It seems you did not work through the article at all - I suggest reading through it again and listening to the video where Fetzer is talking, below the following statement:
"Now, if you decided to let go of the official narrative of jet fuel not being able to bring the buildings down as well as thermite not being able to do it, well there is another option you can fall back on and that is the nuke theory. So, let us investigate that as well, whilst we’re at it."
You might not have studied the material i referenced. I am trained structural engineer, registered for 40 years, who has invested thousands of hours into Twin Towers vaporization. I talked to Richard Gage at four A & E Truth events since 2009 and interviewed him on my TNT Radio program. "Breathtaking" has 45 power point slides, three 90 min videos and when posted at VeteransToday in 2019 had 80 article bibliography. Fetzer and I discussed this in the BitChute video linked in my comment.
I suggest you get your hands on the book and study it, something you confirmed you have not and will not do: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
You want to dismiss EVIDENCE that you confirmed you have not yet studied.
So much for your thousands of hours you have put into studying the "vaporisation" - You do know vaporisation implies heat - of the towers, when you HAVE NOT studied what is included in her 500 page book, discussing EVIDENCE.
So, if you've not studied her book, then you most probably also have not worked through her Qui-Tam case which she filed with the US Supreme Court back in 2007.
So, I'll suggest you get your hands on her book.
I would like you to then REFUTE all the EVIDENCE presented in her book and Qui-Tam case that does not come close to being touched upon your THEORY of nukes being used.
It's been 15 years since the book was published and no one has been able to refute the COLD dust cloud, the cold rubble pile, the ongoing metal transmutation that was easily observable for 100 days post disintegration, the lack of seismic readings, the change in the earth's magnetic field, the lack of ionising radiation, the 1400 toasted cars, and so much more which is covered extensively by the ONLY independent forensic study in the public domain of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001.
If you are so sure of your theory of nukes being used, show me your filings to NIST for correction of the scientifically flawed NIST Report.
I got Judy's book around here someplace. It certainly ain't 500 pages. Some very good photos. After reading much of this stuff, I find no discussion of the observation - obviously high heat and "explosions". Heat and pressure destroyed the 3 towers of 9/11.
The if you study chapters 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 17 for example, you'd find the explanation for the lack of heat in the disintegration of the towers as well as the anomalies with the 9/11 Orphans building 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Banker's Trust building that never get's mentioned by the 9/11 "truther" movement.
I've read em all. David Ray Griffins 10 books are the single best source. Bollyn's "Solving 911", Thompson's "Terror Timeline", and the "Toronto Hearings", Ryan's site: "Dig Within". I try not to get into that mud hole of who's right or wrong. Woods' book is an excellent source of pictures and she certainly asks some very good questions. There are many eyewitness accounts of extreme heat. "No answers, only better questions."
The people world wide are all inside the next 911 event happening around us as the original 911 remains a mystery. Yes our ecosystem is collapsing at an unstoppable free fall rate avd our days are numbered. May our Creator be with us all who love his creation and witness miracles that could only have happened with his grace and the survivors in stairwell B are a prime example of what I speak.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
"Unequivocal 9/11 Nukes" > "Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11" > "Exposing NIST Jenga Game" > VeteransToday.com > https://bitchute.com/video/qsSdSIWX9Jxl/
It seems you did not work through the article at all - I suggest reading through it again and listening to the video where Fetzer is talking, below the following statement:
"Now, if you decided to let go of the official narrative of jet fuel not being able to bring the buildings down as well as thermite not being able to do it, well there is another option you can fall back on and that is the nuke theory. So, let us investigate that as well, whilst we’re at it."
You might not have studied the material i referenced. I am trained structural engineer, registered for 40 years, who has invested thousands of hours into Twin Towers vaporization. I talked to Richard Gage at four A & E Truth events since 2009 and interviewed him on my TNT Radio program. "Breathtaking" has 45 power point slides, three 90 min videos and when posted at VeteransToday in 2019 had 80 article bibliography. Fetzer and I discussed this in the BitChute video linked in my comment.
I suggest you get your hands on the book and study it, something you confirmed you have not and will not do: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
You want to dismiss EVIDENCE that you confirmed you have not yet studied.
So much for your thousands of hours you have put into studying the "vaporisation" - You do know vaporisation implies heat - of the towers, when you HAVE NOT studied what is included in her 500 page book, discussing EVIDENCE.
So, if you've not studied her book, then you most probably also have not worked through her Qui-Tam case which she filed with the US Supreme Court back in 2007.
So, I'll suggest you get your hands on her book.
I would like you to then REFUTE all the EVIDENCE presented in her book and Qui-Tam case that does not come close to being touched upon your THEORY of nukes being used.
It's been 15 years since the book was published and no one has been able to refute the COLD dust cloud, the cold rubble pile, the ongoing metal transmutation that was easily observable for 100 days post disintegration, the lack of seismic readings, the change in the earth's magnetic field, the lack of ionising radiation, the 1400 toasted cars, and so much more which is covered extensively by the ONLY independent forensic study in the public domain of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001.
If you are so sure of your theory of nukes being used, show me your filings to NIST for correction of the scientifically flawed NIST Report.
I suggest anyone wanting to see the muddling of of what Dr Wood presents being demolished in her FAQ page on her website and you can start by reading this: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
Your call to authority being aligned with muddlers of the truth is mute.
I got Judy's book around here someplace. It certainly ain't 500 pages. Some very good photos. After reading much of this stuff, I find no discussion of the observation - obviously high heat and "explosions". Heat and pressure destroyed the 3 towers of 9/11.
You're right - The book in excess of 500 pages.
The if you study chapters 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 17 for example, you'd find the explanation for the lack of heat in the disintegration of the towers as well as the anomalies with the 9/11 Orphans building 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Banker's Trust building that never get's mentioned by the 9/11 "truther" movement.
I've read em all. David Ray Griffins 10 books are the single best source. Bollyn's "Solving 911", Thompson's "Terror Timeline", and the "Toronto Hearings", Ryan's site: "Dig Within". I try not to get into that mud hole of who's right or wrong. Woods' book is an excellent source of pictures and she certainly asks some very good questions. There are many eyewitness accounts of extreme heat. "No answers, only better questions."
Flabbergasted at the obfuscation parade you attract . . . 🙄.
You'll find this article interesting as well;
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
The people world wide are all inside the next 911 event happening around us as the original 911 remains a mystery. Yes our ecosystem is collapsing at an unstoppable free fall rate avd our days are numbered. May our Creator be with us all who love his creation and witness miracles that could only have happened with his grace and the survivors in stairwell B are a prime example of what I speak.
Peace and love to everyone 🙏🙌🙏
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
You are awesome brother; I 💯% agree with everything you say and thank you.
It's high time the technology used is used for the benefits it offers mankind and taken out of the greedy parasites hands for good.