The first part discusses the psyop and the second part, is where the artist talks about the boxes.
The boxes were given to them for free, where they illegally built the balcony out of the tower window….
BB-18 is a power distribution bus for electrical fuses, as in the fuse box that electricity goes through in a house or building, to prevent short-circuits.
They're produced by the Littelfuse company. It's not a bomb fuse, LOL.
So, you need to be open to the idea that those boxes were given to them to push the explosive narrative…
Rebekah Roth pushed a lot of that bullshit with her fictional books, but I am not sure whether someone started it before her.
She was later ousted as a possible government spook.
maybe I'm misunderstanding here something, thus sorry in advance..
these 2 videos are DISAPPOINTING, looking almost AI-made.. Btw. are you trying to divert from the pentagon plan to attack all these rich in resources middle east countries? Don't we have exactly that going on right now?
And then, which Jews are you taking about? I never heard of that one.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Is it intellectually lazy to point out the role played by Larry Silverstein? What about Michael Chertoff? What about the fact that the dancing Israelis were there to “document the event”… how did they know? Is it lazy to point out that 9/11 was used as an excuse for the so-called “war on terror” that led to wars in which USA took out the enemies of the Zionist regime? Have you read the clean break report, is pointing that out intellectually lazy?
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
This is how it should always be. Your specific branch of Science (or even Humanities) shouldn't matter so much as knowing and understanding how to do basic research. I'm glad to see more and more people getting out of their silos and applying their research abilities in broader contexts. The more people who do that, the less power "they" have over us!
You can watch Dr. Judy Wood talk about 9 11 on planetrich.net click on 9/11, episodes 76&78 covers her book. Episodes 140, 142, 143 & 221 cover it again?
descending body, a stony asteroid hit the earth, and gave, like always, a reason for an evolution. Luckily the apes were not hit, so that part stays with us until this day, implying somewhat imperfect evolution.... When you study physics in EU, all the way to PhD level, you most probably never hear the name Nikola Tesla, you know Tesla as the magnetic field unit... It is hard to find an extensive doc from Maxwells original equations for EMF and scalar waves, apparently using quaternions. Tunguska is roughly around 180 degree in width (on the other side of the earth) away from New York, where Tesla lived. Thus having the scalar blow would imply their CURVED propagation, unless the wave went through the earth, not above it.. Luckily Albert came to rescue and explained everything with his General relativity in 1915, everything is curved now, a new spacetime is in action... It is really scary to have such a weapon, which can hit you behind the corner...
Hey Norman, I just finished listening to you defending yourself and Dr Wood's evidence based account and I commented on Mike Barra's X site. "Mr Bara, Norman is empirically correct as is Dr Judy Wood. Do some more research!! You are ill prepared to make disparaging accusations against Norman. Until you do you are now one more of the COINTELPRO you need to shut the fuck up!" Keep up your excellent work. You have many supporters.
HI Graham - It's astounding seeing this Mike Bara fellow, (never heard of him before), that allegedly worked in the space and aerospace industries, wrote a couple of books on UFO's etc, but he stumbles with basic physics?
He must be some sort of spook, like most of the talking heads are in the UFO field.
I had a field day on his Telegram page and numerous of the people on his Telegram messaged me privately stating how they are now suspect of him.
The poor sod abruptly just ended the X space, when he saw that he's interacting with someone that can point out all his b/s talking point and lack of a basic understanding of physics.... I expected more of him, but hey, anyone still believing or promoting the official government conspiracy theory of fire induced collapses and planes, are retards.
As stated previously Catherine Austin Fitts is a COINTELPRO operative and by her own admission a Quaker i.e. crypto-jew by another name ( read Laurent Guyénot's book "From Yahweh to Zion" for details) sorry but no one gets an invite onto CIA/MOSSAD asset Tucker "The Fucker" Carlson's show unless you're in the game. She's there to keep the thinking goy inside the 2nd matrix.
p.s. got my hardback copy of Dr Wood's book on Friday.
Going to say something cynical now I'm afraid. I've been shown 'old books' about such energy research and the thing that struck me is how kind of clumsy and ruthless those early researchers were. I get that it was early research and we are probably far more advanced now, but my suspicion is that, as with most modern science, this stuff is better at trashing things than creating things. Tesla's free energy ideas seemed quite terrifying to me. God knows what happens if you fill an environment with elecktrickery like that . It may be that we arent yet subtle enough to do much besides blow stuff to smithereens with it :( .
Btw I do agree we can almost certainly blow stuff up into dust with it . :(
Does anyone yet have a good/workable theory as to how plane shapes and plane shaped holes were created ??
When one talks about the various events on 9/11 and things that happened, one must be careful in one's word choice.
When looking at what was going on for 100 days after 9/11, it was referred to as "smoke", but it wasn't a phenomenon due to fires or heat. In actual fact it was ongoing metal transmutation as the rest of the rubble pile was still breaking down, as the processes of the disintegration of the towers were non self-quenching.
The towers did not get "blown up", but disintegrated on a molecular level. The molecules, instead of attracting one another, they repelled each other and were transmuted into dust.
What people saw in the skies over Manhattan, took pictures of and took video of, were illusions - better described as, 3D Volumetric Projection Technology aka Project Blue Beam, as nothing solid hit the towers and there were no planes that crashed at Shanksville and the PentaCON.
9/11 The Plane / No Plane debate settled.
Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001
On the creation of the plane shaped holes in the twins, it was done using a directed energy weapon, with the same type of effect on the outer steel façade, as you se with the Hutchison Effect.
This video explains it, but you should watch the full documentary linked in the description of the video.
Lastly, you need to listen to the conversation I had with Dr Morgan Reynolds.
In 2007, he filed a Qui-tam whistleblower case against NIST's subcontractors for their fraudulent plane impact studies at the WTC - One could call him the original "no-planer".
It is astonishing to me that some people in those towers survived whatever this was . How the building around you disintegrates but you stay healthy, that is surreal to me.
It is so important that we understand what went on there.
Indeed what we all saw on TV that day is truly sci-fi and that's what people have trouble with.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
I know I've given you a lot of "homework", but one really needs to get stuck into it and do the work, as too many people are only willing to watch a conspiratorial video or two, for entertainment, instead of doing real work of figure out the truth for oneself.
I'm trying to position myself as a shortcut for people to see how they've been bamboozled by the 9/11 "truth" movement, but there still is the responsibility of each reader to go through what I present and confirm it for themselves.
Then, if there is something that I might have gotten wrong, I'm always ready to change my mind if presented with sufficient evidence, and for now, no one touting the official government narrative or the government approved counter narrative of bombs, thermite, nukes, CGI planes, TV fakery or remote controlled planes, can refute the evidence I am ready to to present them with, when they present their evidence.
Another superbly researched documentary, which is well worth the time invested, will be linked below, as it cover the WTC complex, the hoodwink at Shanksville and the PentaCON.
Her Hiroshima lecture was in 2007 / 2008, if memory serves me. It was shortly after she filed her suit against the 23 NIST subcontractors.
By 2012, she refined her talk and this is the one I stumbled upon, which broke my mind and helped me see through the fog created by the 9/11 truth movement.
Covid, vaccines & 9/11… all part of the same rabbi hole.
my favorite related quote, whose author I have unfortunately not found:
"The further down the rabbit hole you go, the more the 't' becomes silent."
Very accurate 😀.
The whole Israel connection and everyone losing their minds over it, is a wonderful distraction for the intellectually lazy.
To keep people from realising the US Military industrial Complex’s involvement in the events on 9/11 and especially the black-ops technology involved.
Let’s address some of the disinformation pertaining to the “Israelis”.
Let's start with the "artists", Gelatin & “the E-Team” in the one tower, shall we...
Were they Israeli, or Austrian?
Watch the video below, before reading further….
Rumble link: https://rumble.com/v659g91-the-artists-gelatin-and-the-e-team.html
The first part discusses the psyop and the second part, is where the artist talks about the boxes.
The boxes were given to them for free, where they illegally built the balcony out of the tower window….
BB-18 is a power distribution bus for electrical fuses, as in the fuse box that electricity goes through in a house or building, to prevent short-circuits.
They're produced by the Littelfuse company. It's not a bomb fuse, LOL.
So, you need to be open to the idea that those boxes were given to them to push the explosive narrative…
Rebekah Roth pushed a lot of that bullshit with her fictional books, but I am not sure whether someone started it before her.
She was later ousted as a possible government spook.
Listen to this: https://rumble.com/v6u4d7h-exposed-rebekah-roths-methodical-illusion.html
There is truth in that there was some foreknowledge by some, but the conspiracy theory that no Jews died on 9/11, is just that - A conspiracy theory.
maybe I'm misunderstanding here something, thus sorry in advance..
these 2 videos are DISAPPOINTING, looking almost AI-made.. Btw. are you trying to divert from the pentagon plan to attack all these rich in resources middle east countries? Don't we have exactly that going on right now?
And then, which Jews are you taking about? I never heard of that one.
The one clip is from this documentary, which everyone should watch.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
forgot, we definitely have a censorship right now, exactly around that topic..
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
agree. Read Judy's book YEARS back already and just recently gave it away to a physicist who hopefully will grasp the facts described there...
I keep saying that They use the Jews as a scapegoat...
💯X💯c💯!The Cabal:”using Jews for scapegoats for over 3500 years!”
🙏🏻 💜 🙏🏻
Is it intellectually lazy to point out the role played by Larry Silverstein? What about Michael Chertoff? What about the fact that the dancing Israelis were there to “document the event”… how did they know? Is it lazy to point out that 9/11 was used as an excuse for the so-called “war on terror” that led to wars in which USA took out the enemies of the Zionist regime? Have you read the clean break report, is pointing that out intellectually lazy?
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
https://aim4truth.org/2020/09/11/treason-who-terrorized-americans-and-the-world-on-9-11-2/
No mention of Dr Morgan Reynolds or Dr Judy Wood, thus they fail the 9/11 litmus test.
Excellent rebuttal Norm!
I didn’t realize he was on Telegram, thanks for post.
This is how it should always be. Your specific branch of Science (or even Humanities) shouldn't matter so much as knowing and understanding how to do basic research. I'm glad to see more and more people getting out of their silos and applying their research abilities in broader contexts. The more people who do that, the less power "they" have over us!
You can watch Dr. Judy Wood talk about 9 11 on planetrich.net click on 9/11, episodes 76&78 covers her book. Episodes 140, 142, 143 & 221 cover it again?
Lots of other cool stuff on this site.
awesome.
thank you.
Great post, as always;)) The slow awakening for everyone... That Tunguska event in 1908, is described using official science in 2008 at:
https://physics.ucf.edu/~britt/Geophysics/Readings/G9a-Tunguska.pdf
descending body, a stony asteroid hit the earth, and gave, like always, a reason for an evolution. Luckily the apes were not hit, so that part stays with us until this day, implying somewhat imperfect evolution.... When you study physics in EU, all the way to PhD level, you most probably never hear the name Nikola Tesla, you know Tesla as the magnetic field unit... It is hard to find an extensive doc from Maxwells original equations for EMF and scalar waves, apparently using quaternions. Tunguska is roughly around 180 degree in width (on the other side of the earth) away from New York, where Tesla lived. Thus having the scalar blow would imply their CURVED propagation, unless the wave went through the earth, not above it.. Luckily Albert came to rescue and explained everything with his General relativity in 1915, everything is curved now, a new spacetime is in action... It is really scary to have such a weapon, which can hit you behind the corner...
Dr Yeadon getting red-pilled big time. Good for him!
I’m doubtful Yeadon will get it. I’m 50/50. He might.
Hey Norman, I just finished listening to you defending yourself and Dr Wood's evidence based account and I commented on Mike Barra's X site. "Mr Bara, Norman is empirically correct as is Dr Judy Wood. Do some more research!! You are ill prepared to make disparaging accusations against Norman. Until you do you are now one more of the COINTELPRO you need to shut the fuck up!" Keep up your excellent work. You have many supporters.
HI Graham - It's astounding seeing this Mike Bara fellow, (never heard of him before), that allegedly worked in the space and aerospace industries, wrote a couple of books on UFO's etc, but he stumbles with basic physics?
He must be some sort of spook, like most of the talking heads are in the UFO field.
I had a field day on his Telegram page and numerous of the people on his Telegram messaged me privately stating how they are now suspect of him.
The poor sod abruptly just ended the X space, when he saw that he's interacting with someone that can point out all his b/s talking point and lack of a basic understanding of physics.... I expected more of him, but hey, anyone still believing or promoting the official government conspiracy theory of fire induced collapses and planes, are retards.
As stated previously Catherine Austin Fitts is a COINTELPRO operative and by her own admission a Quaker i.e. crypto-jew by another name ( read Laurent Guyénot's book "From Yahweh to Zion" for details) sorry but no one gets an invite onto CIA/MOSSAD asset Tucker "The Fucker" Carlson's show unless you're in the game. She's there to keep the thinking goy inside the 2nd matrix.
p.s. got my hardback copy of Dr Wood's book on Friday.
Interesting take on Fitts. I'll definitely look into it.
Great to hear Dr Wood's book arrived. Looking forward to reading your review of her book.
Please read Operation Gladio by Paul Williams and follow the Colonel's Corner on Rumble
The whole world wars and event are all related to Operation Gladio by the CIA to depopulation and enrich the oligarchs
Yet Paul Williams denies Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood’s evidence presented to court.
It's the Freemasons. It always is.
Going to say something cynical now I'm afraid. I've been shown 'old books' about such energy research and the thing that struck me is how kind of clumsy and ruthless those early researchers were. I get that it was early research and we are probably far more advanced now, but my suspicion is that, as with most modern science, this stuff is better at trashing things than creating things. Tesla's free energy ideas seemed quite terrifying to me. God knows what happens if you fill an environment with elecktrickery like that . It may be that we arent yet subtle enough to do much besides blow stuff to smithereens with it :( .
Btw I do agree we can almost certainly blow stuff up into dust with it . :(
Does anyone yet have a good/workable theory as to how plane shapes and plane shaped holes were created ??
When one talks about the various events on 9/11 and things that happened, one must be careful in one's word choice.
When looking at what was going on for 100 days after 9/11, it was referred to as "smoke", but it wasn't a phenomenon due to fires or heat. In actual fact it was ongoing metal transmutation as the rest of the rubble pile was still breaking down, as the processes of the disintegration of the towers were non self-quenching.
The towers did not get "blown up", but disintegrated on a molecular level. The molecules, instead of attracting one another, they repelled each other and were transmuted into dust.
Read my article for a better understanding;
The 100 days of "smoke" at ground zero.
The COLD rubble pile at the World Trade Center...
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-100-day-fuming-and-molecular
What people saw in the skies over Manhattan, took pictures of and took video of, were illusions - better described as, 3D Volumetric Projection Technology aka Project Blue Beam, as nothing solid hit the towers and there were no planes that crashed at Shanksville and the PentaCON.
9/11 The Plane / No Plane debate settled.
Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-the-plane-no-plane-argument
Read the following article by 9/11 Planes research and the interview with him, where he explains the "planes" on 9/11;
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
On the creation of the plane shaped holes in the twins, it was done using a directed energy weapon, with the same type of effect on the outer steel façade, as you se with the Hutchison Effect.
This video explains it, but you should watch the full documentary linked in the description of the video.
Link: https://rumble.com/v6vnlqd-creating-the-plane-shaped-holes-in-the-twin-towers.html
Lastly, you need to listen to the conversation I had with Dr Morgan Reynolds.
In 2007, he filed a Qui-tam whistleblower case against NIST's subcontractors for their fraudulent plane impact studies at the WTC - One could call him the original "no-planer".
Read his court filings here: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
Ooh I do like thoroughness :) . Thankyou.
It is astonishing to me that some people in those towers survived whatever this was . How the building around you disintegrates but you stay healthy, that is surreal to me.
It is so important that we understand what went on there.
Thankyou .
Indeed what we all saw on TV that day is truly sci-fi and that's what people have trouble with.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
I know I've given you a lot of "homework", but one really needs to get stuck into it and do the work, as too many people are only willing to watch a conspiratorial video or two, for entertainment, instead of doing real work of figure out the truth for oneself.
I'm trying to position myself as a shortcut for people to see how they've been bamboozled by the 9/11 "truth" movement, but there still is the responsibility of each reader to go through what I present and confirm it for themselves.
Then, if there is something that I might have gotten wrong, I'm always ready to change my mind if presented with sufficient evidence, and for now, no one touting the official government narrative or the government approved counter narrative of bombs, thermite, nukes, CGI planes, TV fakery or remote controlled planes, can refute the evidence I am ready to to present them with, when they present their evidence.
Another superbly researched documentary, which is well worth the time invested, will be linked below, as it cover the WTC complex, the hoodwink at Shanksville and the PentaCON.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Thanks for this Norman, Mark Passio's Tesla Doc is brilliant and I've found Dr Judy Woods New Hiroshima lecture on Rumble
https://rumble.com/v1llw1l-september-11th-the-new-hiroshima-dr.-judy-wood-2007.html
Keep up the good work xxx
Thanx for the feedback.
Her Hiroshima lecture was in 2007 / 2008, if memory serves me. It was shortly after she filed her suit against the 23 NIST subcontractors.
By 2012, she refined her talk and this is the one I stumbled upon, which broke my mind and helped me see through the fog created by the 9/11 truth movement.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
The video is on her dedicated YouTube channel…
Brilliant...thank you...have a great day ✌️