wow, where to begin - there appears to be an assumption that "Al Ciada" was the driving force behind the attack, & that airliners where crashed into buildings. Assumption is the Mutha '0 disasta . Do not assume ANYTHING, this whole business isn't properly defined as yet - the court of public opinion MUST hear this case!
The whole business was properly defined in 2007, then the "9/11 truth movement" talking heads, moved people AWAY from 9/11 truth.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Quick question. Is there really no audio version of "Where did the towers go?" or have they hid it so well I can't find it? I've tried google and yandex. Not on youtube or rumble. There is a link that makes it look like it's on youtube (a reading of all the chapters), but the link is unavailable AND they scrubbed it off the wayback machine!
I really want to read this book but current life circumstances make audio a million times easier...
Keep in mind, Catherine Austin Fitts attended this presentation, yet kept mum, when discussing the danger of weaponising breakthrough energy with Tucker Carlson.
Catherine Austin Fitts & Breakthrough Energy
Weaponized Breakthrough Energy has been deployed, but no one wants to talk about it
Norman I reckon you should ask Juxtaposition1 for an interview. He has basically labelled Catherine Austin-Fitts, Carlson, Brand, Rogan, Jones and others as being unreliable (bullshitters!). See if he'll talk with you.
Since you put that post up about Juxta's knowledge of Gage being COINTELPRO I've been watching a lot of his content. It's compelling reading and he's a true character with amazing connections. I'd really like to see you 2 en-GAGE!
I consider you to be the one who has done the most valuable work by tying up of all the real evidence provided by Dr Wood, Andrew Johnson, Mark Conlon and others.
Gage is a spook. He leads the counter-narrative. Anyone that dismissively waves their hand at the mention of Dr Judy Wood's work is not to be trusted. Gage can't even debate me, and who am I? Just someone who reads, researches and thinks independently.
He blocked me on X, just for asking legitimate questions. No name calling, no insults. Just serious questions.
Ask the author here for the definition of a Stand Down psy-op.
There is a solution to your need via AI. It’s perfectly possible if you can get a text file of the book to make an audio version yourself using a speech generation software. You cannot do this for free but based on what I’m using for video dubbing work it won’t cost you more than purchasing the book. I use a software called eleven labs which is not a strong recommendation but maybe just a place to start and try something out if this is of any interest.
What a waste of time. I expected much more from Tucker than this extended gobbly gook talk- a- thon. These people take 5 minutes to say absolutely nothing. This entire series is useless. I've watched all 5.
I guess the ONLY good thing from this entire series is more people will see that the govt narrative is BS. That's about it. Maybe they will investigate themselves, but that is unlikely.
His investigative staff needs to be terminated, immediately.
As I stated in my first article breaking down each episode - Tucker going after the 9/11 Commission Report, is just a further extension of a gaslighting exercise.
He brought nothing new to the table, but he has proved his disingenuousness.
You might not have read;
Alex Jones, Charlie Sheen, Tucker Carlson & 9/11
Two Camp 2 Talking Heads and an Actor Failing at Presenting 9/11 Truth
I suggest you read all 5 articles covering Tucker's failure in finding 9/11 truth.
wow, where to begin - there appears to be an assumption that "Al Ciada" was the driving force behind the attack, & that airliners where crashed into buildings. Assumption is the Mutha '0 disasta . Do not assume ANYTHING, this whole business isn't properly defined as yet - the court of public opinion MUST hear this case!
The whole business was properly defined in 2007, then the "9/11 truth movement" talking heads, moved people AWAY from 9/11 truth.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:
1. 9/11 Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
Quick question. Is there really no audio version of "Where did the towers go?" or have they hid it so well I can't find it? I've tried google and yandex. Not on youtube or rumble. There is a link that makes it look like it's on youtube (a reading of all the chapters), but the link is unavailable AND they scrubbed it off the wayback machine!
I really want to read this book but current life circumstances make audio a million times easier...
Just watch this presentation Dr Wood did in 2012 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Keep in mind, Catherine Austin Fitts attended this presentation, yet kept mum, when discussing the danger of weaponising breakthrough energy with Tucker Carlson.
Catherine Austin Fitts & Breakthrough Energy
Weaponized Breakthrough Energy has been deployed, but no one wants to talk about it
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/catherine-austin-fitts-and-breakthrough
Norman I reckon you should ask Juxtaposition1 for an interview. He has basically labelled Catherine Austin-Fitts, Carlson, Brand, Rogan, Jones and others as being unreliable (bullshitters!). See if he'll talk with you.
I found "Juxtaposition1" on substack and what he has to say is intriguing.
He talks about his friend David W. Gray who worked at the Lawrence Livermore Weapons Lab...
But who he also mentions is Richard Gage...
He states, Richard Gage is a spook. A red herring.
A red herring is something that distracts attention from the real issue.
The term comes from the practice of drawing a red herring across a trail to confuse hunting dogs.
It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences toward a false conclusion.
Richard Gage: The Spook & Red Herring
Video: https://rumble.com/v6s67hn-richard-gage-the-spook-and-red-herring.html
Since you put that post up about Juxta's knowledge of Gage being COINTELPRO I've been watching a lot of his content. It's compelling reading and he's a true character with amazing connections. I'd really like to see you 2 en-GAGE!
This is his latest : https://open.substack.com/pub/juxtaposition1/p/richard-gage-is-a-fraud-and-crispr?r=1ekoaf&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false.
I consider you to be the one who has done the most valuable work by tying up of all the real evidence provided by Dr Wood, Andrew Johnson, Mark Conlon and others.
A great effort !
Gage is a spook. He leads the counter-narrative. Anyone that dismissively waves their hand at the mention of Dr Judy Wood's work is not to be trusted. Gage can't even debate me, and who am I? Just someone who reads, researches and thinks independently.
He blocked me on X, just for asking legitimate questions. No name calling, no insults. Just serious questions.
Ask the author here for the definition of a Stand Down psy-op.
There is a solution to your need via AI. It’s perfectly possible if you can get a text file of the book to make an audio version yourself using a speech generation software. You cannot do this for free but based on what I’m using for video dubbing work it won’t cost you more than purchasing the book. I use a software called eleven labs which is not a strong recommendation but maybe just a place to start and try something out if this is of any interest.
Nothing beats having that solid, heavy book in your hands, when studying the evidence presented by Dr Wood.
I ended up buying it last night. Watched a Rumble episode of yours and realized I NEED this book, and in a form that can't be erased on my phone.
Correct - Once you receive the book and you feel the weight in your hands, you'll be amazed, never mind the massive amount of detail she presents.
Feedback from someone who recently got her copy;
I'm halfway through, can't put it down x easier read than I thought too x
What a waste of time. I expected much more from Tucker than this extended gobbly gook talk- a- thon. These people take 5 minutes to say absolutely nothing. This entire series is useless. I've watched all 5.
I guess the ONLY good thing from this entire series is more people will see that the govt narrative is BS. That's about it. Maybe they will investigate themselves, but that is unlikely.
His investigative staff needs to be terminated, immediately.
As I stated in my first article breaking down each episode - Tucker going after the 9/11 Commission Report, is just a further extension of a gaslighting exercise.
He brought nothing new to the table, but he has proved his disingenuousness.
You might not have read;
Alex Jones, Charlie Sheen, Tucker Carlson & 9/11
Two Camp 2 Talking Heads and an Actor Failing at Presenting 9/11 Truth
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/alex-jones-charlie-sheen-tucker-carlson
Yes, agreed. You can tell I'm disappointed with Tucker.
I'm Freeman A on X with Agent Smith avatar.. You have my real name now. I live in south florida.
O, epic!
Just DM'd you my contact email on X.
We should do a Zoom sometime....