Mark Conlon is of the opinion that some of the "passengers" were real and some of them were "fake" - Meaning some voice enhancement tech was used to fake voices and the calls. When you listen to Mark Bingham's mother's interview on September 12, it is very suspect. I'll drop the interview in a note on my profile, so that you can have your spidey sense dissect it...
Just watched that interview. Very strange. But the thought occurred to me...has anyone confirmed if Mark Bingham was an actual person, not a fictional character? I.e.Facebook account? Photo with his "mom"? Personal references?
I have the communications tower text starting from 3am the day of 9/11. It's an interesting read. To me, it seems some narratives (whatever you wanna call them) were being pushed when events were unfolding. Alpha messages saying small plane, commercial jet, bombs detonating.. these include mainstream media messages and such
Will do. I hope I didn't come across as too hasty when we talked about my 9/11 work. I've had my own family treat me differently over the years for questioning things, so sometimes I'm a tad touchy. But more than willing to learn new perspectives and admit when what I think something could be is wrong
When it comes to the alleged planes, I'd rather refer you to the guru on the alleged plane narrative, which is "9/11 Plane Research", as he's been at it for 14 years and he can back up everything he presents with declassified official documents.
sounds awesome. What really peaked my suspicions about the 'planes' was when trying to enhance the still images, the 'planes' would come out way worse. And live videos had some flaws that are quite suspicious
If you haven't yet watched - 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality, I suggest you watch it as most of the plane related information in the docci is Mark Conlon's (9/11 Plane Research) information.
Can’t believe anything anymore regarding 9/11 or anything else.
Truth has been out there, it's just been censored for 14 years....
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
Great work!
The greater the crime, the greater the cover-up.
The greater the cover-up, the greater the CRIME.
"It's not the crime that gets you, it's the cover-up," - Richard Nixon
Outstanding work! I am now fairly convinced that the correct answer to the question "What happened to the planes?" Is "WHAT PLANES?"
However, there is still one important piece missing for me personally which is:
"What happened to the passengers and crew?"
Are they all still alive under false identities?
or blindfolded & firing squad.
Well, we know for sure that it wasn't Mark Bingham who called his mother...so WHAT HAPPENED to the ACTUAL Mark Bingham?
Collateral damage?
Mark Conlon is of the opinion that some of the "passengers" were real and some of them were "fake" - Meaning some voice enhancement tech was used to fake voices and the calls. When you listen to Mark Bingham's mother's interview on September 12, it is very suspect. I'll drop the interview in a note on my profile, so that you can have your spidey sense dissect it...
Just watched that interview. Very strange. But the thought occurred to me...has anyone confirmed if Mark Bingham was an actual person, not a fictional character? I.e.Facebook account? Photo with his "mom"? Personal references?
Same goes for all other passengers.
You need to watch - 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality - https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
Mark Conlon, 9/11 Plane Research, will be writing / presenting his research regarding the alleged passenger soon.
I will share to my substack, once available.
Mark Conlon (9/11 Plane Research) has let me know he'll be doing a presentation soon on the question: "What happened to the passengers and crew?"
Keep your eyes on the substack for when he makes it availble.
Just observe the "Evan Fairbanks Video" and know that its an insult to human intelligence.
Oh my God. They are rubbish!
I have the communications tower text starting from 3am the day of 9/11. It's an interesting read. To me, it seems some narratives (whatever you wanna call them) were being pushed when events were unfolding. Alpha messages saying small plane, commercial jet, bombs detonating.. these include mainstream media messages and such
Then feel free to share with 9/11 Planes research - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Will do. I hope I didn't come across as too hasty when we talked about my 9/11 work. I've had my own family treat me differently over the years for questioning things, so sometimes I'm a tad touchy. But more than willing to learn new perspectives and admit when what I think something could be is wrong
When it comes to the alleged planes, I'd rather refer you to the guru on the alleged plane narrative, which is "9/11 Plane Research", as he's been at it for 14 years and he can back up everything he presents with declassified official documents.
9/11 Planes research - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
sounds awesome. What really peaked my suspicions about the 'planes' was when trying to enhance the still images, the 'planes' would come out way worse. And live videos had some flaws that are quite suspicious
If you haven't yet watched - 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality, I suggest you watch it as most of the plane related information in the docci is Mark Conlon's (9/11 Plane Research) information.
Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
Absolutely will be watching it this weekend
Weren't a couple of those flights not even scheduled for that day?
Indeed - You need to check out this substack: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Mark Conlon - 9/11 Planes Research
The most thorough work on the planes I've come across.