Great piece. Thanks! It is very obvious except to brain damaged simpletons that the "Dancing Israelis" were just an attention decoy. Intelligent people obviously understand that subterfuges are done for a reason and in fact bring the real perpetrators into closer focus. In the game, what is most hidden is what most reveals, what is most open, conceals and deceives. But the trail of clues, hints and premonitory symbols paradoxically discloses the true logic and ideology of "means justifying ends in an amoral universe."
I was one of so VERY few on 9/12 that was saying We were lied to. At the time I was a civilian working on a military base with a couple of guys who were explosive experts, and on 9/11 They were discussing how the the "terrorists" got explosives into the building. The next day We were all stunned when We were told it was only jet fuel. The guys were mystified.
Me? I knew something was up beyond "terrorists" - or rather, the terrorists were not who They told Us They were.
Good stuff. I wonder though why I can look up Nicholas Rockefeller and find numerous references including a photo that looks a lot like the guy Russo was pictured with. If that point is bogus, I must dig at the other ones. But good food for thought, thanks -
Allegedly born June 6, 1956, California, got his JD from Yale 1987 (after attending Oxford), Inactive status as lawyer in California, CFR member, fat guy with a cheesy mustache, does business in China, that all seems to match.
Or is he just a cut out, a fake character - most of the pages with info on him have the same crappy font; and he isn't listed in Rockefeller family lists. At this point, I'd say he is real. He does have a phone and p o box listed with the state bar of California.
James Corbett looked into him and decided he was real, and thought he might be a con man on the outer branches of the family, a fringe Rockefeller. BUT He looks a lot like David Rockefeller with a mustache. The ears are almost unmistakable. I wonder if he was an unannounced 7th child to the family - perhaps out-of-wedlock? Their sixth child was born in '52. That would give Nick a chip on his shoulder, which might have given him loose lips with Russo. That is my working hypothesis.
I visited the Twin Towers as a tourist in 1995 and stayed up on the rooftop viewing area for quite a few hours as the afternoon faded, watching the long shadows the buildings cast across Brooklyn. These were huge constructions. Great views over Manhattan from up there.
To turn those things into dust was no small feat. Jet fuel or thermite just ain't gonna cut it.
It took black technology. But how did they know it would work at that scale? They must have tested it prior.
holy heck--this is compellin' stuff--I had no idea about all the planted symbolism but waiiiiit.... Miss McGee's viddeyo had me thinkin' about the (great) ol' punk band 999 (pre-911 of course) whose 2 biggest hits have uncannily relevant lyrics... dang! from "Emergency" (of course Emergency in the US is 911) we git this:
There's more--an' their other big hit Homicide also has lyrics could apply--after all 911 was a homicide...
Conned all along! (Would be interestin' ta see if the Tavistock wreck-hurd companies were behind 999 too--lots behind the labels--of course we normies had no idea!)
"He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the International Institute of Strategic Studies, the Advisory Board of RAND, the Corporate Advisory Board of the Pacific Council on International Relations, the Board of the Western Justice Center Foundation, and the Central China Development Council and has served as a participant in the World Economic Forum and the Aspen Institute. He also serves as a director of the Pacific Rim Cultural Foundation, and is a member of the boards of visitors of the law schools of the University of Oregon and of Pepperdine University. Nicholas’ China practice includes transactions with China’s largest banks, energy companies, communications entities and real estate enterprises as well as with China’s principal cities and leading provinces. He was chosen as a board member of the Central China Construction and Development Commission and as a director of the Xiwai International School of Shanghai International University. He has appeared numerous times on CCTV and other China media.
Nicholas is a graduate of Yale University and of Yale Law School. "
IMHO David (waaaay higher up on the Rocky-feller food chain) would not spend one nanosecond with a Brooklyn Jew (Russo) whose father wuz in the "schmatta" bizness sellin' underwear (we call 'em garmentos here)--this is humble beginnin's an' Russo stayed a salt-of-the-Earth New Yawker... began as a music manager an' club booker-- I promise ya that even tho' her produced in Hollyweird (where such humble beginnin's were a-ok, that's how the biz started), NO WAY would the hoi poloi Rockefellers spend 5 minutes with this kinda guy. (Yup, the Rockefellers had humble beginnin's too--but a century earlier an' they erased more or less all caste-marks) Just my 2 cents!
The SIX day war--6/6/67 (666 6+1)--two months after David appeared on the magazine cover with his watch an' the Tarry-TON towers... (they got "lit" like cigarettes!)--a war of airstrikes... hmmm, did the RockyFellers have their hands in that pot too? International "projects"....? (one hand warshes t'other?)
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report. Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Terrific analogy of the past presentation to and for the masses - Get the BS out before the actual truth, so there are no questions as the hook, line and sinker are set in motion. Preconceived.
There has been a murder - Three detectives arrive at the scene.
A body lies on the ground, with a knife and a tyre iron close by.... Two of the detectives decide the cause of death is either due to being stabbed to death or blunt force trauma (both won’t be able to prove this conclusively in a court of law) ... They run off to go look for their suspects and to bring someone to book...
The lone detective left at the crime scene decides to do an independent forensic investigation of the room, where the body has been found and starts putting pieces together.
A short while later the other two detectives call the detective at the crime scene on the phone, to boast they both already have a suspect apprehended - one for the knife and one for the tyre iron....
There is only one problem...
Whilst doing the lone investigating of the crime scene, the detective found no blood on the knife or the tyre iron.... There is no bruising to the body and no injuries to the head. No stab wounds either....
The body has a bullet hole in it...
Now - When looking into the events of September 11, 2001.
When you talk thermite, nukes, or DEW - Who is the detective that investigated the crime scene whilst the other two were running around apprehending innocent people due to making the wrong assumptions, that did not fit the evidence found at the crime scene?
Answer:
The detective that investigated the crime scene and was able to conclude what the murder weapon was, because a conclusive body of evidence is way better than a theory or belief, that will hold no water in a court of law, when you want to charge your suspect of a crime.
Once you have charged someone and taken them to court for the wrong crime – You cannot open a case against them again, remember that.
Well aware, been awake since birth (nearest pin point) more than 60 yrs. I have viewed these books, thnx. The evidence in the case of corruption in the world is astounding and overwhelming!
My fox, pushes n pulls me up, out, over, back, forth and around through, in and out of all of the rabbit holes - My mind is W(holy) open to any and all ideas, which may pass my way.
While in my formative years, if I were to lie or even look at someone as though I were lying, I would receive the horse whipping of my life. Needless to say, first time out, I understood what it meant to be with sound morals, integrity - In the instances of these horse shitters, there should be a scaffolding on the town square,. One for all to bare witness, and to create the understanding of morals, integrity, and ethics, by means of a sound thrashing which would be felt through decades of their lineage, so as not to be done over!
I gotta admit, when I found out the the Rockefellers were an instrumental part of getting the WTC complex built a few months ago, I was instantly questioning. The Rockefellers have quite a past, one that comes to mind is the 1918 'pandemic'. Yep, Rockefellers were involved with the bacterial meningitis shots that, in my opinion, was the real culprit of the deaths during that time. There were some people questioning another man involved named Frederick Gates maybe being related to Bill Gates, but I haven't dived into that rabbit hole just yet
One has to wonder if they built the towers to the specs they called for, for instance the steel being up 100k psi at higher floors, the exterior columns that is. Structural engineer Leslie Robertson once said in an interview that 'they' (who is they?) greatly overstated the safety factors of the towers. Who is 'they' and what in the heck does that mean? Also, he mentions after 9/11 how the towers, specifically #7, turned to sand from it's destruction. Than when asked what his opinion was as to what happened, he rejected even having one, which I thought was strange considering he was a structural engineer. Maybe he is controlled opposition, maybe he was part of the whole op. Maybe he was giving us clues without sacrificing his life to what really happened and who was responsible. I just find it bizarre that a structural engineer would make such statements
All the Zionists complicit
May God deal with them all in this life and in the next
No
Freemasons. Illuminati.
Great piece. Thanks! It is very obvious except to brain damaged simpletons that the "Dancing Israelis" were just an attention decoy. Intelligent people obviously understand that subterfuges are done for a reason and in fact bring the real perpetrators into closer focus. In the game, what is most hidden is what most reveals, what is most open, conceals and deceives. But the trail of clues, hints and premonitory symbols paradoxically discloses the true logic and ideology of "means justifying ends in an amoral universe."
AHO!
In this case; Yes, Amen!
Blessings ~
I was one of so VERY few on 9/12 that was saying We were lied to. At the time I was a civilian working on a military base with a couple of guys who were explosive experts, and on 9/11 They were discussing how the the "terrorists" got explosives into the building. The next day We were all stunned when We were told it was only jet fuel. The guys were mystified.
Me? I knew something was up beyond "terrorists" - or rather, the terrorists were not who They told Us They were.
Good stuff. I wonder though why I can look up Nicholas Rockefeller and find numerous references including a photo that looks a lot like the guy Russo was pictured with. If that point is bogus, I must dig at the other ones. But good food for thought, thanks -
Look at the date ranges for references to Nicholas Rockefeller you find on the net. And tell me what you find.
The clip I used is from a documentary 10 years ago...
Allegedly born June 6, 1956, California, got his JD from Yale 1987 (after attending Oxford), Inactive status as lawyer in California, CFR member, fat guy with a cheesy mustache, does business in China, that all seems to match.
Or is he just a cut out, a fake character - most of the pages with info on him have the same crappy font; and he isn't listed in Rockefeller family lists. At this point, I'd say he is real. He does have a phone and p o box listed with the state bar of California.
James Corbett looked into him and decided he was real, and thought he might be a con man on the outer branches of the family, a fringe Rockefeller. BUT He looks a lot like David Rockefeller with a mustache. The ears are almost unmistakable. I wonder if he was an unannounced 7th child to the family - perhaps out-of-wedlock? Their sixth child was born in '52. That would give Nick a chip on his shoulder, which might have given him loose lips with Russo. That is my working hypothesis.
I visited the Twin Towers as a tourist in 1995 and stayed up on the rooftop viewing area for quite a few hours as the afternoon faded, watching the long shadows the buildings cast across Brooklyn. These were huge constructions. Great views over Manhattan from up there.
To turn those things into dust was no small feat. Jet fuel or thermite just ain't gonna cut it.
It took black technology. But how did they know it would work at that scale? They must have tested it prior.
Re: "They must have tested it prior." - Read my David Icke article and listen to the testimony of Dean Warwick in the article.
Farrell does some good research but he really has a blind spot when it comes to no planes. He won’t go there.
Most 9/11 "truthers" don't want to go there.
If you haven't yet - Check out 9/11 Planes Research: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
holy heck--this is compellin' stuff--I had no idea about all the planted symbolism but waiiiiit.... Miss McGee's viddeyo had me thinkin' about the (great) ol' punk band 999 (pre-911 of course) whose 2 biggest hits have uncannily relevant lyrics... dang! from "Emergency" (of course Emergency in the US is 911) we git this:
Raiders strike but where
Panic in the air
Running scared oh I'm so scared
It gets you everywhere
Heard it on the news
Rebels get accused
Fighting for another cause
But why and where and whose
Carry out their plan
Release us if you can
What's your worth to a pile of earth
You're just another man...
https://genius.com/999-emergency-lyrics
There's more--an' their other big hit Homicide also has lyrics could apply--after all 911 was a homicide...
Conned all along! (Would be interestin' ta see if the Tavistock wreck-hurd companies were behind 999 too--lots behind the labels--of course we normies had no idea!)
If you want to get into symbolism and numerology around 9/11, I think you'd enjoy:
9/11 Alchemy - A Big Idea
Link: https://rumble.com/v4irvwr-911-alchemy-a-big-idea.html
cool, thanks muchly! I'll take a look-see!
Also: the image of the 2 towers dead-eye in the Wash Sq. arch:
https://tinyurl.com/yzd9cbk8
And... mebbe this is too too but the idea of two columns, later in ruins, seen thru an arch looks a lot like this York Rite Masonic imagery ta me:
https://tinyurl.com/yckajyv5
ps No Nick Rockefeller? I think Russo wuz tellin' the truth about what he heard... fwiw...
https://www.geni.com/people/Nicholas-Rockefeller/6000000046719106821
http://nicholasrockefeller.net/
"He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the International Institute of Strategic Studies, the Advisory Board of RAND, the Corporate Advisory Board of the Pacific Council on International Relations, the Board of the Western Justice Center Foundation, and the Central China Development Council and has served as a participant in the World Economic Forum and the Aspen Institute. He also serves as a director of the Pacific Rim Cultural Foundation, and is a member of the boards of visitors of the law schools of the University of Oregon and of Pepperdine University. Nicholas’ China practice includes transactions with China’s largest banks, energy companies, communications entities and real estate enterprises as well as with China’s principal cities and leading provinces. He was chosen as a board member of the Central China Construction and Development Commission and as a director of the Xiwai International School of Shanghai International University. He has appeared numerous times on CCTV and other China media.
Nicholas is a graduate of Yale University and of Yale Law School. "
also... a fair amount 've stuff on the fella--
https://yandex.com/search/?text=nicholas+rockefeller&lr=21411&search_source=yacom_desktop_common
on the CFR website: https://www.cfr.org/membership/roster (search / scroll)
IMHO David (waaaay higher up on the Rocky-feller food chain) would not spend one nanosecond with a Brooklyn Jew (Russo) whose father wuz in the "schmatta" bizness sellin' underwear (we call 'em garmentos here)--this is humble beginnin's an' Russo stayed a salt-of-the-Earth New Yawker... began as a music manager an' club booker-- I promise ya that even tho' her produced in Hollyweird (where such humble beginnin's were a-ok, that's how the biz started), NO WAY would the hoi poloi Rockefellers spend 5 minutes with this kinda guy. (Yup, the Rockefellers had humble beginnin's too--but a century earlier an' they erased more or less all caste-marks) Just my 2 cents!
Too many coincidents to ignore. Linking tomorrow @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
one more "clue"--
The SIX day war--6/6/67 (666 6+1)--two months after David appeared on the magazine cover with his watch an' the Tarry-TON towers... (they got "lit" like cigarettes!)--a war of airstrikes... hmmm, did the RockyFellers have their hands in that pot too? International "projects"....? (one hand warshes t'other?)
I’m sticking with Israel and Mossad. The result of 9/11 was a war in the ME and the removal of Saddam. Qui bono.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report. Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Terrific analogy of the past presentation to and for the masses - Get the BS out before the actual truth, so there are no questions as the hook, line and sinker are set in motion. Preconceived.
You should read these two free e-books...
1. 9/11 – Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 – Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
Here is another analogy...
There has been a murder - Three detectives arrive at the scene.
A body lies on the ground, with a knife and a tyre iron close by.... Two of the detectives decide the cause of death is either due to being stabbed to death or blunt force trauma (both won’t be able to prove this conclusively in a court of law) ... They run off to go look for their suspects and to bring someone to book...
The lone detective left at the crime scene decides to do an independent forensic investigation of the room, where the body has been found and starts putting pieces together.
A short while later the other two detectives call the detective at the crime scene on the phone, to boast they both already have a suspect apprehended - one for the knife and one for the tyre iron....
There is only one problem...
Whilst doing the lone investigating of the crime scene, the detective found no blood on the knife or the tyre iron.... There is no bruising to the body and no injuries to the head. No stab wounds either....
The body has a bullet hole in it...
Now - When looking into the events of September 11, 2001.
When you talk thermite, nukes, or DEW - Who is the detective that investigated the crime scene whilst the other two were running around apprehending innocent people due to making the wrong assumptions, that did not fit the evidence found at the crime scene?
Answer:
The detective that investigated the crime scene and was able to conclude what the murder weapon was, because a conclusive body of evidence is way better than a theory or belief, that will hold no water in a court of law, when you want to charge your suspect of a crime.
Once you have charged someone and taken them to court for the wrong crime – You cannot open a case against them again, remember that.
Well aware, been awake since birth (nearest pin point) more than 60 yrs. I have viewed these books, thnx. The evidence in the case of corruption in the world is astounding and overwhelming!
My fox, pushes n pulls me up, out, over, back, forth and around through, in and out of all of the rabbit holes - My mind is W(holy) open to any and all ideas, which may pass my way.
Blessings ~
While in my formative years, if I were to lie or even look at someone as though I were lying, I would receive the horse whipping of my life. Needless to say, first time out, I understood what it meant to be with sound morals, integrity - In the instances of these horse shitters, there should be a scaffolding on the town square,. One for all to bare witness, and to create the understanding of morals, integrity, and ethics, by means of a sound thrashing which would be felt through decades of their lineage, so as not to be done over!
Done twice, with no mercy.
I gotta admit, when I found out the the Rockefellers were an instrumental part of getting the WTC complex built a few months ago, I was instantly questioning. The Rockefellers have quite a past, one that comes to mind is the 1918 'pandemic'. Yep, Rockefellers were involved with the bacterial meningitis shots that, in my opinion, was the real culprit of the deaths during that time. There were some people questioning another man involved named Frederick Gates maybe being related to Bill Gates, but I haven't dived into that rabbit hole just yet
One has to wonder if they built the towers to the specs they called for, for instance the steel being up 100k psi at higher floors, the exterior columns that is. Structural engineer Leslie Robertson once said in an interview that 'they' (who is they?) greatly overstated the safety factors of the towers. Who is 'they' and what in the heck does that mean? Also, he mentions after 9/11 how the towers, specifically #7, turned to sand from it's destruction. Than when asked what his opinion was as to what happened, he rejected even having one, which I thought was strange considering he was a structural engineer. Maybe he is controlled opposition, maybe he was part of the whole op. Maybe he was giving us clues without sacrificing his life to what really happened and who was responsible. I just find it bizarre that a structural engineer would make such statements