The explosions of the bldgs after the images of planes hitting them seem more likely due to preplanted bombs. These caused standard jet fuel looking immediate explosions and cutout the plane shapes in the seconds after they hit partially hidden from view by the smoke from the bombs. These needed to carve out an exact shape they wanted to represent a plane going in the bldg. Jet fuel like explosions and carve-out explosions do not sound to me like DEW. If you think so, pls explain your rational. Dustification of the blds when destroyed though, yes look like DEW.
So, you are wanting to make an assumption and want to argue a little irrelevant point to what actually happened to the buildings? Ok, I'll bite.
It's just like the argument around Building 7 - Just because it looks like a controlled demolition, does it mean it was a controlled demolition? Watch: https://youtu.be/pEXMFo4eZak
If you read Chris' opinion above regarding the "impact sites" he states: "If it was 'hot' from jet fuel or from explosives, then how are these people standing here?"
I will also suggest you watch a 15 minute section of the documentary: 9/11 A Plane story, from timestamp 16:30 - As Richard D Hall, points out some anomalies just after the initial explosion in the North Tower, where you can clearly see the plane shape hole being made just after the first boom - https://youtu.be/Mwu1hbaZ2_s
You're concluding I don't agree with DEW which is not true. My current opinion is 9.11 was a "fusion theater" with real events (jet fuel type of explosions and facade cutting explosions, CG events (planes on TV and so called private but contracted videographers who did CG), and DEW destruction of all the buildings in addition to some help with real bombs that loosened up the structure.
"where you can clearly see the plane shape hole being made just after the first boom"
YES I agree, I think it was charges pre planted as DEW would be too difficult but willing to bend on that one.
Sorry I've no time to look into all the links. Seems to me, people did see jet fuel type explosions, CG was likely and documented by fakeologist and others, and DEW pre fall and fall itself was well shown by Judy, you, and others.
That's fair enough, you clearly know alot about it. I've also spent many hours on it, and ON SOME POINTS other pundits do not agree with you. At least on the destruction of the blds I'm pretty much a follower of your line. Planes I'm pretty sure are CG, the fireball and plane cut out I have opinion a bit different now but could be flexible just have other things to do.
I have 2 normie jobs and a few thousand followers on my own SS, I can't go further on 9.11 right now but did see a bit of your work and largely agree so keep it up. Tip: short posts with short 1 vid max will get you the most views. V/r
I think there is weak evidence to support bombs. It HAD to look like the shape of a plane hitting diagonally across several floors. I don't think bombs were used because...
1. Someone would have seen the planting of these explosives.
and
2. There is way too much room for error which would blow the illusion.
There were a few floors of the WTCs taken over by crews said to be rewiring the bldgs for a few months before 9.11, charges would fit exactly where a plane could be because the entry of the plane was probably CG (see fakologist) though some say holographs (9.22 revisionist). Security of the bldg was run by Marting Bush, the Pres brother. Easy to do all of this.
And there you all go again, getting distracted arguing about the plane shaped holes... Planes / no planes - It has NOTHING to do with WHAT happened to the buildings.
The buildings turned to DUST - Rather focus on that instead of being distracted by the stupid plane / no plane argument!
I do agree with you about the buildings. I'm just replying to ricky, and stop trying to alienate subscribers who are ON YOUR SIDE and even recommend you on my SS (that has a few thousand subscribers) by negating every other remark I make.
You really need to watch the full docci. Please note the channel is being censored, so if you hear audio with a black screen, refresh or clear your cache...
Simon Hytten (Shack), September Clues, did work for the European Space Agency. His father worked for the United Nations and his brother had connections to the Bin Laden family....
The documentary is full of disinformation, and the movie should be discarded as a propaganda piece.
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part One)
The explosions of the bldgs after the images of planes hitting them seem more likely due to preplanted bombs. These caused standard jet fuel looking immediate explosions and cutout the plane shapes in the seconds after they hit partially hidden from view by the smoke from the bombs. These needed to carve out an exact shape they wanted to represent a plane going in the bldg. Jet fuel like explosions and carve-out explosions do not sound to me like DEW. If you think so, pls explain your rational. Dustification of the blds when destroyed though, yes look like DEW.
So, you are wanting to make an assumption and want to argue a little irrelevant point to what actually happened to the buildings? Ok, I'll bite.
It's just like the argument around Building 7 - Just because it looks like a controlled demolition, does it mean it was a controlled demolition? Watch: https://youtu.be/pEXMFo4eZak
If you read Chris' opinion above regarding the "impact sites" he states: "If it was 'hot' from jet fuel or from explosives, then how are these people standing here?"
There was a shift in the earth's magnetic field, with each event on 9/11, including the appearance of the plane shaped holes. https://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html
For a more in depth discussion that Chris has on the impacts, I suggest you watch his documentary "9/11 Alchemy, Facing Reality" - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Alchemy:6
I will also suggest you watch a 15 minute section of the documentary: 9/11 A Plane story, from timestamp 16:30 - As Richard D Hall, points out some anomalies just after the initial explosion in the North Tower, where you can clearly see the plane shape hole being made just after the first boom - https://youtu.be/Mwu1hbaZ2_s
For some of the best analysis on the "plane" foolery also visit Mark Conlon's blogspot where he discusses the plane shaped holes: https://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/search?q=plane+shaped+holes
I hope these references help you wrap your mind around the psyop of explosives being planted.
You're concluding I don't agree with DEW which is not true. My current opinion is 9.11 was a "fusion theater" with real events (jet fuel type of explosions and facade cutting explosions, CG events (planes on TV and so called private but contracted videographers who did CG), and DEW destruction of all the buildings in addition to some help with real bombs that loosened up the structure.
"where you can clearly see the plane shape hole being made just after the first boom"
YES I agree, I think it was charges pre planted as DEW would be too difficult but willing to bend on that one.
Sorry I've no time to look into all the links. Seems to me, people did see jet fuel type explosions, CG was likely and documented by fakeologist and others, and DEW pre fall and fall itself was well shown by Judy, you, and others.
By not doing the homework, you'll keep having an uninformed opinion.
That's fair enough, you clearly know alot about it. I've also spent many hours on it, and ON SOME POINTS other pundits do not agree with you. At least on the destruction of the blds I'm pretty much a follower of your line. Planes I'm pretty sure are CG, the fireball and plane cut out I have opinion a bit different now but could be flexible just have other things to do.
I have 2 normie jobs and a few thousand followers on my own SS, I can't go further on 9.11 right now but did see a bit of your work and largely agree so keep it up. Tip: short posts with short 1 vid max will get you the most views. V/r
The debacle was probably a combination of planted charges, thermite, DEW's and holography. https://septemberclues.org/
You're stuck in 2006. September clues is b/s, as I posted to you in your other comment to this article.
Want to see the best research documentary out there?
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
I think there is weak evidence to support bombs. It HAD to look like the shape of a plane hitting diagonally across several floors. I don't think bombs were used because...
1. Someone would have seen the planting of these explosives.
and
2. There is way too much room for error which would blow the illusion.
There were a few floors of the WTCs taken over by crews said to be rewiring the bldgs for a few months before 9.11, charges would fit exactly where a plane could be because the entry of the plane was probably CG (see fakologist) though some say holographs (9.22 revisionist). Security of the bldg was run by Marting Bush, the Pres brother. Easy to do all of this.
And there you all go again, getting distracted arguing about the plane shaped holes... Planes / no planes - It has NOTHING to do with WHAT happened to the buildings.
The buildings turned to DUST - Rather focus on that instead of being distracted by the stupid plane / no plane argument!
I do agree with you about the buildings. I'm just replying to ricky, and stop trying to alienate subscribers who are ON YOUR SIDE and even recommend you on my SS (that has a few thousand subscribers) by negating every other remark I make.
What a dense one! Great speculation, though. These ideas make a lot of sense.
You really need to watch the full docci. Please note the channel is being censored, so if you hear audio with a black screen, refresh or clear your cache...
Link to docci: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Alchemy:6
September Clues. https://septemberclues.org/
No. Just no, no, no, no, no!
Simon Hytten (Shack), September Clues, did work for the European Space Agency. His father worked for the United Nations and his brother had connections to the Bin Laden family....
The documentary is full of disinformation, and the movie should be discarded as a propaganda piece.
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part One)
Exposing The Disinformation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part Two)
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception-086
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part Three)
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception-3ff
Exposing The False Claims By Simon Shack In His Addendum Film
An Independent Analysis
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/exposing-the-false-claims-by-simon
September Clues - Addendum - Deceptions - Part One
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions
September Clues - Addendum Deceptions - Part Two
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions-bcd
Simon Shack's Plane Not Visible In NY Good Day Wide Shot Deception
An Independent Investigation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/plane-is-visible-in-the-good-day
Simon Shack’s “MATRIX SHOT” Hoax
An Independent Investigation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-matrix-shot-hoax
Simon Shack’s Amateur Effort of Video Fakery
Cutting Through the Disinformation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-amateur-effort-of-video
Simon Shack "Misrepresents" Plane Flight Path in 9/11 Video
Independent Analysis: Exposing Falsehoods of Simon Shack
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shack-misrepresents-plane-flight
September Clues Points 1 & 2 Analysis
An Independent Analysis
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-points-1-and-2-analysis
9/11 Planes, Layers of Deception
Mark Conlon & Andrew Johnson on RichPlanet TV (Sept 2017) - 9/11 planes research into the "alleged" video fakery of Flight 175 videos.
Link: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-layers-of-deception