I’m sorry if I seem stupid, I agree that these were controlled demolitions but there is video of the second plane apparently crashing and there were eye witnesses. How are people seeking to understand the truth reconcile this
One is not stupid for asking questions. That is how we learn.
No, the damage to the WTC complex was not due to any conventional controlled demolition.
Read the following articles, for more clarity on the destruction and disintegration of the Twins, Buildings 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and the Bankers Trust building.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Now, with regards to the alleged planes - I suggest you read the following articles and then make time to watch the documentary, I will be linking below, as it covers all three sites on September 11, 2001 - The WTC, the hoodwink at Shanksville AND the PentaCON.
The 9/11 Plane & No Plane debate settled
Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001
sorry, long comment... Maybe there is some hope for 9/11 better understanding with the Epstein files...? Definitely the HSBC funding of special operations is of some value, but it is:
2. "A.B. Kronganl, Mr. Krongard has served as an independent director of Apollo and as a member of the audit committee of our board of directors since
2011. From 2001 to 2004. Mr. Krongard served as Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. From 1998 to 2001. Mr. Krongard served as
Counselor to the Director of Central Intelligence. Prior to 1998. Mr. Krongard served in various capacities at Alex Brown. Incorporated, including serving as
Chief Executive Officer beginning in 1991 and assuming additional duties as Chairman of the Board of Directors in 1994. Upon the merger of Alex Brown. Incorporated with Bankers Trust Corporation in 1997. Mr. Krongard served as Vice-
Chairman of the Board of Bankers Trust Corporation and served in such capacity until joining the Central Intelligence Agency. Mr. Krongard serves as the
Lead Director and audit committee Chairman of Under Armour. Inc. and also serves as a board member of Iridium Communications Inc. Mr. Krongard
graduated with honors from Princeton University and received a J.D. from the University of Maryland School of Law, where he also graduated with honors.
Mr. Krongard also serves as the Vice-Chair of the Johns Hopkins Health System. Mr. Krongards comprehensive corporate background contributes to the
range of experience of the board of directors." from page 261.
Page 274 from that doc shows WHO invests in that s.c. APOLLO Operating Group Unit, No 1, with MILLIONS of $'s, is LEON BLACK, the one mentioned zillion time in Epstein files.
Thanks for not thinking my question was stupid but this is how we learn i agree? Thanks for supplying these links I will check them out. I appreciate what your doing I believe that shining the light on 9/11 highlights the lengths governments will go to in order to push agendas, push their narratives and propaganda and ridicule anyone who seeks the truth. I’m glad I found your Substack thanks for all you do
The saddest part about 9/11 and what followed is the following....
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr. Morgan Reynolds - TAP (Truth Action Project) February 17, 5pm PT; 8pm ET
In this TAP Talk we will find out how Dr. Reynolds became a 9/11 truther; how he came to know Judy Wood, formed a “no planes” perspective, and like Wood, filed a lawsuit to correct the (NIST) record, and most recently, teamed up with John Herold in a thought experiment to question AI, indeed challenge AI, to produce an honest account of what happened on September 11th.
I’ve begun reading the court filings I’m taking particular interest in this plane that appears on the news seemingly crashing into the 2nd tower live on TV. So are they saying this was like a movie effect? I saw the word cartoon in the document though I wouldn’t have used that word it didn’t look cartoonish but I would be more willing to accept it was special effect. They claimed there were eyewitnesses that watched the plain crash, have any of these witnesses been tracked down in the years since? For me the only reason I believed a plane crashed at all was because of that second plane seen crashing on live TV and I’m sure it convinced many others
People saw something in the sky, took pictures and video, there is NO denying that.
Anyone that pushes the CGI narrative or remote-controlled planes are disinformation agents or are seriously compromised or has done f-all research, aka reading.
Now, what did people see / hear / took pictures of, and videoed in the sky over Manhattan on September 11, 2001?
First, we need to start with basic flight physics, aerodynamics, Newton’s 3rd law and basic impact dynamics.
1. Real world example that demolishes the narrative or should have people sit up and take note that something is wrong with the official narrative, is the crash of Flight 587 in NYC on November 12, 2001. The plane got its tail wing sheared off by the pilot and as soon as the plane exceeded 240 knots under 10 000 feet, and as it was falling out of the sky, the engines sheared off.
2. Researchers called Boeing to ask if a commercial jet could exceed 500 mph at 700 feet altitude and the reply was no.
3. This was also confirmed by aeronautical engineers and a multitude of commercial pilots.
4. If you bother reading @PlanesResearch work, you will also come to find the official NTSB data and ACARS PROVE beyond a shadow of a DOUBT that BOTH flight 11 and 175 were STILL AIRBORNE well AFTER they allegedly crashed.
5. NOT one ELT was registered for ALL FOUR alleged planes on 9/11. The AFRCC (Air Force Rescue Coordination Center) informed the 9/11 Commission that NO ELTs were activated at all between 8 a.m. and 10:30 a.m., within a radius of 50 nautical miles (about 57.5 miles) of JFK International Airport on 9/11.
This is an absolute “OFFICIAL FACT”, that neither American 11 or United 175 crashed at the North and South Towers, the officially named targets.
6. Then there is the optics – People refer to the black whale image from the east of flight 175, and if the optics aren’t doing what it’s supposed to do, then one needs to ask the question why.
7. Taking all this into account – The people saw, heard, took pictures of and videoed a real time illusion.
8. For those that know, the term “Project Blue Beam” comes to mind, or more descriptively 3D Volumetric Projection Technology.
9. On how the plane shaped holes were created, watch the documentary - 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality, linked below.
Go read Dr Morgan Reynolds 2007 Qui-Tam whistle-blower case against NIST, for fraudulent impact studies and the affidavit of John Lear…
John Lear - a Retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with 17 world records, including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966.
He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 and for 17 years of his career he worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor.
He was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman.
He also had extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011.
People saw something in the sky, took pictures and video, there is NO denying that.
Anyone that pushes the CGI narrative or remote-controlled planes are disinformation agents or are seriously compromised or has done f-all research, aka reading.
Now, what did people see / hear / took pictures of, and videoed in the sky over Manhattan on September 11, 2001?
First, we need to start with basic flight physics, aerodynamics, Newton’s 3rd law and basic impact dynamics.
1. Real world example that demolishes the narrative or should have people sit up and take note that something is wrong with the official narrative, is the crash of Flight 587 in NYC on November 12, 2001. The plane got its tail wing sheared off by the pilot and as soon as the plane exceeded 240 knots under 10 000 feet, and as it was falling out of the sky, the engines sheared off.
2. Researchers called Boeing to ask if a commercial jet could exceed 500 mph at 700 feet altitude and the reply was no.
3. This was also confirmed by aeronautical engineers and a multitude of commercial pilots.
4. If you bother reading @PlanesResearch work, you will also come to find the official NTSB data and ACARS PROVE beyond a shadow of a DOUBT that BOTH flight 11 and 175 were STILL AIRBORNE well AFTER they allegedly crashed.
5. NOT one ELT was registered for ALL FOUR alleged planes on 9/11. The AFRCC (Air Force Rescue Coordination Center) informed the 9/11 Commission that NO ELTs were activated at all between 8 a.m. and 10:30 a.m., within a radius of 50 nautical miles (about 57.5 miles) of JFK International Airport on 9/11.
This is an absolute “OFFICIAL FACT”, that neither American 11 or United 175 crashed at the North and South Towers, the officially named targets.
6. Then there is the optics – People refer to the black whale image from the east of flight 175, and if the optics aren’t doing what it’s supposed to do, then one needs to ask the question why.
7. Taking all this into account – The people saw, heard, took pictures of and videoed a real time illusion.
8. For those that know, the term “Project Blue Beam” comes to mind, or more descriptively 3D Volumetric Projection Technology.
9. On how the plane shaped holes were created, watch the documentary - 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality, linked below.
Full documentary here: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
I think the evidence supports the theory that no physical planes impacted the WTC, Shanksville or the Pentagon. For the WTC, the evidence suggests some kind of hologram technology was used to fake an image of a plane hitting the tower.
Check out Chapter 8 "Going in Search of Planes" of Andrew Johnson's (free) book- starting on page 84, he goes through a study he did of reports of first responder accounts at the WTC site. Many of the first responders (like EMS people and firefighters) did not see or hear planes. Many were surprised when they were told that a plane had hit the building above them.
Note the book "Where Did the Towers Go" also has many eyewitness accounts. Some of them are really astonishing.
P.s. Much eyewitness testimony has been pulled/eliminated from the public record, and some of the public testimonies that remain are heavily redacted. I bet the most relevant testimonies were erased a long time ago, including any names attached to them.
Yes, I must say that thought had crossed my mind. I suppose that looking on the bright side, if you weren’t a threat you wouldn’t be attacked - so you must be doing it right!
Dr. Hughes brings us closer to comprehending various degrees of awareness in the population. Awareness is predicated upon degree of open mindedness. Like most distributions, 85% unaware to 15% somewhat aware would be reasonable. But why does it seem like to you, you are the only one with a valid opinion? I have studied this for years and am still very curious. Those who have a fixed opinion have closed the door on reason and more learning. The Epstein files will reveal more than those with ready (and reasonable) opinions could have imagined; yes, even you. I suggest you enlarge your tent to accommodate more ideas, to make allies, not enemies, if you truly want to understand. Anything less seems like an attempt to accomplish obfuscation, dissolution, and dissipation of the momentum that others like Judy Woods and Gage have gained in general public awareness.
Her name is Dr. Judy Wood and NOT WoodS. Note that that specific mispelling of her name is a classic sign of a disinfo agent. https://t.me/meslinks/27978
If you would like to try and accuse me of obfuscation, dissolution, and dissipation of the momentum, then tell me why Dr Hughes has ghosted me on emails, and has yet to share or mention the open letter 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza penned in January, after our 5h discussion in December, that was aimed at the Camp 2, 9/11 "truth" movement?
Also, Patricia called out Gage et al, in her TAP talk and again during the interview with Sonia Poulton on Monday February 9th? Here are the particular points I've just raised.
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
"I suggest you enlarge your tent to accommodate more ideas, to make allies, not enemies, if you truly want to understand." Oh, ok. - So let's all agree the moon is made of green cheese.
Then we can all be allies. While we're at it, we can all agree that 2+3=7....because you need to enlarge your tent.
If you disagree that 2+3=7, it's because you're being divisive.. -- it has nothing to do with the fact that 2+3=7 is incorrect.
You go from the ridiculous to the sublime. Concentrate for a moment. Not everyone with alternate facts is your enemy. You seem to have ignored the concept of redundancy. We use it in all critical projects, where failure is not an option. Those in charge of this ugly project would have employed redundant means, technologies, methods, to ensure the buildings dropped, covered by a mirage of aircraft, all sending valuable inquirers scurrying in all directions with their particular hypothesis. A set up for argument, not cooperative discussion.
As to your initial question, perhaps Dr. Hughes suspended discussion ("ghosted" you) because your mind is closed to anything but your ideas.
The subject is dead serious, but do you take yourself too seriously?
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a “nuclear bomb” can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
I think you have misunderstood Hughes words. It can be hard to make written language completely unambiguous. He did not imply that nanothermite was a camp 3 position, but a camp 2 position that seems radical to a new camp 2 recruit.
And please remember that in discussions where much is unknown it is right that there should be a healthy diversity of views,.
No, I think Hughes article is clear. He uses an example of a position from Camp 3 that is too radical for Camp 2, whom are not yet ready to process their ideas. However, I think Hughes "accidentally on purpose" put nanothermite, so that when someone catches on his disinfo, he will say it was a mistake and say actually meant "directed energy".
Tell me why Dr Hughes has ghosted me on emails, and has yet to share or mention the open letter 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza penned in January, after our 5h discussion in December, that was aimed at the Camp 2, 9/11 "truth" movement?
Also, Patricia called out Gage et al, in her TAP talk and again during the interview with Sonia Poulton on Monday February 9th? Here are the particular points I've just raised.
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
I heard Hughes and I'm very disappointed in him. Camp Evidence (Door #3) has been harassed, gaslit, mocked, ignored and a million other things. Dr Hughes is discarding evidence instead of criticizing it. Evidence exists; if one is sincere and doubts the evidence, one gives reasons. Dr Hughes didn't do that. He also passive-agressively disparaged Camp Evidence by likening it to a cult.
I’m sorry if I seem stupid, I agree that these were controlled demolitions but there is video of the second plane apparently crashing and there were eye witnesses. How are people seeking to understand the truth reconcile this
One is not stupid for asking questions. That is how we learn.
No, the damage to the WTC complex was not due to any conventional controlled demolition.
Read the following articles, for more clarity on the destruction and disintegration of the Twins, Buildings 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and the Bankers Trust building.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks
Now, with regards to the alleged planes - I suggest you read the following articles and then make time to watch the documentary, I will be linking below, as it covers all three sites on September 11, 2001 - The WTC, the hoodwink at Shanksville AND the PentaCON.
The 9/11 Plane & No Plane debate settled
Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-the-plane-no-plane-argument
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
Illusion of Reality and the 9/11 Planes
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/illusion-of-reality-and-the-911-planes
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
sorry, long comment... Maybe there is some hope for 9/11 better understanding with the Epstein files...? Definitely the HSBC funding of special operations is of some value, but it is:
Great that you mention ALL the buildings, and in particular the Bankers Trust building, which is mentioned many times in Epstein files. One particular at https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00623392.pdf talks about the
"APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, LLC"
with few very special individuals:
1. LEON BLACK summary on p. 257
and
2. "A.B. Kronganl, Mr. Krongard has served as an independent director of Apollo and as a member of the audit committee of our board of directors since
2011. From 2001 to 2004. Mr. Krongard served as Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. From 1998 to 2001. Mr. Krongard served as
Counselor to the Director of Central Intelligence. Prior to 1998. Mr. Krongard served in various capacities at Alex Brown. Incorporated, including serving as
Chief Executive Officer beginning in 1991 and assuming additional duties as Chairman of the Board of Directors in 1994. Upon the merger of Alex Brown. Incorporated with Bankers Trust Corporation in 1997. Mr. Krongard served as Vice-
Chairman of the Board of Bankers Trust Corporation and served in such capacity until joining the Central Intelligence Agency. Mr. Krongard serves as the
Lead Director and audit committee Chairman of Under Armour. Inc. and also serves as a board member of Iridium Communications Inc. Mr. Krongard
graduated with honors from Princeton University and received a J.D. from the University of Maryland School of Law, where he also graduated with honors.
Mr. Krongard also serves as the Vice-Chair of the Johns Hopkins Health System. Mr. Krongards comprehensive corporate background contributes to the
range of experience of the board of directors." from page 261.
Page 274 from that doc shows WHO invests in that s.c. APOLLO Operating Group Unit, No 1, with MILLIONS of $'s, is LEON BLACK, the one mentioned zillion time in Epstein files.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01010705.pdf
talks about Powell and Bankers Trust...
Epstein is bullshit:)
Thanks for not thinking my question was stupid but this is how we learn i agree? Thanks for supplying these links I will check them out. I appreciate what your doing I believe that shining the light on 9/11 highlights the lengths governments will go to in order to push agendas, push their narratives and propaganda and ridicule anyone who seeks the truth. I’m glad I found your Substack thanks for all you do
The saddest part about 9/11 and what followed is the following....
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Thanks for supplying me with these links it greatly assists the research process.
Dr. Morgan Reynolds - TAP (Truth Action Project) February 17, 5pm PT; 8pm ET
In this TAP Talk we will find out how Dr. Reynolds became a 9/11 truther; how he came to know Judy Wood, formed a “no planes” perspective, and like Wood, filed a lawsuit to correct the (NIST) record, and most recently, teamed up with John Herold in a thought experiment to question AI, indeed challenge AI, to produce an honest account of what happened on September 11th.
- Register here (https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/wKS0S-jPQiuSZRm_T53Mzw#/registration) to reserve your spot in the Zoom presentation and ask him some questions.
Dr. Morgan Reynolds, PhD in Economics, is an author of several books, a professor, and for a brief spell, a policy analyst in government.
Read his full bio here: https://nomoregames.net/bio/
Dr. Morgan considered the 9/11 event in the light of the official claims, and realized the official narrative was false. Read why to revisit September 11th here: https://nomoregames.net/2025/09/11/chatgpt-and-9-11-operation-headfake-introduction-and-chapter-1/
I’ve begun reading the court filings I’m taking particular interest in this plane that appears on the news seemingly crashing into the 2nd tower live on TV. So are they saying this was like a movie effect? I saw the word cartoon in the document though I wouldn’t have used that word it didn’t look cartoonish but I would be more willing to accept it was special effect. They claimed there were eyewitnesses that watched the plain crash, have any of these witnesses been tracked down in the years since? For me the only reason I believed a plane crashed at all was because of that second plane seen crashing on live TV and I’m sure it convinced many others
Nope, it was a real time illusion...
What hit the Twin Towers?
People saw something in the sky, took pictures and video, there is NO denying that.
Anyone that pushes the CGI narrative or remote-controlled planes are disinformation agents or are seriously compromised or has done f-all research, aka reading.
Now, what did people see / hear / took pictures of, and videoed in the sky over Manhattan on September 11, 2001?
First, we need to start with basic flight physics, aerodynamics, Newton’s 3rd law and basic impact dynamics.
1. Real world example that demolishes the narrative or should have people sit up and take note that something is wrong with the official narrative, is the crash of Flight 587 in NYC on November 12, 2001. The plane got its tail wing sheared off by the pilot and as soon as the plane exceeded 240 knots under 10 000 feet, and as it was falling out of the sky, the engines sheared off.
2. Researchers called Boeing to ask if a commercial jet could exceed 500 mph at 700 feet altitude and the reply was no.
3. This was also confirmed by aeronautical engineers and a multitude of commercial pilots.
4. If you bother reading @PlanesResearch work, you will also come to find the official NTSB data and ACARS PROVE beyond a shadow of a DOUBT that BOTH flight 11 and 175 were STILL AIRBORNE well AFTER they allegedly crashed.
5. NOT one ELT was registered for ALL FOUR alleged planes on 9/11. The AFRCC (Air Force Rescue Coordination Center) informed the 9/11 Commission that NO ELTs were activated at all between 8 a.m. and 10:30 a.m., within a radius of 50 nautical miles (about 57.5 miles) of JFK International Airport on 9/11.
This is an absolute “OFFICIAL FACT”, that neither American 11 or United 175 crashed at the North and South Towers, the officially named targets.
Source: https://ia800502.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/19/items/911datasets/NARA_911_Commission_Scanned_Jan_2012.zip&file=NARA_911_Commission_Scanned_Jan_2012%2FGSA%20B79%2003010609-12%20Fdr-%20Entire%20Contents-%20USAF%20Memo%20re%20Langley%20visit-%20OPLOTs-%20Payne%20Stewart%20log-%202002%20Hijack%20procedures%20148.pdf .
6. Then there is the optics – People refer to the black whale image from the east of flight 175, and if the optics aren’t doing what it’s supposed to do, then one needs to ask the question why.
7. Taking all this into account – The people saw, heard, took pictures of and videoed a real time illusion.
8. For those that know, the term “Project Blue Beam” comes to mind, or more descriptively 3D Volumetric Projection Technology.
9. On how the plane shaped holes were created, watch the documentary - 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality, linked below.
Go read Dr Morgan Reynolds 2007 Qui-Tam whistle-blower case against NIST, for fraudulent impact studies and the affidavit of John Lear…
John Lear - a Retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with 17 world records, including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966.
He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 and for 17 years of his career he worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor.
He was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman.
He also had extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011.
In short - He knows WTF he's talking about.
2007 Court filings by Dr Morgan Reynolds against NIST: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Full documentary here: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
Please see this article by 9/11 Planes Research.
Nose-Out vs Dust Explosion?
An Independent Video Analysis
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/analysis-proves-911-nose-out-videos
What hit the Twin Towers?
People saw something in the sky, took pictures and video, there is NO denying that.
Anyone that pushes the CGI narrative or remote-controlled planes are disinformation agents or are seriously compromised or has done f-all research, aka reading.
Now, what did people see / hear / took pictures of, and videoed in the sky over Manhattan on September 11, 2001?
First, we need to start with basic flight physics, aerodynamics, Newton’s 3rd law and basic impact dynamics.
1. Real world example that demolishes the narrative or should have people sit up and take note that something is wrong with the official narrative, is the crash of Flight 587 in NYC on November 12, 2001. The plane got its tail wing sheared off by the pilot and as soon as the plane exceeded 240 knots under 10 000 feet, and as it was falling out of the sky, the engines sheared off.
2. Researchers called Boeing to ask if a commercial jet could exceed 500 mph at 700 feet altitude and the reply was no.
3. This was also confirmed by aeronautical engineers and a multitude of commercial pilots.
4. If you bother reading @PlanesResearch work, you will also come to find the official NTSB data and ACARS PROVE beyond a shadow of a DOUBT that BOTH flight 11 and 175 were STILL AIRBORNE well AFTER they allegedly crashed.
5. NOT one ELT was registered for ALL FOUR alleged planes on 9/11. The AFRCC (Air Force Rescue Coordination Center) informed the 9/11 Commission that NO ELTs were activated at all between 8 a.m. and 10:30 a.m., within a radius of 50 nautical miles (about 57.5 miles) of JFK International Airport on 9/11.
This is an absolute “OFFICIAL FACT”, that neither American 11 or United 175 crashed at the North and South Towers, the officially named targets.
Source: https://ia800502.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/19/items/911datasets/NARA_911_Commission_Scanned_Jan_2012.zip&file=NARA_911_Commission_Scanned_Jan_2012%2FGSA%20B79%2003010609-12%20Fdr-%20Entire%20Contents-%20USAF%20Memo%20re%20Langley%20visit-%20OPLOTs-%20Payne%20Stewart%20log-%202002%20Hijack%20procedures%20148.pdf .
6. Then there is the optics – People refer to the black whale image from the east of flight 175, and if the optics aren’t doing what it’s supposed to do, then one needs to ask the question why.
7. Taking all this into account – The people saw, heard, took pictures of and videoed a real time illusion.
8. For those that know, the term “Project Blue Beam” comes to mind, or more descriptively 3D Volumetric Projection Technology.
9. On how the plane shaped holes were created, watch the documentary - 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality, linked below.
Full documentary here: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
Thank you for all the information it’s very interesting reading.
I think the evidence supports the theory that no physical planes impacted the WTC, Shanksville or the Pentagon. For the WTC, the evidence suggests some kind of hologram technology was used to fake an image of a plane hitting the tower.
Check out Chapter 8 "Going in Search of Planes" of Andrew Johnson's (free) book- starting on page 84, he goes through a study he did of reports of first responder accounts at the WTC site. Many of the first responders (like EMS people and firefighters) did not see or hear planes. Many were surprised when they were told that a plane had hit the building above them.
Note the book "Where Did the Towers Go" also has many eyewitness accounts. Some of them are really astonishing.
Link to Johnson's book:
9-11 - Finding the Truth.pdf https://share.google/FUYU8BIe65KFEMPUb
Here is a rework of "Going in Search of Planes".
Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11
Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/going-in-search-of-planes-in-nyc
P.s. Much eyewitness testimony has been pulled/eliminated from the public record, and some of the public testimonies that remain are heavily redacted. I bet the most relevant testimonies were erased a long time ago, including any names attached to them.
More testimonies you don't hear of...
The Sounds of Explosions on 9/11
Was every BOOM a BOMB?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-explosions-on-911
EXCELLENT piece, thank you
The link to Sarah and Thomas isn’t working, do you have another? https://www.youtube.com/@matrixcutte
The discussion between Sarah and Thomas is embedded in this article, linked below.
DONATE TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation
Where is the money going?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/donate-today-for-911-disinformation
Thank you. 🙏🏻 You certainly weren’t exaggerating - that interview is mind blowing!
I admire your work so much, I’m sorry that you are experiencing this crap.
Can you now only think what Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood have been through the last 18 years?
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia for 15 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
Yes, I must say that thought had crossed my mind. I suppose that looking on the bright side, if you weren’t a threat you wouldn’t be attacked - so you must be doing it right!
Dr. Hughes brings us closer to comprehending various degrees of awareness in the population. Awareness is predicated upon degree of open mindedness. Like most distributions, 85% unaware to 15% somewhat aware would be reasonable. But why does it seem like to you, you are the only one with a valid opinion? I have studied this for years and am still very curious. Those who have a fixed opinion have closed the door on reason and more learning. The Epstein files will reveal more than those with ready (and reasonable) opinions could have imagined; yes, even you. I suggest you enlarge your tent to accommodate more ideas, to make allies, not enemies, if you truly want to understand. Anything less seems like an attempt to accomplish obfuscation, dissolution, and dissipation of the momentum that others like Judy Woods and Gage have gained in general public awareness.
Her name is Dr. Judy Wood and NOT WoodS. Note that that specific mispelling of her name is a classic sign of a disinfo agent. https://t.me/meslinks/27978
If you would like to try and accuse me of obfuscation, dissolution, and dissipation of the momentum, then tell me why Dr Hughes has ghosted me on emails, and has yet to share or mention the open letter 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza penned in January, after our 5h discussion in December, that was aimed at the Camp 2, 9/11 "truth" movement?
Also, Patricia called out Gage et al, in her TAP talk and again during the interview with Sonia Poulton on Monday February 9th? Here are the particular points I've just raised.
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
9/11 Jersey Girl Exposes 9/11 Limited Hangouts (Jan 2026)
Video clip: https://rumble.com/v751yr2-911-jersey-girl-exposes-911-limited-hangouts-jan-2026.html
A message for Richard Gage and AE911 from a 9/11 Jersey Girl
Video clip: https://rumble.com/v75lp22-a-message-for-richard-gage-and-ae911-from-a-911-jersey-girl.html
"I suggest you enlarge your tent to accommodate more ideas, to make allies, not enemies, if you truly want to understand." Oh, ok. - So let's all agree the moon is made of green cheese.
Then we can all be allies. While we're at it, we can all agree that 2+3=7....because you need to enlarge your tent.
If you disagree that 2+3=7, it's because you're being divisive.. -- it has nothing to do with the fact that 2+3=7 is incorrect.
You go from the ridiculous to the sublime. Concentrate for a moment. Not everyone with alternate facts is your enemy. You seem to have ignored the concept of redundancy. We use it in all critical projects, where failure is not an option. Those in charge of this ugly project would have employed redundant means, technologies, methods, to ensure the buildings dropped, covered by a mirage of aircraft, all sending valuable inquirers scurrying in all directions with their particular hypothesis. A set up for argument, not cooperative discussion.
As to your initial question, perhaps Dr. Hughes suspended discussion ("ghosted" you) because your mind is closed to anything but your ideas.
The subject is dead serious, but do you take yourself too seriously?
Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a “nuclear bomb” can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
There are no nuclear bombs, my friend. Nuclear weapons are another psyop and hoax:).
I think you have misunderstood Hughes words. It can be hard to make written language completely unambiguous. He did not imply that nanothermite was a camp 3 position, but a camp 2 position that seems radical to a new camp 2 recruit.
And please remember that in discussions where much is unknown it is right that there should be a healthy diversity of views,.
No, I think Hughes article is clear. He uses an example of a position from Camp 3 that is too radical for Camp 2, whom are not yet ready to process their ideas. However, I think Hughes "accidentally on purpose" put nanothermite, so that when someone catches on his disinfo, he will say it was a mistake and say actually meant "directed energy".
Tell me why Dr Hughes has ghosted me on emails, and has yet to share or mention the open letter 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza penned in January, after our 5h discussion in December, that was aimed at the Camp 2, 9/11 "truth" movement?
Also, Patricia called out Gage et al, in her TAP talk and again during the interview with Sonia Poulton on Monday February 9th? Here are the particular points I've just raised.
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
9/11 Jersey Girl Exposes 9/11 Limited Hangouts (Jan 2026)
Video clip: https://rumble.com/v751yr2-911-jersey-girl-exposes-911-limited-hangouts-jan-2026.html
A message for Richard Gage and AE911 from a 9/11 Jersey Girl
Video clip: https://rumble.com/v75lp22-a-message-for-richard-gage-and-ae911-from-a-911-jersey-girl.html
I heard Hughes and I'm very disappointed in him. Camp Evidence (Door #3) has been harassed, gaslit, mocked, ignored and a million other things. Dr Hughes is discarding evidence instead of criticizing it. Evidence exists; if one is sincere and doubts the evidence, one gives reasons. Dr Hughes didn't do that. He also passive-agressively disparaged Camp Evidence by likening it to a cult.
Plata o plomo, baby 🤷♀️ He chose plata.
And the epstein class all worked overtime in lockstep to silence everything.
Epstein is another psyop. Anything to do with Epstein is bs.
I wouldnt call evidence of misconduct bs.
Epstein is fake.