I started using the Webb tool. When you include your own datasets it does make a difference.
You forget he’s one person talking about many subjects. His point isn’t to solve necessarily every single one, it’s to bring attention to get people think. Doesn’t mean he deserves hate for it.
RE: "When you include your own datasets it does make a difference.."
Your own dataset is private and does NOT change the overall result, which is bias to the bullshit thermite and bomb narrative...
Seeing you are obviously paying for access, go do a thought experiment with putting in the work of Dr Morgan Reynolds, Dr Judy Wood and Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes Research and see what comes up.
My interview with Dr Judy Wood, Dr Morgan Reynolds and Mark Conlon, 9/11 Planes Research, 3 March 2026.
Suppressed 9/11 Court Evidence: Why Truthers Fund the Cover-Up
Exposing Fraudulent NIST Reports, WTC Anomalies & the 2007 Filings They Don't Want You to Read
That’s the point, for your own investigation. The chat function is able to make connections and find data in large quantities of files that saves time.
You’ve put yourself in a position of absolutes that your position is the only one that can be true and discount everything else. I’ve gone through Judy Wood filings and works. I’m not convinced. Does that make me the bad guy?
As per Richard Gage: "he (Caroll) reached out to a handful of people in the 9/11 truth community to obtain the most critical 9/11 data. A small team consisting of RichardGage911 and members of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and the 9/11 War Room was more than happy to oblige. It’s been a monumental task for us, given that none of these files existed in one place. But we’ve managed to provide his team with 19,000 files so far — many of them from the “9/11 Datasets” assembled by researcher Justin Keogh."
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Carroll is an obvious spook. His rise to popularity and his background are quick tells. His backing of Trump despite being advised against it is another one. He even ignored "conspiracy" (meaning actually true but hidden) narratives around Trump, which was his supposed bread and butter. He's supposed to be a "conspiracy" guy, but when it came to Trump he gave it a blind eye and backed him, just like his spooky friend Candy Owens. Give me a break.
To learn more and see why he is definitely a spook, see:
I don't think so. But I have no idea if he has every been exposed to the idea that Richard Gage is a limited hangout. From what I can tell, the guy might be open to the idea that Gage is a gatekeeper, but I'm unsure he'd go along with the idea that the towers were dustified. He might be open to the idea, actually, if you show it to him with video examples and showing him the debris pile evidence and the like. It might make him conisder it thoughtfully at the very least. I do feel like he's genuine and I rarely say that these days.
I just think he's not very 'sceincy' oriented. He's more focused on history and liars and controlled opposition. So I think he'll be more into understanding Gage and ae911 is controlled op and stuff like that. But who knows, maybe he'll get it.
From what I recall, he knows someone who knew one of the alleged hijackers and from that first hand info he knows the story is fake. But I don't think he knows anything at all about the possibility of the towers having been dustified or that the planes were not planes. I have the feeling that information might be too out there for him lol
Reach out to him. I like the guy. This is his twitter handle
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
If he's such a great researcher why hasn't he uncovered that a whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
You’re assuming that Richard Gauge included anything of Judy Wood or the 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case. I’m looking through the dataset now. It has a lot of stuff from Richard Gauge but nothing from Judy Wood.
I'm 100% positive you will find NOTHING and NO mention of Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Judy Wood on that platform.
FFS - The International Center for 9/11 Justice recently revived the "9/11 timeline" of Justin Keogh on their website and there is NO MENTION of the two seperate 2007 Qui-Tam whistle-blower cases.
I'll share this with you again.....
As per Richard Gage: "he (Caroll) reached out to a handful of people in the 9/11 truth community to obtain the most critical 9/11 data. A small team consisting of RichardGage911 and members of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and the 9/11 War Room was more than happy to oblige. It’s been a monumental task for us, given that none of these files existed in one place. But we’ve managed to provide his team with 19,000 files so far — many of them from the “9/11 Datasets” assembled by researcher Justin Keogh."
It does list Judy Wood and cites Richard Gage’s presentation. But that’s all it could find since none of the other organizations included her legal filings. Again you’re making assumptions that everything was provided for the dataset.
"It does list Judy Wood and cites Richard Gage’s presentation" - And what does he say in the presentation, Sherlock?
He only talks disparagingly of her work.
Re: "Again you’re making assumptions that everything was provided for the dataset."
Seems you struggle to read with comprehension Charlie - Try reading the following AGAIN...
As per Richard Gage: "he (Caroll) reached out to a handful of people in the 9/11 truth community to obtain the most critical 9/11 data. A small team consisting of RichardGage911 and members of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and the 9/11 War Room was more than happy to oblige. It’s been a monumental task for us, given that none of these files existed in one place. But we’ve managed to provide his team with 19,000 files so far — many of them from the “9/11 Datasets” assembled by researcher Justin Keogh."
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
People, this isn't an either/or demolition job as if only one method of destruction was used. From my research, they threw everything but the kitchen sink at it. Every known and unknown/unacknowledged technology would or could have been employed, as the perp's couldn't leave the towers standing for months whilst the whole world asked too many inconvenient questions.
Lucky Larry had to clear the site ASAP and Controlled Demolition Inc. was in charge of the clean up.
Time is money.
The site was referred to as, "Ground Zero", for a reason......
Nuclear demolition could also explain the, "Dustification", that Judy Wood talks about and the apparent molecular dissociation or dissolving of steel beams or their concrete surroundings as they fell, as seen in many videos, such as 'The Spire' footage.
That reminds me, watch Dave Vonkleist's 2006 documentary, "911 In Plane Sight, Director's Cut".
With all due respect - Go fly a kite, with Dimitri's nuke drivel, that's 10 hours of my life I will never get back, and that of Heinz Pommer, and Jimbo Fetzer...
- It's easily debunked by the lack of seismic readings, undamaged basements, bathtub, the lack of ionizing radiation, the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the North Tower, fluctuations in the earth's magnetic field for each event and the "toasted cars", to name a few.
Read this:
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
You have obviously NOT read Dr Wood's book, or listened to any of presentations, because if you had, then you'd be well aware of the term Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions.
Now, here is source number two, being explained by Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, who's doing ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or “Cold Fusion”), and the Hutchison Effect.
He has also proved convincingly, that the red / grey chips found in the dust of the WTC that Steven E. Jones and Niels Harrit claimed were nano-thermite, were in fact the remains of standard anti-corrosive paints in 2025.
O, and regarding Dave von Kleist's limited hangout from 2006, please try and join us in 2026...
As if knowing that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely fundamentally changes the dynamics of the game. “Conspiracy theories” are mostly just a form of entertainment and a secular religion that serves to divide believers from non-believers - it in no way undermines the dynamics of authoritarianism because it transacts in the very terms it purportedly rejects. 9/11 was planned. So fucking what? Every campaign of mass evil is ALWAYS planned by those in power and the masses provide the fuel for it. Why? Because the worldview of the masses is not fundamentally different from the ruling elite, which is to say the logic of draconian self-interest and endless warfare - kinetic, or otherwise - is endemic to almost all human beings because we have no appetite for actual peace. This is simply structural dynamics/game theory + the dark side of human nature. There’s nothing intrinsically transformational or emancipatory about “enlightening” people to the fact that the world is ruled by evil cabals.
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a “nuclear bomb” can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Yes, enjoyed reading that. I did notice Carroll had started looking at 9/11 he was not correct in what I read either. Thought about correcting him but there were too many mistakes. Talking of explosions and airplanes🙄 I moved on but I’m gonna block and unfollow him bcoz it sounds like he’s a plant, or maybe just an idiot.
Anyway please keep plugging away on this, maybe one day your theories will be proven true, though for me, they ARE FACT, 100%.
Thanks fr that resume, ain’t that the tWOOF😉 Again, Dr Woods thinking is crystal clear and bang on the money for you and I, the rest need to get caught up asap
Not sure why Carroll is attacked. Discredits you from my perspective. It’s a tool that helps people understand the data. There are no definitive truths. That’s why it was such a great psyop and decades later people still don’t know what happened (only that nothing makes sense). It would make sense that a person calling out 9/11 disinformation would be actually a part of the disinfo psyop maybe? I don’t know but this post is very suspect.
If you've done a deep dive into the 21 year long history of the so called 9/11 "truth movement", you will immediately see the infiltration of COINTELPRO agents, perception management and neurolinguistic selling techniques being employed on good intentioned truth seekers, all whilst they are FUNDING the greater cover-up of WHAT happened on 9/11.
Here is some homework to do, that's an expedited version covering the last 21 years of obfuscation of truth.
Please circle back, once you've done your due diligence...
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
Norman, apologies I can't msg you here on Substack- app won't allow it- but had to ask- did you see this news story? Is this the same as the power from the Hutchison effect???
Is this free energy that they're going to sell?
Makes sense to see this now in the midst of a global fuel shortage with no obvious replacement except the energy they used to turn the towers to dust:
It's 1989 all over again, where they are suppressing "cold fusion" aka LENR - Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, WITHOUT ionizing radiation, with the waste being clean water...
I started using the Webb tool. When you include your own datasets it does make a difference.
You forget he’s one person talking about many subjects. His point isn’t to solve necessarily every single one, it’s to bring attention to get people think. Doesn’t mean he deserves hate for it.
Carroll is an obvious spook, what are you on about?
How so? He may be an opportunist, but he’s not a spook.
You’re knocking down his platform that just launched. You haven’t really given it time to evolve.
RE: "When you include your own datasets it does make a difference.."
Your own dataset is private and does NOT change the overall result, which is bias to the bullshit thermite and bomb narrative...
Seeing you are obviously paying for access, go do a thought experiment with putting in the work of Dr Morgan Reynolds, Dr Judy Wood and Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes Research and see what comes up.
My interview with Dr Judy Wood, Dr Morgan Reynolds and Mark Conlon, 9/11 Planes Research, 3 March 2026.
Suppressed 9/11 Court Evidence: Why Truthers Fund the Cover-Up
Exposing Fraudulent NIST Reports, WTC Anomalies & the 2007 Filings They Don't Want You to Read
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/suppressed-911-court-evidence-why
That’s the point, for your own investigation. The chat function is able to make connections and find data in large quantities of files that saves time.
You’ve put yourself in a position of absolutes that your position is the only one that can be true and discount everything else. I’ve gone through Judy Wood filings and works. I’m not convinced. Does that make me the bad guy?
As per Richard Gage: "he (Caroll) reached out to a handful of people in the 9/11 truth community to obtain the most critical 9/11 data. A small team consisting of RichardGage911 and members of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and the 9/11 War Room was more than happy to oblige. It’s been a monumental task for us, given that none of these files existed in one place. But we’ve managed to provide his team with 19,000 files so far — many of them from the “9/11 Datasets” assembled by researcher Justin Keogh."
- https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/journalist-ian-carroll-sets-sights
THUS - The 9/11 dataset is controlled, and manipulated by the exact people and organizations that 9/11 Jersey Girl is critical of..
The Web's coverage of 9/11 is just another gaslighting exercise.
I DARE you to keep on asking "the Web" to add these two 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower cases to the 19 000 files and report back if they will.
I'm positive they will refuse...
Dr Reynolds' 2007 whistle-blower case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Open Letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girls-explosive-plea-a
Carroll is an obvious spook. His rise to popularity and his background are quick tells. His backing of Trump despite being advised against it is another one. He even ignored "conspiracy" (meaning actually true but hidden) narratives around Trump, which was his supposed bread and butter. He's supposed to be a "conspiracy" guy, but when it came to Trump he gave it a blind eye and backed him, just like his spooky friend Candy Owens. Give me a break.
To learn more and see why he is definitely a spook, see:
https://rumble.com/v6ur26n-253-psyop-influencers-2.0-rogan-edition-w-7sees.html
https://sirescanor.substack.com/p/the-ian-carroll-equation-how-to-win
Does the "What is Truth Podcast", pass the 9/11 litmus test?
I don't think so. But I have no idea if he has every been exposed to the idea that Richard Gage is a limited hangout. From what I can tell, the guy might be open to the idea that Gage is a gatekeeper, but I'm unsure he'd go along with the idea that the towers were dustified. He might be open to the idea, actually, if you show it to him with video examples and showing him the debris pile evidence and the like. It might make him conisder it thoughtfully at the very least. I do feel like he's genuine and I rarely say that these days.
I just think he's not very 'sceincy' oriented. He's more focused on history and liars and controlled opposition. So I think he'll be more into understanding Gage and ae911 is controlled op and stuff like that. But who knows, maybe he'll get it.
From what I recall, he knows someone who knew one of the alleged hijackers and from that first hand info he knows the story is fake. But I don't think he knows anything at all about the possibility of the towers having been dustified or that the planes were not planes. I have the feeling that information might be too out there for him lol
Reach out to him. I like the guy. This is his twitter handle
https://x.com/WhatTruthPod?t=dHEDu-Go37SyUrzKhHTQyQ
Just DM' d him. I see he follows my X account...
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-controlled-demolition-vs-forensic
Just a tentative update, we might do an interview this coming Saturday - 28 March. Finishing up the details now...
If he's such a great researcher why hasn't he uncovered that a whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
Read this penned on 23 March 2026.
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Open Letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girls-explosive-plea-a
You’re assuming that Richard Gauge included anything of Judy Wood or the 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case. I’m looking through the dataset now. It has a lot of stuff from Richard Gauge but nothing from Judy Wood.
I'm 100% positive you will find NOTHING and NO mention of Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Judy Wood on that platform.
FFS - The International Center for 9/11 Justice recently revived the "9/11 timeline" of Justin Keogh on their website and there is NO MENTION of the two seperate 2007 Qui-Tam whistle-blower cases.
I'll share this with you again.....
As per Richard Gage: "he (Caroll) reached out to a handful of people in the 9/11 truth community to obtain the most critical 9/11 data. A small team consisting of RichardGage911 and members of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and the 9/11 War Room was more than happy to oblige. It’s been a monumental task for us, given that none of these files existed in one place. But we’ve managed to provide his team with 19,000 files so far — many of them from the “9/11 Datasets” assembled by researcher Justin Keogh."
- https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/journalist-ian-carroll-sets-sights
THUS - The 9/11 dataset is controlled, and manipulated by the exact people and organizations that 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza is critical of..
The Web's coverage of 9/11 is just another gaslighting exercise.
I DARE you to keep on asking "the Web" to add these two 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower cases to the 19 000 files and report back if they will.
I'm positive they will refuse...
It does list Judy Wood and cites Richard Gage’s presentation. But that’s all it could find since none of the other organizations included her legal filings. Again you’re making assumptions that everything was provided for the dataset.
"It does list Judy Wood and cites Richard Gage’s presentation" - And what does he say in the presentation, Sherlock?
He only talks disparagingly of her work.
Re: "Again you’re making assumptions that everything was provided for the dataset."
Seems you struggle to read with comprehension Charlie - Try reading the following AGAIN...
As per Richard Gage: "he (Caroll) reached out to a handful of people in the 9/11 truth community to obtain the most critical 9/11 data. A small team consisting of RichardGage911 and members of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and the 9/11 War Room was more than happy to oblige. It’s been a monumental task for us, given that none of these files existed in one place. But we’ve managed to provide his team with 19,000 files so far — many of them from the “9/11 Datasets” assembled by researcher Justin Keogh."
- https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/journalist-ian-carroll-sets-sights
THUS - The 9/11 dataset is controlled, and manipulated by the exact people and organizations that 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza is critical of..
The Web's coverage of 9/11 is just another gaslighting exercise.
I DARE you to keep on asking "the Web" to add these two 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower cases to the 19 000 files and report back if they will.
I'm positive they will refuse...
Of course it’s controlled. Why SHOULD they include the Judy Wood filings or let alone know enough about it to include it?
There’s tons of data out there and instead of trying to get that data included you simply went on a full blown attack which got you blocked.
Go read this Charlie...
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Open Letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girls-explosive-plea-a
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-controlled-demolition-vs-forensic
People, this isn't an either/or demolition job as if only one method of destruction was used. From my research, they threw everything but the kitchen sink at it. Every known and unknown/unacknowledged technology would or could have been employed, as the perp's couldn't leave the towers standing for months whilst the whole world asked too many inconvenient questions.
Lucky Larry had to clear the site ASAP and Controlled Demolition Inc. was in charge of the clean up.
Time is money.
The site was referred to as, "Ground Zero", for a reason......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbrHCY_avrE
Nuclear demolition could also explain the, "Dustification", that Judy Wood talks about and the apparent molecular dissociation or dissolving of steel beams or their concrete surroundings as they fell, as seen in many videos, such as 'The Spire' footage.
That reminds me, watch Dave Vonkleist's 2006 documentary, "911 In Plane Sight, Director's Cut".
With all due respect - Go fly a kite, with Dimitri's nuke drivel, that's 10 hours of my life I will never get back, and that of Heinz Pommer, and Jimbo Fetzer...
- It's easily debunked by the lack of seismic readings, undamaged basements, bathtub, the lack of ionizing radiation, the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the North Tower, fluctuations in the earth's magnetic field for each event and the "toasted cars", to name a few.
Read this:
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
You have obviously NOT read Dr Wood's book, or listened to any of presentations, because if you had, then you'd be well aware of the term Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions.
Listen here: https://rumble.com/v5xxydh-magnetic-electro-gravitic-nuclear-reactions-on-911.html
Now, here is source number two, being explained by Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, who's doing ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or “Cold Fusion”), and the Hutchison Effect.
US NAVY Dustification Patent
Video clip: https://rumble.com/v70cfss-us-navy-dustification-patent.html
He has also proved convincingly, that the red / grey chips found in the dust of the WTC that Steven E. Jones and Niels Harrit claimed were nano-thermite, were in fact the remains of standard anti-corrosive paints in 2025.
O, and regarding Dave von Kleist's limited hangout from 2006, please try and join us in 2026...
Dr Morgan Reynolds discusses Dave von Kleist
Link: https://x.com/i/status/2028377094082687010
Dr Reynolds' 2007 whistle-blower case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Full discussion with Dr Morgan Reynolds
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics-0c6
My interview with Dr Judy Wood, Dr Morgan Reynolds and Mark Conlon, 9/11 Planes Research, 3 March 2026
Suppressed 9/11 Court Evidence: Why Truthers Fund the Cover-Up
Exposing Fraudulent NIST Reports, WTC Anomalies & the 2007 Filings They Don't Want You to Read
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/suppressed-911-court-evidence-why
As if knowing that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely fundamentally changes the dynamics of the game. “Conspiracy theories” are mostly just a form of entertainment and a secular religion that serves to divide believers from non-believers - it in no way undermines the dynamics of authoritarianism because it transacts in the very terms it purportedly rejects. 9/11 was planned. So fucking what? Every campaign of mass evil is ALWAYS planned by those in power and the masses provide the fuel for it. Why? Because the worldview of the masses is not fundamentally different from the ruling elite, which is to say the logic of draconian self-interest and endless warfare - kinetic, or otherwise - is endemic to almost all human beings because we have no appetite for actual peace. This is simply structural dynamics/game theory + the dark side of human nature. There’s nothing intrinsically transformational or emancipatory about “enlightening” people to the fact that the world is ruled by evil cabals.
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Open Letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girls-explosive-plea-a
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a “nuclear bomb” can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Yes, enjoyed reading that. I did notice Carroll had started looking at 9/11 he was not correct in what I read either. Thought about correcting him but there were too many mistakes. Talking of explosions and airplanes🙄 I moved on but I’m gonna block and unfollow him bcoz it sounds like he’s a plant, or maybe just an idiot.
Anyway please keep plugging away on this, maybe one day your theories will be proven true, though for me, they ARE FACT, 100%.
G’luck 🍀👍
One thing the 9/11 "truth movement" has indoctrinated people with, is calling Dr Wood's EVIDENCE, a theory.
People fail at step 1 - Knowing the difference between a conclusive body of evidence, and that of a theory or hypothesis.
Explanatory video: https://rumble.com/v627qr2-911-understanding-what-happened.html
Thanks fr that resume, ain’t that the tWOOF😉 Again, Dr Woods thinking is crystal clear and bang on the money for you and I, the rest need to get caught up asap
Keep grinding 🍀
Already proven, surely.
I would bet a plant because of all the bells and whistles surrounding the project. It's too... glossy. If that makes sense.
Yes, you have a point there, his rise on YT was very steep at the start, seemed too good to be true to me.
I’m sure I’ve heard whispers that he’s a cia asset.
But anyone can start that rumour and it’s in no way based on real facts, that I’m aware of… TTFN 👋
Not sure why Carroll is attacked. Discredits you from my perspective. It’s a tool that helps people understand the data. There are no definitive truths. That’s why it was such a great psyop and decades later people still don’t know what happened (only that nothing makes sense). It would make sense that a person calling out 9/11 disinformation would be actually a part of the disinfo psyop maybe? I don’t know but this post is very suspect.
If you've done a deep dive into the 21 year long history of the so called 9/11 "truth movement", you will immediately see the infiltration of COINTELPRO agents, perception management and neurolinguistic selling techniques being employed on good intentioned truth seekers, all whilst they are FUNDING the greater cover-up of WHAT happened on 9/11.
Here is some homework to do, that's an expedited version covering the last 21 years of obfuscation of truth.
Please circle back, once you've done your due diligence...
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Open Letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girls-explosive-plea-a
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement?
What happens if you ask TRUTH questions?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/questions-for-the-911-truther-talking
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-controlled-demolition-vs-forensic
Norman, apologies I can't msg you here on Substack- app won't allow it- but had to ask- did you see this news story? Is this the same as the power from the Hutchison effect???
Is this free energy that they're going to sell?
Makes sense to see this now in the midst of a global fuel shortage with no obvious replacement except the energy they used to turn the towers to dust:
Trump Media to Merge With Nuclear Fusion Startup
https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Trump-Media-To-Merge-With-Nuclear-Fusion-Startup.html
It's 1989 all over again, where they are suppressing "cold fusion" aka LENR - Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, WITHOUT ionizing radiation, with the waste being clean water...
Watch - "Cold Fusion" Is hot again: https://youtu.be/UTvaX3vRtRA
Also search for the documentary: Heavy WaterGate - The War Against Cold Fusion(1998)
Thanks for the info