Ezekiel 33:6 But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, so that the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any one of them, that person is taken away in his iniquity, but his blood I will require at the watchman's hand.
should it not be sufficient to show that the buildings could not possibly have fallen as a consequence of airplane crashes ( certainly not WTC7 ) so then, isn't it the addition of undue complexity to include the work of Dr. Wood as evidence?
once it is in court, we can demand "DISCOVERY" and not just request evidence but by court order obtain evidence, I believe your efforts are premature & overly complicate the process, basic application of the laws of physics clearly show that the buildings fell because of some additional input of energy, however the exact nature of that energy doesn't have to be explained up-front, we still have a case, by simply stating the the media lied.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Dr Wood's 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case filed against NIST's 23 subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD, that was ALSO filed in the US Supreme court in 2009 - https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
NONE of the other poo-ba organisations citing "explosive" evidence of bombs, thermite, mini-nukes or buried nukes have EVER filed a request for correction or taken their so called evidence to court.
Ezekiel 33:6 But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, so that the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any one of them, that person is taken away in his iniquity, but his blood I will require at the watchman's hand.
THIS IS WHY WE MUST CONTINUE TO SHARE THE TRUTH
Ephesians 5:11 - Have nothing to do with the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but expose them.
Galatians 4:16 - So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement?
What happens if you ask TRUTH questions?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/questions-for-the-911-truther-talking
should it not be sufficient to show that the buildings could not possibly have fallen as a consequence of airplane crashes ( certainly not WTC7 ) so then, isn't it the addition of undue complexity to include the work of Dr. Wood as evidence?
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11.
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
(Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
The Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
Illusion of Reality and the 9/11 Planes
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/illusion-of-reality-and-the-911-planes
once it is in court, we can demand "DISCOVERY" and not just request evidence but by court order obtain evidence, I believe your efforts are premature & overly complicate the process, basic application of the laws of physics clearly show that the buildings fell because of some additional input of energy, however the exact nature of that energy doesn't have to be explained up-front, we still have a case, by simply stating the the media lied.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Dr Wood's 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case filed against NIST's 23 subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD, that was ALSO filed in the US Supreme court in 2009 - https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Dr Morgan Reynolds 2007 qui-tam case against NIST's subcontractors on scientifically flawed "plane" impact studies: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
NONE of the other poo-ba organisations citing "explosive" evidence of bombs, thermite, mini-nukes or buried nukes have EVER filed a request for correction or taken their so called evidence to court.