Strange the author doesnt mention Rebekah Roth's fantastic read METHODICAL ILLUSION on
the 9-11 event. Between her work and a audio cast heard from retired (and deceased) Col Michael
Aquino, I've known the details which i believe btw, on what happened to the hijacked planes and passengers. Aquino was an odd bird being a part of the Church of Satan but his recount of what really happened chilled me because I was at last finding out the truth as he spoke. Strangely the audiocast is still on the internet but you've got to hunt it down. I found it here, https://rumble.com/v69elvp-michael-aquino-9-11-info-2019.html OR here: https://x.com/TheRubberDuck79/status/1750710357423714388
Agreed, Aquino was no saint and I've never explored his life more because people who call themselves "satanists" do not fascinate me at all. The account he gave of the 9-11 events i found stunning and seemed to stream line with Roth's book altho Aquino had more detail. Of all the narratives I'd heard about 9-11, Aquino's seemed to ring true with my inner instincts
No, Aquino was selling the second layer of the 9/11 cover-up.
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
(Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
90 Minutes that will change the way you look at the destruction at the WTC on 9/11.
Then on Aquino - He also speacilised in phsycological warfare and his interview is telling, as he was pushing the government approved counter narrative of bombs and thermite, when asked about the ecvidence presented by Dr Wood, he side stepped the question...
I suggest you read these articles and watch the docci over the weekend;
What hit the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001?
The ongoing 25 yearlong argument should have been put to bed in 2007
The Aquino interview link is not the full interview - here’s a link to the full https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/US-Army-Lt.-Colonel-Michael-Aquino-on-Psyops-and-9-11:4 - why the heck would a former intel agent call out a coverup in such detail? These guys never leave the biz but to his credit this was essentially death bed - it’s about power and control - Bits and pieces of truth wrapped up in deception - but our job is to listen and gather and discern and pick out the bits to add to the whole - DEW for sure (Aquino is dead wrong about thermite at least for primary cause - it’s a bit muddy because B7 “looked” like controlled demo) but what of the planes? Can what Aquino lays out be disproven and how?
Michael Aquino was an American political scientist, military officer and Satanist.
He was the founder and high priest of the Temple of Set.
Aquino was also a specialist in psychological warfare for military intelligence and an officer in the U.S. Army and do you really expect he won't lay oout some bread crumbs, leading you to a dead end street?
Just like Col John Alexander, Stubblebine and more, who all worked on psychological warfare, and "non-lethal" exotic weaponry, which we all know is a blatant lie...
I agree with you that it's our job to listen, gather, discern and pick out the bits, to add to the whole...
Your first port of call is the 23 NIST subcontractors, who were instrumental in the cover-up, and they are part of an organisation you might not even have heard of...
I'm currently working on having a podcast interview with Art O, the creator of the 2012 docci. The speculation of the fate of the passengers is good, and very troubling.
9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality is factually a much better watch.
Thanks for mentioning "911 Alchemy; Facing Reality" in your post above, and here in the comments. I've had the link open in another tab all day ... I just haven't hit "PLAY" yet!
I know very little compared to researchers, like yourself, who are "in the thick of it," so to speak.
I definitely put more stock in what you, Dr. Judy Wood and Barbara Honegger have to say.
I was warned (a few years ago by someone else) not to waste my time listening to aRGy-baRGy.
It is hard for me to imagine the Pentagon without an early warning system, not to mention anti-aircraft anti-missile systems on the roof and/or the grounds. Wouldn't the Pentagon staff have an alert siren go off and at least a minute to run a few flights down into underground bunkers?
If only it didn’t get bogged down by the official government counter narrative, but it gives a bit of an indication of what could have been going on during the execution of the “inside job / false flag”, carried out by rouge elements of the US Government, and other parties.
As you know, we agree about what the planes really were so yea, the remote control/drone stuff is nonsense to me. What I found compelling was the illustration of the rogue elements and subjection of what might have happened to the passengers who weren’t operatives. Their fate portrayed here is very plausible.
It is not likely to be put in an autoclave alive. If killed, more likely to be put in separate rooms then gassed with or drinks spiked with strong sedatives/morphine leading to respiratory depression and death.
Still there is the option that a few persons that are operatives of secret societies were on the planes then put in so-called witness protection to have identities changed. One example is Barbara Olsen, Ted Olsen's wife. See the links below on matching biometric comparisons, lack of any pre 2001 info on Lady Booth the "new wife" (with one of those peerage names), and a claim that voice analysis is the same.
This video is two minutes in and already historically inaccurate. There were no security measures in airports in 2001. No luggage scans, metal detectors, TSA, etc. Airports used to be like bus stations. Sadly, we have two generations that have no idea how simple air travel was.
The movie is fictional, based on real events, and the massive amount of research that has gone into the 4 alleged planes on 9/11. Here is some additional reading and viewing, which I highly recommend.
What hit the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001?
The ongoing 25 yearlong argument should have been put to bed in 2007
Not Ed Asner. He was/is my hero. Some generals. Ron Paul always said enough to know he knew. True American hero. The Corbett report did great stuff. Check out “China NWO” episode. The internet knew. The show Jericho and last man standing. It was an open secret.
But all those people push the lies. Every one of them pretends there were gravitational collapses. I don’t know Asner but the others definitely push the controlled demolition lie. None of the seven buildings collapse gravitationally. There were no bombs, planes nukes or thermite. Is Asner openly clear on this?
I have just looked. You are mistaken. Asner pushed all the Tier two lies. He supported AE for 911 truth - he pushed controlled demolition…
Sorry. Not a hero. He could be a fool - or he could be something more sinister.
Here - from Wikipedia. They don’t usually lie about this sort of stuff.
“Asner endorsed 9/11 conspiracy theories, including voicing qualified support for the 9/11 truth movement. In 2004, he signed a statement released by the group 9/11 Truth that included a call for a new investigation into some elements of the September 11 attacks that he questioned.[61] Asner confirmed his support for the statement in 2009.[62] In April 2004, Asner wrote an open letter to "peace and justice leaders" encouraging them to demand "full 9–11 truth" through the organization 9-11 Visibility Project.[63] In 2011, Asner hosted the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth documentary on the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, which endorses the theory that the building was taken down by controlled demolition.”
From Wikipedia?🤣🤣 Tell me this is a joke. Or don't. Wikipedia is zionest infested snake pit. Oh, I'm starting to get you real well. Netenyahoo fan boy are you?
Ron Paul is a deep state actor - he pushes system propaganda on most subjects - 911 Covid … he’s a gatekeeper. How many times did Mike try and talk to him. He remains ignorant deliberately. James Corbett also pretends that the towers collapsed. He very famously acts as a tier 2 gatekeeper for 911 and Virology.
There is no sense if he is genuine in why he would argue against the hard fact that Asner pushed the story he himself claims to believe.
I have the film with him narrating. The guy must know it’s Real himself. The distraction about Wikipedia being compromise which obviously is is totally irrelevant and he knows it.
He’s a game player or a very ill fellow.
He’s either full on trolling or he his brain is “seven buildings short of a New York Skyline”
I was in lower Manhattan on 9/11/2001. The second plane flew over my head and smacked the tower while I was standing at the mouth of greenwich street at battery place. When it hit the explosion shockwave blew my hair. I saw it first person live on the street. It was terrifying. I watched the first tower fall from my office on the 10th floor of 1 state street plaza. indescribably.
It’s really kind of painful for me to revisit that. I’m not saying everything went according to Hoyle. But I watched that second plane fly over the top of my head and smack the building. I wrote about it here.
you can read my account of the event on my substack. a story titled “the sound you’d hear at an airshow”.
It fucked me up for a long time. It’s 25 years this year.
I consider myself open-minded on most of this, willing to explore the evidence as presented, but seems like such a big lift...Not only the passengers & crew but their families, friends, etc...?
Planes with people departed, but never hit their alleged targets, and what people saw in the skies, were real time illusions... I suggest you read the following.
Never believed the official narrative from day one. This people are evil and still in control, creating false narratives 24/7. They wouldn’t hesitate to kill millions of innocent people to carry out their agenda. They’ve murdered 39 million since then.
Thank you.
I still believe that Reagan National Airport needs investingating, regarding this issue. Why the secrecy around the airport, and extended lockdown ?
Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research has written about Reagan National Airport.
His substack: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Missed that. Thanks very much 👍
Strange the author doesnt mention Rebekah Roth's fantastic read METHODICAL ILLUSION on
the 9-11 event. Between her work and a audio cast heard from retired (and deceased) Col Michael
Aquino, I've known the details which i believe btw, on what happened to the hijacked planes and passengers. Aquino was an odd bird being a part of the Church of Satan but his recount of what really happened chilled me because I was at last finding out the truth as he spoke. Strangely the audiocast is still on the internet but you've got to hunt it down. I found it here, https://rumble.com/v69elvp-michael-aquino-9-11-info-2019.html OR here: https://x.com/TheRubberDuck79/status/1750710357423714388
Aquino tells the truth only when it serves his master's purpose - so you should not listen to anything he says, let alone trust it.
I trust my gut instinct and it was gyrating wildly that Aquino's recounting of the event was spot on.
Like I said - he may tell the truth - but when he does it is not for your benefit.
Odd bird?? Go read the accounts from Cathy OBrien what that MONSTER did to CHILDREN!!!
Agreed, Aquino was no saint and I've never explored his life more because people who call themselves "satanists" do not fascinate me at all. The account he gave of the 9-11 events i found stunning and seemed to stream line with Roth's book altho Aquino had more detail. Of all the narratives I'd heard about 9-11, Aquino's seemed to ring true with my inner instincts
No, Aquino was selling the second layer of the 9/11 cover-up.
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
(Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
90 Minutes that will change the way you look at the destruction at the WTC on 9/11.
Watch it now: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Sorry to burst your bubble regarding the CIA spook, Rebekah Roth, who was exposed in 2015...
A Methodical Creation of a Methodical 9/11 Illusion
Who is Rebekah Roth?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-methodical-creation-of-a-methodical
Then on Aquino - He also speacilised in phsycological warfare and his interview is telling, as he was pushing the government approved counter narrative of bombs and thermite, when asked about the ecvidence presented by Dr Wood, he side stepped the question...
I suggest you read these articles and watch the docci over the weekend;
What hit the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001?
The ongoing 25 yearlong argument should have been put to bed in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-hit-the-twin-towers-on-september
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
A 9/11 "crash course" for you, that covers all three sites.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
The Aquino interview link is not the full interview - here’s a link to the full https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/US-Army-Lt.-Colonel-Michael-Aquino-on-Psyops-and-9-11:4 - why the heck would a former intel agent call out a coverup in such detail? These guys never leave the biz but to his credit this was essentially death bed - it’s about power and control - Bits and pieces of truth wrapped up in deception - but our job is to listen and gather and discern and pick out the bits to add to the whole - DEW for sure (Aquino is dead wrong about thermite at least for primary cause - it’s a bit muddy because B7 “looked” like controlled demo) but what of the planes? Can what Aquino lays out be disproven and how?
Michael Aquino was an American political scientist, military officer and Satanist.
He was the founder and high priest of the Temple of Set.
Aquino was also a specialist in psychological warfare for military intelligence and an officer in the U.S. Army and do you really expect he won't lay oout some bread crumbs, leading you to a dead end street?
Just like Col John Alexander, Stubblebine and more, who all worked on psychological warfare, and "non-lethal" exotic weaponry, which we all know is a blatant lie...
I agree with you that it's our job to listen, gather, discern and pick out the bits, to add to the whole...
Your first port of call is the 23 NIST subcontractors, who were instrumental in the cover-up, and they are part of an organisation you might not even have heard of...
Established in 1999.
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Dr Reynolds' 2007 whistle-blower case against NIST, was for the fraudulent WTC plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's 2007 whistle-blower case against NIST, was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
What happened to the animals on Noah's Ark?
They mated and multiplied
People do love stories. Even if the stories make no logical sense.
Jamie gets it. This irrational mindset is also why we pay tax on fiat money.
Agree - Taxation is theft.
Profanity is the effort of a feeble mind exerting itself forcibly.
I've also got a great quote - Insults are the last resort of an insecure people, with a crumbling position, trying to appear confident.
"Operation Terror"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XSaMo76s1DnH/
1h 31m 49s
[dramatization of various 9/11 hypotheses, including the hard-to-watch hypothesis of the fate of the passengers]
I post ^this link^ -- despite its flaws, as noted above by 9/11 Revisionist, for anyone who has interest in watching it in full.
I'm currently working on having a podcast interview with Art O, the creator of the 2012 docci. The speculation of the fate of the passengers is good, and very troubling.
9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality is factually a much better watch.
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
Thanks for mentioning "911 Alchemy; Facing Reality" in your post above, and here in the comments. I've had the link open in another tab all day ... I just haven't hit "PLAY" yet!
I know very little compared to researchers, like yourself, who are "in the thick of it," so to speak.
I definitely put more stock in what you, Dr. Judy Wood and Barbara Honegger have to say.
I was warned (a few years ago by someone else) not to waste my time listening to aRGy-baRGy.
Sorry, but it's time to wake you up regarding the possible spook, Barbara Honegger. I cover her in my article;
Explosive Testimony: Pentagon Survivor April Gallop
Is it true that April saw plane parts in the Pentagon BEFORE 9/11?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/explosive-testimony-pentagon-survivor
Thanks for the wake-up call.
Guess I'll just have to plead ignorance ... 🤦
I'll leave my comment up, in case your reply wakes up some others who,
like me, may have been fooled by a possible spook.
It's hardly the first time this has happened to me ...
And I'm sure it won't be the last.
It is hard for me to imagine the Pentagon without an early warning system, not to mention anti-aircraft anti-missile systems on the roof and/or the grounds. Wouldn't the Pentagon staff have an alert siren go off and at least a minute to run a few flights down into underground bunkers?
Thanks for this . My brain can't handle what happened to the passengers .. just no real answer it's speculation , no ?
Amazing when I ask people about the dust and no furniture etc how quick they know the answer , the jet fuel.. and I thought I was slow ...lol
Imagine living through the last 25 years and still not being the slightest bit suspicious. 😲 🤯 🤩
yes with 50 jabs later
Compelling. Did you make this Norman?
The bulk of the video: Is from Art O’s documentary: Operation Terror (2012)
Unfortunately it’s wrong pushing remote controlled planes / drones, bombs and thermite.
If only it didn’t get bogged down by the official government counter narrative, but it gives a bit of an indication of what could have been going on during the execution of the “inside job / false flag”, carried out by rouge elements of the US Government, and other parties.
Then I just added some extras at the end 😎
As you know, we agree about what the planes really were so yea, the remote control/drone stuff is nonsense to me. What I found compelling was the illustration of the rogue elements and subjection of what might have happened to the passengers who weren’t operatives. Their fate portrayed here is very plausible.
I hold the same opinion as you, thus the reason for using parts of the docci, for my two 30 minute thought experiments for my readers / followers.
It is not likely to be put in an autoclave alive. If killed, more likely to be put in separate rooms then gassed with or drinks spiked with strong sedatives/morphine leading to respiratory depression and death.
Still there is the option that a few persons that are operatives of secret societies were on the planes then put in so-called witness protection to have identities changed. One example is Barbara Olsen, Ted Olsen's wife. See the links below on matching biometric comparisons, lack of any pre 2001 info on Lady Booth the "new wife" (with one of those peerage names), and a claim that voice analysis is the same.
https://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2010/04/is-lady-booth-olsen-wife-of-ted-olsen.html
At the end of the day, we can all agree the passengers, crew and planes were collateral damage, what their end was, we can only speculate...
Holograms
This video is two minutes in and already historically inaccurate. There were no security measures in airports in 2001. No luggage scans, metal detectors, TSA, etc. Airports used to be like bus stations. Sadly, we have two generations that have no idea how simple air travel was.
The movie is fictional, based on real events, and the massive amount of research that has gone into the 4 alleged planes on 9/11. Here is some additional reading and viewing, which I highly recommend.
What hit the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001?
The ongoing 25 yearlong argument should have been put to bed in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-hit-the-twin-towers-on-september
Also, here is a 9/11 "crash course" for you, that covers all three sites.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
the fucking jews did 9/11! that little cuck bush and the fucking genocidal jew terrorists! ERADICATE THEM ALL TO EXTINCTION!
Enjoyed that. Brings back memories. I was definitely in the 9/11 Truther movement.
Who Really Controls the 9/11 Truth Movement?
A 40+ year suppression timeline exposing cover-ups and planted leaders steering millions away from the evidence.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
2026 WTC Dust Sample analysis - Sppressed by the 9/11 truth movement talking heads, like Richard Gage.
9/11's Hidden Physics: Exotic Tech or Controlled Demolition?
LENR researcher Bob Greenyer reveals microspheres, plasmoids, & material anomalies that challenge everything we thought we knew
Discussion: https://911revision.substack.com/p/2026-wtc-dust-analysis-bombshell
Most of us fell for it.
Not Ed Asner. He was/is my hero. Some generals. Ron Paul always said enough to know he knew. True American hero. The Corbett report did great stuff. Check out “China NWO” episode. The internet knew. The show Jericho and last man standing. It was an open secret.
But all those people push the lies. Every one of them pretends there were gravitational collapses. I don’t know Asner but the others definitely push the controlled demolition lie. None of the seven buildings collapse gravitationally. There were no bombs, planes nukes or thermite. Is Asner openly clear on this?
I have just looked. You are mistaken. Asner pushed all the Tier two lies. He supported AE for 911 truth - he pushed controlled demolition…
Sorry. Not a hero. He could be a fool - or he could be something more sinister.
Here - from Wikipedia. They don’t usually lie about this sort of stuff.
“Asner endorsed 9/11 conspiracy theories, including voicing qualified support for the 9/11 truth movement. In 2004, he signed a statement released by the group 9/11 Truth that included a call for a new investigation into some elements of the September 11 attacks that he questioned.[61] Asner confirmed his support for the statement in 2009.[62] In April 2004, Asner wrote an open letter to "peace and justice leaders" encouraging them to demand "full 9–11 truth" through the organization 9-11 Visibility Project.[63] In 2011, Asner hosted the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth documentary on the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, which endorses the theory that the building was taken down by controlled demolition.”
From Wikipedia?🤣🤣 Tell me this is a joke. Or don't. Wikipedia is zionest infested snake pit. Oh, I'm starting to get you real well. Netenyahoo fan boy are you?
Ron Paul is a deep state actor - he pushes system propaganda on most subjects - 911 Covid … he’s a gatekeeper. How many times did Mike try and talk to him. He remains ignorant deliberately. James Corbett also pretends that the towers collapsed. He very famously acts as a tier 2 gatekeeper for 911 and Virology.
So only you are the hero. I get it. A difference of opinion. You won't change mine. Bye. 👋
I used to be a supporter of James Corbett, but alas, he has shown himself to not fully be trustworthy...
The Corbett Report & Secret Weapons Technology
The meaning of 9/11 Truth and evidence that shall not be discussed
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-corbett-report-and-secret-weapons
@Brent Borgers appears to be just a troll.
There is no sense if he is genuine in why he would argue against the hard fact that Asner pushed the story he himself claims to believe.
I have the film with him narrating. The guy must know it’s Real himself. The distraction about Wikipedia being compromise which obviously is is totally irrelevant and he knows it.
He’s a game player or a very ill fellow.
He’s either full on trolling or he his brain is “seven buildings short of a New York Skyline”
I was in lower Manhattan on 9/11/2001. The second plane flew over my head and smacked the tower while I was standing at the mouth of greenwich street at battery place. When it hit the explosion shockwave blew my hair. I saw it first person live on the street. It was terrifying. I watched the first tower fall from my office on the 10th floor of 1 state street plaza. indescribably.
Didn't you notice something strange regarding the alleged plane?
Have a quick read...
What hit the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001?
The ongoing 25 yearlong argument should have been put to bed in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-hit-the-twin-towers-on-september
Steel Towers vs. Aluminium Planes: The Physics That Failed on 9/11
Expert pilot reveals the crashes that broke every rule in the book.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
I'd love to hear your opinion of the evidence presented in tis well research documentary.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
It’s really kind of painful for me to revisit that. I’m not saying everything went according to Hoyle. But I watched that second plane fly over the top of my head and smack the building. I wrote about it here.
you can read my account of the event on my substack. a story titled “the sound you’d hear at an airshow”.
It fucked me up for a long time. It’s 25 years this year.
I can imagine that it is painful, but you do want to know the truth, don't you?
Challenge yourself and watch 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
I consider myself open-minded on most of this, willing to explore the evidence as presented, but seems like such a big lift...Not only the passengers & crew but their families, friends, etc...?
9/11 Jersey Girl’s THIRD Bombshell Open Letter: Half-Truths Are Still Whole Lies
Patricia Casazza to Richard Gage & 9/11 Truth Leaders: End the Half-Truths Now!
Open Letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girl-drops-third-open
That shit would look less CIA produced if the “revelation of the method” wasn’t introduced so blatantly and so early in the shtick.
That’s my problem….I keep forgetting just how stupid Americans are.
~al jebr~
(The reunion of fragments)
The patriot hasn’t sussed it yet
But embusqués’ smirk on the tv sets
Was the missing piece of the jigsaw jets.
There weren’t any…because, no planes
Planes with people departed, but never hit their alleged targets, and what people saw in the skies, were real time illusions... I suggest you read the following.
Illusion of Reality and the 9/11 Planes
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/illusion-of-reality-and-the-911-planes
9/11 Planes Research's podcast interview with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
Never believed the official narrative from day one. This people are evil and still in control, creating false narratives 24/7. They wouldn’t hesitate to kill millions of innocent people to carry out their agenda. They’ve murdered 39 million since then.
And the 9/11 "truth" movement is part of the bigger cover-up.
Who Really Controls the 9/11 Truth Movement?
A 40+ year suppression timeline exposing cover-ups and planted leaders steering millions away from the evidence.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline