29 Comments
Feb 17Liked by 9/11 Revisionist

Very nice, Txs!!

Expand full comment

They dropped a molecular disruptor down the lift shafts , no conventional explosive dematerializes 2× 100 million ton steel frame towers into dust, without cracking the basin beneath, or the subway. Just physics!

Judy Woods is a good read.

“ Where did the towers go? “

Thermite is a distraction.

The site was quickly secured and the “remaining “ steel shipped to China.

Esoterically 2 became 1.

A bit like the gender agenda .

They also steered a hurricane heading there that morning, a back up in case the tech failed and left clues.

Cheers

Expand full comment
author

Small correction - It's Dr Wood and you're making an assumption with regards to "they dropped a molecular disruptor down the lift shafts", the bathtub / slurry wall...

The "shipping steel to china" is a cover story for the lack of rubble....

I suggest you work through my previous article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives

Expand full comment
Feb 19Liked by 9/11 Revisionist

Thank you, will do , apologies Dr, let's get to the bottom of this "trade twin towers" catastrophe, as one engineer to another, cheers

Expand full comment

Oh my goodness, how can you believe Pasquale Buzzelli's miracle survivor story? I laughed hysterically when I read it in the NY Times magazine. PB's nonsense story is just one of the overwhelming number of Revelation of the Method (RoM) signs that 9/11 was the biggest demolition job of all time cum glorified exercise. I have PB's interview at the top of my 9/11 page as just one example of what a farce the death and injury claim is.

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911

You don't seem familiar with RoM. If not, you really need to be because it's a very helpful tool in recognising and understanding psyops and is an essential part of their MO.

https://soundofheart.org/galacticfreepress/content/revelation-method-predictive-programming-and-prime-directive

Also, you need to look at all the available information and make a judgement based on ALL of it, not just take a piece of purported evidence as gospel. 9/11 is a STORY and lots of stuff is put forward as "evidence" but when you blow away the magic propaganda dust you see it's FAKE, not real.

You cannot possibly understand 9/11 without a clear sense of the propaganda strategy and you obviously don't have that. Please try to take it onboard. It's not that complicated.

The perps work on the the 90 / 10 principle, that is, they anticipate that 90% will buy their story while 10% won't (or some similar split). In some psyops they simply target the 90% and let the 10% disbelieve their nonsense. In big psyops (and some smaller ones) though they target the 90% with one narrative and the 10% with another creating a False Dilemma situation:

Story A for the 90% - eg, terrrrorrrrists

Story B for the 10% - eg, the cold-blooded and callous US govt left all those poor people to die in the buildings

when the Reality - C is something different

In the case of 9/11, yes the US govt was responsible but 9/11 was really a "live" exercise where all they wanted to was to create a terror story and bring down buildings - they didn't want plane crashes and they didn't want to kill or injure people ... and in psyops only what is wanted is done for real, the rest is faked ... which makes perfect sense because it's all about magician's tricks and mind control, not doing things for real unless wanted or even simulating reality very carefully hence Revelation of the Method.

You've obviously done masses of research ... but the most important thing in psyops is the ability to do a 180 on whatever you currently believe because psyops are so often multi-layered like Russian Dolls. Your research is leading you down the wrong path. You can choose to keep on that path sunk-cost fallacy style or you can do the 180 required and recognise the truth.

The choice is yours:

--- Continue with the false "US govt killed all those poor people in the buildings" narrative

--- Recognise demolition job cum "live" exercise

If you aren't doing 180s in your psyop research ... you're not doing your research right.

Expand full comment
author

With regards to the technology used on 9/11, you are missing the bigger picture!

Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.

Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".

Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.

Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.

And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like they have shown themselves to be.

You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.

In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.

there is only BLUFF!

Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!

Official narrative – Jet fuel.

Option behind door no 1 – explosives,

door no 2 – thermite,

door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.

Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.

Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com

For more information check out Andrew Johnson’s research go to http://CheckTheEvidence.com

Expand full comment

If the buildings dustified then how did that dust cause so much damage to the other buildings?

I appreciate you've done a lot of work, however, as I said, the most important ability in psyop analysis is being able to do a 180. If you cannot do a 180 and want to keep steamrolling down the path you're currently following you'll never make a psyop analyst. You need to be able to go - OMG! I've got it all wrong, it's this other thing that's really going on.

The most important element of 9/11 is the propaganda strategy where they targeted the 90% with one narrative and the 10% with another narrative.

9/11 was a demolition job where normal evacuation procedures were conducted, OK?

Expand full comment
author

Damage to other buildings? You most probably mean the LACK of damage to other buildings - Go re-read my article on the Bankers trust Building where I discuss the lack of debris on top of the buildings, same with my article: WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?

As you can see limited debris on the 9/11 orphans - Buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 in the pictures of that article. - https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings

Also, read my article on building 4 - Where did 75% of that building disappear to?

The basements under building 4 weren't damaged.

Can you explain the anomalies with regards to the earth's magnetic field and the lack of seismic readings in line with the towers and building 7? https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truthers-vs-the-seismic-evidence

then the anomalies with the 1400 toasted cars? How can a dust cloud not cause any damage to people, yet the cars spontaneously caught fire?

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-1-400-toasted-cars-on-911

You should really have a look at my presentation, where I dissect a thermite believer's 10 points where he tries to refute DEW and I show exactly how flawed the thermite theory is, especially when trying to refute DEW.

It's broken up into short segments with each of the 10 points he raised.

It's rather educational, if I say so myself - https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives

Expand full comment

Do you agree that the most important crime of 9/11 was killing 3000 people?

Expand full comment
author
Mar 2·edited Mar 2Author

The most important crime of 9/11 was that it was a false flag event where innocent Americans were killed to justify a fake war on terror, which killed over 4 million people in the middle east, in order to invade 7 countries in 5 years and to strip the American people of more of their "freedoms".

9/11 Was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control exercise - If people managed to wake up from the bamboozle early enough, maybe cv-19 would not have happened.

But people mindlessly outsourced their thinking to the government, MSM and later the government sanctioned so called 9/11 "truther" movement.

As the world slowly stirs to consider what really happened on 9/11, we need direct unambiguous answers.

Challenge, Questions / Controversy between Where Did The Towers Go (https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com) and the controlled opposition traitors like Richard Gage, Ted Walter, James Corbett, Alex Jones, Steven E. Jones, James Fetzer et al. must be embraced and directly answered.

The world needs to recognize that Directed Energy Weapons have been around for decades and were used on 9/11.

The American people, via the consent of the governed, are ultimately responsible for the actions of the UNITED STATES / United States / US FedGov.

The People have to stand up and peacefully, resolutely fix the problem.

The same underlying technology demonstrated on 9/11 can be used to peacefully power the world with free energy or shatter it to pieces like a 1,000 mile diameter asteroid impact.

The time for conscious, fully informed choice has now come.

Choose you this day who you will serve.

Expand full comment

Can you please provide me with one piece of clear evidence that shows a single one of the 3,000 who allegedly died really died or a single one of the 6,000 who were allegedly injured really were injured.

https://www.state.gov/22nd-anniversary-of-the-september-11-2001-attacks/

I ask only for a single piece of clear evidence for 9,000 people.

Expand full comment