So how did all that steel and concrete become dust. This was so long but still didn't clarify ...what tech does that to concrete and steel? Not to mention almost 1100 bodies disappeared ..no DNA at all.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Ha ha ha. I deleted them because I didn't want to overload the thread. I'm just finishing watching the podcast now, the David Hughes clip is interesting. I've heard him on a few interviews and read his substack and something seems off about him. I didn't know he was into Cold Fusion Mini-nukes, lol. My position is: nuclear weapons are a hoax, and if Hughes is still believing in nukes he's either not too smart or an asset.
One of my deleted comments was about AA Flight 11 which was the first (alleged) jet to hit the WTC at 8.46 am. The freemasonic "11" again. 92 persons on board: 9+2=11:).
I get email notifications of comments made and clicked the link and there was nothing there, lol...
People have differing opinions, depending on how deep they've researched topics, but if someone can state that they back Dr Wood's work, due to it being the best evidentiary explanation for the destruction we saw at the WTC, it's a good start.
I take the wins, for promoting the evidence presented by Dr Wood, everyday, even if someone has some critisms...
We must not lose sight of the importance of this breakthrough energy that was weaponized, instead of being used for good...
There is a lot of not very smart, smart people around 😉 I too was surprised to hear him say that, especially as he seems to be an expert on just about everything. Not bad for a PhD in German eh?
Importantly, Denis Rancourt who is a materials science expert carried out analysis of samples of the debris from the towers and could find no evidence of thermite. That is my recollection of what he has said. …..
OK I see now that you have covered his evidence . Good.
Rancourt is a Canadian legend. His brain seems to operate on multiple levels of analysis and seeks out the truth like a Hellfire missile, esp. in regards to the plandemic. Canada continually ignores its most talented individuals at its own peril.
Indeed, I have a lot of respect for Rancourt, but the fact that he still argues that what we saw on 9/11 was a structural collapse, just boggles my mind.
He's completely debunked the bombs and thermite angle, yet as a materials scientist, he still pushes the government conspiracy theory of a fire induced collapse?
Maybe he should take a page out of Dr Mike Yeadon's book?
Give my article a read through...
Dr Denis Rancourt: 2010 Death Blows to the 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis
The 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis and over 15 years of lies
Really interesting and enlightening discussion. 👍🏽🤗 I think these people you are discussing out themselves as counter-ops when they protest too much about Dr Judy Woods work. They make it easy for us to identify them. Yes, a few of them might just be psychologically - intellectually challenged, and changing their view is too difficult for their sense of self/ they're insistence on being their kind of right. And there are a few people like Catherine Austin Fitz with the reasoning that you discussed who won mention Judy Wood.
Interestingly Andrew Johnson's books won't download onto my phone. That hasn't happened before, and I will try on my computer tomorrow.
So how did all that steel and concrete become dust. This was so long but still didn't clarify ...what tech does that to concrete and steel? Not to mention almost 1100 bodies disappeared ..no DNA at all.
It's all explained in this presentation and book...
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
Thank you 🙏🏼
Washington DC = Spooksville.
Why am I only seeing this comment, yet you've left 7 comments?
Ha ha ha. I deleted them because I didn't want to overload the thread. I'm just finishing watching the podcast now, the David Hughes clip is interesting. I've heard him on a few interviews and read his substack and something seems off about him. I didn't know he was into Cold Fusion Mini-nukes, lol. My position is: nuclear weapons are a hoax, and if Hughes is still believing in nukes he's either not too smart or an asset.
One of my deleted comments was about AA Flight 11 which was the first (alleged) jet to hit the WTC at 8.46 am. The freemasonic "11" again. 92 persons on board: 9+2=11:).
I get email notifications of comments made and clicked the link and there was nothing there, lol...
People have differing opinions, depending on how deep they've researched topics, but if someone can state that they back Dr Wood's work, due to it being the best evidentiary explanation for the destruction we saw at the WTC, it's a good start.
I take the wins, for promoting the evidence presented by Dr Wood, everyday, even if someone has some critisms...
We must not lose sight of the importance of this breakthrough energy that was weaponized, instead of being used for good...
There's lots of snakes in the grass:).
There is a lot of not very smart, smart people around 😉 I too was surprised to hear him say that, especially as he seems to be an expert on just about everything. Not bad for a PhD in German eh?
He's not much of an engineer, that's for certain:).
Importantly, Denis Rancourt who is a materials science expert carried out analysis of samples of the debris from the towers and could find no evidence of thermite. That is my recollection of what he has said. …..
OK I see now that you have covered his evidence . Good.
Rancourt is a Canadian legend. His brain seems to operate on multiple levels of analysis and seeks out the truth like a Hellfire missile, esp. in regards to the plandemic. Canada continually ignores its most talented individuals at its own peril.
Indeed, I have a lot of respect for Rancourt, but the fact that he still argues that what we saw on 9/11 was a structural collapse, just boggles my mind.
He's completely debunked the bombs and thermite angle, yet as a materials scientist, he still pushes the government conspiracy theory of a fire induced collapse?
Maybe he should take a page out of Dr Mike Yeadon's book?
Give my article a read through...
Dr Denis Rancourt: 2010 Death Blows to the 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis
The 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis and over 15 years of lies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/denis-rancourt-2010-death-blows-to
Really good interview x
September 11 is the 254th day of the year.
2+5+4 = 11, the freemason's favourite number.
From September 11 to the end of the year is 111 days:)
Good interview with some really insightful bits of wisdom. Thank you!
45m: very interesting regarding the Toronto hearings being held in Canada while the Smith-Mundt Act was still in play.
Just notice Jim Fetzer's body language, as soon as I asked him the question.
He was noticeably shook...
PS: Dr Judy Wood will be on MES' podcast this Saturday at 9PM UK time...
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gf-cAIxVhek
Really interesting and enlightening discussion. 👍🏽🤗 I think these people you are discussing out themselves as counter-ops when they protest too much about Dr Judy Woods work. They make it easy for us to identify them. Yes, a few of them might just be psychologically - intellectually challenged, and changing their view is too difficult for their sense of self/ they're insistence on being their kind of right. And there are a few people like Catherine Austin Fitz with the reasoning that you discussed who won mention Judy Wood.
Interestingly Andrew Johnson's books won't download onto my phone. That hasn't happened before, and I will try on my computer tomorrow.