How did we EVER buy into the “official” narrative of what (((they))) said happened… (It’s embarrassing 🫣😔)…Especially when the ‘facts’ of their narrative contradict even the Laws of Physics! 🙄 The truth is SO obvious now that the story we were SOLD is just ridiculous. 😒😠
We KNOW the Truth of who was behind 9/11…🤔
Would Trump/ANYONE EVER TRUTHFULLY expose it⁉️🤔 …Doubtful. Add it to the EVER-GROWING List of Government Lies… 🤨😒
The moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet? That use the Jews as a scapegoat? Most likely Roman with names like Orsini? Or do We cling to the scapegoat as the "perp?"
Carlson is an excellent actor and fits his role. He’s handsome, charming and quite the alpha male. He doesn’t have to memorize a script. He’s able to speak extemporaneously.
He’s also the son of a CIA operative. Like father, like son.
Yep, if you can fake "sincere," you've got it made...
I get a similar vibe from people like Naomi Wolf: Telling us EXACTLY what we want to hear - and in an ultra-warm and empathetic way, too. Oh, my! Funny how a lifetime of Yale, Oxford, working for the Clintons, and schmoozing with the NY Upper East Side set had never aroused any suspicion in her as to what the elites were really after, since the time of Babylon.
Yes. Ms. Wolf is one of the many sheep in wolves’ clothing. Or perhaps they’re Judas Goats. No doubt many have been trained in their roles in Hollywood and on the news programs.
Nick Fuentes is right about all these "new awakened"...It reminds me the "marranos", in Spain, that converse falsely to avoid being kick out of the Catholic Kingdom.
"The World Order sets up countless groups to promote any type of idea, and then sets up other groups to fanatically oppose them, but the masters have no dedication to anything except slavery."
Thanks for the excellent post. It Reflects a deep understanding.
What happened to the towers goes directly to something of inestimable value, similar to the value in Epstein’s actual product, the utility of transgender and anti racism operations, and the financial covers/ yields of September 11.
Covert cover is a force multiplier for any type of power. Kinetic, compromise, mid level political violence, and wealth for example.
Look 👀 to what they protect the most…. What we’re not allowed to mention.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
"With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!"
DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT super new TECHNOLOGY???
Ask any physics PhD or even profs. if they know anything about it, seldom ANYONE DOES. So looking from that perspective, where Physics Principles being told to every student are :
how on earth 100% of humanity, including T. Carlson suppose to suddenly get educated on that matter and be able to explain the DUSTIFICATION of all the TWC's????
Most people still believe in the hijackers with knifes committing 9/11 and I guess that's where Tucker starts..
Also anthrax 'attacks' which proceeded 9/11 were in fact the reason No 1 why we ended up with covid18 crimes. That's when after 9/11, the US Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act of 20016 and the Bioterrorism Act of 2002,7 which substantially strengthened the ability of the USA to oversee select agents and toxins that could pose public health threats.
Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion"), the Hutchison Effect and how his research explains the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11.
Actually paid $9 for the month of TCN just to see the 9/11 stuff and turned it off after 3 minutes for the reasons you mention I. Your first couple of paragraphs
I watched/listened to episode 1. I won't pay to play on this one. He's still talking about "planes". UGH! And who is this FBI guy? He waits for 24 years to "tell the truth" about our covert ops. WTF.
I'm not a scientist but I knew when they said the jet fuel melted the steel that was a lie. I also already knew about the money the pentagon lost so when bldg 7 went down I suspected something was up.
Glad you responded. I may listen to more of his series on this just to see what else he claims to have found but I'm sure I will just laugh or get pissed.
Thank You for the links to the extremely important court documents of BOTH KEY investigators of 9/11. It is interesting that the courts proceedings filed by DR. MORGAN Reynolds, started in Jan 2008, the year of the biggest banking collapse ever. Do these 2 things, banking frauds and 9/11 frauds have anything in common, by any chance? Because then, clearly exposing one (by Dr. Reynolds FACTS) would lead to the exposure of the second.. It is also INCREDIBLE that all these important investigations were happening so 'early', and yet, until this day in 2025, only few know about it!!!! MSM crimes are enormous.
Oh, Tucker is totally DISAPPOINTING, like the recent congressional hearing on geoengineering, a total cover up.
Concerning bogus science and the laws of physics this time last year rain began falling on the Appalachian Mountains ..the highest rainfall on record. Here is what one eyewitness wrote... There is massive road work going on outside the gates of the COC. Everything past the bridge was wiped out by the flooding. The river has been rerouted and no longer goes under the bridge. The PRMI parking lot is gone. The road past the bridge is gone. It looks like a war zone– or the Grand Canyon: a massive new canyon created by the floods.
Yet this was ' officially' explained by 'exceptional rainfall causing torrential flows.... ' What they failed to mention was the dam and 355 acre reservoir upsteam of this location, where the emergency spillway is known to have activated in the early morning of the 27th Sept. triggering an evacuation warning, which has subsequently been memory-holed. It was a dam-break wave driven by the force of gravity when the build up of water behind gate was released outflow reached super -critical speed before loosing its power impacting structures and terrain in its path. Problem solving ( see my substack) - logical deduction using empirical data to determine the cause of the observed physical damage and casualties .
Remember that Tucker is very much a product of the American post-WW2 well connected political establishment - it’s how he made his wealth - it’s where he has the majority of his social connections, those are the people he grew up with and went to school with - it’s the sea that he has swam in for decades.
I like his stuff, but we can only expect so much from him. To be fully honest and transparent of what happened on 9/11, that would bring the American establishment crashing down. I’m guessing he has a lot of fear about being responsible for that.
Maybe his primary goal is to make it acceptable in “polite society” to start the conversation that the official story of 9/11 is complete hogwash.
He’s not dumb - I’m sure he’s aware of the excellent work of Dr. Judy Wood. My hunch is that he thinks her work is too much for most people to be able to handle at this point.
Many thanks for your excellent work on this Substack, brother !
Re your comment: "He’s not dumb - I’m sure he’s aware of the excellent work of Dr. Judy Wood. My hunch is that he thinks her work is too much for most people to be able to handle at this point."
Wait till my breakdown of episode 4 drops on Saturday, as there is a surprise in store.
My breakdown of episode 2 just dropped.
The Tucker Carlson 9/11 Files | Ep 2
An Alternative Media Talking Head's Mission in Uncovering 9/11 Truth Gone Wrong
So I have an alternate take/question. I understand the concern over specific points in 9/11 truth. All don’t seem to agree but isn’t someone like Tucker bringing this to the forefront a good thing at least to get the conversation started so more people can entertain the official story is a lie? Serious question and I’m not challenging anything in the comments as wrong. But I think all 9/11 truth colleagues can agree the official story is a lie?
It will help you realise, that a whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Thanks for all the info and response. I’ll take a look at all the links. Really appreciate it. What do you think about David Griffins work and his books?
A gentleman that wrote numerous books on 9/11, yet he distances himself from the only two people who took their evidence to court, when NO ONE else, touting bombs, thermite and nukes have?
It should raise eyebrows, especially when he asked people to take his details off their websites if they support the two who went to court?
This info comes directly from one his event and book tour coordinators.
Tucker is wrong in this.
How did we EVER buy into the “official” narrative of what (((they))) said happened… (It’s embarrassing 🫣😔)…Especially when the ‘facts’ of their narrative contradict even the Laws of Physics! 🙄 The truth is SO obvious now that the story we were SOLD is just ridiculous. 😒😠
We KNOW the Truth of who was behind 9/11…🤔
Would Trump/ANYONE EVER TRUTHFULLY expose it⁉️🤔 …Doubtful. Add it to the EVER-GROWING List of Government Lies… 🤨😒
The moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet? That use the Jews as a scapegoat? Most likely Roman with names like Orsini? Or do We cling to the scapegoat as the "perp?"
Carlson is an excellent actor and fits his role. He’s handsome, charming and quite the alpha male. He doesn’t have to memorize a script. He’s able to speak extemporaneously.
He’s also the son of a CIA operative. Like father, like son.
Yep, if you can fake "sincere," you've got it made...
I get a similar vibe from people like Naomi Wolf: Telling us EXACTLY what we want to hear - and in an ultra-warm and empathetic way, too. Oh, my! Funny how a lifetime of Yale, Oxford, working for the Clintons, and schmoozing with the NY Upper East Side set had never aroused any suspicion in her as to what the elites were really after, since the time of Babylon.
Yes. Ms. Wolf is one of the many sheep in wolves’ clothing. Or perhaps they’re Judas Goats. No doubt many have been trained in their roles in Hollywood and on the news programs.
Really?! I wont even start it...
Money talks and Bullshit walks.
Nick Fuentes is right about all these "new awakened"...It reminds me the "marranos", in Spain, that converse falsely to avoid being kick out of the Catholic Kingdom.
If he were real, he wouldn't touch it, rather than lie.
"The World Order sets up countless groups to promote any type of idea, and then sets up other groups to fanatically oppose them, but the masters have no dedication to anything except slavery."
The World Order
Eustace Mullins
1992
Keep in mind:
Tucker's father was in the CIA.
Tucker applied for the CIA but was rejected.
If the CIA can't remove all evidence that an operative applied for the CIA
then the cover story would be that they applied but were rejected.
Thanks for the excellent post. It Reflects a deep understanding.
What happened to the towers goes directly to something of inestimable value, similar to the value in Epstein’s actual product, the utility of transgender and anti racism operations, and the financial covers/ yields of September 11.
Covert cover is a force multiplier for any type of power. Kinetic, compromise, mid level political violence, and wealth for example.
Look 👀 to what they protect the most…. What we’re not allowed to mention.
It’s all one war.
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
"With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!"
DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT super new TECHNOLOGY???
Ask any physics PhD or even profs. if they know anything about it, seldom ANYONE DOES. So looking from that perspective, where Physics Principles being told to every student are :
https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/10-fundamental-laws-of-physics-explained
how on earth 100% of humanity, including T. Carlson suppose to suddenly get educated on that matter and be able to explain the DUSTIFICATION of all the TWC's????
Most people still believe in the hijackers with knifes committing 9/11 and I guess that's where Tucker starts..
Also anthrax 'attacks' which proceeded 9/11 were in fact the reason No 1 why we ended up with covid18 crimes. That's when after 9/11, the US Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act of 20016 and the Bioterrorism Act of 2002,7 which substantially strengthened the ability of the USA to oversee select agents and toxins that could pose public health threats.
Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion"), the Hutchison Effect and how his research explains the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11.
Have a listen to him discuss the patent for dustification: https://rumble.com/v70cfss-us-navy-dustification-patent.html
Actually paid $9 for the month of TCN just to see the 9/11 stuff and turned it off after 3 minutes for the reasons you mention I. Your first couple of paragraphs
Great job on this post as always 😄
I watched/listened to episode 1. I won't pay to play on this one. He's still talking about "planes". UGH! And who is this FBI guy? He waits for 24 years to "tell the truth" about our covert ops. WTF.
I'm not a scientist but I knew when they said the jet fuel melted the steel that was a lie. I also already knew about the money the pentagon lost so when bldg 7 went down I suspected something was up.
Glad you responded. I may listen to more of his series on this just to see what else he claims to have found but I'm sure I will just laugh or get pissed.
My write ups of episode 2 to 5 will drop daily from Thursday through till Sunday.
Tucker did his duty. That was way worse than I expected, and I did not have remotely moderate expectations.
Yeah, keep an eye out for my debriefs of episodes 2 through 5 dropping today, through to Sunday.
Thank You for the links to the extremely important court documents of BOTH KEY investigators of 9/11. It is interesting that the courts proceedings filed by DR. MORGAN Reynolds, started in Jan 2008, the year of the biggest banking collapse ever. Do these 2 things, banking frauds and 9/11 frauds have anything in common, by any chance? Because then, clearly exposing one (by Dr. Reynolds FACTS) would lead to the exposure of the second.. It is also INCREDIBLE that all these important investigations were happening so 'early', and yet, until this day in 2025, only few know about it!!!! MSM crimes are enormous.
Oh, Tucker is totally DISAPPOINTING, like the recent congressional hearing on geoengineering, a total cover up.
Concerning bogus science and the laws of physics this time last year rain began falling on the Appalachian Mountains ..the highest rainfall on record. Here is what one eyewitness wrote... There is massive road work going on outside the gates of the COC. Everything past the bridge was wiped out by the flooding. The river has been rerouted and no longer goes under the bridge. The PRMI parking lot is gone. The road past the bridge is gone. It looks like a war zone– or the Grand Canyon: a massive new canyon created by the floods.
Yet this was ' officially' explained by 'exceptional rainfall causing torrential flows.... ' What they failed to mention was the dam and 355 acre reservoir upsteam of this location, where the emergency spillway is known to have activated in the early morning of the 27th Sept. triggering an evacuation warning, which has subsequently been memory-holed. It was a dam-break wave driven by the force of gravity when the build up of water behind gate was released outflow reached super -critical speed before loosing its power impacting structures and terrain in its path. Problem solving ( see my substack) - logical deduction using empirical data to determine the cause of the observed physical damage and casualties .
Remember that Tucker is very much a product of the American post-WW2 well connected political establishment - it’s how he made his wealth - it’s where he has the majority of his social connections, those are the people he grew up with and went to school with - it’s the sea that he has swam in for decades.
I like his stuff, but we can only expect so much from him. To be fully honest and transparent of what happened on 9/11, that would bring the American establishment crashing down. I’m guessing he has a lot of fear about being responsible for that.
Maybe his primary goal is to make it acceptable in “polite society” to start the conversation that the official story of 9/11 is complete hogwash.
He’s not dumb - I’m sure he’s aware of the excellent work of Dr. Judy Wood. My hunch is that he thinks her work is too much for most people to be able to handle at this point.
Many thanks for your excellent work on this Substack, brother !
Re your comment: "He’s not dumb - I’m sure he’s aware of the excellent work of Dr. Judy Wood. My hunch is that he thinks her work is too much for most people to be able to handle at this point."
Wait till my breakdown of episode 4 drops on Saturday, as there is a surprise in store.
My breakdown of episode 2 just dropped.
The Tucker Carlson 9/11 Files | Ep 2
An Alternative Media Talking Head's Mission in Uncovering 9/11 Truth Gone Wrong
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-tucker-carlson-911-files-ep-2
So I have an alternate take/question. I understand the concern over specific points in 9/11 truth. All don’t seem to agree but isn’t someone like Tucker bringing this to the forefront a good thing at least to get the conversation started so more people can entertain the official story is a lie? Serious question and I’m not challenging anything in the comments as wrong. But I think all 9/11 truth colleagues can agree the official story is a lie?
What you need to remember is that the 9/11 "truth" movement was infiltrated by bad actors from the get go in 2005. Read my following article.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
It will help you realise, that a whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Thanks for all the info and response. I’ll take a look at all the links. Really appreciate it. What do you think about David Griffins work and his books?
Let me ask you this.
A gentleman that wrote numerous books on 9/11, yet he distances himself from the only two people who took their evidence to court, when NO ONE else, touting bombs, thermite and nukes have?
It should raise eyebrows, especially when he asked people to take his details off their websites if they support the two who went to court?
This info comes directly from one his event and book tour coordinators.