Without having to watch the 2 hr video featuring "Norman from S. Africa," who does he think were the actors behind this dastardly deed, if indeed it wasn't the Mossad? I'm quite skeptical of anything out of S. Africa as there is a sizeable Jewish population there & when you have that you can rest assured some will be Israeli intelligence operatives. So, if Mossad isn't the agent provacateur behind it, is he claiming no aspect of the Israeli government had anything to do with it? I am highly skeptical of anyone making this claim because all the players from the American Jewish side of this all had deep ties to the Israeli government. By the way, good job on keeping the issue alive & in front of America's face, & Dr Wood, imho, has the answers to the mechanism of how this was pulled off; what I cannot understand is why the other voices like Richard Gage, et al, are so vehemently opposed to this evidence being known? Most people who are halfway "awake" know we've had this technology since the 90's (?), therefore it's no big secret to be kept under wraps anymore.
It seems you haven't been reading a lot of my substack articles including the additional information above and beyond that was discussed in the conversation that I added to this article.
I suggest you listen to the conversation, because if you did, you won't be making such disingenuous and uninformed statements.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Is this a canned response? If not, then why do you spend such an inordinate amount of time in responding to what you call, "disingenuous and uninformed comments?" I think you have an attitude about your ability to be heard with all the different voices at play on this issue because you keep attacking me who most definitely is on your side and comments like this certainly don't endear you to me. I certainly don't need you to rehash the whole narrative as to what Dr. Wood has done and why she is right in her assertions; I certainly don't know why you keep defending her to me as I have repeatedly told you that I agree with her theory. Maybe you ought to get back to brass tacks here and try to convince those who either 1.) don't have a clue about anything beyond what the gov't says or 2.) tend to believe the version dished out by AE Truthers. I'm done here; it's getting tiresome trying to find common ground with you.
"Norman from S. Africa, who does he think were the actors behind this dastardly deed, if indeed it wasn't the Mossad? I'm quite skeptical of anything out of S. Africa as there is a sizeable Jewish population there & when you have that you can rest assured some will be Israeli intelligence operatives. So, if Mossad isn't the agent provacateur behind it, is he claiming no aspect of the Israeli government had anything to do with it? I am highly skeptical of anyone making this claim because all the players from the American Jewish side of this all had deep ties to the Israeli government".
So, you are misrepresenting what I said in the discussion, because YOU DID NOT LISTEN TO IT and that is disingenuous and intellectually LAZY.
You comment is anything but that of someone "who most definitely is on your side".... It reeks of disingenuousness.
Also, you call the EVIDENCE Dr Wood presents a theory, so you need to go back to school and learn what the difference between a THEORY or hypothesis is, and that of a conclusive body of evidence is that allows you to come to an irrefutable conclusion.
Here is a 5 minute video to help you pul your head out of your arse.
I appreciate all of your efforts since 9/11 is the key to unraveling not just the past century of hoaxes - everybody's favorites - but the past millennia of brainwashing or really imperial ideology. DEW is part of a larger agenda, in which essentially the whole planet is weaponized, life enslaved and the biosphere destroyed.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
Great interview and thanks for all your 9/11 work. But nuclear weapons - you know there are powerful arguments that they're fake? I've seen enough to convince me that is the case, which knocks out one of the twin tower destruction options entirely.
I actually came to say the same thing. There is no proof nuclear weapons exist, which means the Cold War was a hoax too. MAD was successful in scaring everybody while post WWII, the infrastructure of the Technocracy was being developed including DEW.
Yes. With Operation Paperclip bringing German scientists to North America and Britain post-WWII and the confiscation of Tesla’s research by the FBI, the development of DEW and other aspects of the Technocracy were set in motion.
It’s questionable who really runs the world but it has been a long term project with “Full Spectrum Dominance” in mind using a variety of means.
Nothing is really secret since these psychopaths always tell you what they’re doing. We just have to dig. I’m also going to say we need to rethink what we believe is real since we’re talking about a more advanced form of science outside of the usual profit-based science we’re used to and by profit-based, I mean military R/D, which is just about everything.
Norm, that was really interesting and we need to keep fighting against the BS. I listened to the whole podcast so know what it was about, ive not just assumed like some people. But we will get people listening and seeing this evidence, as once you take time to look into it, your invested into trying to get everyone to look at it for themselves x
Without having to watch the 2 hr video featuring "Norman from S. Africa," who does he think were the actors behind this dastardly deed, if indeed it wasn't the Mossad? I'm quite skeptical of anything out of S. Africa as there is a sizeable Jewish population there & when you have that you can rest assured some will be Israeli intelligence operatives. So, if Mossad isn't the agent provacateur behind it, is he claiming no aspect of the Israeli government had anything to do with it? I am highly skeptical of anyone making this claim because all the players from the American Jewish side of this all had deep ties to the Israeli government. By the way, good job on keeping the issue alive & in front of America's face, & Dr Wood, imho, has the answers to the mechanism of how this was pulled off; what I cannot understand is why the other voices like Richard Gage, et al, are so vehemently opposed to this evidence being known? Most people who are halfway "awake" know we've had this technology since the 90's (?), therefore it's no big secret to be kept under wraps anymore.
It seems you haven't been reading a lot of my substack articles including the additional information above and beyond that was discussed in the conversation that I added to this article.
I suggest you listen to the conversation, because if you did, you won't be making such disingenuous and uninformed statements.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
The Israeli Art Students, Gelatin & E-Team PSYOP
It's a wonderful distraction for the intellectually lazy.
Article and video: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-israeli-art-students-gelatin
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Is this a canned response? If not, then why do you spend such an inordinate amount of time in responding to what you call, "disingenuous and uninformed comments?" I think you have an attitude about your ability to be heard with all the different voices at play on this issue because you keep attacking me who most definitely is on your side and comments like this certainly don't endear you to me. I certainly don't need you to rehash the whole narrative as to what Dr. Wood has done and why she is right in her assertions; I certainly don't know why you keep defending her to me as I have repeatedly told you that I agree with her theory. Maybe you ought to get back to brass tacks here and try to convince those who either 1.) don't have a clue about anything beyond what the gov't says or 2.) tend to believe the version dished out by AE Truthers. I'm done here; it's getting tiresome trying to find common ground with you.
Seems you forgot you brain fart of a comment:
"Norman from S. Africa, who does he think were the actors behind this dastardly deed, if indeed it wasn't the Mossad? I'm quite skeptical of anything out of S. Africa as there is a sizeable Jewish population there & when you have that you can rest assured some will be Israeli intelligence operatives. So, if Mossad isn't the agent provacateur behind it, is he claiming no aspect of the Israeli government had anything to do with it? I am highly skeptical of anyone making this claim because all the players from the American Jewish side of this all had deep ties to the Israeli government".
So, you are misrepresenting what I said in the discussion, because YOU DID NOT LISTEN TO IT and that is disingenuous and intellectually LAZY.
You comment is anything but that of someone "who most definitely is on your side".... It reeks of disingenuousness.
Also, you call the EVIDENCE Dr Wood presents a theory, so you need to go back to school and learn what the difference between a THEORY or hypothesis is, and that of a conclusive body of evidence is that allows you to come to an irrefutable conclusion.
Here is a 5 minute video to help you pul your head out of your arse.
Link: https://rumble.com/v627qr2-911-understanding-what-happened.html
Now run along and go file a butthurt report with the internet moderators, as I see right through you.
You know what, f off, I'm sick of your high-handed, pseudo-intellectual superiority! Fucking a**hole!
Quick - File a butt hurt report! We have a snowflake melting!
I appreciate all of your efforts since 9/11 is the key to unraveling not just the past century of hoaxes - everybody's favorites - but the past millennia of brainwashing or really imperial ideology. DEW is part of a larger agenda, in which essentially the whole planet is weaponized, life enslaved and the biosphere destroyed.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Great interview and thanks for all your 9/11 work. But nuclear weapons - you know there are powerful arguments that they're fake? I've seen enough to convince me that is the case, which knocks out one of the twin tower destruction options entirely.
Nooks hoax https://www.buzzsprout.com/791252/episodes/17883558-196-thos-judge-on-why-there-cannot-be-and-has-never-been-a-nuclear-bomb
I'm well aware of the hoax at Hiroshima.
I actually came to say the same thing. There is no proof nuclear weapons exist, which means the Cold War was a hoax too. MAD was successful in scaring everybody while post WWII, the infrastructure of the Technocracy was being developed including DEW.
According to Bob Greenyer and other sources, it is believed that DEW was in the drawing board in the late 1950's and weaponized in the early 1960.
There are official reports of DEW's being tested and cutting off wings of planes in mid flight in 1964 already.
Tesla, the Military Industrial Complex Weapon Technology & 9/11
What did Tesla have available for the MIC in 1943?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-tesla-and-the-military-industrial
Yes. With Operation Paperclip bringing German scientists to North America and Britain post-WWII and the confiscation of Tesla’s research by the FBI, the development of DEW and other aspects of the Technocracy were set in motion.
It’s questionable who really runs the world but it has been a long term project with “Full Spectrum Dominance” in mind using a variety of means.
Nothing is really secret since these psychopaths always tell you what they’re doing. We just have to dig. I’m also going to say we need to rethink what we believe is real since we’re talking about a more advanced form of science outside of the usual profit-based science we’re used to and by profit-based, I mean military R/D, which is just about everything.
Wow truth sounds like hate speech to those who hate truth
Norm, that was really interesting and we need to keep fighting against the BS. I listened to the whole podcast so know what it was about, ive not just assumed like some people. But we will get people listening and seeing this evidence, as once you take time to look into it, your invested into trying to get everyone to look at it for themselves x