36 Comments

The explosions of the bldgs after the images of planes hitting them seem more likely due to preplanted bombs. These caused standard jet fuel looking immediate explosions and cutout the plane shapes in the seconds after they hit partially hidden from view by the smoke from the bombs. These needed to carve out an exact shape they wanted to represent a plane going in the bldg. Jet fuel like explosions and carve-out explosions do not sound to me like DEW. If you think so, pls explain your rational. Dustification of the blds when destroyed though, yes look like DEW.

Expand full comment

So, you are wanting to make an assumption and want to argue a little irrelevant point to what actually happened to the buildings? Ok, I'll bite.

It's just like the argument around Building 7 - Just because it looks like a controlled demolition, does it mean it was a controlled demolition? Watch: https://youtu.be/pEXMFo4eZak

If you read Chris' opinion above regarding the "impact sites" he states: "If it was 'hot' from jet fuel or from explosives, then how are these people standing here?"

There was a shift in the earth's magnetic field, with each event on 9/11, including the appearance of the plane shaped holes. https://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html

For a more in depth discussion that Chris has on the impacts, I suggest you watch his documentary "9/11 Alchemy, Facing Reality" - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Alchemy:6

I will also suggest you watch a 15 minute section of the documentary: 9/11 A Plane story, from timestamp 16:30 - As Richard D Hall, points out some anomalies just after the initial explosion in the North Tower, where you can clearly see the plane shape hole being made just after the first boom - https://youtu.be/Mwu1hbaZ2_s

For some of the best analysis on the "plane" foolery also visit Mark Conlon's blogspot where he discusses the plane shaped holes: https://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/search?q=plane+shaped+holes

I hope these references help you wrap your mind around the psyop of explosives being planted.

Expand full comment

You're concluding I don't agree with DEW which is not true. My current opinion is 9.11 was a "fusion theater" with real events (jet fuel type of explosions and facade cutting explosions, CG events (planes on TV and so called private but contracted videographers who did CG), and DEW destruction of all the buildings in addition to some help with real bombs that loosened up the structure.

"where you can clearly see the plane shape hole being made just after the first boom"

YES I agree, I think it was charges pre planted as DEW would be too difficult but willing to bend on that one.

Sorry I've no time to look into all the links. Seems to me, people did see jet fuel type explosions, CG was likely and documented by fakeologist and others, and DEW pre fall and fall itself was well shown by Judy, you, and others.

Expand full comment

By not doing the homework, you'll keep having an uninformed opinion.

Expand full comment

That's fair enough, you clearly know alot about it. I've also spent many hours on it, and ON SOME POINTS other pundits do not agree with you. At least on the destruction of the blds I'm pretty much a follower of your line. Planes I'm pretty sure are CG, the fireball and plane cut out I have opinion a bit different now but could be flexible just have other things to do.

I have 2 normie jobs and a few thousand followers on my own SS, I can't go further on 9.11 right now but did see a bit of your work and largely agree so keep it up. Tip: short posts with short 1 vid max will get you the most views. V/r

Expand full comment

After looking at the events of 9/11 half heartedly for 12 years, I've decided to revisit EVERYTHING about 9/11 with regards to the narratives of WHAT happened at the WTC, Shanksvillle and the Pentagon the last 12 months.

All the angles - bombs, thermite, nukes, CGI and the work of Dr Wood.

I've put in at least 2500 hours in the last 12 months...

Planes were not CGI - read the article again and watch the docci - 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality, it's well worth 3.5h of your time - The work done is irrefutable - It was holographic technology that was used to have people think they saw planes.

The docci is the culmination of the work of Mark Conlon, Richard D Hall, Andrew Johnson and Chris Hampton - The first 3 gentlemen have been studying the event of 9/11 intensely for the last 16 years, so a short 3h docci should be on your priority list...

Thanx for the heads up on the short posts, but this article was a copy of the outline of Chris' documentary that you must take time to watch.

PS: I'm not really too worried about writing articles to gain followers, I'm sharing the massive volumes of work put out by way more seasoned researchers on 9/11 out there and to make sure that this information does not get wiped off the internet, thus the reason for copying Chris' article, as both his websites, YT channels and more have been scrubbed.

I myself have had my original YT channel scrubbed, so that is most of my work can be found on Odysee, Telegram and to a smaller degree, Rumble and X (Twitter)

PPS: Also, doing this work with no intention of being paid for my efforts, as sharing truth should not be a motivation to earn an income from. People need to realise, once they pay someone, they get emotionally and financially bias to new information and that is exactly why the 9/11 "truther" talking heads followers cannot break free from the spells cast over them with the b/s theories of explosives, thermite or nukes.

Dr Wood sells her book at cost and even pays out of her own pocket for the postage costs - So, that should give you an idea of her integrity with the evidence she presents.

Every library in the world should have a copy and everyone who buys a book, should buy a second and gift it to someone, so people can wake up to the massive psyop still running, because what we saw happen on 9/11 was the use of a "free energy weapon" that could free the world off the dependence of all currently known energy sources.

If it was available to the masses, there would be a massive shift in how our world works.

Book: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Odysee: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7

Telegram: https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@911Revisited01

Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2588430

X: https://twitter.com/911Revisionist

Expand full comment

ok you are prolific , it's just too much for me as I'm settled with my current state and have to move on to other things. My SS is completely free and volunteer, I have 2 other jobs and write to give info all for free.

I made one post on holograms in 9.11 and added a CG part later.

https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/secrets-of-the-orbs

We are not far away in thinking but I'm too busy for 9.11 now.

Expand full comment

I think there is weak evidence to support bombs. It HAD to look like the shape of a plane hitting diagonally across several floors. I don't think bombs were used because...

1. Someone would have seen the planting of these explosives.

and

2. There is way too much room for error which would blow the illusion.

Expand full comment

There were a few floors of the WTCs taken over by crews said to be rewiring the bldgs for a few months before 9.11, charges would fit exactly where a plane could be because the entry of the plane was probably CG (see fakologist) though some say holographs (9.22 revisionist). Security of the bldg was run by Marting Bush, the Pres brother. Easy to do all of this.

Expand full comment

And there you all go again, getting distracted arguing about the plane shaped holes... Planes / no planes - It has NOTHING to do with WHAT happened to the buildings.

The buildings turned to DUST - Rather focus on that instead of being distracted by the stupid plane / no plane argument!

Expand full comment

I do agree with you about the buildings. I'm just replying to ricky, and stop trying to alienate subscribers who are ON YOUR SIDE and even recommend you on my SS (that has a few thousand subscribers) by negating every other remark I make.

Expand full comment

Point taken, but one needs to not get distracted into the various points that end up distraction to the conversation at hand.

It's one of the tactics the 9/11 "truthers" like Gage, Chandler and all of them always fall back to, the planes, when you start asking them difficult questions about WHAT happened to the buildings... I've seen it time and time again this last 12 months when interacting with them on zoom calls of whatever platform they have live question and answer sessions.

One must guard not to fall into that trap of being distracted, that's the point I'm trying to bring across. :-)

Expand full comment

ok fine, just be nice, I'm on your side 95%, we just have to accept not everyone is going to agree with 100% of the puzzle to these complex things.

Expand full comment

What a dense one! Great speculation, though. These ideas make a lot of sense.

Expand full comment

You really need to watch the full docci. Please note the channel is being censored, so if you hear audio with a black screen, refresh or clear your cache...

Link to docci: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Alchemy:6

Expand full comment