No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
We now know what caused the fires in Building 7 thanks to interviews done by Tucker Carlson. I suggest those who are interested in the facts as I am to watcch them.
O, dear. Tucker Carlson? Really? You must be new to my Substack.
Here are two articles you should work through real quick, as Tucker didn’t not even come close, to discussing the anomalies with ALL the buildings with a WTC prefix on 9/11, never mind that of Building 7, that even the 9/11 “truth movement” ever touches on.
The Tucker Carlson 9/11 Files | Ep 4
An Alternative Media Talking Head's Mission in Uncovering 9/11 Truth Gone Wrong
Ah, playing the premeditated ignorance game, and being disingenuous, by not reading the articles, so that you cannot learn about the anomaly with Building 7 that proves it wasn’t a fire induced collapse, or a conventional controlled demolition, using ANY thermal or kinetic mechanisms.
You are a true example of a conspiracytainment consumer and NOT a truth seeker, that does his own research, aka reading…
Fwiw, I don’t think this guy is commenting in earnest. Look at his profile. He's "liked" 3 things.
Careful not to waste your time- although I see how you have some well-thought out copy-and-paste replies just in case an HONEST person finds this subthread. Good idea having that at the ready.
After interacting with people on social media for the last 5 years, you tend to have people stuck on the same disinformation talking points, so my templates come in handy, as to not waste my time in writing an essay with every interaction. Very perceptive of you to notice. ;-)
You gotta remember you are literally on a list for trolls to visit. I've never seen so much bogus trolling on anyone's substack compared to yours. Keep in mind they've profiled you. They know that you'll respond to comments, so they waste your time. Just like with Dr Wood. Be wary. Time suckers are evil fucks.
This is a welcome re-presentation and amplification of Wood's 2023 email reply to Schieder, particularly considering that the links in the original email don't work anymore. A lot of the material is already familiar to those who have followed Wood, but a lot of it bears repeating also to them. It's too bad the corporate figures at ARA and SAIC can't be brought to justice.
Re: Gage calling Dr. Wood a witchcraft practitioner--he's so incredibly bad at this (the name calling, the flying off the handle, being clueless how to handle a tough communications moment, sounding so petulant and petty) one is tempted to conclude that he was unwittingly placed in that position to aid in disclosure.
;^)
> "Truth Summit"
Well sure. We all know science is done by show of hands, right?
I have not watched, read, or listened to everything that's out there about 9/11 but I still have one naagging question that so far, has not been addressed. Important? I have no idea but what I'd like to know is - the noise. The noise of the 'planes' overhead making all look up (rarely are there planes overhead in Manhattan) and if as a halograph (sp?), how'd they do it? I saw my first halograph in 1970 in Disneyland FL while it was being built. In a 'car' riding through tunnels, one entranceway had a halograph of Snow White over the door - who spoke to us. Now, I can understand how that would work in a closed system, but outdoors with 'huge planes' that went down with the buildings?
Very interesting indeed! A few thoughts: I've notice like a 'block' around the 'planes' as they're slowed down which appears as if the air around the object is being affected - or possibly a necessary part of the illusion housing the plane parts - what is that? I'm also wondering if there are any videoes taken from outside Manhattan - like Jersey or Westchester County - I'm wondering about physically tracking the 'planes' back to their origination points. I choose to believe the idea that our Military Complex is behind all of this madness and additionally the idea that they were not 'planes' but rockets with the added illusions - can a rocket be remotely controlled to its destination at the speed identified along with the 'block' I mentioned around it making it more 'plane like' which might also explain the image left of a plane hit on the buildings, no debris like wings flying off and no real plane parts to be found? Just had another thought - would it be possible for rockets to be 'launched' say from vehicles miles away from the Towers instead of airports?
We now know what caused the fires in Building 7 thanks to interviews done by Tucker Carlson. I suggest those who are interested in the facts as I am to watcch them.
O, dear. Tucker Carlson? Really? You must be new to my Substack.
Here are two articles you should work through real quick, as Tucker didn’t not even come close, to discussing the anomalies with ALL the buildings with a WTC prefix on 9/11, never mind that of Building 7, that even the 9/11 “truth movement” ever touches on.
The Tucker Carlson 9/11 Files | Ep 4
An Alternative Media Talking Head's Mission in Uncovering 9/11 Truth Gone Wrong
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-tucker-carlson-911-files-ep-4
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition.
Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
So you don't agree with the way Building 7 was damaged?
Where in my two articles to I state that Building 7 was not damaged?
Any reason that you did not read my articles?
The fact that Building 7 was damaged is observational. Now we know it happened from below. Which makes perfect sense.
Ah, playing the premeditated ignorance game, and being disingenuous, by not reading the articles, so that you cannot learn about the anomaly with Building 7 that proves it wasn’t a fire induced collapse, or a conventional controlled demolition, using ANY thermal or kinetic mechanisms.
You are a true example of a conspiracytainment consumer and NOT a truth seeker, that does his own research, aka reading…
Why are you even subscribed to my Substack?
I'm sorry I bothered you.
I won't bother you again.
And I'll leave you with this...
Why did the FBI gag Ellen Mariani?
Have a wonderful life!
Fwiw, I don’t think this guy is commenting in earnest. Look at his profile. He's "liked" 3 things.
Careful not to waste your time- although I see how you have some well-thought out copy-and-paste replies just in case an HONEST person finds this subthread. Good idea having that at the ready.
After interacting with people on social media for the last 5 years, you tend to have people stuck on the same disinformation talking points, so my templates come in handy, as to not waste my time in writing an essay with every interaction. Very perceptive of you to notice. ;-)
You gotta remember you are literally on a list for trolls to visit. I've never seen so much bogus trolling on anyone's substack compared to yours. Keep in mind they've profiled you. They know that you'll respond to comments, so they waste your time. Just like with Dr Wood. Be wary. Time suckers are evil fucks.
Point taken. It's also a way to have readers notice the energy vampires...
This is a welcome re-presentation and amplification of Wood's 2023 email reply to Schieder, particularly considering that the links in the original email don't work anymore. A lot of the material is already familiar to those who have followed Wood, but a lot of it bears repeating also to them. It's too bad the corporate figures at ARA and SAIC can't be brought to justice.
Unfortunately Dr Wood's website is down, but she has a back up.
Link: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/oldindex.htm
Great piece, thanks.
Re: Gage calling Dr. Wood a witchcraft practitioner--he's so incredibly bad at this (the name calling, the flying off the handle, being clueless how to handle a tough communications moment, sounding so petulant and petty) one is tempted to conclude that he was unwittingly placed in that position to aid in disclosure.
;^)
> "Truth Summit"
Well sure. We all know science is done by show of hands, right?
Again, thanks.
I have not watched, read, or listened to everything that's out there about 9/11 but I still have one naagging question that so far, has not been addressed. Important? I have no idea but what I'd like to know is - the noise. The noise of the 'planes' overhead making all look up (rarely are there planes overhead in Manhattan) and if as a halograph (sp?), how'd they do it? I saw my first halograph in 1970 in Disneyland FL while it was being built. In a 'car' riding through tunnels, one entranceway had a halograph of Snow White over the door - who spoke to us. Now, I can understand how that would work in a closed system, but outdoors with 'huge planes' that went down with the buildings?
The 3D volumetric Projection Technology is way different than the holograms you have in mind.
This black-ops tech can create a signature on radar and also emit sound.
For more detail on how this works, have a look at 9/11 Planes Research's article below and make time to watch the documentary over the weekend.
Illusion of Reality and the 9/11 Planes
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/illusion-of-reality-and-the-911-planes
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Very interesting indeed! A few thoughts: I've notice like a 'block' around the 'planes' as they're slowed down which appears as if the air around the object is being affected - or possibly a necessary part of the illusion housing the plane parts - what is that? I'm also wondering if there are any videoes taken from outside Manhattan - like Jersey or Westchester County - I'm wondering about physically tracking the 'planes' back to their origination points. I choose to believe the idea that our Military Complex is behind all of this madness and additionally the idea that they were not 'planes' but rockets with the added illusions - can a rocket be remotely controlled to its destination at the speed identified along with the 'block' I mentioned around it making it more 'plane like' which might also explain the image left of a plane hit on the buildings, no debris like wings flying off and no real plane parts to be found? Just had another thought - would it be possible for rockets to be 'launched' say from vehicles miles away from the Towers instead of airports?
Nothing solid hit the buildings. Please go work through the following...
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU