I volunteered with AE911Truth from 2010 until 2021 vetting the "Other" supporters on their petition. I was instructed to disallow any talk of the "no planes" theory, and any mention of Dr. Woods' work as well. I quit because I didn't agree with that kind of censorship since only the perpetrators know exactly what transpired on that day. Why disallow legitimate theories from discussion and why would anyone think that only one method was used to disintegrate the Twin Towers? Can't we all work together on this? I don't believe any one person, or group of researchers, could ever know all of the details to pull off such a scheme of what clearly looks to me that multiple modalities were used to produce the kind of human sacrifice and psychological operation on the global masses that day. Cheney knows how it all went down, that's for sure.
I highly recommend Professor Hughes extensive coverage of 9/11 on his substack, but also read the article linked above: 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
Thank you. I'm a retired firefighter with 15 years experience, and I have an AS degree in Fire Science so I'm very familiar with fire behavior so much so that I have no doubt that fire did not cause the disintegration of the Towers, nor did it bring down WTC 7. Furthermore, any high school student who paid attention in science class knows the official narrative is patently false. I like to recommend the book, Women At Ground Zero for those interested in the verbatim accounts by the women rescuers that day: https://www.amazon.com/Women-Ground-Zero-Stories-Compassion/dp/0981814905?&tag=usdeplaceme07-20 Are you aware of this book?
I will definitely get a hold of the book - Thank you for the recommendation.
If I may ask - How does it make you feel knowing that these “poo-ba” 9/11 “truth” organisations are willfully bamboozling people?
As a South African, it infuriates me that these people can still walk around and not have their conscience weigh on them?
Do you think they are just soulless demons or what?
I have tried interacting with Richard Gage, David Chandler, Wayne Coste, Jonathan Cole, Ted Walter, gene Laratonda, Craig McKee, Jim Fetzer, Joe Olson, Boston 9/11, Colorado 9/11 and many more (all chronicled in a 2h documentary), and it’s astounding how they can lie with a straight face.
Could it be that some of them are really so affected by PTSD that they might be suffering from that cannot break free from their brainwashing?
I even approached Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists, via email (wrote an article chronicling the interactions) - But they just stuck their heads in the sand like ostriches…
Truly bizarre behaviour…
NONE of these people are open to a civil discussion of the observable evidence, that does not fit the thermite or nuke narratives. Gene Laratonda gave me his word as a Christian, in front of 10 people in a zoom call to have the discussion, just to walk his promise back the next day and banned me from his war room after I called them out, in a civil manner, that they CANNOT call themselves “truth seekers”, if they do not want to have uncomfortable discussions.
Who or what are they protecting?
Any honest person with a little bit of research and looking at all the observable evidence, can see what happened on 9/11, wasn’t due to a structural failure (collapse), or a controlled demolition due to ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism.
All these people taking money from good intentioned truth seekers, and that makes them truth-traitors and they are just as complicit as the perpetrators of 9/11.
May God have mercy on their souls.
Ephesians 5:11 - Have nothing to do with the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but expose them.
Galatians 4:16 - So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
I feel like I cannot trust anyone who censors others when they don't know everything themselves. Yes, truly bizarre behavior from those not willing to keep an open mind about the event. I haven't read Dr. Woods' book, but I've watched some videos of her speaking and see that what she presents is certainly plausible, in my mind. I'm thinking that the military debuted some weapons of which we're not privy. Who are they protecting? Themselves! Fear of being on a no-fly list, or other government list. Any honest person looking into this, and other government malfeasance, must keep an open mind, always, all ways.
My husband went hunting for a month and I had just received Judy Wood's book, so I had the luxury of reading and studying the entire volume all the way through without interruptions. I also read and follow David Hughes. I remember 9/11 so well because it was pre-internet and pre-cell phone, so we were all totally engaged and observant.
Indeed - Our world today has many distractions, but when you take the time to look into 9/11, things become abundantly clear...
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
There are people left that still think highjackers with box knives drove planes into the towers--I actually know one and he is not dumb. He is a highly trained EMT 2, former military and has an engineering degree. After talking with him at length, I came to the conclusion that he simply cannot accept any other evidence of conspiracy because that would mean his whole understanding of what happened that day would be upended. I think it scares him to death, so he has developed a mind block about it and gets pretty angry if it's brought up. It doesn't matter what I show him anymore. I see that attitude a lot now after Covid. It might be a protective measure that people unknowingly use to retain what little sanity they have left.
Indeed - I encounter many such people in my daily life on a multitude of subjects, not just 9/11 and CV-19...
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control event and most Americans don't know the department of psychological warfare was established in 1951 and the same year the invention secrecy act was also passed.
It' not like the whole CIA's infiltration of the media is a secret or operation mockingbird and so many others...
Some people will never be able to admit they've been fooled. thus one must just keep planting seed and give more attention to those who are willing to have an open discussion and who might be willing to change their minds when presented with a substantive argument.
Only issue is, open debate is what the "controllers" don' want people to have on a myriad of subjects....
All one can do is chip away at the lies and expose them.
The comments here are very good. I think ignorance (of sequestered “black” technology), fear of being branded a “conspiracy theorist” and losing your livelihood, and “ normalcy bias” combine to lock people in to the narrative the perps designed to go along with the event. Damned effective.
Thanks to you, Matthiew Estepho, and others, i have finally realized that not only Saboteur STEVEN JONES, but also RICHARD GAGE, have a mission of COVERING UP THE DIRECTED ENERGY TRUTH of 9/11.
For Gage to say -- in a circa 2023 Panel including Andrew Johnson -- that Judy Wood's book is "pure fantasy", is unforgivable, and exposes GAGE AS A SABOTEUR OF THE TRUTH.
It really doesn't matter what destroyed the towers, fact is that the WTC was destroyed in a manner obviously unnatural . . . therefore the official story is a LIE . . . Lets run with that
People will always ask, then what really happened?
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s what the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
You might also want to read the 2007 qui-tam whistle-blower case filed presenting the evidence collected.
This textbook that should be mandatory reading for everyone on earth.
A 500-page textbook, that the 9/11 “truther” movement DOES NOT want you to know about or read, because once you’ve read it and understand the evidence, their grift is up. The scariest 9/11 book out there: “Where did the towers go?” by Dr Judy Wood.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I volunteered with AE911Truth from 2010 until 2021 vetting the "Other" supporters on their petition. I was instructed to disallow any talk of the "no planes" theory, and any mention of Dr. Woods' work as well. I quit because I didn't agree with that kind of censorship since only the perpetrators know exactly what transpired on that day. Why disallow legitimate theories from discussion and why would anyone think that only one method was used to disintegrate the Twin Towers? Can't we all work together on this? I don't believe any one person, or group of researchers, could ever know all of the details to pull off such a scheme of what clearly looks to me that multiple modalities were used to produce the kind of human sacrifice and psychological operation on the global masses that day. Cheney knows how it all went down, that's for sure.
Hi Laila - If I may ask.
Is this my first article you are reading?
Yes, this is the first one I've looked at more closely than your other articles.
I highly recommend Professor Hughes extensive coverage of 9/11 on his substack, but also read the article linked above: 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
Here is the link to his articles: https://dhughes.substack.com/t/911
Thank you. I'm a retired firefighter with 15 years experience, and I have an AS degree in Fire Science so I'm very familiar with fire behavior so much so that I have no doubt that fire did not cause the disintegration of the Towers, nor did it bring down WTC 7. Furthermore, any high school student who paid attention in science class knows the official narrative is patently false. I like to recommend the book, Women At Ground Zero for those interested in the verbatim accounts by the women rescuers that day: https://www.amazon.com/Women-Ground-Zero-Stories-Compassion/dp/0981814905?&tag=usdeplaceme07-20 Are you aware of this book?
Laila - WOW, thank you for your service.
I will definitely get a hold of the book - Thank you for the recommendation.
If I may ask - How does it make you feel knowing that these “poo-ba” 9/11 “truth” organisations are willfully bamboozling people?
As a South African, it infuriates me that these people can still walk around and not have their conscience weigh on them?
Do you think they are just soulless demons or what?
I have tried interacting with Richard Gage, David Chandler, Wayne Coste, Jonathan Cole, Ted Walter, gene Laratonda, Craig McKee, Jim Fetzer, Joe Olson, Boston 9/11, Colorado 9/11 and many more (all chronicled in a 2h documentary), and it’s astounding how they can lie with a straight face.
Could it be that some of them are really so affected by PTSD that they might be suffering from that cannot break free from their brainwashing?
I even approached Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists, via email (wrote an article chronicling the interactions) - But they just stuck their heads in the sand like ostriches…
Truly bizarre behaviour…
NONE of these people are open to a civil discussion of the observable evidence, that does not fit the thermite or nuke narratives. Gene Laratonda gave me his word as a Christian, in front of 10 people in a zoom call to have the discussion, just to walk his promise back the next day and banned me from his war room after I called them out, in a civil manner, that they CANNOT call themselves “truth seekers”, if they do not want to have uncomfortable discussions.
Who or what are they protecting?
Any honest person with a little bit of research and looking at all the observable evidence, can see what happened on 9/11, wasn’t due to a structural failure (collapse), or a controlled demolition due to ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism.
All these people taking money from good intentioned truth seekers, and that makes them truth-traitors and they are just as complicit as the perpetrators of 9/11.
May God have mercy on their souls.
Ephesians 5:11 - Have nothing to do with the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but expose them.
Galatians 4:16 - So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
I feel like I cannot trust anyone who censors others when they don't know everything themselves. Yes, truly bizarre behavior from those not willing to keep an open mind about the event. I haven't read Dr. Woods' book, but I've watched some videos of her speaking and see that what she presents is certainly plausible, in my mind. I'm thinking that the military debuted some weapons of which we're not privy. Who are they protecting? Themselves! Fear of being on a no-fly list, or other government list. Any honest person looking into this, and other government malfeasance, must keep an open mind, always, all ways.
Not "thermite" - termites!
Link to 911 Essential Guide is empty
Thanks - Link is fixed in the article...
Here it is the direct link: https://rumble.com/v4b3ptu-911-the-essential-guide.html
Sorry, had to laugh: Kevin Barret never closed his mouth breather! Nor, did he ever BLINK!
My husband went hunting for a month and I had just received Judy Wood's book, so I had the luxury of reading and studying the entire volume all the way through without interruptions. I also read and follow David Hughes. I remember 9/11 so well because it was pre-internet and pre-cell phone, so we were all totally engaged and observant.
Indeed - Our world today has many distractions, but when you take the time to look into 9/11, things become abundantly clear...
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
There are people left that still think highjackers with box knives drove planes into the towers--I actually know one and he is not dumb. He is a highly trained EMT 2, former military and has an engineering degree. After talking with him at length, I came to the conclusion that he simply cannot accept any other evidence of conspiracy because that would mean his whole understanding of what happened that day would be upended. I think it scares him to death, so he has developed a mind block about it and gets pretty angry if it's brought up. It doesn't matter what I show him anymore. I see that attitude a lot now after Covid. It might be a protective measure that people unknowingly use to retain what little sanity they have left.
Indeed - I encounter many such people in my daily life on a multitude of subjects, not just 9/11 and CV-19...
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control event and most Americans don't know the department of psychological warfare was established in 1951 and the same year the invention secrecy act was also passed.
It' not like the whole CIA's infiltration of the media is a secret or operation mockingbird and so many others...
Some people will never be able to admit they've been fooled. thus one must just keep planting seed and give more attention to those who are willing to have an open discussion and who might be willing to change their minds when presented with a substantive argument.
Only issue is, open debate is what the "controllers" don' want people to have on a myriad of subjects....
All one can do is chip away at the lies and expose them.
Good always trumps over evil in the end.
I think my this article hit a nerve…
So they banned me from their FB community…
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1078702010391256
The e-book has been shoad.
Shoad?
The comments here are very good. I think ignorance (of sequestered “black” technology), fear of being branded a “conspiracy theorist” and losing your livelihood, and “ normalcy bias” combine to lock people in to the narrative the perps designed to go along with the event. Damned effective.
It's beautifully explained in this presentation...
Prof David A. Hughes – An 1h Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence in 2024
There are three key layers to perception management:
(i) the official narrative,
(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and
(iii) the truth.
Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood
Thanks to you, Matthiew Estepho, and others, i have finally realized that not only Saboteur STEVEN JONES, but also RICHARD GAGE, have a mission of COVERING UP THE DIRECTED ENERGY TRUTH of 9/11.
For Gage to say -- in a circa 2023 Panel including Andrew Johnson -- that Judy Wood's book is "pure fantasy", is unforgivable, and exposes GAGE AS A SABOTEUR OF THE TRUTH.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR DEDICATION TO THE TRUTH, SIR.
Sincerely,
Jackson Rip Holmes
It really doesn't matter what destroyed the towers, fact is that the WTC was destroyed in a manner obviously unnatural . . . therefore the official story is a LIE . . . Lets run with that
OK?
People will always ask, then what really happened?
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s what the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
You might also want to read the 2007 qui-tam whistle-blower case filed presenting the evidence collected.
Link: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
It was also nicely put together in this 500-page textbook.
Link: https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/where-did-the-towers-go-by-dr-judy-wood/
This textbook that should be mandatory reading for everyone on earth.
A 500-page textbook, that the 9/11 “truther” movement DOES NOT want you to know about or read, because once you’ve read it and understand the evidence, their grift is up. The scariest 9/11 book out there: “Where did the towers go?” by Dr Judy Wood.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications