7 Comments

Indeed, it's time to refute some stories. ("Debunk" has EXTREMELY negative connotations, so I prefer to avoid the word.)

The courts obviously don't care, but the questions prevail:

What about the ruins glowing the next morning?

What about the evidence taken away in 24 hours?

What about airplane fuel melting steel? Or "batteries"?

What about Building 7 collapsing as a result of "office fire"? (That would be a first in history.)

Expand full comment

How about those firemen walking around on ground zero without cooking?

Expand full comment

If that answer satisfies you, I have nothing else to say.

Expand full comment
author

How many of my articles have you actually read - There are 83, which cover all your points...

1. The courts were covering for the US Military Industrial Complex's involvement.

2. The ruins weren't glowing because they were NOT hot.

3. There wasn't evidence to quickly take away, as it was a cover story for the LACK of rubble for 2 x 110 story buildings, a 22 story Marriot Hotel (Building 3) and the MISSING 75% of building 4.

4. If you still think jet fuel is involved, you really need to read my plane articles.

5. Building 7 has been covered extensively in my articles and I even did a 2h presentation on Building 7 alone.

You really need to deep dive my articles.

Also make time this weekend to watch this 2018 documentary.

9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality - https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html

9/11 Planes: Layers of Deception

Facing 9/11 Reality - No more games

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-planes-layers-of-deception

Back to thermite:

Just this basic thermite challenge that has been standing unanswered since 2011, should open your eyes to the bamboozle on trusting truth seekers for 13 years so far: https://rumble.com/v55osf7-the-unanswered-2011-nanothermite-challenge-for-911.html

Then let’s not even get into the “peer reviewed” thermite paper that was published by a PAY TO PUBLISH journal, which saw TWO editor of the journal QUIT, after the paper was published without their consent and even the study itself was FLAWED on a scientific level.

No one talks about that information that’s also been available for over 14 years: https://rumble.com/v3zqfm4-911-and-the-thermite-conspiracy-2010.html

You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf

Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com

Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:

1. 9/11 Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf

2. 9/11 Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf

Expand full comment

Thermite was put there to stay there. Of course it's bullshit.

Expand full comment

Great work!

Interesting that clip with the walls (buckling) inward......

Without significant core damage, it wouldn't be synchronized on both faces uniformaly, due to different beam numbers in sections, and the top being anchored.

Looks like an implosion/ vacuum effect.

That would be the floor in the middle with possible device there.

Lift shafts?

Is it on all 4 sides? Synconised.

Is the UPS a new company to the building, did it "thwart" other cyber cover-ups planned ? (Power out data loss, hurricane etc), or just for fireworks or a source of elements for other uses, combined...

I hope you don't mind me sound boarding, it relaxes me 🤯

Still possible a drone with precision laser targeting with a payload on board was used, the holographics may have been projected onto the drone plane to make it look commercial.

Video quality is to rubbish to be sure.

Keep rockin'

Cheers

Expand full comment
author

I highly recommend this documentary, as it will answer many of your questions.

9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality

Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html

Expand full comment