I got hooked onto Fox news at the time and distinctly remember Fox news pinning the blame on Osama bin Laden. Today, people like Roger Stone, Alex Jones, Glenn Beck and a handful of others are unable to separate DEW, from Controlled demolition or Islamic terrorists. I like your reverse psychology at the end there - I see what you're doing... :)
A news anchor actually blamed Osama 45 seconds after flight 175 allegedly hit the South Tower...
I'm currently in correspondence with Roger Stone on X - He recently had Richard Gage on and it seems Roger is now willing to look at other narratives that are not the government narrative... I sent him some short video clips and links to some of my articles and Dr Wood's book - So, let's see what might come from it.
My sense is Richard Gage is getting paid to say what he says, so unlikely to change his mind. I can see Roger changing his mind - he wrote an excellent book on the JFK assassination The Man Who Killed Kennedy. He had a 30 man FBI SWAT team arrest him in the early morning, so he is probably not a fan of pig gov.
What Gage's motivation for being a LIAR one can only speculate on, but one can rest assured he will have to atone for his sins one day...
I really hope Stone will look into what I've shared with him and I know a number of people who've contacted him after the Gage interview... We'll just have to wait and see.
Well, we all would like to know how the machine / weapon works, but unfortunately the US Supreme court railroaded Dr Wood by stating that they are ignoring the law by not listening to her case. If the case went ahead, she would have been able to depose the 23 NIST subcontractors, especially ARA and SAIC that were tasked with security and cleanup of ground zero. These two companies in turn specialise in DEW and weather manipulation, as she thinks hurricane Erin had some sort of role to play in the 9/11 events.
If you're more inclined to watch video's than read then the following;
Thermite on 9/11: The ULTIMATE Debunk
(Which is a history on the thermite theory and how many times other scientist actually proved that Steven E. Jones' paper, on which architects for an engineered truth's and Richard Gage's premis is built, is absolute bull)
My short understanding based on talking to the great granddaughter of one of the key architects it was a demolition. More importantly 911 was an operation to strip the rights of citizens based on the unpatriotic act called the Patriot Act. The erosion of the American’s rights!!
The American people give no direct consent as they do not know what is really happening. And those that do know are shut down. We are victims of pirates and brigands who lie, murder, and steal for a living. No one would consent to that. There is no social contract that's meaningful since there is no transparency. People always blame the victims when they are addicted to power.
They use all the tools in their arsenal to destroy us with silent weapons like bioweapons, ideological subversion, mind control, direct energy weapons, chemicals, disinformation, cultural genocide and who knows what else. Governments are all guilty of destroying their own populations and others for their Overlords. They are what I call the oligopoly who are establishing the biosecurity slave state for total control.
Actually being blocked by PedoPedia is a badge of honor since it's basically a psyop posing as an "encyclopedia".
My research on 9/11 consists of showing that the media narrative derived from the FEMA and NIST reports which both should have won Hugo Awards for speculative fiction if not fantasy is total BS.
First the myth that two aluminum alloy aircraft could have penetrated those massive tempered steel and reinforced concrete towers:
Scientific proof that they would have been like a bug hitting a windshield at 60 MPH.
Okay jet fuel is basically kerosine which burns at around 1300 max meaning it can't melt steel nor can it vaporize the occupants.
Note neither the FEMA and NIST reports mention the Solomon Building AKA Building 7 owned by "pull it" Lucky Larry Silverman nor the Customs Building AKA Building 6 which was cratered by a highly brisant blast of some kind.
How it was done?
Well we can eliminate jet fuel. Thermite would have taken hours if not days and the towers woulda burned like July 4th Sparklers.
Conventional explosives?
It took months to rig the Aladdin in Vegas. The Twin Towers and 7 would have taken years for a controlled demolition.
Thus nukes ( there is such a thing as Nuclear Demolition) or Judy Woods' theory of DEW seems like the more likely candidates though the latter doesn't explain the Cherenkov effect (i.e. those pretty blue "memorial lights") noted after the debris was cleared from over the bath tub.
Oh yeah what about the planes?
What planes?
Over at September Clues they did an extensive poll and found that the majority of witnesses never saw one hit the South Tower and witnesses saw a small twin engine aircraft hit the North Tower which was reported to Bush when he was in Florida.
Cruise missile?
BTW according to BTS AA 99 was never scheduled to fly that day from Logan and according to Pilots for 9/11 Truth UA 175 was still transmitting ACARS 20 minutes after allegedly hitting the South Tower. Go figure.
I haven't seen you comment before, so you must be new to reading my substack articles.
I hope you read a few more of them...
Nukes are ruled out....
Heinz Pommer and his "nuke theory" was quite a theoretical feat but puts the cart before the horse. It appeared he failed to ask the question what happened?
Dr. Judy Wood - 9/11 The New Hiroshima, exhaustively describes what happened (before the cover-up which began immediately) .
Pommer's theory was pretty much blown away by Wood's presentation.
The giant cavern below the WTC complex was formed during geologic times not by a nuke on 911.
Videos of the basement below the towers show that there was little damage to the infrastructure in the basement and people walking through it without encountering any of the mythical pools of molten metals.
A nuke below each tower would surely have damaged the walls of the 'bathtub', the dyke that held the Hudson back, which would have flooded Manhattan. There was no evidence that there was any heat energy released in the collapses which Pommer said would have been necessary to melt the steel.
Steel, by the way, glows bright red before melting.
We did not see any red hot steel or any evidence of extreme heat.
Cars appeared to burning but the piles of paper on the ground did not combust.
Judy Wood had to be 'cancelled' because she was right.
Not the best presenter, but a hell of a structural engineer who immediately saw what nobody else did and spent years trying to get the word out.
Ironically, it was the '911 Truth' movement who took her down.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
They could not rebut the evidence she gathered so they ignored it (Covid anyone?).
Wood's book, Where Did the Towers Go? "Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" introduces her theory, based on the evidence, that the work of Nicola Tesla had been used in the process...
For more on the "planes" I suggest you study 9/11 Planes Research's substack:
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," or the nuke proponents, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Prof David A. Hughes – An 1h 40 min Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence (2024)
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
Personally I have my own theories on how it could have been done but without an actual forensic study of the crime scene AKA “Ground Zero” which before 9/11 originally meant “ground zero” n. a point on the surface of land or water at or directly above or below the center of a nuclear explosion.Collins English Dictionary, Major New Edition (Third Edition 1991, ISBN 0 00 433286-5 Standard).
It is all theoretical.
Aside from that IMHO any discussion of how it was done is a distraction from who did it. For instance there are over 4 T of intel gathered by Able Danger that has never been released to the public.
There is also SatIntel acquired by NRO and NGA sats never released either.
For me the Cherenkov Effect is a clue to how it was done which is what I pointed out way back to some 9/11 “Truther” group and immediately blocked after that especially since I didn’t agree with the Thermite Hypothesis.
Again if one wants to know what happened on 9/11 they must look back to the initial effort taken in ‘93 which they say was caused by AnFo which like the OC Bombing was impossible. Blasting agents do not leave a crater the size of a football field behind nor can they take down almost 1/3 of a reenforced concrete structure like the Murrah Federal Building.
All the best in your research but I’ll go my own way on this and may have an answer when all documents related to the event are fully declassed including those held by Russia’s SVR.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
Oh I see so if one questions say the scamdemic according to you one would have to be more “qualified” than the late …er I mean the eminent Dr. Anthony Fauci to do so….got it.
I’m not interested in joining the cult of Judy Wood.
I got hooked onto Fox news at the time and distinctly remember Fox news pinning the blame on Osama bin Laden. Today, people like Roger Stone, Alex Jones, Glenn Beck and a handful of others are unable to separate DEW, from Controlled demolition or Islamic terrorists. I like your reverse psychology at the end there - I see what you're doing... :)
A news anchor actually blamed Osama 45 seconds after flight 175 allegedly hit the South Tower...
I'm currently in correspondence with Roger Stone on X - He recently had Richard Gage on and it seems Roger is now willing to look at other narratives that are not the government narrative... I sent him some short video clips and links to some of my articles and Dr Wood's book - So, let's see what might come from it.
My sense is Richard Gage is getting paid to say what he says, so unlikely to change his mind. I can see Roger changing his mind - he wrote an excellent book on the JFK assassination The Man Who Killed Kennedy. He had a 30 man FBI SWAT team arrest him in the early morning, so he is probably not a fan of pig gov.
What Gage's motivation for being a LIAR one can only speculate on, but one can rest assured he will have to atone for his sins one day...
I really hope Stone will look into what I've shared with him and I know a number of people who've contacted him after the Gage interview... We'll just have to wait and see.
Great work keeping this in the limelight, dim as it may be....
I've followed the scenario since day 1. I've always been a sceptic and avid investigator and 9/11 was the Daddy of them all.
Clearly NOT achieved by Muslim "terrorists" so who did it.
We know, the same people involved in the Convid scam, the same people involved in the Ukraine "war", the same people involved in potential WW3.
The very same people!!!
Who are they and why???
Some of us know, the rest aren't allowed to know.....
The truth WILL set us free.... maybe 🤨
Keep up the good work folks... ❤️✌️🏴
We know who to ask...
DEPS - The Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Elaine?
Magnetic electro-gravitic nuclear reaction - A lot like the work you see that Hutchison did for the US Military at Los Alamos Labs in 1986...
I'd suggest listening to this 2012 interview, Dr Wood explains it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-The-EVIDENCE--Theo-Chalmers-interviews-Dr-Judy-Wood:3
Hutchison had things disappear - One of his colleagues he worked with managed to have a whole building disappear - It's discussed in this awesome docci - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/Where-Did-the-Towers-Go-2nd-edition:1
1:03:19 to 1:04:24 - Another building disappeared
Well, we all would like to know how the machine / weapon works, but unfortunately the US Supreme court railroaded Dr Wood by stating that they are ignoring the law by not listening to her case. If the case went ahead, she would have been able to depose the 23 NIST subcontractors, especially ARA and SAIC that were tasked with security and cleanup of ground zero. These two companies in turn specialise in DEW and weather manipulation, as she thinks hurricane Erin had some sort of role to play in the 9/11 events.
Yeah, 9/11 is totally debunked. I thought it was a hoax when I was watching it on TV that day, but in the aftermath I wasn't so sure.
I'm sure now.
Thermite for sure.
I take it you're new to my substack...
Here is some reading you can do....
The controlled demolition of the thermite & nuke theory?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
If you're more inclined to watch video's than read then the following;
Thermite on 9/11: The ULTIMATE Debunk
(Which is a history on the thermite theory and how many times other scientist actually proved that Steven E. Jones' paper, on which architects for an engineered truth's and Richard Gage's premis is built, is absolute bull)
Link: https://rumble.com/v4p8aix-thermite-on-911-the-ultimate-debunk.html
Thermite & 9/11 - The Final Nail in the Coffin?
Aerospace Engineer discusses the truth about thermite.
Link: https://rumble.com/v4wdnpr-thermite-and-911-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin.html
My short understanding based on talking to the great granddaughter of one of the key architects it was a demolition. More importantly 911 was an operation to strip the rights of citizens based on the unpatriotic act called the Patriot Act. The erosion of the American’s rights!!
You state: "one of the key architects it was a demolition."
Please define demolition - what was the mechanism used to disintegrate the buildings into a molecular dust cloud before it even reached the ground?
Have a look at this: https://x.com/911Revisionist/status/1791804269735084474
Do you know who wrote the Patriot Act? It was Joe Biden in 1995
The American people give no direct consent as they do not know what is really happening. And those that do know are shut down. We are victims of pirates and brigands who lie, murder, and steal for a living. No one would consent to that. There is no social contract that's meaningful since there is no transparency. People always blame the victims when they are addicted to power.
They use all the tools in their arsenal to destroy us with silent weapons like bioweapons, ideological subversion, mind control, direct energy weapons, chemicals, disinformation, cultural genocide and who knows what else. Governments are all guilty of destroying their own populations and others for their Overlords. They are what I call the oligopoly who are establishing the biosecurity slave state for total control.
Actually being blocked by PedoPedia is a badge of honor since it's basically a psyop posing as an "encyclopedia".
My research on 9/11 consists of showing that the media narrative derived from the FEMA and NIST reports which both should have won Hugo Awards for speculative fiction if not fantasy is total BS.
First the myth that two aluminum alloy aircraft could have penetrated those massive tempered steel and reinforced concrete towers:
https://youtu.be/U4wDqSnBJ-k?si=2tWRjO9TrF4CwCaE
Scientific proof that they would have been like a bug hitting a windshield at 60 MPH.
Okay jet fuel is basically kerosine which burns at around 1300 max meaning it can't melt steel nor can it vaporize the occupants.
Note neither the FEMA and NIST reports mention the Solomon Building AKA Building 7 owned by "pull it" Lucky Larry Silverman nor the Customs Building AKA Building 6 which was cratered by a highly brisant blast of some kind.
How it was done?
Well we can eliminate jet fuel. Thermite would have taken hours if not days and the towers woulda burned like July 4th Sparklers.
Conventional explosives?
It took months to rig the Aladdin in Vegas. The Twin Towers and 7 would have taken years for a controlled demolition.
Thus nukes ( there is such a thing as Nuclear Demolition) or Judy Woods' theory of DEW seems like the more likely candidates though the latter doesn't explain the Cherenkov effect (i.e. those pretty blue "memorial lights") noted after the debris was cleared from over the bath tub.
Oh yeah what about the planes?
What planes?
Over at September Clues they did an extensive poll and found that the majority of witnesses never saw one hit the South Tower and witnesses saw a small twin engine aircraft hit the North Tower which was reported to Bush when he was in Florida.
Cruise missile?
BTW according to BTS AA 99 was never scheduled to fly that day from Logan and according to Pilots for 9/11 Truth UA 175 was still transmitting ACARS 20 minutes after allegedly hitting the South Tower. Go figure.
I could go on but I'll stop here.
I haven't seen you comment before, so you must be new to reading my substack articles.
I hope you read a few more of them...
Nukes are ruled out....
Heinz Pommer and his "nuke theory" was quite a theoretical feat but puts the cart before the horse. It appeared he failed to ask the question what happened?
Dr. Judy Wood - 9/11 The New Hiroshima, exhaustively describes what happened (before the cover-up which began immediately) .
Pommer's theory was pretty much blown away by Wood's presentation.
The giant cavern below the WTC complex was formed during geologic times not by a nuke on 911.
Videos of the basement below the towers show that there was little damage to the infrastructure in the basement and people walking through it without encountering any of the mythical pools of molten metals.
A nuke below each tower would surely have damaged the walls of the 'bathtub', the dyke that held the Hudson back, which would have flooded Manhattan. There was no evidence that there was any heat energy released in the collapses which Pommer said would have been necessary to melt the steel.
Steel, by the way, glows bright red before melting.
We did not see any red hot steel or any evidence of extreme heat.
Cars appeared to burning but the piles of paper on the ground did not combust.
Judy Wood had to be 'cancelled' because she was right.
Not the best presenter, but a hell of a structural engineer who immediately saw what nobody else did and spent years trying to get the word out.
Ironically, it was the '911 Truth' movement who took her down.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
They could not rebut the evidence she gathered so they ignored it (Covid anyone?).
Wood's book, Where Did the Towers Go? "Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" introduces her theory, based on the evidence, that the work of Nicola Tesla had been used in the process...
For more on the "planes" I suggest you study 9/11 Planes Research's substack:
Illusion of Reality and the 9/11 Planes
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/illusion-of-reality-and-the-911-planes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," or the nuke proponents, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Prof David A. Hughes – An 1h 40 min Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence (2024)
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
Personally I have my own theories on how it could have been done but without an actual forensic study of the crime scene AKA “Ground Zero” which before 9/11 originally meant “ground zero” n. a point on the surface of land or water at or directly above or below the center of a nuclear explosion.Collins English Dictionary, Major New Edition (Third Edition 1991, ISBN 0 00 433286-5 Standard).
It is all theoretical.
Aside from that IMHO any discussion of how it was done is a distraction from who did it. For instance there are over 4 T of intel gathered by Able Danger that has never been released to the public.
There is also SatIntel acquired by NRO and NGA sats never released either.
For me the Cherenkov Effect is a clue to how it was done which is what I pointed out way back to some 9/11 “Truther” group and immediately blocked after that especially since I didn’t agree with the Thermite Hypothesis.
Again if one wants to know what happened on 9/11 they must look back to the initial effort taken in ‘93 which they say was caused by AnFo which like the OC Bombing was impossible. Blasting agents do not leave a crater the size of a football field behind nor can they take down almost 1/3 of a reenforced concrete structure like the Murrah Federal Building.
All the best in your research but I’ll go my own way on this and may have an answer when all documents related to the event are fully declassed including those held by Russia’s SVR.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
I see your POV but I’ll go with declass. Carry on.
O, then please entertain me with your theory.
Are you more qualified than Dr Wood?
Let’s hear what your extensive study of 9/11 has exposed.
Oh I see so if one questions say the scamdemic according to you one would have to be more “qualified” than the late …er I mean the eminent Dr. Anthony Fauci to do so….got it.
I’m not interested in joining the cult of Judy Wood.
Good article in Encyclopedia Dramatica but it seems to be MIA though this one in the Unencyclopedia is good https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Jimbo_Wales