What we can see is that one of the distraction propaganda streams is "How exactly the buildings came down" - a little similar to "Israel did it!" Even when I believed all the Israel propaganda (some of which at least may well be based in truth, eg, the Israelis doing stuff in the twin towers in the months before) I wondered how people were so focused on Israel when obviously it all had to be done under the auspices of the US government, it's not as if Israel "did it" ... and, of course, where was their involvement in the planes and the Pentagon, that had to be mostly - if not all -US military right? Regardless they couldn't have been responsible for 9/11 they could only have been players (and who wasn't? - my own PM, Little Johnny Howard, just happened to be paying a "surprise" visit to Washington on the fateful day) but it truly is astonishing how much focus goes on Israel. The magic of propaganda!
While the US military might have been mainly responsible for the planes and the Pentagon, the destruction of the WTC is a whole different story. I believe that the DEWs-nuclear-thermite propaganda is to mislead us into thinking that perhaps the military may have been responsible in that an unusual form of demolition was implemented when the most obvious culprit for being the main player is Controlled Demolition Inc (CDI) who they very generously hinted at by informing us it was CDI who presented a cleanup plan for the WTC 11 days - yeah 11 days - after 9/11.
CDI hold world records in bringing down large buildings using traditional methods. Why wouldn't they use their tried and trusted methods for the WTC and I see no clear evidence that they didn't. It's easy to purport faked evidence to suggest something different from normal explosives and we know that they did that for thermite (short video showing what seems to show molten steel is really just emergency workers using flashlights https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txk6tCZ1p6s)
Ultimately, it's as you said yourself - the faked plane crashes (mean faked passenger deaths) and ludicrous failure of defence is where it's at not the buildings.
Thanks for your time. I'm not making a full conclusion but I can see now that Gage and gang are leading to the wrong door. Him and Chandler are often evasive and only make sense a little. Also, normally inquisitive investigators would vet other theories but they don't do much with the DEW theory. I also see buildings disappearing in mid air and lack of rubble on the ground leading me to question everything, incl hybrid DEW and conventional demolition is not ruled out to me. DEW is very real based on past docs, current US mil public weaponry, and attacks in the last years: Paradise, Lahaina, others.
I don't think we can entirely trust what they show us for the twin towers while the authenticity of the footage of WTC-7's destruction - showcased to us from 7 vantage points - I have no doubt of and looks 100% normal implosion style.
It could be that they used different techniques for the other buildings, however there is no record that we know of in using other methods to bring down skyscrapers and we know that there is a propaganda focus on exactly how the buildings came down ... and ultimately all the focus on various aspects of the buildings is simply part of the smokescreen to cover the fact 9/11 was the biggest demolition job of all time cum biggest anti-terror exercise of all time.
While anyone is leaving out staged death and injury from their 9/11 analysis they are propagating second-level propaganda ... whatever they're saying.
My comments are pretty clear that I think highly of your efforts and the concepts you are reporting from the Wood camp. That being said, I do like Petra as a commenter in general, and have exchanged dozens of comments with her (?) over the months, most not on 9.11. Some points I may not resonate fully with her but still honestly I would like to meet her in person, as you, and others. We don't have to agree on every point, or even big points, to have positive feeling to each other. I always look forward to your posts esp the short vids and we'll be in touch.
PS One of Agent's post linked to "clouds/chemtrails with germs in them" and didnt reply to my inquiry on that. So that's not a positive step, but that doesnt change my openness to listen to him.
I don't read everything he writes and I certainly can't say I agree with everything either but when I saw the questioning of DEWs as a psyop I'm like, yeah, I think so. I remember someone pointing out how the burnt out cars shown to indicate DEWs were faked for 9/11 and I had that same feeling for the cars in Maui. Everyone has to make up their own mind and mine is made up - I don't buy either of the Judys.
9/11 has a number of complex doors including hybrid fakery as possible, I would always leave one's mind open to any new info for anything, we have to be like that or we lose the game. Even when you are convinced, "pretty sure, but open" is the best attitude.
It's funny how there is such emphasis on the videos of 1, 2 and 7 "collapsing" but very little footage or commentary on the rest of the WTC buildings that also mostly disappeared. Meanwhile, just about every building around the entire WTC only had cosmetic damage. Wild.
You really need to share my articles on the 9/11 orphans...
The reason Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth and the rest of the poo-ba organisation do not want people to count past 3 is because, once they investigate the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers trust building, then the jig is up with regards to the explosives / thermite and nuke theories....
The anomalies with the orphans cannot be explained by the theories these 9/11 "truther" talking heads tout.
Just the anomaly with the earth's magnetic field and the seismic readings should be enough for people to wake up, but alas - People are too brainwashed to challenge the beliefs they hold.
Orphans are the buildings that never get mentioned - Buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Banker's Trust Building - I've written articles on all but Building 5 so far.
That is why I call Richard Gage et all - architects for an engineered truth - all part of a cult, that cannot count past 3...
While I’ve had my suspicions, I never saw all this information before. Very interesting.
You really need to read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
For more information check out Andrew Johnson’s research go to http://CheckTheEvidence.com
This substack does not get the attention it deserves.
Then please share it far and wide...
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
For more information check out Andrew Johnson’s research go to http://CheckTheEvidence.com
Shared as a note which gets many dozen views, I cant find out how many.
Thank you so much...
I have to disagree I'm afraid PM.
What we can see is that one of the distraction propaganda streams is "How exactly the buildings came down" - a little similar to "Israel did it!" Even when I believed all the Israel propaganda (some of which at least may well be based in truth, eg, the Israelis doing stuff in the twin towers in the months before) I wondered how people were so focused on Israel when obviously it all had to be done under the auspices of the US government, it's not as if Israel "did it" ... and, of course, where was their involvement in the planes and the Pentagon, that had to be mostly - if not all -US military right? Regardless they couldn't have been responsible for 9/11 they could only have been players (and who wasn't? - my own PM, Little Johnny Howard, just happened to be paying a "surprise" visit to Washington on the fateful day) but it truly is astonishing how much focus goes on Israel. The magic of propaganda!
While the US military might have been mainly responsible for the planes and the Pentagon, the destruction of the WTC is a whole different story. I believe that the DEWs-nuclear-thermite propaganda is to mislead us into thinking that perhaps the military may have been responsible in that an unusual form of demolition was implemented when the most obvious culprit for being the main player is Controlled Demolition Inc (CDI) who they very generously hinted at by informing us it was CDI who presented a cleanup plan for the WTC 11 days - yeah 11 days - after 9/11.
CDI hold world records in bringing down large buildings using traditional methods. Why wouldn't they use their tried and trusted methods for the WTC and I see no clear evidence that they didn't. It's easy to purport faked evidence to suggest something different from normal explosives and we know that they did that for thermite (short video showing what seems to show molten steel is really just emergency workers using flashlights https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txk6tCZ1p6s)
https://www.controlled-demolition.com/world-records/
Ultimately, it's as you said yourself - the faked plane crashes (mean faked passenger deaths) and ludicrous failure of defence is where it's at not the buildings.
Thanks for your time. I'm not making a full conclusion but I can see now that Gage and gang are leading to the wrong door. Him and Chandler are often evasive and only make sense a little. Also, normally inquisitive investigators would vet other theories but they don't do much with the DEW theory. I also see buildings disappearing in mid air and lack of rubble on the ground leading me to question everything, incl hybrid DEW and conventional demolition is not ruled out to me. DEW is very real based on past docs, current US mil public weaponry, and attacks in the last years: Paradise, Lahaina, others.
Have you seen Agent131711's post, Were Maui DEWs a PSYOP? Did We Fall for a MASSIVE Distraction - https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/were-maui-dews-a-psyop-did-we-fall?
I don't think we can entirely trust what they show us for the twin towers while the authenticity of the footage of WTC-7's destruction - showcased to us from 7 vantage points - I have no doubt of and looks 100% normal implosion style.
It could be that they used different techniques for the other buildings, however there is no record that we know of in using other methods to bring down skyscrapers and we know that there is a propaganda focus on exactly how the buildings came down ... and ultimately all the focus on various aspects of the buildings is simply part of the smokescreen to cover the fact 9/11 was the biggest demolition job of all time cum biggest anti-terror exercise of all time.
While anyone is leaving out staged death and injury from their 9/11 analysis they are propagating second-level propaganda ... whatever they're saying.
I'm not committed, it's not as cut and dry as proving a virus wasn't found. and will simmer on your points of course. Have a great weekend!
You too!
Proton, not until you do your due diligence and read this book, will your eyes open - https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
Psy-Op detective, is anything but a "detective" as she never looks into anything shared with her - We've been at each other for months.
My comments are pretty clear that I think highly of your efforts and the concepts you are reporting from the Wood camp. That being said, I do like Petra as a commenter in general, and have exchanged dozens of comments with her (?) over the months, most not on 9.11. Some points I may not resonate fully with her but still honestly I would like to meet her in person, as you, and others. We don't have to agree on every point, or even big points, to have positive feeling to each other. I always look forward to your posts esp the short vids and we'll be in touch.
PS One of Agent's post linked to "clouds/chemtrails with germs in them" and didnt reply to my inquiry on that. So that's not a positive step, but that doesnt change my openness to listen to him.
I don't read everything he writes and I certainly can't say I agree with everything either but when I saw the questioning of DEWs as a psyop I'm like, yeah, I think so. I remember someone pointing out how the burnt out cars shown to indicate DEWs were faked for 9/11 and I had that same feeling for the cars in Maui. Everyone has to make up their own mind and mine is made up - I don't buy either of the Judys.
9/11 has a number of complex doors including hybrid fakery as possible, I would always leave one's mind open to any new info for anything, we have to be like that or we lose the game. Even when you are convinced, "pretty sure, but open" is the best attitude.
Read this: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-icke-on-911
and this: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-1-400-toasted-cars-on-911
And come and debunk this: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives
Read this article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-icke-on-911
Then this one:
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
It's funny how there is such emphasis on the videos of 1, 2 and 7 "collapsing" but very little footage or commentary on the rest of the WTC buildings that also mostly disappeared. Meanwhile, just about every building around the entire WTC only had cosmetic damage. Wild.
You really need to share my articles on the 9/11 orphans...
The reason Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth and the rest of the poo-ba organisation do not want people to count past 3 is because, once they investigate the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers trust building, then the jig is up with regards to the explosives / thermite and nuke theories....
The anomalies with the orphans cannot be explained by the theories these 9/11 "truther" talking heads tout.
Just the anomaly with the earth's magnetic field and the seismic readings should be enough for people to wake up, but alas - People are too brainwashed to challenge the beliefs they hold.
Sorry what does "orphans" mean here?
Orphans are the buildings that never get mentioned - Buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Banker's Trust Building - I've written articles on all but Building 5 so far.
That is why I call Richard Gage et all - architects for an engineered truth - all part of a cult, that cannot count past 3...
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-telltale-signs-of-a-911-cult
Grrrr! thank you! I'll have to rewrite my article! =)))
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/911-2-planes-3-towers
Hi Prof. Nazar
When wanting the truth of what happened on 9/11 there is one book, you should read.
Where did the towers go? by Dr Judy Wood: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
Her FAQ from her website: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/faq/
Her 2007 Qui-Tam Whistleblower case against the US Gov: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
And if you want to learn the truth of the cover up of the cover up by the 9/11 truther movement: Read Andrew Johnson's book: https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2009/06/15/9-11-finding-the-truth-free-download-book/
Listen to this 1h discussion with Andrew Johnson on the cover up of the cover up: https://jermwarfare.com/red-pills/andrew-johnson-on-the-cover-up-of-the-9-11-cover-up
Lots to process. Have patience with this newcomer =)
Then just start with her 2012, 2.5h presentation and watch it this weekend.
Link: https://youtu.be/aWNzq9OWGmY
Wow!!! Loaded with information. Thank you!
LOL - Want to be overloaded with information?
My Odysee channel has about 550 videos related to 9/11 subject matter - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7?view=playlists