In a way. You should read this article to understand how much of a process it was for John Herold with Morgan Reynolds to "programme" ChatGPT to be truthful.
Yes, I did realize it didn’t include the real sources in the original ‘programming’ and the results of their (Jon & Morgan) efforts is stunning. I have Dr. Judy’s book and after the initial shock on 911, I questioned the lie for years, although not aware of the true capability of DEWs until a couple of years ago. Still an amateur. Still questioning everything and although the AI disagrees, I believe one of the key elements of the plan IS to reveal all of this. No way to succeed without this.
a simple examination of events, in light of the laws of physics, clearly indicates that the events, that is alleged plane crashes and building collapse, being in violation of the laws of physics, therefore the official story is a lie, this alone is sufficient to launch the case and with that have court orders for DISCOVERY and therefore find out for certain by who and how the anomalies were actually done.
If you are among those who have called for a new, open, and independent investigation, today’s your lucky day! This is not only “The New Investigation,” it is the only comprehensive-forensic investigation to date in the public domain. As of this publication only one person —myself, Dr. Judy Wood— has conducted a comprehensive investigation to determine what happened to the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. This was part of the federal qui tam (whistleblower) case I filed (2007) in which I accused the defendants of science fraud.
This book is a summary of the physical evidence submitted in my federal qui tam case accusing the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to “Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed…” yet NIST admitted to me that they did not analyze the “collapse.” The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final.
Sadly, this case had no support from the “Truth movement,” leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).
A lot of Americans are still struggling with PTSD and I think they know deep down inside that something is very off with what happened on 9/11, but they are too scared to know the truth, as the truth is truly frightening.
Two 110 story buildings, with everything in them, turned into nano-scale dust.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Let’s hope you get some inquisitive minds asking you about the book on your coffee table.
I don’t doubt there was multiple Jewish casualties on 9/11. But Odigo Instant Messaging, Israeli software, alerted the thousands of Israelis (4000 from memory) not to go into the towers on 9/11. It worked because the only Israeli to die on 9/11 was a handicapped janitor.
The actual confirmed Israeli nationals that died on 9/11 is 5.
Then the approximate jewish people is calculated between 300 and 400. It cannot be confirmed how many of them were dual citizens.
What is suspect, is how intellectually lazy you are, not wanting to focus on the involvement of the MIC (Military Industrial Complex) in the events of the day, as well as the cover-up of what actually happened when the MIC subcontractors took control of ground zero, on September 13, 2001 and controlled the narrative by selling people on the following disinformation talking points;
1. The rubble pile being thousands of degrees hot - The rubble pile was cold
2. Molten Metal - this was complete and utter bullshit
3. The "smoke" for 100 days - Which was ongoing metal transmutation
4. The lack of rubble - Covered up by the "quickly shipped off to China" talking point
5. The dust being safe to breathe
There are many more, but that's just to give you an idea....
Maybe, just maybe you need to really understand what actually happened, before you want to go running and blaming someone on a suspicion.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11.
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Once you've been shown that you know f'all, have done no real research of your own, people like you always try and paint the person pointing out your shortcomings and intellectual laziness, as a jew.
Grow up, retard.
Please don't promote this take or get it twisted: Al Franken is a comedian and this is clearly a joke (albeit a dry one, but that's Franken).
He's making fun of the conspiracy theory that jews did 9/11.
I'm not saying there was no foreknowledge by some, but just as I pointed out to you on a X post - The investigation should start with who tasked NIST with covering up evidence at ground zero and who was controlling the narrative.
Please try and do better and stop being an intellectually lazy regurgitation of bullshit speculation, that is rooted in pure fantasy.
You make yourself look stupid.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Superb! ChatGPT spilled all the beans. Chilling responses from the fictionalized operative.
ChatGPT is much better ‘programmed’ to assess facts!
In a way. You should read this article to understand how much of a process it was for John Herold with Morgan Reynolds to "programme" ChatGPT to be truthful.
ChatGPT and 9/11: Operation Headfake
by John Herold with Morgan Reynolds
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/chatgpt-and-911-operation-headfake
Yes, I did realize it didn’t include the real sources in the original ‘programming’ and the results of their (Jon & Morgan) efforts is stunning. I have Dr. Judy’s book and after the initial shock on 911, I questioned the lie for years, although not aware of the true capability of DEWs until a couple of years ago. Still an amateur. Still questioning everything and although the AI disagrees, I believe one of the key elements of the plan IS to reveal all of this. No way to succeed without this.
That was the best use of an LLM chat bot I have ever seen!
You should read the first article with 50 questions - It's epic.
It's linked in this article.
ChatGPT is SATANIC!
The truth shall set us free, but first it will piss us off.
link: https://x.com/911Revisionist/status/1903491870619017496
Great coverage. It’s all scripted for us.
Another casualty of 9/11
https://www.brasscheck.com/video/the-work-of-mark-lombardi/
a simple examination of events, in light of the laws of physics, clearly indicates that the events, that is alleged plane crashes and building collapse, being in violation of the laws of physics, therefore the official story is a lie, this alone is sufficient to launch the case and with that have court orders for DISCOVERY and therefore find out for certain by who and how the anomalies were actually done.
If you are among those who have called for a new, open, and independent investigation, today’s your lucky day! This is not only “The New Investigation,” it is the only comprehensive-forensic investigation to date in the public domain. As of this publication only one person —myself, Dr. Judy Wood— has conducted a comprehensive investigation to determine what happened to the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. This was part of the federal qui tam (whistleblower) case I filed (2007) in which I accused the defendants of science fraud.
This book is a summary of the physical evidence submitted in my federal qui tam case accusing the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to “Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed…” yet NIST admitted to me that they did not analyze the “collapse.” The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final.
Sadly, this case had no support from the “Truth movement,” leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden.
Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Always.. always look forward to your sterile steely eye on this overwhelming project🙏🏻
O, here we need to thank John Herold and Dr Morgan Reynolds for their stellar work.
I’m just helping spread the message.
Thank you for your support and reading the article.
To say,I wish I went much further than holding DrWoods book. I appreciate your digs however they show up, because I didn’t.🙏🏻
It’s never too late to ramp up your activism, seeing everyone is waiting for the release of the meaningless 9/11 files.
Time to share what Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood exposed, way back in 2007 already.
Pity people weren’t ready to face the truth.
I am not sure that I was…ready
To think the unthinkable was the hurdle I was struggling with. Because of you, I put her book on our coffee table, still waiting to hear someone ask🤨
A lot of Americans are still struggling with PTSD and I think they know deep down inside that something is very off with what happened on 9/11, but they are too scared to know the truth, as the truth is truly frightening.
Two 110 story buildings, with everything in them, turned into nano-scale dust.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Let’s hope you get some inquisitive minds asking you about the book on your coffee table.
Not to mention the ‘advanced cellphone ‘ technology tracking aircraft over several towers with an uninterrupted connection????
Not possible today, never mind 20+ years ago! Great for the MoldStream clowns to parrot about, not good for reality 🤮
[Isreal] (redact) did 9/11.
Nice to see you're coming over from X, to leave intellectually lazy comments under my substack articles.
I hope you actually read some of my articles... Don't forget to subscribe.
The whole Israel connection and everyone losing their minds over it is a wonderful distraction for the lazy.
To keep people from realising the US Military industrial Complex’s involvement in the events on 9/11 and especially the black-ops technology involved.
Let’s address some of the disinformation pertaining to the “Israelis”.
Let's start with the "artists", Gelatin & “the E-Team” in the one tower, shall we...
Were they Israeli, or Austrian?
Watch the video…. https://rumble.com/v659g91-the-artists-gelatin-and-the-e-team.html
The first part discusses the psyop and the second part, is where the artist talks about the boxes.
The boxes were given to them for free, where they illegally built the balcony out of the tower window….
So, you need to be open to the idea that those boxes were given to them to push the explosive narrative…
There is truth in that there was some foreknowledge by some, but the conspiracy theory that no Jews died on 9/11, is just that - A conspiracy theory.
The Jewish victims of Sept. 11 (partial list)
Read more: https://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/archives/the-jewish-victims-of-sept-11/article_6271d354-13ab-5051-9a80-4ea156b4ad48.html
I don’t doubt there was multiple Jewish casualties on 9/11. But Odigo Instant Messaging, Israeli software, alerted the thousands of Israelis (4000 from memory) not to go into the towers on 9/11. It worked because the only Israeli to die on 9/11 was a handicapped janitor.
Your site is more than a little suspect.
The actual confirmed Israeli nationals that died on 9/11 is 5.
Then the approximate jewish people is calculated between 300 and 400. It cannot be confirmed how many of them were dual citizens.
What is suspect, is how intellectually lazy you are, not wanting to focus on the involvement of the MIC (Military Industrial Complex) in the events of the day, as well as the cover-up of what actually happened when the MIC subcontractors took control of ground zero, on September 13, 2001 and controlled the narrative by selling people on the following disinformation talking points;
1. The rubble pile being thousands of degrees hot - The rubble pile was cold
2. Molten Metal - this was complete and utter bullshit
3. The "smoke" for 100 days - Which was ongoing metal transmutation
4. The lack of rubble - Covered up by the "quickly shipped off to China" talking point
5. The dust being safe to breathe
There are many more, but that's just to give you an idea....
Maybe, just maybe you need to really understand what actually happened, before you want to go running and blaming someone on a suspicion.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11.
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Did you get “The Jew Call” like Al Franken?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byjlfHbh6AQ
O, hell - You're a typical idiot.
Once you've been shown that you know f'all, have done no real research of your own, people like you always try and paint the person pointing out your shortcomings and intellectual laziness, as a jew.
Grow up, retard.
Please don't promote this take or get it twisted: Al Franken is a comedian and this is clearly a joke (albeit a dry one, but that's Franken).
He's making fun of the conspiracy theory that jews did 9/11.
I'm not saying there was no foreknowledge by some, but just as I pointed out to you on a X post - The investigation should start with who tasked NIST with covering up evidence at ground zero and who was controlling the narrative.
Please try and do better and stop being an intellectually lazy regurgitation of bullshit speculation, that is rooted in pure fantasy.
You make yourself look stupid.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Stop acting like a faux Semite and descendant of a shicksa, goyishe, pagan, idol worshipping, cow, from bum fktd Kazakhstan and answer the question.
Did you get “The Jew Call?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byjlfHbh6AQ