Geez, it's weird people lie when it's so easy to prove their lie. In the video you linked to, it seems like Alex Jones is DESPERATE to not be seen as a limited hangout. I guess that's his job.
I think this situation is kind of a microcosm of the "9/11 truth movement" situation. It was a lie that Alex Jones told and people can easily verify that it was a lie, but most people won't. Most people listening to him or reading his Tweets or whatever will just accept what he says without checking it (or reject what he says without checking it if they're on the other side of the spectrum).
For people like Alex Jones, whose job it is to keep people away from certain important truths, it doesn't really matter if the lies can be easily identified as lies by people who are willing to think for themselves. It doesn't even really matter if they make logical sense to people who are willing to think for themselves. It only really matters if they are effective i.e. for the people who have rejected the mainstream media/official government narrative and are looking for an alternative explanation, what matters is whether enough of those people just accept the lies without questioning them.
That's their goal. It's not to tell the perfect, airtight lie that everybody falls for, it's to tell lies that seem plausible to the casual observer, most of whom will accept them without question if the lies do seem plausible.
The character "Tucker Carlson" is a Mossad/CIA actor that is now being repositioned as an "outsider" to distract and further divide the people who are starting to doubt the official narrative. He is being given prominence now because more and more people are noticing the obvious livestreamed genocide and are waking up to the truth. He and his handlers know exactly what happenned amd who is responsible and why they did it, after all, he works for the same gang, just like his dad before him. This is a multi-generational criminal gang that operates by a code of deception and theater, secrecy, extortion, blackmail, with a long history of violent false flag terrorism.
1) Tucker's arms are crossed tightly in front of his body talking about "truth". I don't know if there's a direct correlation between that kind of body language and lies. But that closed off body language conveys the opposite of his spoken words. That he is NOT open to the subject under discussion.
2) Tucker isn't being used unknowingly. He is very close to power and must know that DEWs are real. That this clip implies DEWs are a crazy idea is evidence that he is lying. For this not to be true he'd have to be quite stupid, like below average IQ.
3) The Judy Wood portion of this clip - I have the same feeling of dismayed amazement that I get when I recognize other psy-ops. I was once in a PhD program at UCSB in social psychology. I probably rubbed elbows with people that WORK on the actual psy-ops. I quit social psych but I am still AMAZED at how sophisticated - yet how simple - the propaganda is. Because Judy Wood is saying, Look at what is right in front of you. Trust your own eyes. And psychological manipulation is so clever that many, many people are doing the equivalent of labeling a dog an elephant. Because the popular narrative says elephant, not dog. The popular narrative says only a crazy stupid lady from the Bible belt believes in "space lasers".
I would just like to say one thing about Chase Hughes: I think he is "one of them" because he claims that "we can't win against artificial intelligence," and I disagree.
The issue we have with society is that most people are zombies and accept everything at face value... Look how long it's taken for the UK to realise they are being invaded and you still have people "who can't see it", and that's how the digital ID's etc etc are going to be rolled out.
Chase Hughes was in one of your video compilations in this article, being interviewed by Joe Rogan. It was in another video elsewhere that I heard Chase make his claim about AI.
I agree with your assessment of most people being zombies. It is very disheartening.
For the last 26 years at least, this not so secret "club" has been busy building Tesla inspired "death rays" of every size and output; from "non lethal" (what a joke) to doomsday lethal.
After picking my jaw off the floor, it became CRYSTAL CLEAR that only a cloaked "death ray" could cause the type of destruction we saw on 9/11.
The technology to pull it off was ready to go long before 2001.
Their member academic institutions and defense industries number in the dozens and are located all over the United States.
Every "truther" should read their free pdf complete with maps and photos of their latest war machines.
After seeing all of that damning evidence in PLAIN SIGHT, only an imbecile would believe that the US government did NOT deploy these weapons against it's own citizens.
They did it with Covid, but the dress rehearsal for that horrific mass genocide was Sept 11, 2001.
I wasn't 100% convinced that Tucker was knowingly spreading disinformation. I was probably at about 80% but having now read this article and seen what he's said in his 9/11 series, I'm now convinced there's no possibility that he doesn't know exactly what he's doing.
This was the most blatant giveaway:
"In the wake of 9/11, it’s possible that there are people who wanted conspiracy theories to thrive — the more far out, the better. The more time people spend wondering about directed-energy weapons, the less time they focus on the obvious — the facts hiding in plain sight — and the main fact that they are ignoring: our government’s central role in facilitating those attacks. We established this in Episode 1 of this series. And the extreme levels of incompetence that made it possible for Bin Laden from Kandahar, Afghanistan to pull off the most sophisticated terror attacks in history."
This is Tucker Carlson explicitly telling his enormous audience not only to perceive the use of directed-energy weapons as a "conspiracy theory" (whilst insinuating that it's the most far out conspiracy theory of them all) but also commanding them not to think about DEWs because to do so is to distract yourself from the far more important truth that government incompetence allowed Bin Laden "to pull off the most sophisticated terror attacks in history". In reality, anybody who has looked at the facts about the use of directed-energy weapons on 9/11 knows that the Osama Bin Laden cover story is a sick joke. And now it is not only obvious that Tucker Carlson knows this, but it is also obvious that he has agreed to tell lies to the entire world in order to cover up the truth. One of the few who have done this to huge audiences in both Camp 1 and Camp 2.
My guess is that this was all planned many years ago, to the extent that Tucker Carlson was probably chosen to be fired from FOX News for being too much of a truth teller and would then be marketed to the public as such, gather a massive "independent" audience, start his own network, and then promote the authorised 9/11 conspiracy theories for all of the newly awakening post-Covid truth-seekers. I bet they planned it to the month i.e. the same month as the 24th anniversary, so that the lead up to the 25th anniversary would be saturated with authorised, Camp 2 propaganda.
If you pay attention to Tucker long enough, he does catch himself out with his lies. Not just the recent one about not knowing that his own dad was CIA until after he died (having already said on video a year or so earlier that he did know) but other ones like claiming that he doesn't ever watch videos because his dyslexic brain can't handle the stress, and then in other shows he references videos he's watched. Then he says things like Alex Jones predicted 9/11 and no-one else did, but a 5-minute Google search will show you that Bill Cooper predicted 9/11 and also called out Alex Jones for being controlled opposition. So Jones just copied Cooper's prediction, probably already knowing that Cooper would be dead within 2 months of 9/11. And now Jones tells his audience that Cooper was an alcoholic who was unruly and kept using expletives when Jones invited him on, which is just flat out false. And we're supposed to believe that journalist Tucker Carlson can't find any of this out because he doesn't watch videos, except when he does watch the videos he admits he has watched.
Finally, the laugh. The fake, execute on-demand, ever-so-slightly camp laugh that he uses as a means of labelling something as absurd. He does the same thing with his careful choice of words because he is actually a decent writer. Obviously the use of language makes it much more subtle but it is ultimately the same technique: he frames things a certain way and tells you what you're supposed to think about it, whilst claiming to be all about the truth. Classic mainstream media talking head. Classic authorised alternative media talking head.
There has been a massive argument on X with regards to Alex Jones and Bill Cooper predicting 9/11...
An interesting timeline:
- March 4, 2001 - The pilot episode of "The Lone Gunman", aired with a foiled attack on the World Trade Center
- March 6, 2001 - Alex Jones discusses FBI and War games and flying a plane into the World Trade Center
- June 28, 2001 - Bill Cooper discusses Osama Bin Laden will be made out to be the boogieman if a massive attack happens on US soil (November 6. 2001 he is shot dead by cops at his home)
- July 25, 2001 - Alex Jones disses if there is an attack involving planes, it will be an inside job and it will probably be pinned on Osama Bin Laden
Let's just say Bill Cooper wasn't vey fond of Alex Jones and many have called Alex Jones out as a limited hangout with regards to the actual truth of the events of 9/11 in later years...
Tucker Carlson has been going viral for a while now due to the controversy surrounding the rabidly pro-Israel branch of the controlled opposition industrial complex criticising him/condemning him as a Nazi for interviewing Nick Fuentes, who Tucker previously (and not that long ago) described as a Fed and a plant meant to discredit people who aligned with any of his views.
This reminds me of the time when Jim Fetzer and Steven E. Jones started Scholars for 9/11 Truth. And over time they had public disagreements and ultimately there was a huge food fight (I think Andrew Johnson called it that) and the group ended up splitting into two different factions. The effect of that is to further divide what people generally assume to be an authentic "9/11 truth movement", and also to affect the people in each group in predictable ways due to the psychology of groups e.g. increased loyalty to the in-group, increased criticism of/animosity towards the out-group.
I am now wondering whether this recent Tucker Carlson moment is an engineered psy-op between different branches of controlled opposition inc. (some of whom probably don't even consciously understand that they are controlled opposition, and some of whom definitely do). Are people being manipulated to see Tucker Carlson as some sort of righteous heroic figure immediately after he just dropped a load of Camp 2 9/11 propaganda to millions of uninformed newbies?
I'd be interested to hear what people think about that.
I just wrote this in a different comments section. I thought it was probably worth copying and pasting it under this article too:
I just watched some of the recent Ian Carroll interview on Tucker Carlson. Carroll says he was 9 when 9/11 happened and his generation knows that when you see the government acting this way (having spoken throughout the interview about the Las Vegas shooting) it's because they're covering up one of these things. Tucker responds "By the way, when I act that way I'm covering something up. When you do too, that's a human thing. If I'm hiding something, if I'm lying about something there's a reason. I'm not doing it - unless I'm some total sociopath freak - I'm not doing it for fun. I'm doing it because I'm trying to conceal something."
What is it they say? When someone tells you who they are, believe them.
It's a difficult one with Tucker Carlson because I do think he does a lot of interviews that reveal a lot of truth and he's attacked for that by the right people, which does seem to be genuine. But he does also tell lies about 9/11. They're not mistakes at this point, they're lies. And occasionally it's as if his subconscious leaks out an admission about that. I think this is an example of exactly that.
TC: So what you're saying is that mass formation psychology clearly has taken hold among a bunch of people where it's like they just can't think clearly.
IC: Well I don't think that it takes hold by accident. I think that it's the kind of thing that only happens when you have a massive propaganda campaign and basically a state-sponsored operation to control the information space ... [Tucker cuts him off.]
TC: Well there's definitely some of that, flat out we know because I'm watching it and I'm not gonna, whatever, I should just shut up now because I know too many people involved and I love them all, honestly.
You'll find this amusing...
Alex Jones is butt hurt because I called him a 9/11 limited hangout
X Post: https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1971980238424068458
So it looks like Alex Jones never provided a link of having Dr Wood on his show...
Alex Jones lied. He has never had her on.
Watch this clip of him freaking out twice, when asked to have her on.
Link: https://x.com/911Revisionist/status/1971988238207537631
Geez, it's weird people lie when it's so easy to prove their lie. In the video you linked to, it seems like Alex Jones is DESPERATE to not be seen as a limited hangout. I guess that's his job.
I think this situation is kind of a microcosm of the "9/11 truth movement" situation. It was a lie that Alex Jones told and people can easily verify that it was a lie, but most people won't. Most people listening to him or reading his Tweets or whatever will just accept what he says without checking it (or reject what he says without checking it if they're on the other side of the spectrum).
For people like Alex Jones, whose job it is to keep people away from certain important truths, it doesn't really matter if the lies can be easily identified as lies by people who are willing to think for themselves. It doesn't even really matter if they make logical sense to people who are willing to think for themselves. It only really matters if they are effective i.e. for the people who have rejected the mainstream media/official government narrative and are looking for an alternative explanation, what matters is whether enough of those people just accept the lies without questioning them.
That's their goal. It's not to tell the perfect, airtight lie that everybody falls for, it's to tell lies that seem plausible to the casual observer, most of whom will accept them without question if the lies do seem plausible.
O, this little clip is explanatory.
Link: https://x.com/i/status/1971949714753896552
Sometimes a bit of dark humor and sarcasm is warranted.
What do You expect from controlled opposition? LOL!
NOW THIS IS A TRUTH TELLER
The character "Tucker Carlson" is a Mossad/CIA actor that is now being repositioned as an "outsider" to distract and further divide the people who are starting to doubt the official narrative. He is being given prominence now because more and more people are noticing the obvious livestreamed genocide and are waking up to the truth. He and his handlers know exactly what happenned amd who is responsible and why they did it, after all, he works for the same gang, just like his dad before him. This is a multi-generational criminal gang that operates by a code of deception and theater, secrecy, extortion, blackmail, with a long history of violent false flag terrorism.
And the odious Cantdance Owens!!!!
LOL - That's funny! Cantdance Owens ;-)
You win the internet today!
I've known for a long time that Tucker was controlled opposition. Hes from a CIA family. As is Alex Jones. Both spooks.
1) Tucker's arms are crossed tightly in front of his body talking about "truth". I don't know if there's a direct correlation between that kind of body language and lies. But that closed off body language conveys the opposite of his spoken words. That he is NOT open to the subject under discussion.
2) Tucker isn't being used unknowingly. He is very close to power and must know that DEWs are real. That this clip implies DEWs are a crazy idea is evidence that he is lying. For this not to be true he'd have to be quite stupid, like below average IQ.
3) The Judy Wood portion of this clip - I have the same feeling of dismayed amazement that I get when I recognize other psy-ops. I was once in a PhD program at UCSB in social psychology. I probably rubbed elbows with people that WORK on the actual psy-ops. I quit social psych but I am still AMAZED at how sophisticated - yet how simple - the propaganda is. Because Judy Wood is saying, Look at what is right in front of you. Trust your own eyes. And psychological manipulation is so clever that many, many people are doing the equivalent of labeling a dog an elephant. Because the popular narrative says elephant, not dog. The popular narrative says only a crazy stupid lady from the Bible belt believes in "space lasers".
Excellent piece! Your work is so important!
I would just like to say one thing about Chase Hughes: I think he is "one of them" because he claims that "we can't win against artificial intelligence," and I disagree.
Thank you for the kind words.
Chase Hughes? Not really sure who that is.
The issue we have with society is that most people are zombies and accept everything at face value... Look how long it's taken for the UK to realise they are being invaded and you still have people "who can't see it", and that's how the digital ID's etc etc are going to be rolled out.
Chase Hughes was in one of your video compilations in this article, being interviewed by Joe Rogan. It was in another video elsewhere that I heard Chase make his claim about AI.
I agree with your assessment of most people being zombies. It is very disheartening.
What type of DEWs were used that day? Where were they positioned? Thoughts, anyone?
It was some sort of "cold directed energy technology", that seem to use "field effects", that breaks the molecular bonds of matter.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors, two of whom are US MIC contractors, who were tasked with security and clean-up from September 13, 2001.
They are part of a big club, you might not have heard of.
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Holy mackeroli!!
For the last 26 years at least, this not so secret "club" has been busy building Tesla inspired "death rays" of every size and output; from "non lethal" (what a joke) to doomsday lethal.
After picking my jaw off the floor, it became CRYSTAL CLEAR that only a cloaked "death ray" could cause the type of destruction we saw on 9/11.
The technology to pull it off was ready to go long before 2001.
Their member academic institutions and defense industries number in the dozens and are located all over the United States.
Every "truther" should read their free pdf complete with maps and photos of their latest war machines.
After seeing all of that damning evidence in PLAIN SIGHT, only an imbecile would believe that the US government did NOT deploy these weapons against it's own citizens.
They did it with Covid, but the dress rehearsal for that horrific mass genocide was Sept 11, 2001.
May God help us.
Great article as usual, thank you. 👍🏽💕
Really good article, thanks for writing it.
I wasn't 100% convinced that Tucker was knowingly spreading disinformation. I was probably at about 80% but having now read this article and seen what he's said in his 9/11 series, I'm now convinced there's no possibility that he doesn't know exactly what he's doing.
This was the most blatant giveaway:
"In the wake of 9/11, it’s possible that there are people who wanted conspiracy theories to thrive — the more far out, the better. The more time people spend wondering about directed-energy weapons, the less time they focus on the obvious — the facts hiding in plain sight — and the main fact that they are ignoring: our government’s central role in facilitating those attacks. We established this in Episode 1 of this series. And the extreme levels of incompetence that made it possible for Bin Laden from Kandahar, Afghanistan to pull off the most sophisticated terror attacks in history."
This is Tucker Carlson explicitly telling his enormous audience not only to perceive the use of directed-energy weapons as a "conspiracy theory" (whilst insinuating that it's the most far out conspiracy theory of them all) but also commanding them not to think about DEWs because to do so is to distract yourself from the far more important truth that government incompetence allowed Bin Laden "to pull off the most sophisticated terror attacks in history". In reality, anybody who has looked at the facts about the use of directed-energy weapons on 9/11 knows that the Osama Bin Laden cover story is a sick joke. And now it is not only obvious that Tucker Carlson knows this, but it is also obvious that he has agreed to tell lies to the entire world in order to cover up the truth. One of the few who have done this to huge audiences in both Camp 1 and Camp 2.
My guess is that this was all planned many years ago, to the extent that Tucker Carlson was probably chosen to be fired from FOX News for being too much of a truth teller and would then be marketed to the public as such, gather a massive "independent" audience, start his own network, and then promote the authorised 9/11 conspiracy theories for all of the newly awakening post-Covid truth-seekers. I bet they planned it to the month i.e. the same month as the 24th anniversary, so that the lead up to the 25th anniversary would be saturated with authorised, Camp 2 propaganda.
If you pay attention to Tucker long enough, he does catch himself out with his lies. Not just the recent one about not knowing that his own dad was CIA until after he died (having already said on video a year or so earlier that he did know) but other ones like claiming that he doesn't ever watch videos because his dyslexic brain can't handle the stress, and then in other shows he references videos he's watched. Then he says things like Alex Jones predicted 9/11 and no-one else did, but a 5-minute Google search will show you that Bill Cooper predicted 9/11 and also called out Alex Jones for being controlled opposition. So Jones just copied Cooper's prediction, probably already knowing that Cooper would be dead within 2 months of 9/11. And now Jones tells his audience that Cooper was an alcoholic who was unruly and kept using expletives when Jones invited him on, which is just flat out false. And we're supposed to believe that journalist Tucker Carlson can't find any of this out because he doesn't watch videos, except when he does watch the videos he admits he has watched.
Finally, the laugh. The fake, execute on-demand, ever-so-slightly camp laugh that he uses as a means of labelling something as absurd. He does the same thing with his careful choice of words because he is actually a decent writer. Obviously the use of language makes it much more subtle but it is ultimately the same technique: he frames things a certain way and tells you what you're supposed to think about it, whilst claiming to be all about the truth. Classic mainstream media talking head. Classic authorised alternative media talking head.
Keep an eye open for my Alex Jones, Charlie Sheen, Tucker Carlson & 9/11 article that I'm currently working on.
Whist you wait - Have a look at this video I made: https://rumble.com/v40pz6w-the-911-prediction-war.html
The 9/11 Prediction War
There has been a massive argument on X with regards to Alex Jones and Bill Cooper predicting 9/11...
An interesting timeline:
- March 4, 2001 - The pilot episode of "The Lone Gunman", aired with a foiled attack on the World Trade Center
- March 6, 2001 - Alex Jones discusses FBI and War games and flying a plane into the World Trade Center
- June 28, 2001 - Bill Cooper discusses Osama Bin Laden will be made out to be the boogieman if a massive attack happens on US soil (November 6. 2001 he is shot dead by cops at his home)
- July 25, 2001 - Alex Jones disses if there is an attack involving planes, it will be an inside job and it will probably be pinned on Osama Bin Laden
Let's just say Bill Cooper wasn't vey fond of Alex Jones and many have called Alex Jones out as a limited hangout with regards to the actual truth of the events of 9/11 in later years...
Tucker Carlson has been going viral for a while now due to the controversy surrounding the rabidly pro-Israel branch of the controlled opposition industrial complex criticising him/condemning him as a Nazi for interviewing Nick Fuentes, who Tucker previously (and not that long ago) described as a Fed and a plant meant to discredit people who aligned with any of his views.
This reminds me of the time when Jim Fetzer and Steven E. Jones started Scholars for 9/11 Truth. And over time they had public disagreements and ultimately there was a huge food fight (I think Andrew Johnson called it that) and the group ended up splitting into two different factions. The effect of that is to further divide what people generally assume to be an authentic "9/11 truth movement", and also to affect the people in each group in predictable ways due to the psychology of groups e.g. increased loyalty to the in-group, increased criticism of/animosity towards the out-group.
I am now wondering whether this recent Tucker Carlson moment is an engineered psy-op between different branches of controlled opposition inc. (some of whom probably don't even consciously understand that they are controlled opposition, and some of whom definitely do). Are people being manipulated to see Tucker Carlson as some sort of righteous heroic figure immediately after he just dropped a load of Camp 2 9/11 propaganda to millions of uninformed newbies?
I'd be interested to hear what people think about that.
It's a great observation on your part and I'm inclined to agree with you.
Tucker definitely knows more than he's letting on.
Same goes for Alex Jones, if you read my Jones / Carlson / Sheen article.
Even the guys in the 9/11 truth movement are showing cracks in their disinformation peddling of bombs and thermite.
Firefighter Raul Angulo: How to explain DEW on 9/11
Video clip: https://youtu.be/WIyPwgmtWIY
I just wrote this in a different comments section. I thought it was probably worth copying and pasting it under this article too:
I just watched some of the recent Ian Carroll interview on Tucker Carlson. Carroll says he was 9 when 9/11 happened and his generation knows that when you see the government acting this way (having spoken throughout the interview about the Las Vegas shooting) it's because they're covering up one of these things. Tucker responds "By the way, when I act that way I'm covering something up. When you do too, that's a human thing. If I'm hiding something, if I'm lying about something there's a reason. I'm not doing it - unless I'm some total sociopath freak - I'm not doing it for fun. I'm doing it because I'm trying to conceal something."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_Vt_Lo5SiE&t=8153s
What is it they say? When someone tells you who they are, believe them.
It's a difficult one with Tucker Carlson because I do think he does a lot of interviews that reveal a lot of truth and he's attacked for that by the right people, which does seem to be genuine. But he does also tell lies about 9/11. They're not mistakes at this point, they're lies. And occasionally it's as if his subconscious leaks out an admission about that. I think this is an example of exactly that.
Edit: Just watching the end of the interview and there's another bit worth pointing out - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_Vt_Lo5SiE&t=8500s
TC: So what you're saying is that mass formation psychology clearly has taken hold among a bunch of people where it's like they just can't think clearly.
IC: Well I don't think that it takes hold by accident. I think that it's the kind of thing that only happens when you have a massive propaganda campaign and basically a state-sponsored operation to control the information space ... [Tucker cuts him off.]
TC: Well there's definitely some of that, flat out we know because I'm watching it and I'm not gonna, whatever, I should just shut up now because I know too many people involved and I love them all, honestly.