A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr David A. Hughes interview with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Bob, there is a Wikipedia page about Directed Energy Weapons. If you think only kooks believe in them, why is there a Wikipedia article about them, complete with subheadings like "History" and "Modern 21st Century Use"?
Also it matters big time who you trust with 9/11. Because if you trust what 9/11 Revisionist or Dr Judy Woods says about 9/11, you know that our government is lying about something that would change all of our lives. This directed energy technology that destroyed the WTC complex- its source is free. FREE!
The perpetrators of 9/11 did not need solar or wind power, or coal power, or nuclear to perpetrate the destruction of the towers. No, they used a technology that requires none of the typical inputs to create energy.
That is why it's referred to as "free".
Now if I had free energy, I could heat my greenhouse to 60°F in winter, put up lights, and grow tomatoes in December (in northern hemisphere). My husband could drive to work for free. The company he works for could make all these car compressors without an electric bill. And come to think of it, with no electric bill, maybe someone like you could open a factory to compete with the one my husband works at. It's hard to imagine a world with "free" energy because it is like the opposite of what we live in. But this power generation tech exists, Dr Woods' exposed it, and it would change the world.
THAT is why Richard Gage's rabbit hole is such an awful distraction. Besides the fact that he's never done anything to challenge the government. I would think that the person who brought a court case against the US government is way smarter, and way more able to cover all the bases, than someone who has never challenged the government, ever.
I am totally about advocating for unity, but I want you to understand that for those of us who have read Dr Woods' work, we can't stand it when good, honest people like yourself-people who know we're getting screwed out of the truth- when peope like that mention Richard Gage... We just shake our heads, because we know that Gage is selling snake oil. We know from his actions (or lack thereof) that his purpose is to misdirect people like you, so you'll never know that the ruling elite have the technology for a society of abundance, and you'll be like the 90% who think resources are finite, and that the future is bleak.
Don't forget how these poo-ba 9/11 "truth" movement organizations have been enriching themselves, whilst gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers, and constantly extorting more and more money out of them.
Hell, I'd love to earn $120K a year, all whilst sharing 9/11 info, like Gage has in the past... I'm doing all this work in my spare time, with hardly any support from my 12 000 subscribers here on substack.
I wonder what AE911 will do, once all their donors between 2014 and 2024, ask for their donations totaling $7.5 million, back?
Bob, the reason why it is crucial to accept the FACT that the buildings were taken down by cold fusion (DEW) and not by thermite, nukes or bombs, is because that same cold fusion can be used to dustify entire cities; and evaporate every human being in it's path.
A very convincing argument for DEWs causing all of the California wildfires in the last 20 years plus the recent destruction of Maui was presented by a California arborist with 50 years experience studying forest fires. He dissects the aftermath of the California wildfires, the effects on trees and plant life and concludes that none of the wildfires were caused by conventions means. The wood was cooked from the inside out, no plastic was touched, all glass and metal was melted or pulverized, any plant-life containing water was toast, etc. The same with Maui.
What's more disturbing, immediately after every fire, a clean up crew magically appears and hauls away all of the evidence! Nothing is left that might arouse suspicion as to what caused those fires. Just like the WTC. Crews were working all night long to clear away not metal debris- but DUST. The story that China bought all of the scrap metal was baloney. There was no scrap metal. A 110 story building comes down and the amount of debris left over only reaches the second floor?? The mess should have been 10 stories high, like after a controlled demolition.
Interesting how you downplay the two whistleblower cases of 2007 that the 9/11 truth movement talking heads are distracting from and when confronted about, deny knowing about.
Do you have a problem discerning when people are deceiving good intentioned truth seekers whilst they are enriching themselves?
Bob, you've clearly never entertained Dr Woods' work. Everything you bring up is addressed by actual scientists. The data about noise, about seismic signals, is in the court case you keep devaluing. It's in Dr Woods' book. Mathematical equations with actual data to support the noise data and the refutation of an engineered collapse. Your profile makes me think you're a real person so I don't quite understand why you seem so determined to only look in one direction. Unless you're a real person trying to steer people away from the truth?
If you're genuinely interested in truth, read Dr Woods' book. We know if you don't that you don’t have the same goals that we have. This is a technology that would lead to revolution and the toppling of the ruling elite bankers who have destroyed the West. I.e., this is important shit, and we'd appreciate it if you consulted the evidence from the Woods camp before commenting here, because Woods already answered these questions.
It's a great book! It'll blow your mind! You can buy it on Amazon or from here:
Overruled - you allow the power structure to execute their back up plan, the fake truth movement, which ensures the perpetrators continue unmolested. Only the actual, literal truth can crack this or any nut. The truth WILL out.
Overruled is a play on words to your "objection," since you are framing this as a courtroom affair. The only "REAL" truth movement is one which pursues the truth despite its unpopularity. But, go ahead, follow the pied piper, "Free Radical." ( Hint, if TV talking points align with your perspective e.g. kumbayah with fake 9/11 truth, you are not free and certainly not radical. )
Free Radical Bob refers to the "real" 9/11 truth movements that "will be launching lawsuits". Why would he not want to hear about the lawsuits that have ALREADY been filed? It's almost like our time is being wasted here...
The 9/11 “truth movement” was put into play to distract away from the evidence presented to court in 2007 by Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood, respectively…
As recent as 2023 I asked numerous 9/11 “truthers” like Richard Gage, his solicitor and Ted Walter, CEO of the “International Center for 9/11 Justice” in a Zoom call about the cases and they played dumb, making asif they don’t know about these cases…
It was a vetting requirement by AE911, since 2010, that if people sign their petition and the volunteers find that a signee ever mentioned Dr Wood or “no planes” on their social media, they would be removed from their platform…
I'll check it out! You know, the most interesting part of that 4-person discussion you posted recently was Judy and Andrew's comments about their time in the truth moment. How they were brought in and then DISTRACTED. Judy said they had her building a website when she had no business doing that. It's very, very interesting, how "they" control people. It seems the #1 way to control people is by wasting their time.
The statement about the bible page being "melted" to the steel/aluminium isn't grammatical. I think the guy was saying "melded" to the page. Unless this was a written statement from the guy himself, I think you need to take a step back. Don't attribute a false argument to someone based on a mishearing of a key phrase. It stuck to the page, not that the steel was melted.
Nitpick. If the the metal was flowing so as to stick by conventional means, the heat would burn the paper. Paper and metal cannot be melded together with typical processes.
Everybody hates to have their grammar corrected. But words have meaning and meanings s/b respected not misunderstood in making an opponent's argument seem more improbable than it is already.
Pressure from any force, like another surviving beam falling on it could cause a temporary bond between paper and metal. Looking at the photo you can see the bible pages are far from completely melded even to each other. The top page is torn over another page underneath it.
The paper should have burned or at the very least shown burn marks at the edges which it didn't in this case and ,as we can see from all the other pieces flying around, that paper wasn't subjected to combustible heat during the destruction of the towers. That's the anomaly that should be the argument's focus, not that the opposition is saying paper could have melted and yet somehow still be legible. It just makes no sense to imply he's saying the paper melted.
In other DEW experiments metal changes from solid to liquid without typical heat energy. Melted might not be the best term, maybe engineers will make a new term.
All pretty confusing. As a professional project engineer and entrepreneur, I see almost all involved in this debate making a fundamental error. They each argue for their particular hypothesis. In fact, I think they all have merit and ought not to be dissing the others. Given such a project, I would have used redundant methods, employing whatever technologies available at the time. If you want to solve the mysteries, discuss, don't debate. Debates accomplish nothing. Resolve to solve the mystery through productive, respectful discussion, please. Gery Warner, PEng., past contributor at ae911truth.org.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
I suggest you read the following articles, in order for you to see how you have been duped by a COINTELPRO operation, masquerading as the 9/11 "truth" movement.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Dr David A. Hughes interview with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Your posts and videos are confusing. You are not helping. In fact, one could argue you may be part of a campaign to confuse and confound anyone looking into the 9/11 incident with new interest. Settle down and cooperate. You do not have to be right all the time. Leave room in your mind for others to have somethings right. Stop the frantic rhetoric.
"I also have my doubts on [Sue Serpa's] sincerity when it comes to the truth, as she is also financially involved in gatekeeping open discourse, as we saw in my article Donate TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation, as she is on the payroll."
Serpa doesn't appear to be mentioned in the cited article, as a search on her name reveals no find. We therefore do NOT see that "she is on the payroll." How do you justify this assertion, then, if you can? If you can't, you should withdraw it immediately.
Some secrets stay secret. They are still lying about the Titanic hitting a fairytale iceberg, and that event happened in 1912, so they won't be telling us any truths about 911 any time soon.
O, it was the Olympic - Saw a docci, think I have it in my library that shows the name plate that fell off and shows the name hidden under the name plate, when they sent down a remote undersea explorer. I think the docci is from the 1990’s.
Chuck is such a cool guy - We spoke twice. The second round was a 2h presentation, live for the members and we had a Q&A that went on for an additional 5h, which was not recorded.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Dr David A. Hughes interview with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-hughes-on-the-importance-of
Have you even bothered to read what is contained in these cases and keep in mind Dr Wood to her case all the way to the US Supreme court.
NONE of the people touting bombs, thermite or nukes have EVER taken their so called “explosive evidence” to court.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Step 1 - Understand the difference between a conclusive body of evidence and that of a theory or hypothesis.
It seems you struggle to apply intellectual humilty.
5 minute video: https://rumble.com/v627qr2-911-understanding-what-happened.html
There is no question DEW technology is real and the weapons exist. It’s not a question of “belief.”
Bob, there is a Wikipedia page about Directed Energy Weapons. If you think only kooks believe in them, why is there a Wikipedia article about them, complete with subheadings like "History" and "Modern 21st Century Use"?
Also it matters big time who you trust with 9/11. Because if you trust what 9/11 Revisionist or Dr Judy Woods says about 9/11, you know that our government is lying about something that would change all of our lives. This directed energy technology that destroyed the WTC complex- its source is free. FREE!
The perpetrators of 9/11 did not need solar or wind power, or coal power, or nuclear to perpetrate the destruction of the towers. No, they used a technology that requires none of the typical inputs to create energy.
That is why it's referred to as "free".
Now if I had free energy, I could heat my greenhouse to 60°F in winter, put up lights, and grow tomatoes in December (in northern hemisphere). My husband could drive to work for free. The company he works for could make all these car compressors without an electric bill. And come to think of it, with no electric bill, maybe someone like you could open a factory to compete with the one my husband works at. It's hard to imagine a world with "free" energy because it is like the opposite of what we live in. But this power generation tech exists, Dr Woods' exposed it, and it would change the world.
THAT is why Richard Gage's rabbit hole is such an awful distraction. Besides the fact that he's never done anything to challenge the government. I would think that the person who brought a court case against the US government is way smarter, and way more able to cover all the bases, than someone who has never challenged the government, ever.
I am totally about advocating for unity, but I want you to understand that for those of us who have read Dr Woods' work, we can't stand it when good, honest people like yourself-people who know we're getting screwed out of the truth- when peope like that mention Richard Gage... We just shake our heads, because we know that Gage is selling snake oil. We know from his actions (or lack thereof) that his purpose is to misdirect people like you, so you'll never know that the ruling elite have the technology for a society of abundance, and you'll be like the 90% who think resources are finite, and that the future is bleak.
Don't forget how these poo-ba 9/11 "truth" movement organizations have been enriching themselves, whilst gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers, and constantly extorting more and more money out of them.
Hell, I'd love to earn $120K a year, all whilst sharing 9/11 info, like Gage has in the past... I'm doing all this work in my spare time, with hardly any support from my 12 000 subscribers here on substack.
I wonder what AE911 will do, once all their donors between 2014 and 2024, ask for their donations totaling $7.5 million, back?
DONATE TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation
Where is the money going?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/donate-today-for-911-disinformation
Bob, the reason why it is crucial to accept the FACT that the buildings were taken down by cold fusion (DEW) and not by thermite, nukes or bombs, is because that same cold fusion can be used to dustify entire cities; and evaporate every human being in it's path.
A very convincing argument for DEWs causing all of the California wildfires in the last 20 years plus the recent destruction of Maui was presented by a California arborist with 50 years experience studying forest fires. He dissects the aftermath of the California wildfires, the effects on trees and plant life and concludes that none of the wildfires were caused by conventions means. The wood was cooked from the inside out, no plastic was touched, all glass and metal was melted or pulverized, any plant-life containing water was toast, etc. The same with Maui.
What's more disturbing, immediately after every fire, a clean up crew magically appears and hauls away all of the evidence! Nothing is left that might arouse suspicion as to what caused those fires. Just like the WTC. Crews were working all night long to clear away not metal debris- but DUST. The story that China bought all of the scrap metal was baloney. There was no scrap metal. A 110 story building comes down and the amount of debris left over only reaches the second floor?? The mess should have been 10 stories high, like after a controlled demolition.
Here is the link to the interview:
https://rumble.com/v5sdcdt-whats-causing-these-weird-fire-burn-patterns-in-california-and-maui-forensi.html
Interesting how you downplay the two whistleblower cases of 2007 that the 9/11 truth movement talking heads are distracting from and when confronted about, deny knowing about.
Do you have a problem discerning when people are deceiving good intentioned truth seekers whilst they are enriching themselves?
Have you no sense of right and wrong?
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
DONATE TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation
Where is the money going?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/donate-today-for-911-disinformation
Bob, you've clearly never entertained Dr Woods' work. Everything you bring up is addressed by actual scientists. The data about noise, about seismic signals, is in the court case you keep devaluing. It's in Dr Woods' book. Mathematical equations with actual data to support the noise data and the refutation of an engineered collapse. Your profile makes me think you're a real person so I don't quite understand why you seem so determined to only look in one direction. Unless you're a real person trying to steer people away from the truth?
If you're genuinely interested in truth, read Dr Woods' book. We know if you don't that you don’t have the same goals that we have. This is a technology that would lead to revolution and the toppling of the ruling elite bankers who have destroyed the West. I.e., this is important shit, and we'd appreciate it if you consulted the evidence from the Woods camp before commenting here, because Woods already answered these questions.
It's a great book! It'll blow your mind! You can buy it on Amazon or from here:
https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/book/
Overruled - you allow the power structure to execute their back up plan, the fake truth movement, which ensures the perpetrators continue unmolested. Only the actual, literal truth can crack this or any nut. The truth WILL out.
These lawsuits that the 9/11 truth movement talking heads are distracting from and when confronted about, deny knowing about.
Do you have a problem discerning when people are deceiving good intentioned truth seekers whilst they are enriching themselves?
Have you no sense of right and wrong?
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
DONATE TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation
Where is the money going?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/donate-today-for-911-disinformation
Overruled is a play on words to your "objection," since you are framing this as a courtroom affair. The only "REAL" truth movement is one which pursues the truth despite its unpopularity. But, go ahead, follow the pied piper, "Free Radical." ( Hint, if TV talking points align with your perspective e.g. kumbayah with fake 9/11 truth, you are not free and certainly not radical. )
Free Radical Bob refers to the "real" 9/11 truth movements that "will be launching lawsuits". Why would he not want to hear about the lawsuits that have ALREADY been filed? It's almost like our time is being wasted here...
The 9/11 “truth movement” was put into play to distract away from the evidence presented to court in 2007 by Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood, respectively…
As recent as 2023 I asked numerous 9/11 “truthers” like Richard Gage, his solicitor and Ted Walter, CEO of the “International Center for 9/11 Justice” in a Zoom call about the cases and they played dumb, making asif they don’t know about these cases…
It was a vetting requirement by AE911, since 2010, that if people sign their petition and the volunteers find that a signee ever mentioned Dr Wood or “no planes” on their social media, they would be removed from their platform…
Read my article discussing it.
The tell-tale signs of a 9/11 cult.
Countering a 9/11 cult that cannot count past 3.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-telltale-signs-of-a-911-cult
I'll check it out! You know, the most interesting part of that 4-person discussion you posted recently was Judy and Andrew's comments about their time in the truth moment. How they were brought in and then DISTRACTED. Judy said they had her building a website when she had no business doing that. It's very, very interesting, how "they" control people. It seems the #1 way to control people is by wasting their time.
The statement about the bible page being "melted" to the steel/aluminium isn't grammatical. I think the guy was saying "melded" to the page. Unless this was a written statement from the guy himself, I think you need to take a step back. Don't attribute a false argument to someone based on a mishearing of a key phrase. It stuck to the page, not that the steel was melted.
Have you read Dr Wood’s book and did you even bother listening to the explanation given by Bob Greenyer?
Nitpick. If the the metal was flowing so as to stick by conventional means, the heat would burn the paper. Paper and metal cannot be melded together with typical processes.
Everybody hates to have their grammar corrected. But words have meaning and meanings s/b respected not misunderstood in making an opponent's argument seem more improbable than it is already.
Pressure from any force, like another surviving beam falling on it could cause a temporary bond between paper and metal. Looking at the photo you can see the bible pages are far from completely melded even to each other. The top page is torn over another page underneath it.
The paper should have burned or at the very least shown burn marks at the edges which it didn't in this case and ,as we can see from all the other pieces flying around, that paper wasn't subjected to combustible heat during the destruction of the towers. That's the anomaly that should be the argument's focus, not that the opposition is saying paper could have melted and yet somehow still be legible. It just makes no sense to imply he's saying the paper melted.
You forget about the Miracle on September 11, 2001.
The miracle of the orthodox church and it's religious relic that is NOT the Bible.
Read my article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-miracle-on-911
A DEW anomaly misinterpreted as God's miracle.
I said it once before, but it bears repeating now, "Nitpick."
pinprick
In other DEW experiments metal changes from solid to liquid without typical heat energy. Melted might not be the best term, maybe engineers will make a new term.
The term Hutchison uses is jellification.
Good stuff!
All pretty confusing. As a professional project engineer and entrepreneur, I see almost all involved in this debate making a fundamental error. They each argue for their particular hypothesis. In fact, I think they all have merit and ought not to be dissing the others. Given such a project, I would have used redundant methods, employing whatever technologies available at the time. If you want to solve the mysteries, discuss, don't debate. Debates accomplish nothing. Resolve to solve the mystery through productive, respectful discussion, please. Gery Warner, PEng., past contributor at ae911truth.org.
Nothing is confusing.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
I suggest you read the following articles, in order for you to see how you have been duped by a COINTELPRO operation, masquerading as the 9/11 "truth" movement.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
DONATE TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation
Where is the money going?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/donate-today-for-911-disinformation
Dr David A. Hughes interview with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-hughes-on-the-importance-of
Your posts and videos are confusing. You are not helping. In fact, one could argue you may be part of a campaign to confuse and confound anyone looking into the 9/11 incident with new interest. Settle down and cooperate. You do not have to be right all the time. Leave room in your mind for others to have somethings right. Stop the frantic rhetoric.
Step 1 - Know the difference between a conclusive body of evidence and that of a theory or hypothesis.
5 Min video clip: https://rumble.com/v627qr2-911-understanding-what-happened.html
"I also have my doubts on [Sue Serpa's] sincerity when it comes to the truth, as she is also financially involved in gatekeeping open discourse, as we saw in my article Donate TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation, as she is on the payroll."
Serpa doesn't appear to be mentioned in the cited article, as a search on her name reveals no find. We therefore do NOT see that "she is on the payroll." How do you justify this assertion, then, if you can? If you can't, you should withdraw it immediately.
Then you really didn't pay attention to what was shared in the article Roy, and I suggest you work through it again.
Some secrets stay secret. They are still lying about the Titanic hitting a fairytale iceberg, and that event happened in 1912, so they won't be telling us any truths about 911 any time soon.
O, it was the Olympic - Saw a docci, think I have it in my library that shows the name plate that fell off and shows the name hidden under the name plate, when they sent down a remote undersea explorer. I think the docci is from the 1990’s.
Glad that you have been able to work with Chuck Fall. We have been united in our demand for scientific truth
Chuck is such a cool guy - We spoke twice. The second round was a 2h presentation, live for the members and we had a Q&A that went on for an additional 5h, which was not recorded.
Here is my most recent discussion with TAP.
Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/tap-talk-take-two-with-911-revisionist