“Doctoral degrees in Linguistics and in Communication. Winner of major national award in Europe. Independent, unfunded research of the link between AI and humans communicating in natural languages. 43 years of professional and creative…”
"To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence..."
Dr. Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials.
She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).
Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
This is not a pissing contest or comparing dicks. There have been many types of "evidence" that contradicted each other. I even doubt that the videos were real.
Always looking to be educated in the truth - In all of the years since I have followed and tried to make sense of this phenomenon; Today, I ran across this 1999 movie, which speaks of such things. Perhaps it will be of interest:
Later on in the movie, there was another reference made with regard to the evil not yet done at the time of the making of the movie. Plenty of times, I will take in a movie, just for the educational properties it may offer up. As these sick fooks like to allow to be heard their plans, prior to doing these nasty deeds.
Alex Jones Info wars crew were working with the crisis actors on Jan 6th that whole lawsuit and court appearance was to take what independence he haf left. I think he was allowed in the Grove and he's worked with his family for cia the whole time. Foe him to succeed Bill Coopet had to be removed he's Jewish. All these Ametican dew companies are owned by Israelis. In fact every large medium and most small companies worldwide have Blackrock state street and vanguard as the main owners with it revolving between the three. Same board of directors on tel aviv boulevard so it is an Israeli operation. It wasn't masonic it's all a plan to destroy amalek which is everyone but them.
i still think hurricane erin was faked though..didnt pass over dry land so no verification from weather stations...just to play with your minds re geoengineering and distract from the grand solar minimum which is not man made..my opinion and entitled to it so there
personally, I don't care if it was black magic & witchcraft that brought down the buildings, fact is the media & gov LIED about it, the destruction of the towers & 7 had to have been by way of some additional source of energy, could not possibly have been a "gravity driven collapse"
therefore ALL of the news media people and ALL of the politicians who promote the official story are complicit in FRAUD.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I'm so glad I found your online presence, even though I was hip to DEW/exotic weaponry on 9/11 since ~2010, thanks to Nico Haupt and Dr. Wood.
As it pertains to the video footage, you seem keen on promoting Project Blue Beam, while discrediting Ace Faker Baker, but isn't it possible that BOTH holographic and CGI deception were used? 🤔
The CGI narrative was introduced to distract away from the evidence Dr Morgan Reynolds presented in his 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case against NIST and the fraudulent impact studies done.
Think you should get the lowdown on the shenanigans on the 9/11 planes, since the formation of the “Scholars for 911 truth” in 2005.
We also discuss the shill Ace baker in the conversation.
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
You do know there were a plethora of so-called live video recordings of the South Tower "impact", right? What I am contending is that, while some demonstrate the holographic imagery, others appear to exhibit CGI fakery.
I know that the "No Planes Theory" was disingenuously conflated with the "📺 Fakery" hypothesis . . . so you dismiss any and all allegations of TVF on 9/11? Based on the revelations of Craig Lazo/Killtown, that's a tuff 💊 for me to swallow . . . but we can concur that NONE of the footage demonstrated what genuinely struck EITHER skyscraper, right?
Are you familiar with Gerard Holmgren's research (you remind me of him lol)?
So the private Israeli contractors doing elevator shaft maintenance in the few weeks prior to 9/11 was a limited hangout to give credence to the shape charges (thermite or what have you) hypothesis?
I have lots of your 🔗s open, planning to dive deep this week . . . but Simon Hytten/Shack's brother did not race for Osama, rather, it was another bin Laden. Ozzy bin Oswald (Greg Thomson) exposed the CluesForum admins as being transparently disingenuous for other reasons . . .
Lastly (for now), what is your take on the "VicSims Report" and what happened in Shanksville? 🤔
You are obviously new to my substack, so there is a LOT of catching up you need to do with regards to my interactions with the 9/11 "truth" movement and the shills moving people away from truth.
I suggest you watch the discussion Dr Reynolds and I had.
You also subscribe to 9/11 Planes Research and he has done excellent work, which you should delve through, as he completely and utterly demolishes the CGI narrative, people like Shack, Loose Change and the shill Ace Baker and more, over the last 15 years....
He and I also recently demolished and exposed the re-pivot of the 9/11 "truth" movement, now trying to resurrect the completely ludicrous remote control planes narrative...
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Yeah, I will explore these resources and get back to you.
I have seen myriad, purported South Tower impact videos, and they all contain anomalies and inconsistencies from one to the other. For the sake of time and energy conservation, I hope what you presented (or endorsed on others' behalf) addresses this, so I don't have to 🫰 back with another contention.
Excellent discussion, I really enjoyed the deep the breakdown on thermite, lots of good information there on why it's a dead end. One of the reasons I stopped looking into 9/11 is the sheer amount of obfuscation around the details (no planes, fake planes, cgi, thermite, and so one). I have reviewed Wood's website thoroughly, the one she created before publishing her book?
You did mention that Hutchinson worked for SDI and was part of a team of scientists who were deleted. Where is this information? Very curious to learn about his history. There are too sites about his work that don't have everything.
On the plane / no plane debate (there shouldn't be one to begin with) watch my two discussions with Dr Morgan Reynolds and 9/11 Planes Research - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
It looks like there were a number of methods applied to all these buildings.
I find it interesting how you comment on a podcast of two and a half hours, within 20 minutes after it being uploaded.
Are you playing a premeditated ignorance game?
Answer the question; it comes from reading your other publications.
“Doctoral degrees in Linguistics and in Communication. Winner of major national award in Europe. Independent, unfunded research of the link between AI and humans communicating in natural languages. 43 years of professional and creative…”
Ok, now go study this book: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
The book is a summary of this 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case against 23 NIST subcontractors for science fraud: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
More about the author:
"To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence..."
Dr. Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials.
She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).
Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
This is not a pissing contest or comparing dicks. There have been many types of "evidence" that contradicted each other. I even doubt that the videos were real.
How can one ascertain that a source is authentic?
Read the book and get back to me, as your comments point to the fact that you’ve yet to even look at the evidence Dr Wood presents.
My question must be answered first: How can one be sure a source can be trusted?
I never trust a source, including myself. :)
Without answering the question, reading the book would be a waste of my time.
"It looks like"
What is that proof, evidence, fact... of?
Always looking to be educated in the truth - In all of the years since I have followed and tried to make sense of this phenomenon; Today, I ran across this 1999 movie, which speaks of such things. Perhaps it will be of interest:
https://tubitv.com/movies/528803/the-incredible-genie?autoplay=true The app is free and can be accessed easily (I am not selling anything), if uninterested in watching the entire movie, go to apx 14:39 and view that portion of the flick.
Blessings ~
Unfortunately Tubi TV isn't available in my country.
Perhaps a VPN can help. All of them cost some money...
Use an zip code for USA (type in zip codes and choose any of them to use). Then it becomes available.
Blessings ~
This might help:
The source works best on Brave (no ads), and doesn't require a login.
Later on in the movie, there was another reference made with regard to the evil not yet done at the time of the making of the movie. Plenty of times, I will take in a movie, just for the educational properties it may offer up. As these sick fooks like to allow to be heard their plans, prior to doing these nasty deeds.
Alex Jones Info wars crew were working with the crisis actors on Jan 6th that whole lawsuit and court appearance was to take what independence he haf left. I think he was allowed in the Grove and he's worked with his family for cia the whole time. Foe him to succeed Bill Coopet had to be removed he's Jewish. All these Ametican dew companies are owned by Israelis. In fact every large medium and most small companies worldwide have Blackrock state street and vanguard as the main owners with it revolving between the three. Same board of directors on tel aviv boulevard so it is an Israeli operation. It wasn't masonic it's all a plan to destroy amalek which is everyone but them.
Have you read this article of mine?
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
i still think hurricane erin was faked though..didnt pass over dry land so no verification from weather stations...just to play with your minds re geoengineering and distract from the grand solar minimum which is not man made..my opinion and entitled to it so there
Yeah, 10 universities and NASA studying Erin was a figment of their imaginations.
Maybe you'd like to read my article on hurricane Erin and then follow the links and read up on all the data that Dr Wood has on Erin...
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001
personally, I don't care if it was black magic & witchcraft that brought down the buildings, fact is the media & gov LIED about it, the destruction of the towers & 7 had to have been by way of some additional source of energy, could not possibly have been a "gravity driven collapse"
therefore ALL of the news media people and ALL of the politicians who promote the official story are complicit in FRAUD.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
I'm so glad I found your online presence, even though I was hip to DEW/exotic weaponry on 9/11 since ~2010, thanks to Nico Haupt and Dr. Wood.
As it pertains to the video footage, you seem keen on promoting Project Blue Beam, while discrediting Ace Faker Baker, but isn't it possible that BOTH holographic and CGI deception were used? 🤔
The CGI / 3D Volumetric debate has been settled.
The CGI narrative was introduced to distract away from the evidence Dr Morgan Reynolds presented in his 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case against NIST and the fraudulent impact studies done.
Think you should get the lowdown on the shenanigans on the 9/11 planes, since the formation of the “Scholars for 911 truth” in 2005.
We also discuss the shill Ace baker in the conversation.
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
You do know there were a plethora of so-called live video recordings of the South Tower "impact", right? What I am contending is that, while some demonstrate the holographic imagery, others appear to exhibit CGI fakery.
I know that the "No Planes Theory" was disingenuously conflated with the "📺 Fakery" hypothesis . . . so you dismiss any and all allegations of TVF on 9/11? Based on the revelations of Craig Lazo/Killtown, that's a tuff 💊 for me to swallow . . . but we can concur that NONE of the footage demonstrated what genuinely struck EITHER skyscraper, right?
Are you familiar with Gerard Holmgren's research (you remind me of him lol)?
So the private Israeli contractors doing elevator shaft maintenance in the few weeks prior to 9/11 was a limited hangout to give credence to the shape charges (thermite or what have you) hypothesis?
I have lots of your 🔗s open, planning to dive deep this week . . . but Simon Hytten/Shack's brother did not race for Osama, rather, it was another bin Laden. Ozzy bin Oswald (Greg Thomson) exposed the CluesForum admins as being transparently disingenuous for other reasons . . .
Lastly (for now), what is your take on the "VicSims Report" and what happened in Shanksville? 🤔
You are obviously new to my substack, so there is a LOT of catching up you need to do with regards to my interactions with the 9/11 "truth" movement and the shills moving people away from truth.
I suggest you watch the discussion Dr Reynolds and I had.
You also subscribe to 9/11 Planes Research and he has done excellent work, which you should delve through, as he completely and utterly demolishes the CGI narrative, people like Shack, Loose Change and the shill Ace Baker and more, over the last 15 years....
He and I also recently demolished and exposed the re-pivot of the 9/11 "truth" movement, now trying to resurrect the completely ludicrous remote control planes narrative...
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
On the victims report, 9/11 Planes Research, covers that in depth in one of his latest articles.
The 9/11 Hoodwink at Shanksville, PA
No Jet Fuel, or a plane at the Flight 93 Crash Site
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hoodwinked-at-shanksville-on-911
The PentaCon on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Poem: Ghosts In The Flight - Don't believe your eyes
Article: https://robdubya.substack.com/p/poem-ghosts-in-the-flight
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
You have a lot of homework to do, with the two podcasts and the documentary to watch this week.
Yeah, I will explore these resources and get back to you.
I have seen myriad, purported South Tower impact videos, and they all contain anomalies and inconsistencies from one to the other. For the sake of time and energy conservation, I hope what you presented (or endorsed on others' behalf) addresses this, so I don't have to 🫰 back with another contention.
Lastly, lol @ the 🧌s you have attracted . . . 😂
Excellent discussion, I really enjoyed the deep the breakdown on thermite, lots of good information there on why it's a dead end. One of the reasons I stopped looking into 9/11 is the sheer amount of obfuscation around the details (no planes, fake planes, cgi, thermite, and so one). I have reviewed Wood's website thoroughly, the one she created before publishing her book?
You did mention that Hutchinson worked for SDI and was part of a team of scientists who were deleted. Where is this information? Very curious to learn about his history. There are too sites about his work that don't have everything.
You can find more on Hutchison in this episode of Jesse Ventura’s show, which dates from 2012, I think…
Silly name for the episode, as it is not descriptive of what Dr Wood presents as the destructive mechanism on 9/11.
Link: https://rumble.com/v6r68qe-jesse-ventura-dew-and-911.html
Also, give this docci a watch for some interesting takes on Hutchison as well;
Link: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
On the plane / no plane debate (there shouldn't be one to begin with) watch my two discussions with Dr Morgan Reynolds and 9/11 Planes Research - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html