I was one of the VERY Few on 9/12 that year saying it was not what We were told. I looked into everything I could find about it, and yes, I knew that more than three buildings had major damage.
Unfortunately you are unaware of the controversy surrounding Ace Baker, as he was an operative put in place to put the CGI narrative into the consciousness of the "9/11 truther movement".
He was put in place to steer people away from the actual technology employed by the US government to FOOL the onlookers on September 11, 2001.
His documentary, A great American Psyopera - Was exactly that, a second layer to the psy-op that 9/11 was, as in his docci he also marginalises the work of Dr Wood, in order to plant the notion of nuclear devices being used on 9/11...
Debunking Ace Baker - "The Key" CGI & Video Fakery Plane Compositing Theory
You really should read Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11 as he chronicles all the disinformation / COINTELPRO agents that came into play once Dr Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds left the group: "Scholars for 9/11 truth" that was formed by Prof Jim Fetzer and Dr Steven E. Jones (captain thermite, ex-CIA consultant and employed by the Dept of Energy)
In 2007 Dr Moragn Reynolds filed a Qui-Tam whistleblower case against the 23 NIST subcontractors for science fraud pertaining to the "plane impact" studies.
@9/11 Revisionist - Latest Joe Rogan (#2269) with Bret Weinstein has a spot that might interest you. At 54:00 minutes in, Bret makes the case that he thinks UFO sightings (not "drones", but stuff like the TicTac, underwater craft, etc...) are...wait for it...3D VOLUMETRIC PROJECTIONS. Basically making the case that the physics of the craft don't appear to be interacting with reality (i.e. no sonic boom)
Now, if he turned that critical eye towards 9/11....
Thank you for your hard work rebutting the #nefariousNewWorldOrder’s #BigLie re the pre-Plandemic #911FalseFlagAtrocity “Crime of the Century.”
LewWelge.com
#CREATORS (Conspiracy Realist Educator Activist Truther Organizer Reader Socializer)
Well done, I'm glad you are getting more widely read.
Thank you Sarah - much appreciated.
I was one of the VERY Few on 9/12 that year saying it was not what We were told. I looked into everything I could find about it, and yes, I knew that more than three buildings had major damage.
Hearing from folks who've flown explaining how impossible this all was was great!!!
Wait….. what? Richard agrees with statement 5 !!!!!!
?? Eh?!
Have to teach now. Can’t wait to hear this out….
Did you not know that? Come on Tim - I've sent you so much homework on Telegram, lol
Ah! I may have confused my Hall for my Gage 😀
That's sacrilege to want to confuse Richard D. Hall with the liar Richard Gage - shame on you Tim. This could be the end of our friendship, lol
I wouldn’t blame you. Next I’ll be mistaking Judy Wood for J.D Rockerfeller
Ooooooooo - Then you'll be in BIG trouble, lol
Well done.
Indeed, no planes: https://hillmd.substack.com/p/no-planes-hit-the-towers-eyewitnesses
Unfortunately you are unaware of the controversy surrounding Ace Baker, as he was an operative put in place to put the CGI narrative into the consciousness of the "9/11 truther movement".
He was put in place to steer people away from the actual technology employed by the US government to FOOL the onlookers on September 11, 2001.
His documentary, A great American Psyopera - Was exactly that, a second layer to the psy-op that 9/11 was, as in his docci he also marginalises the work of Dr Wood, in order to plant the notion of nuclear devices being used on 9/11...
Debunking Ace Baker - "The Key" CGI & Video Fakery Plane Compositing Theory
Link: https://rumble.com/v4etrm3-debunking-ace-baker-the-key-cgi-and-video-fakery-plane-compositing-theory.html
You really should read Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11 as he chronicles all the disinformation / COINTELPRO agents that came into play once Dr Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds left the group: "Scholars for 9/11 truth" that was formed by Prof Jim Fetzer and Dr Steven E. Jones (captain thermite, ex-CIA consultant and employed by the Dept of Energy)
In 2007 Dr Moragn Reynolds filed a Qui-Tam whistleblower case against the 23 NIST subcontractors for science fraud pertaining to the "plane impact" studies.
Court filings: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
And Dr Wood filed against the same companies for science fraud on the reports of the disintegration of the towers.
Court filings: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:
1. 9/11 – Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 – Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
Here is some suggested watching, to get you to understand why CGI is part of the second layer of the cover-up:
9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
9/11 The Essential Guide
Link: https://rumble.com/v4b3ptu-911-the-essential-guide.html
Read my article:
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11
Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/psychology-of-resistance-to-truth
@9/11 Revisionist - Latest Joe Rogan (#2269) with Bret Weinstein has a spot that might interest you. At 54:00 minutes in, Bret makes the case that he thinks UFO sightings (not "drones", but stuff like the TicTac, underwater craft, etc...) are...wait for it...3D VOLUMETRIC PROJECTIONS. Basically making the case that the physics of the craft don't appear to be interacting with reality (i.e. no sonic boom)
Now, if he turned that critical eye towards 9/11....
https://open.spotify.com/episode/228sh8JkOutqToUEnuPK6O
O, great - Thanx for the heads up!