I clearly do not understand the sole focus on the details of "How?" on 9/11. At the end of the day, we know our government and the media is complicit in the cover up as its totally obvious the planes did not knock down WTC 7. Every engineer knows steel and concrete buildings do not fail and collapse due to fire.
Fundamentally the Who, What, When, Where and Why are at least as important, or in this case more important, than the How?.
We know the What, When and Where. Its the Who and Why that really need to be addressed first.
The exact method of How, is less important, at least currently. Arguing about the theory's of How the buildings collapsed misses the whole point of Who was behind it and Why.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address 4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Great Post, as always! The recent judicial win for the CA BART workers, who were 'reimbursed' for NOT allowing to inject themselves with covid shots and loosing their jobs, had ZERO science explanation in it. The 99.8% of all synthetic genetics studies done on HUMANS injected with that are plain fraud, thus not including it in lawsuit contributed to that win of >7mln$ for 6 affected individuals! The real science behind covid shots is completely suppressed. In case of directed weapons the degree of difficulty of knowing the details is WAY MORE complicated, since it is behind the curtain of black budget operations. Still, the facts gathered by Prof. Wood should have LONG been enough for a conviction and NIST is the right start, which should end up with all the major politicians involved. All what one needs is a NON-corrupted judge, like the one in CA in that BART case....
You see, if someone really seeks truth, they'd read Dr Wood's book or listen to her presentations, that everyone has been warned NOT to read or watch her presentations...
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
The court of public opinion needs evidence that anybody can understand, a problem that I see here is all too many times I've heard " here, read this 500 page book in order to get the picture properly"
REALLY PEOPLE? I remember the early stages of the space program where experts went on TV to explain ( in a manner that anybody could grasp ) how satellites were launched and why they stayed in orbit and the many benefits of having satellites. WHY isn't there the equivalent explanation for why we should KNOW that 9/11/2001 was not the product of 19 suicidal fanatics?
You see, if someone really seeks truth, they'd read the 500 page book that everyone has been warned NOT to read...
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
in the court of public opinion, it would be sufficient to make the case for the towers NOT having collapsed by gravity, but requiring some additional source of energy to make it happen, therefore the media ( and all of the politicians who support the official fraud )
LIED . . there you have it, the case is sufficient to prosecute.
The 9/11 “truth” movement talking heads, like Richard Gage, architects for an engineered truth and anyone denigrating Dr Wood’s evidence, are complicit truth-traitors…
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s that the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
(Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
Are you really believe in the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
I have a great understanding to put hope for change in a real person as a president, but that is a mistake from which we should have learned after all the presidents come with great promise and go with great lies.
9/11, Trump and the Israeli connection. (Johnny Gat Mirror)
How Elon Musk Was Trained in Psychological Manipulation via a Jeffrey Epstein-Funded Program.
In 2011, a small group of extremely influential people met to discuss the future of humanity. Among their ranks were Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Nathan Myhrvold, Sergey Brin, and the infamous pedophile child trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein. But this was not the first time these powerful and affluent technophiles had met to determine how best to control society.
How Elon Musk Was Trained in Psychological Manipulation via a Jeffrey Epstein-Funded Program.
In 2011, a small group of extremely influential people met to discuss the future of humanity. Among their ranks were Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Nathan Myhrvold, Sergey Brin, and the infamous pedophile child trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein. But this was not the first time these powerful and affluent technophiles had met to determine how best to control society.
I clearly do not understand the sole focus on the details of "How?" on 9/11. At the end of the day, we know our government and the media is complicit in the cover up as its totally obvious the planes did not knock down WTC 7. Every engineer knows steel and concrete buildings do not fail and collapse due to fire.
Fundamentally the Who, What, When, Where and Why are at least as important, or in this case more important, than the How?.
We know the What, When and Where. Its the Who and Why that really need to be addressed first.
The exact method of How, is less important, at least currently. Arguing about the theory's of How the buildings collapsed misses the whole point of Who was behind it and Why.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address 4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Great Post, as always! The recent judicial win for the CA BART workers, who were 'reimbursed' for NOT allowing to inject themselves with covid shots and loosing their jobs, had ZERO science explanation in it. The 99.8% of all synthetic genetics studies done on HUMANS injected with that are plain fraud, thus not including it in lawsuit contributed to that win of >7mln$ for 6 affected individuals! The real science behind covid shots is completely suppressed. In case of directed weapons the degree of difficulty of knowing the details is WAY MORE complicated, since it is behind the curtain of black budget operations. Still, the facts gathered by Prof. Wood should have LONG been enough for a conviction and NIST is the right start, which should end up with all the major politicians involved. All what one needs is a NON-corrupted judge, like the one in CA in that BART case....
This one should be tried in the court of public opinion,
the tyrant who can make you believe absurdities
can make you commit atrocities.
and 9/11/2001 as carried out by 19 suicidal fanatics is an absurdity
You see, if someone really seeks truth, they'd read Dr Wood's book or listen to her presentations, that everyone has been warned NOT to read or watch her presentations...
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20 minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Thank you for this. It has never been a shred of doubt in my mind that that our own government did this.
Bingo.
Along with Israel.
The court of public opinion needs evidence that anybody can understand, a problem that I see here is all too many times I've heard " here, read this 500 page book in order to get the picture properly"
REALLY PEOPLE? I remember the early stages of the space program where experts went on TV to explain ( in a manner that anybody could grasp ) how satellites were launched and why they stayed in orbit and the many benefits of having satellites. WHY isn't there the equivalent explanation for why we should KNOW that 9/11/2001 was not the product of 19 suicidal fanatics?
You see, if someone really seeks truth, they'd read the 500 page book that everyone has been warned NOT to read...
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20 minute video that most can follow, as per your request: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/where-did-the-towers-go-by-dr-judy-wood/
in the court of public opinion, it would be sufficient to make the case for the towers NOT having collapsed by gravity, but requiring some additional source of energy to make it happen, therefore the media ( and all of the politicians who support the official fraud )
LIED . . there you have it, the case is sufficient to prosecute.
The 9/11 “truth” movement talking heads, like Richard Gage, architects for an engineered truth and anyone denigrating Dr Wood’s evidence, are complicit truth-traitors…
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A, Hughes
Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
is it not sufficient to KNOW that the towers could not possibly have “collapsed” in the manner reported by the lamestream media?
we can KNOW that there is a huge problem here, without needing to go down the rabbit hole of exotic secret weapons.
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s that the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
(Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
the “door #1 (etc . . . ) argument, constitutes a waste of effort, it is sufficient to know that the official story is a LIE.
Are you really believe in the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
I have a great understanding to put hope for change in a real person as a president, but that is a mistake from which we should have learned after all the presidents come with great promise and go with great lies.
9/11, Trump and the Israeli connection. (Johnny Gat Mirror)
https://archive.org/details/youtube-3yDtIeWOSN8
9 11, Israel, Trump Connection CASE CLOSED 2 (Johnny Gat Mirror)
https://archive.org/details/youtube-GnsZpOGXhog
https://juli2a5i4.substack.com/p/is-donald-trump-make-america-great
https://julimination.wordpress.com/2024/10/26/is-donald-trump-make-america-great-again/
How Elon Musk Was Trained in Psychological Manipulation via a Jeffrey Epstein-Funded Program.
In 2011, a small group of extremely influential people met to discuss the future of humanity. Among their ranks were Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Nathan Myhrvold, Sergey Brin, and the infamous pedophile child trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein. But this was not the first time these powerful and affluent technophiles had met to determine how best to control society.
Read the article at https://newspaste.com/2024/10/31/musk-epstein-the-third-culture-dossier/
https://rumble.com/v5kybgr-musk-and-epstein-the-third-culture-dossier-a-johnny-vedmore-read-through.html
Follow the money, the patents and the evidence!
https://rumble.com/v14382h-the-great-reset-explained-in-their-own-words-gates-musk-harari-schwab-and-g.html
Are you really believe in the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
https://juli2a5i4.substack.com/p/is-donald-trump-make-america-great
https://julimination.wordpress.com/2024/10/26/is-donald-trump-make-america-great-again/
How Elon Musk Was Trained in Psychological Manipulation via a Jeffrey Epstein-Funded Program.
In 2011, a small group of extremely influential people met to discuss the future of humanity. Among their ranks were Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Nathan Myhrvold, Sergey Brin, and the infamous pedophile child trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein. But this was not the first time these powerful and affluent technophiles had met to determine how best to control society.
Read the article at https://newspaste.com/2024/10/31/musk-epstein-the-third-culture-dossier/
https://rumble.com/v5kybgr-musk-and-epstein-the-third-culture-dossier-a-johnny-vedmore-read-through.html
Follow the money, the patents and the evidence!
https://rumble.com/v5its6t-we-robot-elon-musk-is-a-key-player-in-the-technocracy-beast-system.-rebel-c.html
https://rumble.com/v5its6t-we-robot-elon-musk-is-a-key-player-in-the-technocracy-beast-system.-rebel-c.html
https://open.substack.com/pub/anamihalceamdphd/p/interview-on-truth-be-told-with-todd?utm_source=direct&r=1pk0jl&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&comments=true
https://rumble.com/v5its6t-we-robot-elon-musk-is-a-key-player-in-the-technocracy-beast-system.-rebel-c.html
https://rumble.com/v5its6t-we-robot-elon-musk-is-a-key-player-in-the-technocracy-beast-system.-rebel-c.html
https://open.substack.com/pub/anamihalceamdphd/p/interview-on-truth-be-told-with-todd?utm_source=direct&r=1pk0jl&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&comments=true
Thank you for the information, but how exactly does this tie into 9/11?
Especially when looking at the evidence pointing to technology in line with free energy? (getting more energy out than what you put in)