No opinion - Just a conclusion based on irrefutable empirical evidence.
You should read her book, which I doubt you ever have and most probably never will, because you’re ignorant and playing the premeditated ignorance game.
Your assumption that anyone who reads Dr. Woods Book will be convinced of the validity of her arguments . . . humans don’t work like that, we are all different here. Not all individuals will be convinced by reading any specific book.
After taking all the evidence into account, one arrives at an irrefutable conclusion.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
This has nothing to do with this conversation; just using it to get a comment to you. Not sure if you are familiar with Agent131711’s Substack but he just posted an interesting article today, that you might like to read - They Tried to Scrub it: The 9/11 DRILL - The Strange Story You Probably Haven't Heard
Great stuff Norman. Restacked!
Your convo with Jerm was so good
Great to hear you found it worth listening to.
Learn anything new pertaining to 9/11?
The invention secrecy act was interesting
Great . . Dr. Wood has an opinion . . . whatever . . .
No opinion - Just a conclusion based on irrefutable empirical evidence.
You should read her book, which I doubt you ever have and most probably never will, because you’re ignorant and playing the premeditated ignorance game.
Your assumption that anyone who reads Dr. Woods Book will be convinced of the validity of her arguments . . . humans don’t work like that, we are all different here. Not all individuals will be convinced by reading any specific book.
Dr Wood has no argument.
She presents evidence.
After taking all the evidence into account, one arrives at an irrefutable conclusion.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Thank U very much for your OPINION . . .
O, I base my opinion on irrefutable facts.
You're welcome.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
thank you for your opinion . . .
This has nothing to do with this conversation; just using it to get a comment to you. Not sure if you are familiar with Agent131711’s Substack but he just posted an interesting article today, that you might like to read - They Tried to Scrub it: The 9/11 DRILL - The Strange Story You Probably Haven't Heard
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/they-tried-to-scrub-it-the-911-drill
Just letting you know!!! The Watchman
The guy is a disinfo peddler, has me blocked from commenting.
Thanx for letting me know, but I have serious concerns about him.