Sage is either male or a group of persons. I have not been able to confirm they understand there is no-virus. The large no of 'scribers means bots and Intel support. There is no reason to have any discussion with them, but many people like Sage and I suspect I would get flak even from making this comment into a note. Just keep what you are doing and ignore them.
...yes although sometimes, it's worth commenting in a place and to a person (?) whom you know is not going to change their mind, because someone else is likely to read the thread. That third person is really the one you're talking to...
I am one of the Sage 10K -he probably is male; the highly eccentric, yet sustained style suggests not a "group". I saw "Revisionist" comments there and was disappointed at the author's reception - he can be that way. Discussion there - and the author's content - is usually wide open and shifting - with e.g. no fixed position on virus or lab leak or no virus (or no viruses, period - that's a bridge too far for most of the crowd there). The trend has been to settle at "no virus" = straight op.
The consensus there on Lahaina was DEWs; I thought that approach to 911 would get a more sympathetic hearing there. Personally, I am more of a why and who guy than a how guy on 911.
This is a new site to me - bookmarked - I will read this closely later. You think Fetzer is controlled - ? - long a hunch of mine - former marine, Princeton ("what more do you need know?" as Mathis says at times).
I suggest you start your journey on my substack with my first article and follow them in chronological order otherwise you'll have trouble with most of the content...
And his main gig - is stirring the pot. But if anyone dares challenge him - you'll get a classic Sage Hana reply - such as "go shoot yourself in the head". He is not worth paying any attention to - regardless of his follower numbers because it's obvious that he is on Substack purely for his own entertainment - akin to yelling fire in a crowded theatre.
Unrelated, but wanted to get your take on this. I heard a mention on a conspiracy podcast that "in Feb 2001, the FCC granted the 33GHz frequency band for space-to-earth satellites". My ears perked up knowing about your content. Sure enough, that did happen. Do you think there are any connections?
Another thread I've been following, and see potential overlaps to Dr. Woods work (things like the hutch effect) is the M H 370 saga. Have you seen anything from https://www.youtube.com/@JustXAshton/featured
It's a fascinating rabbit hole which has lead to topics of
- Teleportation or faster than light communication
Indeed I've been following Justin on X with regards to MH 370.
I've also shared a lot of zero point energy, Hutchison, Col Tom E. Bearden and Col John Alexander research in his comment sections..
He just does not want to look into the 9/11 "debate" or the evidence that Dr Wood presents.
I've eve pointed out to him the first reported military use of DEWs were during the 1989 Panama invasion, as reported in the 1992 Academy Award winning documentary, The Panama Deception...
I'll keep on trying to have him realise the importance of the live demonstration for a weapon that can disrupt the molecular bonds of matter on September 11, 2001...
Listening to some recent podcasts with him, it sounds like he has taken the investigation as far as he can right now. He talked about putting it down , and moving onto other stuff for a while. Maybe he will think about the connections.
I was mainly curious if you were also making similar connections about the backend technology as I was
I have no idea who Justin is, but I have had some success in convincing people DEWs are real with these links below. I say to people:
"Many people ridicule the very idea of DEWs and don't realize that the military has already openly confirmed the use of directed energy weapons. Also online there are many accounts of various types of DEWs being used at least as far back as Vietnam, along with weaponized weather going back at least to WWII."
"In the next two decades, new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy and mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict. These advances will enable lasers with reasonable mass and cost to effect very many kills."
— from New World Vistas, by the US Air Force
"It's politically sensitive, but it's going to happen. Some people don't want to hear this, and it sure isn't in vogue, but -- absolutely -- we're going to fight in space. We're going to fight from space and we're going to fight into space. That's why the U.S. has development programs in directed energy and hit-to-kill mechanisms."
You should listen to the commentary of Dean Warwick in my David Icke article on the DEW tests that were conducted by the Soviets, British and Americans in the laste 1950's where they were turning 25 story buildings to dust...
Already downloaded, along with a bunch of your other links! I'm so glad to find other people researching this too - I've had quite a few lonely years! :)
I am new to this DEW but after watching a lot of Dr. Judy Woods work (thank you 9/11 Revisionist) I am quite convinced. Also watching Peggy Hall and that amazing Arborist (i can't remember his name) covering the Lahina , Paradise Valley , Chile fires I am convinced that the Globalists are using this weapon against the citizens of the world. They spend more money in the military industrial complex than anything else, of course they have weapons as such. Very grateful to run into people such a yourselves.
Me too, there's an avalanche of people who follow the AE911Truth psyop (I used to be one of them) because it was so effective at keeping people away from Dr. Wood. I appreciate each and every person who discovers her and the truth!
It's not a job - I'm doing this for the search for accountability and to have people wake up to the bamboozle that is the so called 9/11 "truther" movement.
Howdy! Noob here trying to understand your main thesis — is it that some sort of DEW vaporized some fraction of the WTC buildings, such that the missing material did not register in seismic recordings?
Perhaps Gage banned mention of Woods work because he thought she was disinformation, it's not unreasonable since even if she's right, it changes nothing and is diversionary.
And on your question if DEW weapons can make buildings disintegrate on a molecular level, I suggest you read her book and then you decide whether or not the evidence she presents is refutable - It's been out for 12 years and NO ONE has been able to: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
So, please do your due diligence before raising an uninformed opinion.
If you truly deem yourself a truth seeker - You would investigate both sides of an argument to make an informed decision.
A last point - Do you know the difference between a conclusive body of evidence and that of a theory or belief?
So many helpful links, thank you! I am always looking for ammunition. I went through the shift in understanding after reading Where Did The Towers Go - and I read every page to make sure I understood it fully. It blew me away, and not just her evidence, but the scientific and technological implications. I was forced to realize that I had spent 15 years of my life believing the A&ETruth dialectic, and promoting it, which had been designed to catch people just like me in its net.
I've got to be honest, back in 2011, I was under his spell and only in late 2012, did I come across the work of Dr Wood and my whole outlook on the world changed. After watching this presentation and then I got her book: https://youtu.be/aWNzq9OWGmY
The book is actually a course in critical thinking and thus helped me see through the covid farce from the beginning...
Some additional "ammo" you should have in your arsenal would be the following;
1. You can download and read Dr Judy Wood’s Refutation of Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023:
You are 100% correct in describing her book as a course in critical thinking - I loved that she set aside the whole, Who Did It, and Why, and just set about gathering evidence at a crime scene - you cannot prosecute a crime if you do not know What the perpetrator actually did. I have to say though, that the photo that struck me the most initially was this one:
I have been dropping that photo along with her links in comments allovertheplace for ages now, and because I host the photo I can see how many downloads/views it gets - it's been growing and growing this past year. Funny that that photo is something [they] have tried to discredit too - Wood is clearly extremely influential to many people.
Yes, I've been busy - Again - Wanted to set it up as a learning hub - Thus all the playlists...
YouTube has nukes two of my channels so far, so my biggest body of work is Odysee, then a couple of vids on Rumble so far and very limited, as i'm not too bothered with the censorship loving YouTube...
Sage is either male or a group of persons. I have not been able to confirm they understand there is no-virus. The large no of 'scribers means bots and Intel support. There is no reason to have any discussion with them, but many people like Sage and I suspect I would get flak even from making this comment into a note. Just keep what you are doing and ignore them.
...yes although sometimes, it's worth commenting in a place and to a person (?) whom you know is not going to change their mind, because someone else is likely to read the thread. That third person is really the one you're talking to...
I am one of the Sage 10K -he probably is male; the highly eccentric, yet sustained style suggests not a "group". I saw "Revisionist" comments there and was disappointed at the author's reception - he can be that way. Discussion there - and the author's content - is usually wide open and shifting - with e.g. no fixed position on virus or lab leak or no virus (or no viruses, period - that's a bridge too far for most of the crowd there). The trend has been to settle at "no virus" = straight op.
The consensus there on Lahaina was DEWs; I thought that approach to 911 would get a more sympathetic hearing there. Personally, I am more of a why and who guy than a how guy on 911.
This is a new site to me - bookmarked - I will read this closely later. You think Fetzer is controlled - ? - long a hunch of mine - former marine, Princeton ("what more do you need know?" as Mathis says at times).
I suggest you start your journey on my substack with my first article and follow them in chronological order otherwise you'll have trouble with most of the content...
First article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/in-2022-we-passed-the-21st-anniversary
- I'm just a dumb African, that knows what a woman is.
Sage is a dude - just FYI.
O, interesting - Thanx for the heads up
And his main gig - is stirring the pot. But if anyone dares challenge him - you'll get a classic Sage Hana reply - such as "go shoot yourself in the head". He is not worth paying any attention to - regardless of his follower numbers because it's obvious that he is on Substack purely for his own entertainment - akin to yelling fire in a crowded theatre.
I enjoy the battling of ideas - Most just struggle when confronted with irrefutable evidence, that's why they try and shut the conversation down...
Much like Gene Laratonda and his "war room" that has now been rebranded by me as the "safe padded echo chamber / play room".
Unrelated, but wanted to get your take on this. I heard a mention on a conspiracy podcast that "in Feb 2001, the FCC granted the 33GHz frequency band for space-to-earth satellites". My ears perked up knowing about your content. Sure enough, that did happen. Do you think there are any connections?
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/02/22/01-4215/33-36-ghz-for-federal-government-use
Will have to look into it and will get back to you on it...
Great. Appreciate it.
Another thread I've been following, and see potential overlaps to Dr. Woods work (things like the hutch effect) is the M H 370 saga. Have you seen anything from https://www.youtube.com/@JustXAshton/featured
It's a fascinating rabbit hole which has lead to topics of
- Teleportation or faster than light communication
- Zero point energy
- Room temp superconductivity
- Global satellite filming and recording
Hi John
Indeed I've been following Justin on X with regards to MH 370.
I've also shared a lot of zero point energy, Hutchison, Col Tom E. Bearden and Col John Alexander research in his comment sections..
He just does not want to look into the 9/11 "debate" or the evidence that Dr Wood presents.
I've eve pointed out to him the first reported military use of DEWs were during the 1989 Panama invasion, as reported in the 1992 Academy Award winning documentary, The Panama Deception...
I'll keep on trying to have him realise the importance of the live demonstration for a weapon that can disrupt the molecular bonds of matter on September 11, 2001...
Listening to some recent podcasts with him, it sounds like he has taken the investigation as far as he can right now. He talked about putting it down , and moving onto other stuff for a while. Maybe he will think about the connections.
I was mainly curious if you were also making similar connections about the backend technology as I was
It seems he's waking up or he read some of my comments...
https://twitter.com/JustXAshton/status/1762710362074312834
I have no idea who Justin is, but I have had some success in convincing people DEWs are real with these links below. I say to people:
"Many people ridicule the very idea of DEWs and don't realize that the military has already openly confirmed the use of directed energy weapons. Also online there are many accounts of various types of DEWs being used at least as far back as Vietnam, along with weaponized weather going back at least to WWII."
From the Government Accountability Office:
https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106717?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#:~:text=Directed%20energy%20weapons%20(DEW)%20use,and%20high%20power%20microwave%20weapons.
From the Air Force Research Laboratory
https://afresearchlab.com/technology/directed-energy/
Two quotes from c. 1997:
"In the next two decades, new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy and mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict. These advances will enable lasers with reasonable mass and cost to effect very many kills."
— from New World Vistas, by the US Air Force
"It's politically sensitive, but it's going to happen. Some people don't want to hear this, and it sure isn't in vogue, but -- absolutely -- we're going to fight in space. We're going to fight from space and we're going to fight into space. That's why the U.S. has development programs in directed energy and hit-to-kill mechanisms."
— Gen Joseph Ashy, of the US Space Command
You should listen to the commentary of Dean Warwick in my David Icke article on the DEW tests that were conducted by the Soviets, British and Americans in the laste 1950's where they were turning 25 story buildings to dust...
Already downloaded, along with a bunch of your other links! I'm so glad to find other people researching this too - I've had quite a few lonely years! :)
Do you have the link?
I am new to this DEW but after watching a lot of Dr. Judy Woods work (thank you 9/11 Revisionist) I am quite convinced. Also watching Peggy Hall and that amazing Arborist (i can't remember his name) covering the Lahina , Paradise Valley , Chile fires I am convinced that the Globalists are using this weapon against the citizens of the world. They spend more money in the military industrial complex than anything else, of course they have weapons as such. Very grateful to run into people such a yourselves.
Me too, there's an avalanche of people who follow the AE911Truth psyop (I used to be one of them) because it was so effective at keeping people away from Dr. Wood. I appreciate each and every person who discovers her and the truth!
Holy shit. What a nasty person.
You have everything on this subject, and she or it, should look into all of your research if they are truly interested in this subject.
I’m sorry it was so nasty to you.
Angela - comes with the territory.
I've had worse - people don't like to have their world view challenged with irrefutable facts.
You wouldn’t be doing your job if you weren’t getting pushback 🙏
It's not a job - I'm doing this for the search for accountability and to have people wake up to the bamboozle that is the so called 9/11 "truther" movement.
I appreciate it very much…I’m learning so much from all your hard work putting this together.. 🙏😊
Thank you Julie - But ALL CREDIT goes to Dr Judy Wood.
1. Step 1 is to read her book, so you too can take ownership of the truth of what happened on 9/11 - https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
2. Her YT channel - https://www.youtube.com/@911EmpiricalEvidence
3. Her 2012 presentation - https://youtu.be/aWNzq9OWGmY
Howdy! Noob here trying to understand your main thesis — is it that some sort of DEW vaporized some fraction of the WTC buildings, such that the missing material did not register in seismic recordings?
I have a couple of articles on my substack going through the seismic anomalies...
Also check out my presentation - https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives
I’m only waking up & questioning all levels. Dr Woods presentation definitely stuck with me as the most honest & truthful about 9/11 that I’ve seen
Perhaps Gage banned mention of Woods work because he thought she was disinformation, it's not unreasonable since even if she's right, it changes nothing and is diversionary.
Can DEW weapons make a building explode anyway?
Tell me - did you follow the links to Elsa Schieder, PhD's two articles she wrote after her June 2023 truth summit?
Did you;
1. Read Dr Wood's refutation of Gage's Game?
2. Read the article linked - The controlled demolition of the thermite & nuke theory
3. Watch my presentation of February 10, 2024
Two important and rather telling interactions with Gage -
1. 2011 - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/Richard-Gage-AE911Truth-caught-with-his-pants-down:9
2. 2023 when I asked him some questions - https://rumble.com/v3g82mu-911-truth-what-does-it-take-for-you-to-distrust-someone.html
And on your question if DEW weapons can make buildings disintegrate on a molecular level, I suggest you read her book and then you decide whether or not the evidence she presents is refutable - It's been out for 12 years and NO ONE has been able to: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
So, please do your due diligence before raising an uninformed opinion.
If you truly deem yourself a truth seeker - You would investigate both sides of an argument to make an informed decision.
A last point - Do you know the difference between a conclusive body of evidence and that of a theory or belief?
This short clip will be ale to put it into perspective for you: https://rumble.com/v4f6oz2-911-a-conclusive-body-of-evidence-vs-a-belief-or-a-theory-hypothesis.html
It changes everything.
So many helpful links, thank you! I am always looking for ammunition. I went through the shift in understanding after reading Where Did The Towers Go - and I read every page to make sure I understood it fully. It blew me away, and not just her evidence, but the scientific and technological implications. I was forced to realize that I had spent 15 years of my life believing the A&ETruth dialectic, and promoting it, which had been designed to catch people just like me in its net.
I've got to be honest, back in 2011, I was under his spell and only in late 2012, did I come across the work of Dr Wood and my whole outlook on the world changed. After watching this presentation and then I got her book: https://youtu.be/aWNzq9OWGmY
The book is actually a course in critical thinking and thus helped me see through the covid farce from the beginning...
Some additional "ammo" you should have in your arsenal would be the following;
1. You can download and read Dr Judy Wood’s Refutation of Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023:
https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
2. 9/11 A conclusive body of evidence vs a belief or a theory / hypothesis - https://rumble.com/v4f6oz2-911-a-conclusive-body-of-evidence-vs-a-belief-or-a-theory-hypothesis.html
3. 9/11 TRUTH: What does it take for you to distrust someone?
https://rumble.com/v3g82mu-911-truth-what-does-it-take-for-you-to-distrust-someone.html
Excellent! Thanks again!
You are 100% correct in describing her book as a course in critical thinking - I loved that she set aside the whole, Who Did It, and Why, and just set about gathering evidence at a crime scene - you cannot prosecute a crime if you do not know What the perpetrator actually did. I have to say though, that the photo that struck me the most initially was this one:
https://filedn.com/lTfJzsvwbXbHXhzXsWJwEM5/Dustification.jpg
I have been dropping that photo along with her links in comments allovertheplace for ages now, and because I host the photo I can see how many downloads/views it gets - it's been growing and growing this past year. Funny that that photo is something [they] have tried to discredit too - Wood is clearly extremely influential to many people.
If you want to use a new "spire" video - Have a look in this article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-last-thought-for-2023
It's a great thought experiment for people believing in explosives, thermite etc.....
I once had questions for Jonathan Cole, the guy who did all those thermite experiments and let's just say he struggled.
I edited the video in such a way as to disprove every point he makes during his answer to my question: https://rumble.com/v3e0iam-disproving-john-cole-pes-alternative-north-tower-spire-theory-and-the-offic.html
You might want to watch all my interactions with them in 2023, before they started barring me from asking questions that make them feel uncomfortable: https://rumble.com/v3xm981-911-truth-greatest-hits-2023-extended-cut.html
Thank you so much. I just found your huge Odysee collection - my gosh you have done SO much work!!
Yes, I've been busy - Again - Wanted to set it up as a learning hub - Thus all the playlists...
YouTube has nukes two of my channels so far, so my biggest body of work is Odysee, then a couple of vids on Rumble so far and very limited, as i'm not too bothered with the censorship loving YouTube...
Yeah no reason to beat your head against a brick YT wall. Rumble appears to be pretty good these days. Anyway I followed you on all of them.
I will probably download most of your stuff - it's a nervous habit I have now, after seeing things disappear for so many years lol
Thanks for that Refutation link especially - Dr. Wood is such a clear thinker, it's so refreshing.
Gage's lies laid bare
https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2014/08/03/richard-gage-and-other-liars-for-9-11-truth/
My free book was published in 2009 - http://tinyurl.com/911ftb
Follow up was published a few years later... http://tinyurl.com/911htb
I updated Dr Wood's website a few years ago:
http://www.drjudywood.com/
So there's a "crash course" on there (if you'll pardon the expression).
Plenty of "liars for rent" it seems!
Hi Andrew!
Thank you for popping in and sharing the crash course - Much appreciated and thank you for the truth warrior you have been all these years.
You are a true inspiration - Thank you again, from the bottom of my heart!
Excellent write up. I was thinking the same thing in 2011… where did the towers go?
Read Elana Freelands book Under an Ionized Sky last year and boom, there it is DEW with help from HAARP. Dots are connecting now!