A close friend of Steve E. Jones was at The Energy Breakthrough Conference in 2012. At the Q/A part of the lecture, He turned on him based on the IRREFUTABLE evidence that Dr. Judy Wood presented.
The 9/11 Perpetrators’ Horrifying Tech Can Cause Things & People to Come Apart at Molecular Level
In 2010, Dr. Judy Wood published her groundbreaking book, Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11, in which she presented ample forensic evidence indicating the deployment on 9/11 of some technology unknown to the general public.
Wood’s work has not received the attention it deserves.
International relations scholar David A. Hughes, PhD is trying to change that by publishing a series of articles in defense of Wood.
In this interview, Hughes returns to the Solari Report to join me in discussing the geopolitical and other major implications of Dr. Wood’s work on 9/11’s invisible weaponry.
Wood is a former mechanical engineering professor who received her PhD in materials engineering science from Virginia Tech. In the 500 pages of her book, which includes numerous high-quality images, she argues that “Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic” and shows that what we see in the pictures does not match the explanatory narratives presented to us—neither the “official reality” narrative of airplanes causing the collapse nor the alternative theories of a “pancake collapse” caused by nanothermite or mini-nukes.
For example, hardly any debris—from two towers weighing half a million tons each—was visible at Ground Zero just moments after the event. According to Wood, the towers did not so much collapse as appear to turn into dust mid-air.
I'm with you on Corbett, as he's always been dismissive of looking at Dr Wood's work, even now after his sidekick from Media Monarchy has now apologised for ever doubting in Dr Wood's work and being dismissive of it.
Then, ol Whitney Webb - Everyone states she's such a good investigative journalist, yet she is still drinking the architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage's kool-aid of bombs and thermite... I've even gone after her in her comment sections on X, pointing out what a limited hangout she is, when it comes to 9/11, but no response.
9/11 - IS the litmus test, and any talking head in the alt media, that does not want to take on the work of Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood, are highly suspect, in my opinion.
Especially, if you point to the work of these two brave people.
Even in 2019, Joe Rogan CONFIRMED he has a copy of Dr Wood's book, yet he has never interviewed her.
His name is "Lucky Larry Silverstein" and his comment was planned to push people down the dead end street of a controlled demolition, which Building 7 was NOT.
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition.
Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.
Eddie Bravo brings up Dr. Judy Wood on Joe Rogan's show with Alex Jones in 2019 and it turns into Alex Jones arguing he's not covering up 9/11...
He showing signs of "edge behavior" - when people reach the limits of what they know, or are comfortable with, they often exhibit large rises and falls of energy, quickly dismissing something, changing the subject, etc..
Tucker Carlson's wife Susan Andrews is transgender. So are his daughters. That is a sign he is part of the cabal system. As if his murky parentage and connections with Fox and Murdoch isn't enough. Murdoch is as deep state and bloodline as it gets.
No real truth will ever come from Tucker. He's a well paid actor. A phoney.
Dr. Judy Wood is a hero for bringing this information forward, at yet, 99.9% of the human population does not have a clue, and even worse, does not want a clue.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Fitts mentioned the book by Sauder Underground bases and tunnels. There's a pdf online. It details a "nuclear subterrenes" as a 2000 degree earthworm that can slice through rock.
Please listen to the presentation, as you obviously have NOT.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Barca is talking about tunnel boring machines, theoretically used to make miles of tunnel connecting DUMBs around the country. This has nothing to do with the 'nukes used on 9/11' theory.
Admitting the truth about 9-11 would mean giving up a lifetime of propaganda about being great and good and seeing we live in a collapsing empire and cyber-prison rapidly engulfing our planet. We'd have to see ourselves as the brutal genocidists we have always been. At the end of the day, free energy is still the promise and the possibility. It gives me hope that people are waking up but not the critical mass...yet. People are just too easy to manipulate.
There was a huge amount of black fumes coming out of the Tehran building prior to its destruction, without many visible flames. Unlike the Myanmar building. There was no earthquake in Tehran that day. So that doesn't explain it. Nor does it look like a conventional CD. In fact, YouTube has removed one of the videos of it. Shorter clips are still up. Don't be so quick to judge.
I'll send the article to Andrew Johnson and a few of my collaborators for their opinions...
We know the building was used by garment manufacturers and businesses. A red flag for me is AE911 pushing a controlled demo narrative, including "molten metal", which you could clearly see the earth moving equipment being hosed down to cool off the hydraulics and the buckets. Something we didn't see with the twin tower clean-up...
I'll get back to you with more feedback, after more careful study...
Fair enough. There were rumors of DEW use in Iraq. This Tehran building does not seem important enough to warrant a DEW attack, unless these weapons are more common than we think. There seems to be substantial rubble in the aftermath. The black and white “smoke” or fumes looked strange, but, on balance, it might be a genuine collapse after fire. Iranian construction standards are probably not the best.
Andrew Johnson did a great job chronicling the 9/11 truth movement's talking heads all the way from 2006 with his first book, 9/11 Finding the truth and then updated more information, when he released 9/11 holding the truth in 2017.
It shows you beautifully how the truth movement was installed to move people away from the truth.
https://youtu.be/8jC9W2vbyrs?t=2h9m2s
Dr. Judy Wood ends a friendship at her lecture 😅🙌
A close friend of Steve E. Jones was at The Energy Breakthrough Conference in 2012. At the Q/A part of the lecture, He turned on him based on the IRREFUTABLE evidence that Dr. Judy Wood presented.
The gentleman is Sterling D. Allan. You can find out more about him in '9/11 - Holding the Truth' by Andrew Johnson, pages 116 to page 129. http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
The 9/11 Perpetrators’ Horrifying Tech Can Cause Things & People to Come Apart at Molecular Level
In 2010, Dr. Judy Wood published her groundbreaking book, Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11, in which she presented ample forensic evidence indicating the deployment on 9/11 of some technology unknown to the general public.
Wood’s work has not received the attention it deserves.
International relations scholar David A. Hughes, PhD is trying to change that by publishing a series of articles in defense of Wood.
In this interview, Hughes returns to the Solari Report to join me in discussing the geopolitical and other major implications of Dr. Wood’s work on 9/11’s invisible weaponry.
Wood is a former mechanical engineering professor who received her PhD in materials engineering science from Virginia Tech. In the 500 pages of her book, which includes numerous high-quality images, she argues that “Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic” and shows that what we see in the pictures does not match the explanatory narratives presented to us—neither the “official reality” narrative of airplanes causing the collapse nor the alternative theories of a “pancake collapse” caused by nanothermite or mini-nukes.
For example, hardly any debris—from two towers weighing half a million tons each—was visible at Ground Zero just moments after the event. According to Wood, the towers did not so much collapse as appear to turn into dust mid-air.
5 min highlight reel: https://youtu.be/bVdqiHK0k4I
Full interview: https://solari.com/invisible-weaponry-the-implications-of-dr-judy-woods-work-with-david-a-hughes/
I'm with you on Corbett, as he's always been dismissive of looking at Dr Wood's work, even now after his sidekick from Media Monarchy has now apologised for ever doubting in Dr Wood's work and being dismissive of it.
Link: https://rumble.com/v5lhe55-james-corbett-when-a-911-truther-is-wrong-will-he-apologise.html
Then, ol Whitney Webb - Everyone states she's such a good investigative journalist, yet she is still drinking the architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage's kool-aid of bombs and thermite... I've even gone after her in her comment sections on X, pointing out what a limited hangout she is, when it comes to 9/11, but no response.
9/11 - IS the litmus test, and any talking head in the alt media, that does not want to take on the work of Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood, are highly suspect, in my opinion.
Especially, if you point to the work of these two brave people.
Even in 2019, Joe Rogan CONFIRMED he has a copy of Dr Wood's book, yet he has never interviewed her.
Have a listen: https://rumble.com/v6qionk-joe-rogan-alex-jones-and-eddie-bravo-dew-on-911.html
His name is "Lucky Larry Silverstein" and his comment was planned to push people down the dead end street of a controlled demolition, which Building 7 was NOT.
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition.
Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
Then on the whole UFO distraction, you'd enjoy this article.
Secret Super Weapons, UFO's & 9/11
Scalar Waves, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions
There is no evidence that "space" as such exists. Thus the never ending psyops and scifi movies about it, from Star Trek to Star Wars.
Jo Rogan is a CIA asset;).
Have a listen....
Joe Rogan, Alex Jones & Eddie Bravo - DEW on 9/11
Eddie Bravo brings up Dr. Judy Wood on Joe Rogan's show with Alex Jones in 2019 and it turns into Alex Jones arguing he's not covering up 9/11...
He showing signs of "edge behavior" - when people reach the limits of what they know, or are comfortable with, they often exhibit large rises and falls of energy, quickly dismissing something, changing the subject, etc..
In other words, they vibrate.
Video: https://rumble.com/v6qionk-joe-rogan-alex-jones-and-eddie-bravo-dew-on-911.html
It’s strange that a year later he had Gage on, yet never Dr Wood?
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Nothing strange about having Gage. He's a controlled asset spreading disinformation. Gage glows, as the saying goes.
No one with Jo Rogan's platform is not part of the system. A limited hangout. It's been suggested "Joe" is transgender.
I watched the video yesterday and wondered why she didn’t mention the 9/11 demonstration … I don’t trust her or Tucker.
thanks for summarizing all the concrete concerns about her 🙏
But Tucker keeps on telling us shocking things that we have all known for years!
Which video? There is a 2 1/2 hour video above all about 911.
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
I have never really trusted Tucker but now also have serious concerns about CAF.
CAF is not saying anything that could not already be heard prior.
Trust your instincts.
Tucker Carlson's wife Susan Andrews is transgender. So are his daughters. That is a sign he is part of the cabal system. As if his murky parentage and connections with Fox and Murdoch isn't enough. Murdoch is as deep state and bloodline as it gets.
No real truth will ever come from Tucker. He's a well paid actor. A phoney.
Dr. Judy Wood is a hero for bringing this information forward, at yet, 99.9% of the human population does not have a clue, and even worse, does not want a clue.
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
There could be a lot more going on below us than we realize. If they can vaporize vertically they can probably do so horizontally too.
Nuclear power tunnel devices. Have a look.
Nukes - The distraction behind door no 3
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
I'm not convinced that nukes are much more than fear porn myself.
Gibs me ma free enrgy!
We need to ask Trump to repeal the "1951 Inventions Secrecy Act" and release all the free energy patents they have behind lock and key.
I would approve of that. Give us Tesla's research, no doubt buried in the Smithsonian near Indy's Arc of the Covenant.
He'll never do it.
I will, though~ Truly detest secrets in a world that requires discerning the truth to make the best decisions.
Vote for Ki 😈🥰
Fitts mentioned the book by Sauder Underground bases and tunnels. There's a pdf online. It details a "nuclear subterrenes" as a 2000 degree earthworm that can slice through rock.
Please listen to the presentation, as you obviously have NOT.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
I'm talking about a specific book here. Not sure what you're talking about.
Thought you were trying to insinuate the ridiculous "buried nuke" b/s...
No not at all. The circular holes in the tower rubble weren't made by nukes. You're one of the people that opened my eyes. Thank you.
Barca is talking about tunnel boring machines, theoretically used to make miles of tunnel connecting DUMBs around the country. This has nothing to do with the 'nukes used on 9/11' theory.
Admitting the truth about 9-11 would mean giving up a lifetime of propaganda about being great and good and seeing we live in a collapsing empire and cyber-prison rapidly engulfing our planet. We'd have to see ourselves as the brutal genocidists we have always been. At the end of the day, free energy is still the promise and the possibility. It gives me hope that people are waking up but not the critical mass...yet. People are just too easy to manipulate.
Another DEW event, Tehran 2017? https://www.winterwatch.net/2025/05/the-tehran-plasco-building-affair-38-years-of-unfinished-business/
No, that is a standard structural failure. Maybe you've not read this article yet?
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
There was a huge amount of black fumes coming out of the Tehran building prior to its destruction, without many visible flames. Unlike the Myanmar building. There was no earthquake in Tehran that day. So that doesn't explain it. Nor does it look like a conventional CD. In fact, YouTube has removed one of the videos of it. Shorter clips are still up. Don't be so quick to judge.
It’s easy to see in the rubble - clear pancake collapse, whereas with 9/11, there was no pancake collapse or pile driver.
Most of the two buildings just “vanished”.
Structural collapse from a fire. I've heard that excuse before somewhere...
I'll send the article to Andrew Johnson and a few of my collaborators for their opinions...
We know the building was used by garment manufacturers and businesses. A red flag for me is AE911 pushing a controlled demo narrative, including "molten metal", which you could clearly see the earth moving equipment being hosed down to cool off the hydraulics and the buckets. Something we didn't see with the twin tower clean-up...
I'll get back to you with more feedback, after more careful study...
Fair enough. There were rumors of DEW use in Iraq. This Tehran building does not seem important enough to warrant a DEW attack, unless these weapons are more common than we think. There seems to be substantial rubble in the aftermath. The black and white “smoke” or fumes looked strange, but, on balance, it might be a genuine collapse after fire. Iranian construction standards are probably not the best.
An interesting interview. I wonder if Tucker will ever interview Professor Judy Wood.
https://maryanngebauer.substack.com/p/countering-the-911-theory-of-controlled
Currently reading 911 holding the truth, and it's very interesting. I only just started. Thank you
Andrew Johnson did a great job chronicling the 9/11 truth movement's talking heads all the way from 2006 with his first book, 9/11 Finding the truth and then updated more information, when he released 9/11 holding the truth in 2017.
It shows you beautifully how the truth movement was installed to move people away from the truth.