 9/11 alchemy documentary first! I know I should probably watch them inorder though! But I'm really interested in the numerology connection to this!
Once you’ve worked through the book, cover to cover, you’ll realise just how irrefutable the evidence she presents is and why there was an industry built on trying to keep truth seekers away from looking at her work and why even in 2024 there is such a hard push to keep truth seekers blind to the truth of what happened on 9/11…
You’ll really enjoy the 9/11 Alchemy series…
Thank you for reading, watching and still caring about finding the truth of what happened on September 11, 2001.
Ephesians 5:11 - Have nothing to do with the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but expose them.
Galatians 4:16 - So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
Oh of course! I definitely want to know the truth! All Americans should! I watched it happen on live TV that morning! When I got to work that morning and saw my coworkers around the TV watching it, the first plane hit just seconds before! I watched the second plane hit! But now I'm learning that there were no planes! Sophisticated technology was used to fool the public! I want to know who's responsible! The whole truth needs to come out!
I saw the video when Bush, Jr. got told about the WTC getting attacked and his reaction! Bush, Jr's reaction and expression on his face spoke volumes! That Bush, Jr. knew it would happen and who's responsible! He had that "oh shit!" expression on his face when he got told about the attack! Bush, Jr. refused to answer questions about what happened and refused to investigate further! The way Bush, Jr. responded to questions convinced me it was getting covered up!
It makes me wonder, if the whole time comes out, just how many prominent people will be brought down? Same with the JFK assassination and look how long that's been covered up! The lid needs to get blown off and everything get exposed! If these truths came out then they would all lose control over humanity, they work very, very hard to keep this information covered up!
Should you not credit @keithal for the wording of much of this article? Unless you're the same person, of course, in which case I apologise. We should credit ourselves more often, as it's a form of self-kindness.
That explains it - I thought his post was quite well worded, after all, if a little angry. I am definitely one to talk there though as I often get angry - seeing as there's a lot to be angry about, after all. I think we have to be careful about that however when we're attempting to win people over via mature discussion and presentation.
With regards to your 3 issues, though - how do you explain people who don't have those 3 issues? Me, for example - I have exceptional problem-solving skills (and not just from having a degree in philosophy), I am absolutely immune to group think, and as for the third, I was forced to confront the implications of a world run by monsters from a very early age, so I have an immunity to that one too.
It means I can apply a whole range of critical thinking skills along with an exploration of what-if hypotheticals, along with a significant level of knowledge about science, psychology and espionage and so on. I also happen to be an excellent auto-didact.
I do have a massive amount of stuff on my to-do list at the moment in the run up to 16/11/24 (event day), but I will try and examine all your stuff more deeply as I will certainly be doing at least one 9-11 article at some point (probably more than one, actually, or a series even, as it definitely merits it). Thanks for reading my psych article, btw, and the restack. You might like the first two parts as well if you get time.
I appreciate your willingness to revisit 9/11 and all the narratives around 9/11….
Seeing that you have exceptional problem-solving skills (and not just from having a degree in philosophy), and being absolutely immune to group think.
Let me then start you off with two main articles, before you read Dr Wood’s book and her Qui-Tam whistle-blower court documents, as your whole range of critical thinking skills along with an exploration of what-if hypotheticals, along with a significant level of knowledge about science, psychology and espionage and excellent auto-didact skills will come in quite handy in seeing the grift of the 9/11 “truther” movement.
Pity all those skills were never used the last 23 years, but hey….
Better late than never, as the saying goes….
I look forward to getting your feedback.
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11
An email discussion with Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists
My first response is that I'm going to be honest, which is how you have been, so you can't complain. You said 'pity all those skills were never used the last 23 years' - I believe I kind of hinted in my previous comment that you have to be civil and mature and reasonable when you engage people in discussion. Insulting them and their intelligence is never going to win hearts and minds. In view of that I am really not surprised in the slightest if the likes of Fran et al. didn't want to engage with you. Under the circumstances I thought Fran in particular was extremely polite and civil. Given how much I understand about psychology that tells me a great deal.
Once you do your due diligence and work through the homework I gave you you too will be a little cheezed off…
1. At yourself for outsourcing your thinking.
2. The monumental gaslighting of the so called 9/11 “truther” movement.
3. The stupidity of certain people playing the premeditated ignorance game.
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control exercise and the government approved controlled opposition, COINTELPRO agents were put into place during the formation of “Scholars for 9/11 truth.”
I’ve been interacting DAILY with people like you mouthing off just how clever they are, but have yet not woken up to their own bamboozle, can entertain one just so long, before you get easily irritated.
I’m not here to make friends or coddle you into the truth, but to challenge you to challenge yourself and the world view and truths you hold.
MOST have yet to learn from COVID, now imagne people’s cognitive dissonance on 9/11.
YOU have shown yours - Now - instead of getting defensive - Go do your homework.
As stated before - The following article is a good start to work through - before your read Dr Wood’s book and Andrew Johnson’s two free e-books.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Ok- I’ll be totally honest with you here. Your 3 points there are what’s known as psychological projection.
If one takes a step back and examines what you (and the Judy Wood, no planes, CGI planes, DEWs etc. brigade) are really doing here is trying to convince people that they can’t trust their own senses, whether that’s their own eyes or ears, or their own common sense. Likewise, they can no longer trust their own intellect or science or anything. And THAT is about gaslighting and inflicting mental trauma. THAT is an attack on human consciousness.
What it leads to is known as LEARNED HELPLESSNESS. That’s a classic MK-Ultra torture technique used for mind control programming. Learned helplessness is one of the most important and effective methods for inducing the freeze response and thus creating slaves, and for destroying all possibility of opposition and resistance.
It’s yet another corollary of the fake events narrative, in which we are now unable to trust anything whatsoever about history or anything which a huge number of brilliant investigative researchers have spent their lives unravelling and exposing over the last 100 years.
You are also subliminally convincing people that the cabal are somehow all-powerful and can totally control people’s entire perception of reality. Again, that creates learned helplessness and a total lack of resistance, because people will believe that resistance is futile.
Slavery, in other words.
So I really think you should examine the consequences of what you are doing. If you are not doing this intentionally then I guess that’s a slight mitigation in your favour. But if you are aware, then that makes you a cognitive infiltrator. Some of your insulting aggressive comments would tend to bear that out.
You don’t need to worry about me, though, because compared to you I scarcely have an audience at all. So I’m hardly a threat.
Just to say, I have better, more productive things to do with my time than dive into very dark rabbit holes. I spent a long time climbing out of one, and I’m not going back into that abyss.
Too much REALLY important stuff happening RIGHT NOW to go back and argue about what happened over 20 years ago. What a distraction. This might as well be corporate media: No need to worry about your country collapsing LOOK OVER HERE.... That's right. Let's split hairs about stuff of no relevance TODAY and get really worked up about it. This might just all be AI dialog between chat bots. // This topic, and DEWS on 9/11... who can care? How does it shine light on the massive assault, economic, political, social, fiscal, medical, radiological playing in your town tonight?
One may argue why should we dwell on an event that happened such a long time ago.
Surely we have more pressing issues to be concerned about such as the recent plandemic, future scamdemics, mRNA gene interventions, the climate hoax, 15-minute cities, censorship, Big Pharma, trans agenda, indoctrination of our kids, the Gaza genocide, fake wars, migration invasion, 5G, EMF poisoning, non-existent democracy and the endless drive towards totalitarianism?
You are yet to realise, that if people understood 9/11 fully, and what was done to them, then CV-19 would not have happened…
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
One other initial response I had to this article is that it appears, at least superficially, to be not much more than an ad hominem attack, which is the worst logical fallacy of them all. In fact it's not even a logical fallacy. I believe it was Socrates who said that personal attacks are the last resort of someone who's lost the argument. I might add, they are an option for someone who doesn't even have an argument.
The observation I'd make is that you haven't provided any evidence whatsoever to prove that Dylan Avery and the Loose Change team were controlled opposition. All you've done is say 'I don't agree with their explanation for what happened on 9-11'. But this is a misdirection because the purpose of your article is clearly not to critically examine the content of Loose Change, and attempt to disprove that content point by point. Rather, the purpose of your article is to convince the reader that Loose Change was a controlled opposition psyop. And you have provided a big fat ZERO evidence of that. It's just nothing but insults. And insults do not an argument make.
Do you have any evidence? Because in the utmost sincerity I would love to see that evidence. If it exists it would be very important indeed for the 9-11 Truth Movement.
Everything I've just said, by the way, is not an insult, and should not be taken as such. It is a critical response. I hope you'll respect it as such.
It seems you missed the following: "All 4 of the alleged planes (including the ones shown in Loose Change) were calculated to be traveling at 500+ mph at or near sea level, which is NOT POSSIBLE. Does Loose Change come back and correct this fundamental error? No, because they are a major part of the Disinformation Controlled Opposition cadre."
You have obviously NOT read any of Dr Wood, Andrew Johnson or Mark Conlon's (9/11 Planes Research) work.
Thus you are approaching all of this from an uninformed OPINION based on propaganda you've been fed at all these years...
More homework for you to do - On the planes for now....
Ok, first of all you haven’t proven the following:
1/ the planes (or whatever objects they were) were travelling at 500+mph.
2/ planes can’t travel at 500mph at or near sea level (you will need to use proper laws of physics to prove this, not the standard model.
3/ Loose Change, as far as I recall, didn’t necessarily say the ‘planes’ were real planes. They admitted the possibility they could have been cruise missiles (esp. Pentagon), or another kind of plane dressed up to look like a commercial airliner.
4/ In the November 2001 crash that plane was travelling nowhere near 500mph. In fact, the reason it crashed was because it wasn’t travelling fast enough to pick up lift from the charge field. The plane stalled, in other words, because of an inexperienced pilot. This made it slow down, which is why it crashed and broke up.
Can you answer those 4 points, briefly, or at least point me towards a link where those four points have been answered using the real laws of physics (i.e. Miles Mathis).
On that final note, actually, can you answer the question for me as to whether Judy Wood has ever cited Miles Mathis’ physics papers? You’ve obviously read everything she’s written so you should be able to answer that sincere question for me.
I’ll remind you again – You are stuck in 2010 – You quickly need to do some due diligence and get to 2024 – You’ve been asleep for 14 years, since Loose Change was released.
You stumble at the get go, as there were NO ELT’s recorded on 9/11 – That means, there is really no need to address the rest of your points.
I’ll refer you AGAIN, to the work of 9/11 Planes Research, for you to get up to speed.
3. Loose Change has been pointed out as having numerous errors – Again – go read the work of 9/11 Planes Research
4. Flight 587 broke apart due to the drag in the thicker air, due to excess speeds, the engines actually hit the ground before the plane.
I can see you did NOT do your due diligence by reading / watching everything I put in the article.
You are another person, knee jerking your uninformed opinions, instead of working through what is being presented to you, for you to understand the argument that is being presented.
Premeditated ignorance wins again….
Pertaining to Miles Mathis’ physics papers – Go read Dr Wood’s book and find out – I’m not here to spoon feed you – Real truth seekers do the work and don’t outsource their thinking.
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Anyone who has done a serious investigation into 911 knows Israel carried it out along with the US government. Anyone who denies Israel carried this out is nothing but a shekel shilling dis/misinformation shill.
Thank you for this information! I just got my copy of Dr. Woods book and I'm looking forward to reading it! I figured that 9/11 had numerology involved! It's my understanding that the "powers that shouldn't be" use occulted knowledge with Gematria and numerology to do and plan their dirty work! I'm gonna watch that second 9/11 alchemy documentary first! I know I should probably watch them inorder though! But I'm really interested in the numerology connection to this!
Great to hear!
Once you’ve worked through the book, cover to cover, you’ll realise just how irrefutable the evidence she presents is and why there was an industry built on trying to keep truth seekers away from looking at her work and why even in 2024 there is such a hard push to keep truth seekers blind to the truth of what happened on 9/11…
You’ll really enjoy the 9/11 Alchemy series…
Thank you for reading, watching and still caring about finding the truth of what happened on September 11, 2001.
Ephesians 5:11 - Have nothing to do with the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but expose them.
Galatians 4:16 - So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
Oh of course! I definitely want to know the truth! All Americans should! I watched it happen on live TV that morning! When I got to work that morning and saw my coworkers around the TV watching it, the first plane hit just seconds before! I watched the second plane hit! But now I'm learning that there were no planes! Sophisticated technology was used to fool the public! I want to know who's responsible! The whole truth needs to come out!
I saw the video when Bush, Jr. got told about the WTC getting attacked and his reaction! Bush, Jr's reaction and expression on his face spoke volumes! That Bush, Jr. knew it would happen and who's responsible! He had that "oh shit!" expression on his face when he got told about the attack! Bush, Jr. refused to answer questions about what happened and refused to investigate further! The way Bush, Jr. responded to questions convinced me it was getting covered up!
It makes me wonder, if the whole time comes out, just how many prominent people will be brought down? Same with the JFK assassination and look how long that's been covered up! The lid needs to get blown off and everything get exposed! If these truths came out then they would all lose control over humanity, they work very, very hard to keep this information covered up!
Should you not credit @keithal for the wording of much of this article? Unless you're the same person, of course, in which case I apologise. We should credit ourselves more often, as it's a form of self-kindness.
Keith is a good friend of mine - Discussed it with him that I'll use his comment to you and build on it...
Now go do your due diligence, by working through everything referenced in the article, and get into 2024 and get yourself unstuck from 2010...
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
That explains it - I thought his post was quite well worded, after all, if a little angry. I am definitely one to talk there though as I often get angry - seeing as there's a lot to be angry about, after all. I think we have to be careful about that however when we're attempting to win people over via mature discussion and presentation.
With regards to your 3 issues, though - how do you explain people who don't have those 3 issues? Me, for example - I have exceptional problem-solving skills (and not just from having a degree in philosophy), I am absolutely immune to group think, and as for the third, I was forced to confront the implications of a world run by monsters from a very early age, so I have an immunity to that one too.
It means I can apply a whole range of critical thinking skills along with an exploration of what-if hypotheticals, along with a significant level of knowledge about science, psychology and espionage and so on. I also happen to be an excellent auto-didact.
I do have a massive amount of stuff on my to-do list at the moment in the run up to 16/11/24 (event day), but I will try and examine all your stuff more deeply as I will certainly be doing at least one 9-11 article at some point (probably more than one, actually, or a series even, as it definitely merits it). Thanks for reading my psych article, btw, and the restack. You might like the first two parts as well if you get time.
I appreciate your willingness to revisit 9/11 and all the narratives around 9/11….
Seeing that you have exceptional problem-solving skills (and not just from having a degree in philosophy), and being absolutely immune to group think.
Let me then start you off with two main articles, before you read Dr Wood’s book and her Qui-Tam whistle-blower court documents, as your whole range of critical thinking skills along with an exploration of what-if hypotheticals, along with a significant level of knowledge about science, psychology and espionage and excellent auto-didact skills will come in quite handy in seeing the grift of the 9/11 “truther” movement.
Pity all those skills were never used the last 23 years, but hey….
Better late than never, as the saying goes….
I look forward to getting your feedback.
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11
An email discussion with Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/psychology-of-resistance-to-truth
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/where-did-the-towers-go-by-dr-judy-wood/
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:
1. 9/11 Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
My first response is that I'm going to be honest, which is how you have been, so you can't complain. You said 'pity all those skills were never used the last 23 years' - I believe I kind of hinted in my previous comment that you have to be civil and mature and reasonable when you engage people in discussion. Insulting them and their intelligence is never going to win hearts and minds. In view of that I am really not surprised in the slightest if the likes of Fran et al. didn't want to engage with you. Under the circumstances I thought Fran in particular was extremely polite and civil. Given how much I understand about psychology that tells me a great deal.
Once you do your due diligence and work through the homework I gave you you too will be a little cheezed off…
1. At yourself for outsourcing your thinking.
2. The monumental gaslighting of the so called 9/11 “truther” movement.
3. The stupidity of certain people playing the premeditated ignorance game.
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control exercise and the government approved controlled opposition, COINTELPRO agents were put into place during the formation of “Scholars for 9/11 truth.”
I’ve been interacting DAILY with people like you mouthing off just how clever they are, but have yet not woken up to their own bamboozle, can entertain one just so long, before you get easily irritated.
I’m not here to make friends or coddle you into the truth, but to challenge you to challenge yourself and the world view and truths you hold.
MOST have yet to learn from COVID, now imagne people’s cognitive dissonance on 9/11.
YOU have shown yours - Now - instead of getting defensive - Go do your homework.
As stated before - The following article is a good start to work through - before your read Dr Wood’s book and Andrew Johnson’s two free e-books.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Ok- I’ll be totally honest with you here. Your 3 points there are what’s known as psychological projection.
If one takes a step back and examines what you (and the Judy Wood, no planes, CGI planes, DEWs etc. brigade) are really doing here is trying to convince people that they can’t trust their own senses, whether that’s their own eyes or ears, or their own common sense. Likewise, they can no longer trust their own intellect or science or anything. And THAT is about gaslighting and inflicting mental trauma. THAT is an attack on human consciousness.
What it leads to is known as LEARNED HELPLESSNESS. That’s a classic MK-Ultra torture technique used for mind control programming. Learned helplessness is one of the most important and effective methods for inducing the freeze response and thus creating slaves, and for destroying all possibility of opposition and resistance.
It’s yet another corollary of the fake events narrative, in which we are now unable to trust anything whatsoever about history or anything which a huge number of brilliant investigative researchers have spent their lives unravelling and exposing over the last 100 years.
You are also subliminally convincing people that the cabal are somehow all-powerful and can totally control people’s entire perception of reality. Again, that creates learned helplessness and a total lack of resistance, because people will believe that resistance is futile.
Slavery, in other words.
So I really think you should examine the consequences of what you are doing. If you are not doing this intentionally then I guess that’s a slight mitigation in your favour. But if you are aware, then that makes you a cognitive infiltrator. Some of your insulting aggressive comments would tend to bear that out.
You don’t need to worry about me, though, because compared to you I scarcely have an audience at all. So I’m hardly a threat.
Just to say, I have better, more productive things to do with my time than dive into very dark rabbit holes. I spent a long time climbing out of one, and I’m not going back into that abyss.
Too much REALLY important stuff happening RIGHT NOW to go back and argue about what happened over 20 years ago. What a distraction. This might as well be corporate media: No need to worry about your country collapsing LOOK OVER HERE.... That's right. Let's split hairs about stuff of no relevance TODAY and get really worked up about it. This might just all be AI dialog between chat bots. // This topic, and DEWS on 9/11... who can care? How does it shine light on the massive assault, economic, political, social, fiscal, medical, radiological playing in your town tonight?
One may argue why should we dwell on an event that happened such a long time ago.
Surely we have more pressing issues to be concerned about such as the recent plandemic, future scamdemics, mRNA gene interventions, the climate hoax, 15-minute cities, censorship, Big Pharma, trans agenda, indoctrination of our kids, the Gaza genocide, fake wars, migration invasion, 5G, EMF poisoning, non-existent democracy and the endless drive towards totalitarianism?
You are yet to realise, that if people understood 9/11 fully, and what was done to them, then CV-19 would not have happened…
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Please take the time to read this article and watch the 26 minute video included: https://911revision.substack.com/p/september-11-2001-an-essential-guide
One other initial response I had to this article is that it appears, at least superficially, to be not much more than an ad hominem attack, which is the worst logical fallacy of them all. In fact it's not even a logical fallacy. I believe it was Socrates who said that personal attacks are the last resort of someone who's lost the argument. I might add, they are an option for someone who doesn't even have an argument.
The observation I'd make is that you haven't provided any evidence whatsoever to prove that Dylan Avery and the Loose Change team were controlled opposition. All you've done is say 'I don't agree with their explanation for what happened on 9-11'. But this is a misdirection because the purpose of your article is clearly not to critically examine the content of Loose Change, and attempt to disprove that content point by point. Rather, the purpose of your article is to convince the reader that Loose Change was a controlled opposition psyop. And you have provided a big fat ZERO evidence of that. It's just nothing but insults. And insults do not an argument make.
Do you have any evidence? Because in the utmost sincerity I would love to see that evidence. If it exists it would be very important indeed for the 9-11 Truth Movement.
Everything I've just said, by the way, is not an insult, and should not be taken as such. It is a critical response. I hope you'll respect it as such.
My dear...
It seems you missed the following: "All 4 of the alleged planes (including the ones shown in Loose Change) were calculated to be traveling at 500+ mph at or near sea level, which is NOT POSSIBLE. Does Loose Change come back and correct this fundamental error? No, because they are a major part of the Disinformation Controlled Opposition cadre."
You have obviously NOT read any of Dr Wood, Andrew Johnson or Mark Conlon's (9/11 Planes Research) work.
Thus you are approaching all of this from an uninformed OPINION based on propaganda you've been fed at all these years...
More homework for you to do - On the planes for now....
Revisiting the various 9/11 Plane Narratives
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-911-cgi-plane-narrative
Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11
Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/going-in-search-of-planes-in-nyc
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Ok, first of all you haven’t proven the following:
1/ the planes (or whatever objects they were) were travelling at 500+mph.
2/ planes can’t travel at 500mph at or near sea level (you will need to use proper laws of physics to prove this, not the standard model.
3/ Loose Change, as far as I recall, didn’t necessarily say the ‘planes’ were real planes. They admitted the possibility they could have been cruise missiles (esp. Pentagon), or another kind of plane dressed up to look like a commercial airliner.
4/ In the November 2001 crash that plane was travelling nowhere near 500mph. In fact, the reason it crashed was because it wasn’t travelling fast enough to pick up lift from the charge field. The plane stalled, in other words, because of an inexperienced pilot. This made it slow down, which is why it crashed and broke up.
Can you answer those 4 points, briefly, or at least point me towards a link where those four points have been answered using the real laws of physics (i.e. Miles Mathis).
On that final note, actually, can you answer the question for me as to whether Judy Wood has ever cited Miles Mathis’ physics papers? You’ve obviously read everything she’s written so you should be able to answer that sincere question for me.
I’ll remind you again – You are stuck in 2010 – You quickly need to do some due diligence and get to 2024 – You’ve been asleep for 14 years, since Loose Change was released.
You stumble at the get go, as there were NO ELT’s recorded on 9/11 – That means, there is really no need to address the rest of your points.
I’ll refer you AGAIN, to the work of 9/11 Planes Research, for you to get up to speed.
Here is an article on the ELT’s - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/a-presentation-discussing-the-official
I’ll just humour your four points for some fun…
1. 3D Radar Video Analysis of Flight 175, using the official radar data: https://rumble.com/v53lv92-911-wtc-planes-3d-video-analysis.html
2. More than enough pilots have testified to the impossible speeds – I’ll refer you to the 2007 Qui-Tam case against NIST for the fraudulent plane impact studies, for your further education - https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
3. Loose Change has been pointed out as having numerous errors – Again – go read the work of 9/11 Planes Research
4. Flight 587 broke apart due to the drag in the thicker air, due to excess speeds, the engines actually hit the ground before the plane.
I can see you did NOT do your due diligence by reading / watching everything I put in the article.
You are another person, knee jerking your uninformed opinions, instead of working through what is being presented to you, for you to understand the argument that is being presented.
Premeditated ignorance wins again….
Pertaining to Miles Mathis’ physics papers – Go read Dr Wood’s book and find out – I’m not here to spoon feed you – Real truth seekers do the work and don’t outsource their thinking.
Watched Judy's talks years ago 👍
I see a pattern arising:
No planes
No viruses
No CO2 climate change
No WMD
🤔
Indeed - You will find this articles rather telling on the cover-up of the cover-up and exposing the truth-traitors in the 9/11 “truth” movement…
Illusion of Reality and the 9/11 Planes
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/illusion-of-reality-and-the-911-planes
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
How Not to Critique Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Francis O'Neill's intellectually flimsy attack on Judy Wood bears all the hallmarks of propaganda, undermining his credibility as a dissident voice.
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/how-not-to-critique-judy-wood
Yes, the political machine is being operated by the
Prince of Darkness
Anyone who has done a serious investigation into 911 knows Israel carried it out along with the US government. Anyone who denies Israel carried this out is nothing but a shekel shilling dis/misinformation shill.
is there a link for the video about airliner crash performance? I'd like to be able to share it outside Substack, ( with credit given )
I have a lot of plane related content on Rumble.
You cannot post anything questioning the 9/11 planes narrative on YouTube, without it being removed.
Link to Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2588430