Corbett, another disappointment. I just found him a year ago. But how can I trust him on other topics if I know he's lying about 9/11? What happens to these people?
Side note, Jerm Warfare replied to my comment asking him why he showed the Fetzer interview after Fetzer has been proven untrustworthy and an asshole (mentioned his harassment of Dr Wood.)
He said his "problem" with the Dr Wood camp is (approximate quotation), "they never say who did it."
I wanted to msg you privately but I don't have a way to do that.
I think Fetzer suffers from the arrogance of most in academia and the medical profession in that they can not admit that they may have gotten things wrong. It is a humbling experience to realize most of what we learned in school, heard or read in the media, and perhaps even insisted we knew - was wrong. It is perhaps harder for people that are older because the indoctrination has been longer and recognizing it requires leaving your comfort level.
I suggest reading Andrew Johnson's two free e-books, linked in my article and listen to the clip embedded in the article, where Fetzer used to be a Dr Wood fanboy, but once she started talking about the "Hutchison Effect, "cold fusion" and the energy aspects, Fetzer THREATENED her...
Jim Fetzer (non scientist) Threatens Dr Judy Wood In Major Cover Up Scandal
Jewell- I also try to see the best in people, try to see how situations made them do what they did, but when I started reading Andrew Johnson's book, it was clear that Fetzer was bad-intentioned. He's been on the scene all along to steer honest people away from the real truth (directed energy) and its implications for humanity. He's been in the stew pot from the beginning, in fact he knew it was directed energy before we all did...
But your argument is why I don't talk with my mom about a lot of politics. It's just too much.
I didn't discover Dr Wood's work until a few years ago. Someone mentioned her name in the comments section of a YouTube doco about 911, and that led me to further researching including her book, interviews, presentations, and the excellent documentatary Where Did The Towers Go by a young Canadian guy, which I've downloaded and saved. But the first things that made me doubt the official story were two pieces of information in older docos on the topic. First was a US navy Top Gun instructor, A-grade pilot, who said he didn't think even he could hit the towers flying a plane at the trajectory and speed that was given. It would be just too difficult, so there's no way a couple of hijackers with crappy training could accomplish it. Second, was an aeronautical engineer who said that a passenger jet can't fly at 500 mph at 1000 feet - the airframe would simply disintegrate from the stress. They can only fly that fast at cruising altitudes around 30,000 feet where the air is much thinner, thus less resistance.
Boom. The official narrative dies then and there, without anything further.
Of course, some of the "truthers" say a missile was involved or a remote controlled military jet hit the towers. Again, nonsense, but either way there were no muslims or hijackers in the mix, so the followup of invading Afghanistan and Iraq to "stop terror" etc was a load of baloney.
911 was NOT a terrorist strike. It was something else entirely.
One or two shills somewhere have written that the towers weren't built well or were "built to fail" whatever that means, or designed to be demolished as if 911 was already planned ahead in 1966 or whenever. That seems unlikely, and just more misinformation or bullshit. As I've mentioned in other posts, there are two steel-framed buildings in the US still standing strong which are more or less exact replicas of the twin towers except smaller. One is the 52 storey BOK - Bank of Oklahoma - Tower in Tulsa, built in 1976, and designed by the same architect as the WTC, the other "skyscraper" is the taller 83 storey Aon Center in Chicago, built in 1973. Interestingly this was formerly the Standard Oil Building, giving it a Rockefeller connection like the New York twin towers.
I'm not in America, but I'm sure a visit to either of these buildings would indicate they are well occupied, in good condition, and not at any risk of falling down from a fire in a wastebasket or electrical fault. Not that I am an engineer of any kind. Just an observer:).
On the contrary Gecko1, 911 was a terrorist strike. The terrorists are unfortunately the "good guys", or actually the Israelis. In closing, I will add 'the suit and tie is the uniform of the modern-day criminal'.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 page NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a “nuclear bomb” can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
You can message me on this platform's messenger function...
This is what you should reply to Jerm ;-)
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialize in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
I really had to think about the reply. I wanted to hit him back with his own subject matter... so here's what I said:
Hey Jeremy, you wrote that your “issue with the DEW arguments is that they don’t look at who was behind it, and why.”
I hear your argument, but let me ask you- Who controlled Epstein and why? Even if we have evidence he was a CIA or Mossad asset, who told the CIA/Mossad to use him?
Who brainwashed the West and my country especially, the US, into thinking China is a dirty, rotten, censored hellhole? We don’t know who specifically ordered this disinformation campaign, but that doesn’t stop us from fighting it.
Who decided blue collar workers should no longer get actual pay raises, to keep up with the cost of living? Sure, individual companies made their own decisions, but who masterminded the impoverishment of the middle class in the US, Europe and allied countries? We don’t know but we still are interested.
Who started the idea that we can change genders and pushed it on the public? We know who benefits from it, but who had the idea to turn cross-dressing into a psychological disorder worthy of major medical intervention?
Who pushes theories that ancient societies were stupid so thus needed alien help for their accomplishments? And why?
Who ordered MLK’s death? Who ordered Kennedy’s death? The CIA isn’t a good enough answer. It’s not specific. Who directed the CIA to eliminate these people?
You’re interested in a lot of topics where it is nearly impossible with our current information to know the perpetrator. That does not mean you’re not interested.
I will grant you one point- I also wish the “DEW camp” explained to people why and how “free energy” would completely change the world. I am at fault here for not looking into this further, at least not yet. But I’m pretty sure that the change would be awesome beyond words. I’m a small farmer and can see how super cheap energy would make me competitive against monopolies. But it is hard to even imagine how our lives would be so different- so much better- if energy were free. And I’m sorry I don’t know who talks about that, if anybody. Maybe you should! Wink.
We do know where to start - The 23 NIST subcontractors, who were part and parcel of the cover-up as soon as the clean-up started as well as the NIST Report that was made up by their bogus science reports.
I've shared the following, that I've put on a MEME with him a number of times...
Hell, he even interviewed me!
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a “nuclear bomb” can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
"But how can I trust him on other topics if I know he's lying about 9/11? "
Exactly. I recommending read his 'The Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect' newsletter from Dec 11th 2023. He's been hoisted by his own petard!
His omission of Dr.Woods forensic investigation of the 9/11 event is not a trivial thing. I now no longer trust him and find myself increasingly distancing myself from his work. Which is a shame, really, as he's done so much insightful analysis! However, this subject is too important to dismiss and I feel it's a major, MAJOR oversight.
It's obvious the public can't know exactly who was involved in the directed energy attack. "Dr Woods camp" deals in evidence, not speculation. Why is evidence and not speculation a problem for Jerm Warfare when it comes to 9/11?
Jerm and I had a huge fight on his private Telegram group...
This was his last statement;
"Again, it’s not about working through anything. I’m not sure how else to type this. Going after people is not efficient. You might be right in your position, but your strategy is inefficient. It’s like a false positive. Winning me over simply with a persuasive argument is using a true positive."
I then commented with this:
Persuasive argument? Ok, here it is: 9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
GERM is controlled opposition. When Jeremy Null first got syndicated, one of the first things he did on air was to publicize the plop plop, fiz fiz of his daily antacid routine and verbalize what he was doing (taking antacids to combat his indegestion). I stopped listening to him after that.
Stomach acid is important to not only digest and assimilate as much nutritional value as possible but also acts as a second line of defense against microbes and parasites (after the first line of defense, the saliva). Antacids are the antithesis to healthy living.
Yeah, lost respect for Corbett on this, and his CHD stuff. Smells bad. His face goes blank when Judy Wood is mentioned. Jason Bermas, who drew me in with his film, writes off Wood. Bye Jason.
I stopped reading Corbett after he published his stand-by psyop, "Popular Uprising Against the CBDC", to which I pointed out the ruse in September, 2023:
While I was not familiar with the technical term, I called my readers' attention to false hope as early as October, 2022 in "The Weaponization of Hope" (after that, "weaponize" became a fashionable term among "alt" authors):
I saw a clip of him with Derrick Broze, Corbett says he did a FOI request to see if they had isolated terrain - that's how uninformed he is about the no virus issue - how can someone smear something they know not even the basic thing about. Mind blowing
90% truth, 10% lies. Or 10% truth, 90% lies. Or somewhere in the middle?
Go with you gut instinct Derek. Of the three human thought centers, the brain, the heart, and the gastrointestinal tract (i.e. the stomach), the stomach has more cells. There is some truth to trust your gut instinct.
This is a good post. To me, it is too nice to say Corbett "errs". Besides Judy Wood, he has blatantly ignored and denied the non-existence of covid virus and the possibility that 5G is dangerous. He is also in cahootz with obvious COINTELPRO op Derek Broze. See details here.
And just to add, it's too late for Media Monarchy to admit DEW on 9.11, the war machine has done its dirty deeds. Media Monarchy needs to pull his head out of his...
Well done sir! Pointing out Corbet, personally I think you are way too kind in your assessment of Corbett. An obvious tool and grifter. Corbett = telling half truths and living with “fraud” as a way of life! He wasn’t stupid, he tipped around topics to keep his audience. Thx for sharing your insights.
My guess is he's some kind of a limited hangout. His background is a TEFL guy in Japan, so he has no expertise in harder disciplines like engineering, finance, science, and so on. He did a huge deep dive into the alleged Arab 911 hijackers - stuff like finding out what kind of pizza they had home delivered the day before the event (joke, but similar). Cannot seem to grasp there were NO planes hijacked so these Mossad stooges are irrelevant.
Know them by their signs. Also, five pointed starts are a huge giveway, especially if they are streaming across the screen. as it is the star of baphomet and also the international symbol of zionism.
I also used to listen to JC but hes a gatekeeper and promoter of architects and engineers etc
Corbett, another disappointment. I just found him a year ago. But how can I trust him on other topics if I know he's lying about 9/11? What happens to these people?
Side note, Jerm Warfare replied to my comment asking him why he showed the Fetzer interview after Fetzer has been proven untrustworthy and an asshole (mentioned his harassment of Dr Wood.)
He said his "problem" with the Dr Wood camp is (approximate quotation), "they never say who did it."
I wanted to msg you privately but I don't have a way to do that.
I think Fetzer suffers from the arrogance of most in academia and the medical profession in that they can not admit that they may have gotten things wrong. It is a humbling experience to realize most of what we learned in school, heard or read in the media, and perhaps even insisted we knew - was wrong. It is perhaps harder for people that are older because the indoctrination has been longer and recognizing it requires leaving your comfort level.
Sorry, but Fetzer is COINTELPRO.
I suggest reading Andrew Johnson's two free e-books, linked in my article and listen to the clip embedded in the article, where Fetzer used to be a Dr Wood fanboy, but once she started talking about the "Hutchison Effect, "cold fusion" and the energy aspects, Fetzer THREATENED her...
Jim Fetzer (non scientist) Threatens Dr Judy Wood In Major Cover Up Scandal
Video clip: https://rumble.com/v6n5nti-jim-fetzer-non-scientist-threatens-dr-judy-wood-in-major-cover-up-scandal.html
more likely he got the phone call.
No, you should read Andrew Johnson's two free downloadable E-Books to find out who he is working for.
Unfortunately I'm not going to spoon feed people.
It's time y'all do your own research and start getting angry and supporting Patricia Casazza...
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
Jewell- I also try to see the best in people, try to see how situations made them do what they did, but when I started reading Andrew Johnson's book, it was clear that Fetzer was bad-intentioned. He's been on the scene all along to steer honest people away from the real truth (directed energy) and its implications for humanity. He's been in the stew pot from the beginning, in fact he knew it was directed energy before we all did...
But your argument is why I don't talk with my mom about a lot of politics. It's just too much.
It's truly frustrating that I ask people to do their due diligence, then they don't.
Too many "truth seekers" seem to be conspiracytainment consumers, instead of doing their own research..
Thank you that you actually did your due diligence by reading Andrew's two books.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Fetzer is certainly controlled opposition kept on a leash by the CIA.
You'll enjoy this article.
The Nuking of Joe Olsen and James Fetzer
It's laughable how people can be so wrong.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-nuking-of-joe-olsen-and-james
I didn't discover Dr Wood's work until a few years ago. Someone mentioned her name in the comments section of a YouTube doco about 911, and that led me to further researching including her book, interviews, presentations, and the excellent documentatary Where Did The Towers Go by a young Canadian guy, which I've downloaded and saved. But the first things that made me doubt the official story were two pieces of information in older docos on the topic. First was a US navy Top Gun instructor, A-grade pilot, who said he didn't think even he could hit the towers flying a plane at the trajectory and speed that was given. It would be just too difficult, so there's no way a couple of hijackers with crappy training could accomplish it. Second, was an aeronautical engineer who said that a passenger jet can't fly at 500 mph at 1000 feet - the airframe would simply disintegrate from the stress. They can only fly that fast at cruising altitudes around 30,000 feet where the air is much thinner, thus less resistance.
Boom. The official narrative dies then and there, without anything further.
Of course, some of the "truthers" say a missile was involved or a remote controlled military jet hit the towers. Again, nonsense, but either way there were no muslims or hijackers in the mix, so the followup of invading Afghanistan and Iraq to "stop terror" etc was a load of baloney.
911 was NOT a terrorist strike. It was something else entirely.
If you ever want to have a face to face discussion, send me a mail.
norman@ic911a.org
One or two shills somewhere have written that the towers weren't built well or were "built to fail" whatever that means, or designed to be demolished as if 911 was already planned ahead in 1966 or whenever. That seems unlikely, and just more misinformation or bullshit. As I've mentioned in other posts, there are two steel-framed buildings in the US still standing strong which are more or less exact replicas of the twin towers except smaller. One is the 52 storey BOK - Bank of Oklahoma - Tower in Tulsa, built in 1976, and designed by the same architect as the WTC, the other "skyscraper" is the taller 83 storey Aon Center in Chicago, built in 1973. Interestingly this was formerly the Standard Oil Building, giving it a Rockefeller connection like the New York twin towers.
I'm not in America, but I'm sure a visit to either of these buildings would indicate they are well occupied, in good condition, and not at any risk of falling down from a fire in a wastebasket or electrical fault. Not that I am an engineer of any kind. Just an observer:).
On the contrary Gecko1, 911 was a terrorist strike. The terrorists are unfortunately the "good guys", or actually the Israelis. In closing, I will add 'the suit and tie is the uniform of the modern-day criminal'.
911 is freemasonic coding.
9x11 = 99
99 inverts to 66 :).
It's a little bit more layered than that..
Let's do a thought experiment, to who the team behind 9/11 could be and what roles they played.
Have a listen: https://rumble.com/v6u8p8z-who-is-the-team-behind-911.html
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 page NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a “nuclear bomb” can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Open Letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girls-explosive-plea-a
You can message me on this platform's messenger function...
This is what you should reply to Jerm ;-)
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialize in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
I really had to think about the reply. I wanted to hit him back with his own subject matter... so here's what I said:
Hey Jeremy, you wrote that your “issue with the DEW arguments is that they don’t look at who was behind it, and why.”
I hear your argument, but let me ask you- Who controlled Epstein and why? Even if we have evidence he was a CIA or Mossad asset, who told the CIA/Mossad to use him?
Who brainwashed the West and my country especially, the US, into thinking China is a dirty, rotten, censored hellhole? We don’t know who specifically ordered this disinformation campaign, but that doesn’t stop us from fighting it.
Who decided blue collar workers should no longer get actual pay raises, to keep up with the cost of living? Sure, individual companies made their own decisions, but who masterminded the impoverishment of the middle class in the US, Europe and allied countries? We don’t know but we still are interested.
Who started the idea that we can change genders and pushed it on the public? We know who benefits from it, but who had the idea to turn cross-dressing into a psychological disorder worthy of major medical intervention?
Who pushes theories that ancient societies were stupid so thus needed alien help for their accomplishments? And why?
Who ordered MLK’s death? Who ordered Kennedy’s death? The CIA isn’t a good enough answer. It’s not specific. Who directed the CIA to eliminate these people?
You’re interested in a lot of topics where it is nearly impossible with our current information to know the perpetrator. That does not mean you’re not interested.
I will grant you one point- I also wish the “DEW camp” explained to people why and how “free energy” would completely change the world. I am at fault here for not looking into this further, at least not yet. But I’m pretty sure that the change would be awesome beyond words. I’m a small farmer and can see how super cheap energy would make me competitive against monopolies. But it is hard to even imagine how our lives would be so different- so much better- if energy were free. And I’m sorry I don’t know who talks about that, if anybody. Maybe you should! Wink.
Rather good reply :-)
We do know where to start - The 23 NIST subcontractors, who were part and parcel of the cover-up as soon as the clean-up started as well as the NIST Report that was made up by their bogus science reports.
I've shared the following, that I've put on a MEME with him a number of times...
Hell, he even interviewed me!
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a “nuclear bomb” can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Dear Rachel, the answers to some of your question might be found here:
https://dn720001.ca.archive.org/0/items/toronto_protocols_666_20230218_1604/toronto_protocols_666.pdf
and here:
https://www.jchristoff.com/blog/the-dr-richard-day-tapes-secret-society-insider-steps-forward-with-some-scary-truths
Source for second link:
https://www.jchristoff.com/blog/the-6-source-documents-and-one-confession-that-explain-what-s-happening
"But how can I trust him on other topics if I know he's lying about 9/11? "
Exactly. I recommending read his 'The Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect' newsletter from Dec 11th 2023. He's been hoisted by his own petard!
His omission of Dr.Woods forensic investigation of the 9/11 event is not a trivial thing. I now no longer trust him and find myself increasingly distancing myself from his work. Which is a shame, really, as he's done so much insightful analysis! However, this subject is too important to dismiss and I feel it's a major, MAJOR oversight.
It's obvious the public can't know exactly who was involved in the directed energy attack. "Dr Woods camp" deals in evidence, not speculation. Why is evidence and not speculation a problem for Jerm Warfare when it comes to 9/11?
Jerm and I had a huge fight on his private Telegram group...
This was his last statement;
"Again, it’s not about working through anything. I’m not sure how else to type this. Going after people is not efficient. You might be right in your position, but your strategy is inefficient. It’s like a false positive. Winning me over simply with a persuasive argument is using a true positive."
I then commented with this:
Persuasive argument? Ok, here it is: 9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
The conversation was then ended with him agreeing...
GERM is controlled opposition. When Jeremy Null first got syndicated, one of the first things he did on air was to publicize the plop plop, fiz fiz of his daily antacid routine and verbalize what he was doing (taking antacids to combat his indegestion). I stopped listening to him after that.
Stomach acid is important to not only digest and assimilate as much nutritional value as possible but also acts as a second line of defense against microbes and parasites (after the first line of defense, the saliva). Antacids are the antithesis to healthy living.
Jerm is a personal friend of mine, and is anything but controlled opposition.
Yeah, lost respect for Corbett on this, and his CHD stuff. Smells bad. His face goes blank when Judy Wood is mentioned. Jason Bermas, who drew me in with his film, writes off Wood. Bye Jason.
Any idea what the buzzing is from the radio communications in the TAP talk video?
Which of the video's are you referring to?
I stopped reading Corbett after he published his stand-by psyop, "Popular Uprising Against the CBDC", to which I pointed out the ruse in September, 2023:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/popular-uprising-against-the-cbdcs
While I was not familiar with the technical term, I called my readers' attention to false hope as early as October, 2022 in "The Weaponization of Hope" (after that, "weaponize" became a fashionable term among "alt" authors):
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-weaponization-of-hope
Corbett also smeared the no virus community.
I saw a clip of him with Derrick Broze, Corbett says he did a FOI request to see if they had isolated terrain - that's how uninformed he is about the no virus issue - how can someone smear something they know not even the basic thing about. Mind blowing
Yet- he’s produced some insightful content. It’s concerning.
I think these guys have to operate within boundaries.
Are you saying they compromise for money?
Have a listen to this clip, pertaining to influencers, podcasters and "researchers" - https://x.com/i/status/2024443595953230291
Thanks. Blackmail and bribery are effective tactics.
I am deeply grateful for your investigation & reporting work. Thanks for staying on it.
I stopped watching and support James Corbett because of this. Something feels wrong about him now.
90% truth, 10% lies. Or 10% truth, 90% lies. Or somewhere in the middle?
Go with you gut instinct Derek. Of the three human thought centers, the brain, the heart, and the gastrointestinal tract (i.e. the stomach), the stomach has more cells. There is some truth to trust your gut instinct.
This is a good post. To me, it is too nice to say Corbett "errs". Besides Judy Wood, he has blatantly ignored and denied the non-existence of covid virus and the possibility that 5G is dangerous. He is also in cahootz with obvious COINTELPRO op Derek Broze. See details here.
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/isolated-terrain
And just to add, it's too late for Media Monarchy to admit DEW on 9.11, the war machine has done its dirty deeds. Media Monarchy needs to pull his head out of his...
Thank you for this... I've challenged Derek Bronze to cover this and you should too, Proton.
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
Donald Rumsfeld announces 2.3 Trillion missing from the Pentagon on September 10th 2001
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpSBUgbxBU
The next day a fake jet liner (Deep State DOD/CIA Drone) crashed in to the very office doing the audit and it was destroyed. No more questions asked.
Some reading for you on the PentaCON...
The PentaCON on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Pentagon 9/11 Whistleblower on Redacted
US Army member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/pentagon-911-whistleblower-on-redacted
Well done sir! Pointing out Corbet, personally I think you are way too kind in your assessment of Corbett. An obvious tool and grifter. Corbett = telling half truths and living with “fraud” as a way of life! He wasn’t stupid, he tipped around topics to keep his audience. Thx for sharing your insights.
My guess is he's some kind of a limited hangout. His background is a TEFL guy in Japan, so he has no expertise in harder disciplines like engineering, finance, science, and so on. He did a huge deep dive into the alleged Arab 911 hijackers - stuff like finding out what kind of pizza they had home delivered the day before the event (joke, but similar). Cannot seem to grasp there were NO planes hijacked so these Mossad stooges are irrelevant.
just started listening to the first vid (few min in) of corbett report, just a cute note - a 33% discount for subscribers to buy the CD
Know them by their signs. Also, five pointed starts are a huge giveway, especially if they are streaming across the screen. as it is the star of baphomet and also the international symbol of zionism.