There’s no cause to be defensive. I actually discovered your channel about a week ago. It was a treat and I’ve watched several hours of con at this point. I’m sure you used to people dropping troll comments, but I wasn’t doing I’ve looked at a wide variety of 911 research over the years and what I appreciated about, Dawson‘s content is that he focuses on naming names and describing the criminal Enterprises in history behind these sorts of events. I used to think that Dr. Woods material was disinformation, but now I’m not so sure, regardless maybe we shouldn’t Be quick to label This or that researcher disinformation, I don’t have to agree with everything that he says or that you’re saying to extract some very insightful and useful arguments. I think we can all agree that this is a massive topic with endless rabbit holes and a lot of a lot of actual disinformation for sure anyway, no I didn’t drop in just to make a comment.
Then, if you're interested in learning who the limited hangouts are, read Andrew Johnson's two books AND Dr Wood's book and my article, as you have a lot to catch up on...
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
very informative interview, with so many details! THANK You!If you just could list the names of those gov workers who know well about the DEW weapons, hard to search this LONG interview again...Sorry for bothering you..
From this interview learned your real name;) So Daniel, you must have covered it already, just it occurred only now to me, kind of trivial.. The Erin hurricane was there in order to blow the wind in the right direction so that the imaging and all the scenery won't be covered up by the smoke emanating from the towers. The other side towards the Hudson River has no big 'public exposure', there are not many streets where people take photos, have the 'proof', etc...., maybe?
My name is Norman - Daniel is the resident sceptic on the VaConLoversPodcast.
Dr Wood speculates that the hurricane could have been part of the field effects needed for the process of dustification to happen, as hurricanes have a static field in front of them.
You know how people can "feel" the weather approaching?
What Hutchison did in his experiments was to create a static field using Tesla Coils and Van der Graaf generators and then place his various metals, plastics or whatever in the static field and then bombard it with intersecting sound and microwaves and in so doing unlocking a kind of key, that causes the metal transmutation, jellification, glowing without hat, disintegrating and even levitation...
Check out my article;
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
According to the research done by Rebekah Roth and shared in Her 'Decrption' novel series whatever happened to the towers and the pentagon and Shanksville the four planes were flown to Westover Airbase and the crews took off for Europe immediately after the events. Who knows what happened to the innocent passengers who were not in on the plan 😏The novels are easy to read and full of insights that only an ex airline steward would have - especially since after the first novel many flight professionals weighed in with further info.
Thank you for your tireless work and leaving your comment section open. 9/11 is a pivotal moment and a gateway drug for looking at the big picture including all the hoaxes of the past century and beyond. We're looking at the whole infrastructure of the Technocracy of which DEW is a part with basically the Earth being weaponized.
Check out Ryan Dawson’s work. “Empire Unmasked”
Ryan Dawson is a limited hangout - I have no respect for him
What’s a limited hangout?
Someone that shares 80% truth, but the most important 20% is not discussed.
He's a disinfo peddler...
Did you even bother to listen to the full podcast discussion or did you just come slap a comment here?
There’s no cause to be defensive. I actually discovered your channel about a week ago. It was a treat and I’ve watched several hours of con at this point. I’m sure you used to people dropping troll comments, but I wasn’t doing I’ve looked at a wide variety of 911 research over the years and what I appreciated about, Dawson‘s content is that he focuses on naming names and describing the criminal Enterprises in history behind these sorts of events. I used to think that Dr. Woods material was disinformation, but now I’m not so sure, regardless maybe we shouldn’t Be quick to label This or that researcher disinformation, I don’t have to agree with everything that he says or that you’re saying to extract some very insightful and useful arguments. I think we can all agree that this is a massive topic with endless rabbit holes and a lot of a lot of actual disinformation for sure anyway, no I didn’t drop in just to make a comment.
Apologies for the grammar I’m replying while commuting using voice dictation lol
Then, if you're interested in learning who the limited hangouts are, read Andrew Johnson's two books AND Dr Wood's book and my article, as you have a lot to catch up on...
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:
1. 9/11 Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Thank you for all the links and information I’ll have a look
very informative interview, with so many details! THANK You!If you just could list the names of those gov workers who know well about the DEW weapons, hard to search this LONG interview again...Sorry for bothering you..
From this interview learned your real name;) So Daniel, you must have covered it already, just it occurred only now to me, kind of trivial.. The Erin hurricane was there in order to blow the wind in the right direction so that the imaging and all the scenery won't be covered up by the smoke emanating from the towers. The other side towards the Hudson River has no big 'public exposure', there are not many streets where people take photos, have the 'proof', etc...., maybe?
Hi there.
My name is Norman - Daniel is the resident sceptic on the VaConLoversPodcast.
Dr Wood speculates that the hurricane could have been part of the field effects needed for the process of dustification to happen, as hurricanes have a static field in front of them.
You know how people can "feel" the weather approaching?
What Hutchison did in his experiments was to create a static field using Tesla Coils and Van der Graaf generators and then place his various metals, plastics or whatever in the static field and then bombard it with intersecting sound and microwaves and in so doing unlocking a kind of key, that causes the metal transmutation, jellification, glowing without hat, disintegrating and even levitation...
Check out my article;
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001
isn't there a hurricane Erin out in the Atlantic today? another hurricane off of mauia prior to the lahaina fires too.
Indeed there is... You might want to read these two articles;
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001
DEW is on fire in Maui
People are just jumping to conclusions, don't be caught out.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dew-is-on-fire-in-maui
According to the research done by Rebekah Roth and shared in Her 'Decrption' novel series whatever happened to the towers and the pentagon and Shanksville the four planes were flown to Westover Airbase and the crews took off for Europe immediately after the events. Who knows what happened to the innocent passengers who were not in on the plan 😏The novels are easy to read and full of insights that only an ex airline steward would have - especially since after the first novel many flight professionals weighed in with further info.
I'm sorry to have to report to you that Rebekah was exposed as a CIA spook in 2015.
I suggest you read my article, laying it all bare.
A Methodical Creation of a Methodical 9/11 Illusion
Who is Rebekah Roth?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-methodical-creation-of-a-methodical
Thanks for your response. I will read your article.
Thank you for your tireless work and leaving your comment section open. 9/11 is a pivotal moment and a gateway drug for looking at the big picture including all the hoaxes of the past century and beyond. We're looking at the whole infrastructure of the Technocracy of which DEW is a part with basically the Earth being weaponized.
In case you missed this open letter, by a 9/11 Jersey Girl...
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september