I surely give very high probability it was DEW's although I suspect some explosives were used on the initial evidence. We know there was a pick of the interior a short while before that day with a bunch of cartons of what was labeled, I think it was "detonation cords" or such. However the psychopaths in control brought down those buildings, it was NOT jets and their fuel.
Possibly in the initial "plane impact" and fireball for a nice Hollywood effect, to sell the "plane" narrative... But the molecular disintegration of the Towers weren't due to
explosives, thermite or nukes...
It was molecular dissociation, due the use of a process called Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions, by means of the use of scalar interferometry...
The molecular bonds of the towers were repelling each other, instead of attracting each other, that made it look like explosions... That is the perception management at play..
I can tell you as an audio engineer that the claim in the Rumble film from the NIST engineer that we should have heard "sounds" of 120 or 130dB "half a mile to a mile away" is so casual, airy and handwaving that it's almost bound to be wrong. It's too easy to pull the wool over people's eyes with a logarithmic scale like decibels and this claim is an obvious candidate for exaggeration. Let's show how this works and give some markers.
120dB is the loudest sound you will ever have heard from a loudspeaker, and it's more likely than not that you will never have heard ANY speaker go that loud. Getting 110dB from a speaker at 1 metre is quite an achievement by itself, for any domestic loudspeaker, and you are looking at something pretty damn large and that is likely to dominate almost any living space. The loudest I know of can manage about 117dB and we're looking at 15 inch drivers with a throw of, not the usual 6mm or so, but 40mm peak-to-peak and costing in the region of £100k for two of them. We are already in the most rarified space.
That figure halves with every doubling in distance. On this log scale that is a loss of 6dB. So at 2m the 117dB becomes 111dB, at 4m it is 105dB, at 8m 99dB and 93dB at 16m. At the distance he's talking about, we'll say 1024m, the sound pressure level has fallen by a full 60dB or (a factor of 1000 in spl terms and 1 millionth the amount of power!) and this "loudest sound you've ever heard" is now at the level of two people chatting in a library, trying to keep their voices down.
Or, looking at it the other way around, if you really are hearing 120-30dB where you're standing, a kilometer away, the explosion itself was 1000x louder at up to 190dB! The only think I can think of that might have got that loud is a Saturn V rocket launch and the explosion of a bit of kerosene (most of it in free air, outside), plus squibs, is nothing like comparable. Kerosene is hardly even explosive; this is more like your central heating boiler switching on - and that actually has forced air to help the kerosene burn more completely, which 9/11 didn't (and burnt with a very smoky yellow flame). Boilers don't often have you jumping out of your seat with surprise, do they?
Of course you can use more than one speaker (or source) and you might think you've heard higher than 120dB at a rock concert, perhaps. Well, it's touch and go. If the venue has speakers this capable (which is unlikely, so it will have to use probably 4 speakers to produce the initial spl) and has 32 of them (the high performance ones) then, if it were open air, those closer than 100ft (the 32 metres) could have spl levels at or above the original 117dB (and you'll need twice the power to get to 120dB - and 10x the power to get from 120dB to 130dB!), so it's still pretty unlikely. Indoors it's a bit different because the sound can be reflected from the walls (though it is also absorbed), so it is a touch easier to get to these ear damaging levels.
Note that no dispensation is given in the film for any of WTCs to absorb any sound at all so these calculations should really be showing higher figures still, which are now getting beyond silly. IMO, this is just a poor, off-the-cuff, bit of guesswork that they hoped would defend them against accusations that the buildings were rigged with explosives. It doesn't, and it is so outlandish that it takes us into the realm of impossible behaviours and impossibly rare sound pressure levels which don't withstand scrutiny. (I'd like to mention here that we could do this examination from the perspective of the amount of energy or power required to make these sorts of levels of noise. My guess - though it still is a guess - is that it would fail that test also.)
Are you really trying so hard to cling onto the b/s narrative touted by architects for an engineered truth that you are playing the premeditated ignorance game?
Let's use the Seattle Kingdome as an example... It's concrete dome weighed 130 000 tons.
Then LISTEN to ANY video building 7 going down SILENTLY..... Oops...
Now, there is another anomaly with Building 7, that NO ONE talks about....
Do you know what it is?
I guess not, because it DEMOLISHES the fire induced and conventional controlled demolition narratives.
Have a listen to a 15 minute highlight of my 2h presentation on Building 7 and be sure to read the articles linked in the description. You're welcome...
No, I'm not trying to cling onto any narrative at all, I'm pointing out firstly that one of their excuses doesn't work and they haven't examined it in detail and, secondly, they are hoping to shock people with huge numbers plucked from the air and have them do the job of shoring up their explanation.
Having said that, and since you obviously haven't read what I wrote, your belligerent and combative attitude has just lost you a subscriber and viewer of your work. Not a great loss as I don't need to be told that the official explanation of 9/11 is fantasy and it's a battle we lost a long time ago. There are more important things ahead. Bye.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
will look forward ta readin' more -- 9/11 (the attack on not just our soil, a major city, an' a' ploy ta spy on us more easily huntin' fer "terroir-ists"--but the assualt on all critty-cul thinkin') is still a big deal tho' too many feel it's jus' old warter under the bridge--glad ta have recently discovered yer important work Andrew--just listened (via a link I sawr) on Elsa's fine stack. To wit... I wanna add some info that mebbe of use... take it is ya will...
BACKGROUND--- It concerns what I'd call "handler behavior" from a known gatekeeper who seems to be hard-set on dismissin; Dr. Judy as if his own life (or job?) depended on it-- So ya git my drift, sure. Now this podcaster I'm referrin' ya to--the feller who encountered said gatekeeper not allowin' him ta speak to his friend, one Dr. David W. Gregg who was QUITE the fascinatin' scientist--is an odd duck himself (the podcaster I mean...) --
He goes by the handle of "Juxtaposition" (I'll call 'im JP) an' often wears a Star Trek outfit that gives me more of a creepy Jack Parson's feelin' than 'bout noble Capt. Kirk... so he may be a mite "spooky" (in all ways) but I'll take stories when I kin git 'em...
Normally he blogs all about the dark side of tinseltown an' issues related... he always points ta the "chews" as bein' behind EVERY scandal, op, evil in the world (which gets kinda borin') but some of his research seems ta be legit--so like I say, he may be ltd. hang-outty or have inside info--but this story really was a mite "enGage'in'" so take it fer whutever it's worth given caveats:
Dr. Gregg was mostly a nukes / weapons guy but he had some interestin' ideas 'bout autism to help a friend... there's LOTS more about Dr. Gregg on the innertubes
So JP's friend scientist Dr. David W. Gregg -- Lawrence Livermore Weapons Lab-- invited him (JP) over as the two were gonna go see Bohemian Grove (!!!! yup , I know...) but WHO showed up at the front door but RG of the A&E... who tried ta show JP the door an' boot him out. Hear the rest at the link but this is very much "handler" behavior--an' then Dr. Gregg DIED... unexpectedly????. Dr. Gregg who wuz an expurt on Weapons of Mass Destruction... Not sure if this wuz before RG got married--otherwise why was he actin' like a "roomate?"
At about 27:32 is when they were to go to bohemian grove...
Anywhoo, RG seems to be act like a "spook" / Dr. Gregg's controller -- he even "eavesdropped" on the conversation--
Gregg may have been murdered (died on 7/6 at age 76 in 2011--I don't have any mastery of all the numerology but apparently it's a big thing for the cabal... )
I believe Webb told JP that every thing top secret is underground... but you can store DEWs an' other stuff underground 'til it's time ta put it inta place, no?
Sorry fer the long red herring--make of it what ya will--I found it very creepy AND consistent with the appalling behavior I saw from the same character on Elsa's summit... HTH!
I surely give very high probability it was DEW's although I suspect some explosives were used on the initial evidence. We know there was a pick of the interior a short while before that day with a bunch of cartons of what was labeled, I think it was "detonation cords" or such. However the psychopaths in control brought down those buildings, it was NOT jets and their fuel.
Possibly in the initial "plane impact" and fireball for a nice Hollywood effect, to sell the "plane" narrative... But the molecular disintegration of the Towers weren't due to
explosives, thermite or nukes...
It was molecular dissociation, due the use of a process called Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions, by means of the use of scalar interferometry...
My thoughts precisely. Those explosions looked very much like explosions! But the the rest looked 100% like DEW's.
Unfortunately I cannot share a picture here to help you with the thought experiment...
You need to check the picture of the bunny, being sold as a cat....
Check out the cover pic of this video, in line with Building 7 - https://rumble.com/v4kukif-building-7-the-great-big-bamboozle.html
The molecular bonds of the towers were repelling each other, instead of attracting each other, that made it look like explosions... That is the perception management at play..
I'm not talking the big kabooms. I agree that was DEW. Like You said, I was talking about those initial "plane impacts." Everything else was DEW.
I can tell you as an audio engineer that the claim in the Rumble film from the NIST engineer that we should have heard "sounds" of 120 or 130dB "half a mile to a mile away" is so casual, airy and handwaving that it's almost bound to be wrong. It's too easy to pull the wool over people's eyes with a logarithmic scale like decibels and this claim is an obvious candidate for exaggeration. Let's show how this works and give some markers.
120dB is the loudest sound you will ever have heard from a loudspeaker, and it's more likely than not that you will never have heard ANY speaker go that loud. Getting 110dB from a speaker at 1 metre is quite an achievement by itself, for any domestic loudspeaker, and you are looking at something pretty damn large and that is likely to dominate almost any living space. The loudest I know of can manage about 117dB and we're looking at 15 inch drivers with a throw of, not the usual 6mm or so, but 40mm peak-to-peak and costing in the region of £100k for two of them. We are already in the most rarified space.
That figure halves with every doubling in distance. On this log scale that is a loss of 6dB. So at 2m the 117dB becomes 111dB, at 4m it is 105dB, at 8m 99dB and 93dB at 16m. At the distance he's talking about, we'll say 1024m, the sound pressure level has fallen by a full 60dB or (a factor of 1000 in spl terms and 1 millionth the amount of power!) and this "loudest sound you've ever heard" is now at the level of two people chatting in a library, trying to keep their voices down.
Or, looking at it the other way around, if you really are hearing 120-30dB where you're standing, a kilometer away, the explosion itself was 1000x louder at up to 190dB! The only think I can think of that might have got that loud is a Saturn V rocket launch and the explosion of a bit of kerosene (most of it in free air, outside), plus squibs, is nothing like comparable. Kerosene is hardly even explosive; this is more like your central heating boiler switching on - and that actually has forced air to help the kerosene burn more completely, which 9/11 didn't (and burnt with a very smoky yellow flame). Boilers don't often have you jumping out of your seat with surprise, do they?
Of course you can use more than one speaker (or source) and you might think you've heard higher than 120dB at a rock concert, perhaps. Well, it's touch and go. If the venue has speakers this capable (which is unlikely, so it will have to use probably 4 speakers to produce the initial spl) and has 32 of them (the high performance ones) then, if it were open air, those closer than 100ft (the 32 metres) could have spl levels at or above the original 117dB (and you'll need twice the power to get to 120dB - and 10x the power to get from 120dB to 130dB!), so it's still pretty unlikely. Indoors it's a bit different because the sound can be reflected from the walls (though it is also absorbed), so it is a touch easier to get to these ear damaging levels.
Note that no dispensation is given in the film for any of WTCs to absorb any sound at all so these calculations should really be showing higher figures still, which are now getting beyond silly. IMO, this is just a poor, off-the-cuff, bit of guesswork that they hoped would defend them against accusations that the buildings were rigged with explosives. It doesn't, and it is so outlandish that it takes us into the realm of impossible behaviours and impossibly rare sound pressure levels which don't withstand scrutiny. (I'd like to mention here that we could do this examination from the perspective of the amount of energy or power required to make these sorts of levels of noise. My guess - though it still is a guess - is that it would fail that test also.)
Um, really - Building 7 - A silent demolition?
Are you really trying so hard to cling onto the b/s narrative touted by architects for an engineered truth that you are playing the premeditated ignorance game?
Let's use the Seattle Kingdome as an example... It's concrete dome weighed 130 000 tons.
It was demolished using explosives - Here, watch this clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt2ekbkDVv4
Now, also watch this clip of the 37 story Ocean Tower demolition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO2q4LErGN4
Then LISTEN to ANY video building 7 going down SILENTLY..... Oops...
Now, there is another anomaly with Building 7, that NO ONE talks about....
Do you know what it is?
I guess not, because it DEMOLISHES the fire induced and conventional controlled demolition narratives.
Have a listen to a 15 minute highlight of my 2h presentation on Building 7 and be sure to read the articles linked in the description. You're welcome...
Building 7 - The Great Big Bamboozle
Link: https://rumble.com/v4kukif-building-7-the-great-big-bamboozle.html
No, I'm not trying to cling onto any narrative at all, I'm pointing out firstly that one of their excuses doesn't work and they haven't examined it in detail and, secondly, they are hoping to shock people with huge numbers plucked from the air and have them do the job of shoring up their explanation.
Having said that, and since you obviously haven't read what I wrote, your belligerent and combative attitude has just lost you a subscriber and viewer of your work. Not a great loss as I don't need to be told that the official explanation of 9/11 is fantasy and it's a battle we lost a long time ago. There are more important things ahead. Bye.
Oops, the seismic readings hit you on the arse on your way out....
Now you're blocked - for being an impertinent little turd.
Yep - No answer for that 0.6 seismic reading for a 230 000 ton building crashing down, due to fires or explosives.
Even the NIST report, NCSTAR1-3 stated: "No steel was recovered from WTC 7".
Oops... didn’t he see the Pillars vanish into dust???!!!
I think it's the seismic reading and the NIST report on building 7 that hurt his feelings...
Well handled.
Those last columns turning to dust sealed the deal.
Guy in the black suit, good catch. Linking today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
The Pillars turning to dust in front of our eyes around 5:57 in video and beyond; is the smoking gun. What’s behind door nr.4? 9/11?
Behind door nr. 4 is..........
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
will look forward ta readin' more -- 9/11 (the attack on not just our soil, a major city, an' a' ploy ta spy on us more easily huntin' fer "terroir-ists"--but the assualt on all critty-cul thinkin') is still a big deal tho' too many feel it's jus' old warter under the bridge--glad ta have recently discovered yer important work Andrew--just listened (via a link I sawr) on Elsa's fine stack. To wit... I wanna add some info that mebbe of use... take it is ya will...
BACKGROUND--- It concerns what I'd call "handler behavior" from a known gatekeeper who seems to be hard-set on dismissin; Dr. Judy as if his own life (or job?) depended on it-- So ya git my drift, sure. Now this podcaster I'm referrin' ya to--the feller who encountered said gatekeeper not allowin' him ta speak to his friend, one Dr. David W. Gregg who was QUITE the fascinatin' scientist--is an odd duck himself (the podcaster I mean...) --
He goes by the handle of "Juxtaposition" (I'll call 'im JP) an' often wears a Star Trek outfit that gives me more of a creepy Jack Parson's feelin' than 'bout noble Capt. Kirk... so he may be a mite "spooky" (in all ways) but I'll take stories when I kin git 'em...
Normally he blogs all about the dark side of tinseltown an' issues related... he always points ta the "chews" as bein' behind EVERY scandal, op, evil in the world (which gets kinda borin') but some of his research seems ta be legit--so like I say, he may be ltd. hang-outty or have inside info--but this story really was a mite "enGage'in'" so take it fer whutever it's worth given caveats:
the link --
https://odysee.com/@Juxtaposition1:0/WIN_20231209_14_32_23_Pro:0
GO TO this mark: 24.22 an' give it a listen 'til the end (mebbe 8 min. more?)
So said JP the vlogger was talking about this scientist first:
Earnest Lawrence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Lawrence which led him to start speakin' 'bout another Lawrence Institute pal he had, Dr. David Gregg...
https://www.ageofautism.com/2011/07/farewell-to-an-honest-scientist-and-a-good-friend.html
Dr. Gregg was mostly a nukes / weapons guy but he had some interestin' ideas 'bout autism to help a friend... there's LOTS more about Dr. Gregg on the innertubes
So JP's friend scientist Dr. David W. Gregg -- Lawrence Livermore Weapons Lab-- invited him (JP) over as the two were gonna go see Bohemian Grove (!!!! yup , I know...) but WHO showed up at the front door but RG of the A&E... who tried ta show JP the door an' boot him out. Hear the rest at the link but this is very much "handler" behavior--an' then Dr. Gregg DIED... unexpectedly????. Dr. Gregg who wuz an expurt on Weapons of Mass Destruction... Not sure if this wuz before RG got married--otherwise why was he actin' like a "roomate?"
At about 27:32 is when they were to go to bohemian grove...
Anywhoo, RG seems to be act like a "spook" / Dr. Gregg's controller -- he even "eavesdropped" on the conversation--
Gregg may have been murdered (died on 7/6 at age 76 in 2011--I don't have any mastery of all the numerology but apparently it's a big thing for the cabal... )
I believe Webb told JP that every thing top secret is underground... but you can store DEWs an' other stuff underground 'til it's time ta put it inta place, no?
Sorry fer the long red herring--make of it what ya will--I found it very creepy AND consistent with the appalling behavior I saw from the same character on Elsa's summit... HTH!
O, thank you for this! It's GOLD!