Corbett has done great work on the bluff around 9/11, but the key lies with the destructive mechanism of the WTC complex. Here, do some additional reading.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Read their court filings.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Thank you for your article. Dr. Judy wood’s research opened my eyes to the 9/11 cover up. Once you take a good look at one of the towers, (made mainly of steel and concrete) turning into DUST in mid air it’s hard to accept any other hypothesis. Clearly they used some kind of special device. A special device that could revolutionize our world for the better, yet they’ve kept it from the world hidden, for decades now. It’s time to bring the kingdom of GOD to earth. Keep up the good work.
The towers and Bldg. 7 certainly didn't drop b/o two airplanes. Why is that not enough proof that the (un)Patriot(ic) Act was introduced in order to curb constitutional rights?
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
Yet as a cognitive scientist who projected the current events already in 1998, I am convinced that the technocratic scheme will inevitably fail, except it might not happen soon enough:
In a way, it looks like the elitists are correct. Already Aristotle claimed in Politics that about 70% of humans (the percentage of helotes in Athens at the time) deserve to be slaves, and based on the muzzle experiments, they are even asking for it...
Sorry, as much as there is no "grand deception," there is full global control:
I'm not a truther either. I'm a truth seeker, employing critical thinking skills and intellectual humility. I'm always ready to change my mind, when presented with irrefutable evidence.
PS: With regards to Hiroshima, the evidence points to a massive firebombing.
I highly recommend you read the following book and watch the presentation and you'll learn that what happened to the Twins and all the other buildings with a WTC prefix, ALL seven of them, was NOT due to any thermal or kinetic mechanism.
Yes, I am aware of that. But it does not prove that the Israeli 'Art Students' were not up to some shenanigans inside the towers. WTC 7 was certainly a traditional CD. WTC 6 had to have been hit with DEW to make those large circular holes. Who knows?
The first part discusses the psyop and the second part, is where the artist talks about the boxes.
The boxes were given to them for free, where they illegally built the balcony out of the tower window….
BB-18 is a power distribution bus for electrical fuses, as in the fuse box that electricity goes through in a house or building, to prevent short-circuits.
They're produced by the Littelfuse company. It's not a bomb fuse, LOL.
So, you need to be open to the idea that those boxes were given to them to push the explosive narrative…
Rebekah Roth pushed a lot of that bullshit with her fictional books, but I am not sure whether someone started it before her.
She was later ousted as a possible government spook in 2015.
Hopefully this article nudges him to show some intellectual humility.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Two lies prop themselves up on either ends of the truth (evidence)
This way both can legitimately debunk the other, and through dialectics, stay within the two acceptable camps (official story vs official conspiracy story)
Example: Official story can rightly say there is no evidence of explosives / accelerants. Official conspiracy theory can rightly say the event was inconsistent with a gravity driven event.
Two partial truths weaponised to support lies.
And by containing debate to the two camps, you capture the vast majority of observers and few if any see the Hidden third leg of the triangle: the evidence.
Edit: My point is of course that Dr. Rancourt won't address the evidence presented by Judy Wood. I bet he and Stephen "Los Alamos" Jones have been yukking it up at how easily the masses have been contained. Maybe they're starting to sweat now though LOL
One can only speculate on why Dr Rancourt takes the position he does.
It's rather disappointing and my respect for him has now taken a knock.
Dr Mike Yeadon luckily has intellectual humility.
There are three camps of truth awareness, according to Dr David A, Hughes;
Camp 1 - The government narrative
Camp 2 - The government approved counter narrative, filled with truth tellers, that don't tell you the full truth, it's also filled with charlatans and operatives to muddle up the truth and most truth seekers get stuck in camp two.
Camp 3 - The uncomfortable truth, where the truth gets ridiculed, censored and the algorithms make sure you don't get to camp three easily.
Dr David Hughes on the importance of 9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters
A critical look at the three camps of 9/11 truth awareness
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Each person gets to decide what they do. I have other priorities. Maybe later? Never say never. Anyway, you don't need me. Everyone just think and learn for yourselves.
I highly respect your work on CV-19 and the damages of the shots, as well as your writings in 2010, pointing out the disingenuousness of Steven E. Jones et al, which in turn carries over to Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth. Where someone like Piers Robinson under the banner of the “International Center for 9/11 Justice”, suppression - Is now further helping with the cover-up of what happened on 9/11.
This lack luster approach to the 9/11 event by academia is exactly why Dr David A, Hughes left academia…
As a scholar yourself, you should appreciate his writings on the subject.
9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline – Prof David A. Hughes
Given the massive amount of evidence calling the official "9/11" narrative into question, why won't academia ask any critical questions?
I’ll just keep on reminding you from time to time.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I read Dr. woods book and I can never look at the image of buildings “collapsing “ the same way. One thing I’m confused about is Hurricane Erin. Perhaps I’m too dense but how is the sudden change in path direct related ?
There's cover-up and then there's cover-up! Incredible work. Naturally, real truthers never get a big enough platform, let alone funding, to do what the controlled opposition is doing here.
Corbett has done great work on the bluff around 9/11, but the key lies with the destructive mechanism of the WTC complex. Here, do some additional reading.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition.
Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone
Link: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
WTC Molten Metal: Fact or Fiction?
Analysis of the Evidence at Ground Zero
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wtc-molten-metal-fact-or-fiction
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Read their court filings.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Thank you for your article. Dr. Judy wood’s research opened my eyes to the 9/11 cover up. Once you take a good look at one of the towers, (made mainly of steel and concrete) turning into DUST in mid air it’s hard to accept any other hypothesis. Clearly they used some kind of special device. A special device that could revolutionize our world for the better, yet they’ve kept it from the world hidden, for decades now. It’s time to bring the kingdom of GOD to earth. Keep up the good work.
“Our Father who art in heaven,
hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come.
Thy will be done
on earth as it is in heaven…..”
The towers and Bldg. 7 certainly didn't drop b/o two airplanes. Why is that not enough proof that the (un)Patriot(ic) Act was introduced in order to curb constitutional rights?
Of course, the end game is here, and it's uglier:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-flagship-article-the-ring-of-violence
Also keep in mind, the controlled demolition narrative of Building 7, is bullshit too.
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition.
Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
Of course, it is.
Why is it that the "investigation" prevents informing the public that people have been betrayed?
It doesn't matter how the towers collapsed as long as it was not airplanes, which it was not...
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
I'm still having a hard time to believe that there are nukes. :)
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/there-is-no-nuclear-threat-apart
One thing is certain: the tech used on 9/11 was already beyond whatever it out there today for public consumption.
The clean-energy news has been around for years, yet nothing convincing, except what's out in the open: the 9/11 "miracle."
I have been subscribing to the DEW hypothesis for a while by now, because there is simply no other feasible explanation.
Also, it's obvious that technocracy can prevail only with an extremely-limited number of "survivors"; cyborg slaves, that is.
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-current-structure-of-the-imminent
Yet as a cognitive scientist who projected the current events already in 1998, I am convinced that the technocratic scheme will inevitably fail, except it might not happen soon enough:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-will-the-globalists-game-end
In a way, it looks like the elitists are correct. Already Aristotle claimed in Politics that about 70% of humans (the percentage of helotes in Athens at the time) deserve to be slaves, and based on the muzzle experiments, they are even asking for it...
Sorry, as much as there is no "grand deception," there is full global control:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-current-structure-of-the-imminent
Well, nearly full:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/holes-in-the-nwo-net
And sorry, I am not a truther:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-makes-you-think-you-are-right
I'm not a truther either. I'm a truth seeker, employing critical thinking skills and intellectual humility. I'm always ready to change my mind, when presented with irrefutable evidence.
PS: With regards to Hiroshima, the evidence points to a massive firebombing.
Fellow nukes denier here!
Whatever disintegrated the towers was a powerful technology that is as yet unknown to the public.
But I believe it is possible that some conventional forms of controlled demolition may have been employed also.
I highly recommend you read the following book and watch the presentation and you'll learn that what happened to the Twins and all the other buildings with a WTC prefix, ALL seven of them, was NOT due to any thermal or kinetic mechanism.
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Yes, I am aware of that. But it does not prove that the Israeli 'Art Students' were not up to some shenanigans inside the towers. WTC 7 was certainly a traditional CD. WTC 6 had to have been hit with DEW to make those large circular holes. Who knows?
Let’s address some of the disinformation pertaining to the “Israelis”.
Let's start with the "artists", Gelatin & “the E-Team” in the one tower, shall we...
Were they Israeli, or Austrian?
Watch the video below, before reading further….
Rumble link: https://rumble.com/v659g91-the-artists-gelatin-and-the-e-team.html
The first part discusses the psyop and the second part, is where the artist talks about the boxes.
The boxes were given to them for free, where they illegally built the balcony out of the tower window….
BB-18 is a power distribution bus for electrical fuses, as in the fuse box that electricity goes through in a house or building, to prevent short-circuits.
They're produced by the Littelfuse company. It's not a bomb fuse, LOL.
So, you need to be open to the idea that those boxes were given to them to push the explosive narrative…
Rebekah Roth pushed a lot of that bullshit with her fictional books, but I am not sure whether someone started it before her.
She was later ousted as a possible government spook in 2015.
Listen to this: https://rumble.com/v6u4d7h-exposed-rebekah-roths-methodical-illusion.html
There is truth in that there was some foreknowledge by some, but the conspiracy theory that no Jews died on 9/11, is just that - A conspiracy theory.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Those are Strawman arguments.
Absolutely not - It's facts.
This is the issue with Americans. They alwys want to look for the foreign enemy, instead of looking at the domestic enemies.
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Israel and Zionists in the Bush administration orchestrated 9/11.
I am extremely disappointed by Denis Rancourt’s response - refusing a discussion with you is showing bias and an anti-scientific attitude.
Hopefully this article nudges him to show some intellectual humility.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
It's the triangle approach:
Two lies prop themselves up on either ends of the truth (evidence)
This way both can legitimately debunk the other, and through dialectics, stay within the two acceptable camps (official story vs official conspiracy story)
Example: Official story can rightly say there is no evidence of explosives / accelerants. Official conspiracy theory can rightly say the event was inconsistent with a gravity driven event.
Two partial truths weaponised to support lies.
And by containing debate to the two camps, you capture the vast majority of observers and few if any see the Hidden third leg of the triangle: the evidence.
Edit: My point is of course that Dr. Rancourt won't address the evidence presented by Judy Wood. I bet he and Stephen "Los Alamos" Jones have been yukking it up at how easily the masses have been contained. Maybe they're starting to sweat now though LOL
One can only speculate on why Dr Rancourt takes the position he does.
It's rather disappointing and my respect for him has now taken a knock.
Dr Mike Yeadon luckily has intellectual humility.
There are three camps of truth awareness, according to Dr David A, Hughes;
Camp 1 - The government narrative
Camp 2 - The government approved counter narrative, filled with truth tellers, that don't tell you the full truth, it's also filled with charlatans and operatives to muddle up the truth and most truth seekers get stuck in camp two.
Camp 3 - The uncomfortable truth, where the truth gets ridiculed, censored and the algorithms make sure you don't get to camp three easily.
Dr David Hughes on the importance of 9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters
A critical look at the three camps of 9/11 truth awareness
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-hughes-on-the-importance-of
Each person gets to decide what they do. I have other priorities. Maybe later? Never say never. Anyway, you don't need me. Everyone just think and learn for yourselves.
I highly respect your work on CV-19 and the damages of the shots, as well as your writings in 2010, pointing out the disingenuousness of Steven E. Jones et al, which in turn carries over to Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth. Where someone like Piers Robinson under the banner of the “International Center for 9/11 Justice”, suppression - Is now further helping with the cover-up of what happened on 9/11.
This lack luster approach to the 9/11 event by academia is exactly why Dr David A, Hughes left academia…
As a scholar yourself, you should appreciate his writings on the subject.
9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline – Prof David A. Hughes
Given the massive amount of evidence calling the official "9/11" narrative into question, why won't academia ask any critical questions?
Read the peer reviewed paper here: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/911-truth-and-the-silence-of-the
Even Dr Mike Yeadon has now looked at WDTTG and has seen the light.
Dr Mike Yeadon getting stuck into 9/11 truth
The ex-Pfizer scientist is about to find the truth of the events on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-getting-stuck-into
I’ll just keep on reminding you from time to time.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
A black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
I read Dr. woods book and I can never look at the image of buildings “collapsing “ the same way. One thing I’m confused about is Hurricane Erin. Perhaps I’m too dense but how is the sudden change in path direct related ?
Dr Wood goes into great detail in her book. Maybe read that chapter again.
Here is my breakdown.
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001
There's cover-up and then there's cover-up! Incredible work. Naturally, real truthers never get a big enough platform, let alone funding, to do what the controlled opposition is doing here.