Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Excellent overview. Yes, like Covid, a planned event. And the gain was achieved, tbo at great price. It was called the Patriot Act, the legislative approval of the surveillance state which Trump is amplifying daily. A few minor Quibbles...
"If directed-energy weapons were indeed used on 9/11, that event sent a chilling signal to the world: the United States possesses these capabilities"
Two problems. Lasers would have visible evidence and particle beam technology (supposedly) couldn't do what happened - likely an internal controlled demolition of structural members. More important, if it were a show of our technical abilities - and the Govt Media has always denied anything other than kerosene fueled fire (ha) - there is no "show".
As for all dust, we know tger were large building materials found intact like structural steel beams. That said, so much dust is possible from the gravitational force of collapse from 1340 feet to ground. Not much left survives with terminal velocity materials collapsing on itself.
Let Bob Greenyer explain it to you - from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion"), the Hutchison Effect and how his research explains the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Just because someone disagrees with everything in your theory (yes, until proven in court of law, everything is hypothesis) doesn't mean they agree with Govt OR that you are necessarily correct. Both sides may may be partially or wholly accurate. You would do so much better listening to others, not condescending or implying ignorance and following another Einstein Quote:
"…A dictatorship means muzzles all round and consequently stultification. Science can flourish only in an atmosphere of free speech.“
Albert Einstein
BTW - not disagreeing just pointing out possible flaws. I appreciate the links and will look further.
You are obviously new to my Substack and have not read any of my articles and you've not confirmed whether or not you've watched any of Dr Wood's presentations or read her book, so I'm probably safe in assuming you have no clue what her presentations or her book contains... Correct?
Scroll back up, read the article containing information from a 30+ year demolition expert and then also the comparative article with the structural collapse in Myanmar and be sure to leave comments in the comment sections of those two articles.
For good measure, here is a third one for you to work through.
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Lastly, let me have you realize the following, as Patricia ALSO pointed out in het letter above...
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
Hey Lionel, just wanted to pop in here, I hope you don’t mind me jumping in.
I'm going to assume you are an eager, honest truth seeker.
Assuming you are that, please understand that many people who visit the 9/11 Revisionist's substack are NOT honest and eager truth seekers. There are constant spam comments, trolling comments, comments to distract and mislead eager and honest truth seekers.
Assuming you are an eager and honest truth seeker, you know from experience that the room gets (metaphorically) hot when someone is hovering over the target. In plain English, the closer one is to revealing gov dishonesty and crime, the more one encounters BAD-intentioned people. People with no other mission than to waste the truth seeker's time.
I've seen so many trolls on this page, so many distractions and junk thrown at the 9/11 Revisionist, that I felt compelled to respond here. Thank you for visiting this page, and I hope you do some further reading. The 9/11 Revisionist's substack is a gold mine of information for anybody honestly seeking the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Thank you Rachel - But the true hero's are Dr Morgan Reynolds, Dr Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson, Richard D. Hall, Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes Research and Chris Hampton with his brilliant 3 part series - 9/11 Alchemy.
I'm just shining a light on what they have proven and exposed, through the last 20 years.
Judy Wood’s book is like an encyclopedia.. absolutely unbelievably well researched. It is a brilliant book and one all of us, knowing we were lied to, should have on our bookshelves.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
This is a great letter, but one sentence in it stands out to me as dubious: "Claims of nano thermite/controlled demolition, CGI plane projections, missiles at the Pentagon, or mini-nuclear devices have been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked by a series of distinguished scientists, engineers, pilots, and researchers."
(1) The use of nanothermite has been debunked by only a few researchers as far as I know, and I don't know that the debunking has been conclusive, though it may yet become so. Likewise, I don't think the use of at least some controlled-demolition techniques has been definitively ruled out.
(2) Ms. Casazza erroneously conflates CGI and 3D projection, neither of which – at least in my view – has been conclusively debunked.
(3) I don't think anyone has ever suggested there were more than one missile at the Pentagon, and what proof exists that there wasn't just one?
(4) Mini-nukes as generally understood may have been debunked, but DEW technology itself, believed by Ms. Casazza to have been used in the destruction of the Towers, can involve nuclear processes, and so it may be a bit hasty to rule out the use of some sort of nuclear technology completely.
I would hope for at least some revision of this sentence in a possible further edit of this document.
Some notes that people can work through, to help them see the disinformation that has been peddled over the year, that has been challenged and NOT answered by those putting out said disinformation.
1. "Thermite in the dust sample study" by Niels Harrit, Steven E. Jones et al has been heavily criticized as soon as it was published, and the ongoing doubling down as if it stands alone as proof, by AE911, Richard Gage et al, is disingenuous to say the least..
I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone
Dr. James R. Millette, a forensic scientist and president of MVA Scientific Consultants, conducted an independent analysis of World Trade Center (WTC) dust samples in late 2011 and early 2012.
This work was commissioned by skeptic Chris Mohr to investigate claims from the 2009 paper by Niels Harrit et al., which suggested red/gray chips in the dust were "active thermitic material" (nano-thermite).
Millette's study examined chips from four dust samples collected near Ground Zero and concluded they were consistent with primer paint used on steel structures, not thermite.
2023 - 9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
2. Your view of wanting to kitchen sink CGi and 3D Volumetric Projections feeds into your own bias, as you were personally involved in translating the erroneously error filled September Clues by Simon Shack, who has been called out on the disinformation contained in his documentary, and addendums, by Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes research and Shack refuses to revise the mistakes made.
9/11 Planes Research has a whole series picking September clues apart - Up to 10 articles, which people should study. https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Pentagon False Flag Exposed: From Cleanup to Cover-Up
Adam Eisenberg's In-Depth Testimony – Zero Aircraft Evidence, a Person of Interest's Ties to Black Ops and Global Intrigue, Plus Exposing Disinfo Agents in the 9/11 Movement
4. If you studied Dr Wood's book, you would have been made aware of what Dr Wood describes as Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions, taking place due to the energy that was weaponized on September 11, 2001.
It's Zionists, rogue elements in the US government, the US MIC, and corporate interests, time for you to do some actual research, instead of shouting slogans that have no bloody substance - You sound woke.
Sems this whole open letter went over your head. No wonder the cover-up is still going strong, because people like YOU just can't think for themselves!
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 page NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialize in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
I would like to reassure you, son that I’ve been doing this truth thing for many many decades and I have forgotten more than you’ll ever know. When I say it’s the Jews, I mean read Revelation. Have you heard of Henry Kissinger and the destruction of Cambodia? There are so many fucking data points of death and destruction caused by Jews to list them all is a waste of my fucking time in my life. Jews are from the beginning mass murderers. It’s in their culture. It’s in their blood. It’s in their DNA. The reason this goes on and on is because insecure people like you who have no sense of their own intellectual powers are always trying to add more data to the picture. How much fucking data do you need?
It's a pity you still think Richard Gage is an upstanding guy and he won't lie, what a bloody laugh... Unfortunately you are easily fooled. Caught, hook, line, and sinker...
Don't fret. You're not the only one. He once had me convinced too, once I broke free of the 2nd layer of the cover-up.
Suggested reading.... Letter penned on 23 March 2026.
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Judy Woods theory is total bullshit. There’s no way directed energy could deliver enough energy to blow up the buildings. Directed energy was used in Lahaina to start the fire as it was used in pacific policies to start the fires, it cannot blow up the World Trade Center. Judy Woods is full of shit. And yes, it was done by Israel and the Jews. It was a commercial operation. The World Trade Center is a commercial twin tower. It has biblical origins, the entire buildings were built to be blown up. They were blown up with nano thermite. Believe whatever you wanna believe.
O, dear - can't even get the person you are trying to insult name right.
Failing on the get go.
Did you even read this letter from Patricia Casazza, or did you just come here to troll?
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
do the math. how much energy does it take to blow up three WTC buildings? how much energy comes from air borne DEWS? it does not add up. Judy Woods is retaraded. u r an idiot
Hi there Jimmy Vushnad Thanks for your pile of excrement! Can you do “Bill Gates” is the second coming next please. I reckon you could pull it off sir. You have an admirable disregard for reality, evidence and truth. 👍
We know they never came home, and at the end of the day, a plane crashing into a Tower, could NOT cause what we saw at the WTC, and we know Shanksville and the PentaCON were stages scenes.
If you want to read more on the crew and passengers, see the work of Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes Research, here on Substack - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Maybe not collateral damage at all, why would you say that when you gave us evidence that the planes never crashed into the towers or the Pentagon? Have you ever thought that maybe since the planes were well below capacity that day, they could have been populated by none other than government operatives or crisis actors??
Also, here is a 9/11 "crash course" for you, that covers all three sites on 9/11.
In my opinion, the gold standard of investigative citizen journalism on the internet, in a documentary form, that cuts through all the bullshit put out in the last 24 years. You're welcome.
Profound, had never heard @ the D.E.W. theory,, which would fit the free fall in it's own footprint collapse. I was convinced of the thermite/ cording, demo, theory as it spoke of 3 months of molten steel pools. & demo explosives " finger prints".
Hi Rachel. If you’ve never heard of the conclusive body of evidence, that points to a non-thermal, non kinetic mechanism, as the destructive mechanism, I will suggest the following…
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
It's hard to believe the public has not demanded a complete, fair investigation of every question that cuts against the official tale.
In using DNA to identify the remains of the victims, I wonder if anyone on the two airplanes was identified. They would have been in the rubble just like the building's inhabitatants, if the government narrative were accurate. I know a forensic scientist who spent quite a bit of time helping with the DNA identification effort in New York City, and it was a huge project.
If the government had a hand in orchestrating the event, in covering up the evidence, a farcical 9/11 NIST and Commission Report, how much of the DNA evidence do you think can also be fraudulent.
NOTHING solid hit the Towers, and Shanksville and the PentaCON were staged scenes, as we can prove ALL FOUR planes were still airborne, WELL AFTER the alleged crash times.
There were no "two planes," have you not been keeping up w/the evidence that the planes were seen on radar as having flown past the towers? One was shown to have continued on their flight westward & was last seen over KS I believe, while the other was seen on radar, flying past the WTC towers! No plane hit the Pentagon or we would have been furnished footage of it by the corrupt FBI!
There were no "two planes," have you not been keeping up w/the evidence that the planes were seen on radar as having flown past the towers? One was shown to have continued on their flight westward & was last seen over KS I believe, while the other was seen on radar, flying past the WTC towers! No plane hit the Pentagon or we would have been furnished footage of it by the corrupt FBI!
Wait, who are these women & why are we only now, 25 years later, just getting this story? I question some of their data, such as there having been 200 jumpers that fateful day; if that's true, what happened to the obvious footage that would have surfaced by now? While I agree with their assumptions about KSM, involvement of ppl like Silverstein, Giuliani, Lutnick, et al, and their reference to Dr Wood's famous book & report on DEW having brought down the towers, I must question such an elaborate presentation by these ladies because, as we've seen so many times before, the best way to control a narrative is to get in front of it by leading it, by appearing to be on the side of the "common folk.". Why do they claim to have seen a beloved husband & father "murdered before their very eyes," were they standing by the WTC towers that day or do they mean they saw it on TV, & is that the same as seeing it "before your very eyes?" Sorry, but I'm highly skeptical of such "outing" reports such as this, especially when we're chastened upfront by accusations that we may not want to see the truth, sorta like, "if you don't believe our sincerely, then you're not a decent human being.". Who are these ladies?
Hi Bernard, if you have subscribed to me when I started writing in 2023, you would have come along for the ride on the expose of the official narrative and that of the false counter narrative pushed by Architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage.
You have much catching up to do with my over 200 articles.
Now, pertaining to the 9/11 Jersey Girls - Have you been living under a rock for the last 25 years?
Of the many faces and names to emerge after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, few were more evocative to Americans than the “Jersey Girls”.
They were four women from New Jersey whose husbands were killed in the tragedy and went on to campaign for a national commission of inquiry into the attacks.
In eventually winning their battle to be heard in Washington, the four transformed themselves into powerful representatives of the 9/11 victims.
For a long time, the Jersey girls were among the most outspoken people on the attacks. Each had lost a husband in the most awful circumstances.
Van Auken’s spouse, Kenneth, was a bond trader at Cantor Fitzgerald on the 104th floor of Tower 1, the South Tower and called his wife to tell her he loved her after an aircraft hit.
Breitweiser’s husband, Ronald, was a senior vice-president for Fiduciary Trust International. Investigators found his wedding ring in the ruins of the World Trade Centre, but not much else.
Patty Casazza’s husband, John, also worked at Cantor Fitzgerald on the 104th floor of Tower 1, the South Tower, who also managed to call to say goodbye and was just 38 when he died.
The final member of the quartet was Mindy Kleinberg, whose spouse, Alan, was another Cantor worker.
The four banded together and, in the face of official intransigence, campaigned with other victims’ relatives to set up the 9/11 commission.
9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza speaks with 9/11 Revisionist
The 9/11 Commission Report, life after the commission, and the 9/11 truth movement
The Forgotten Firefighters of Stairwell B of the North Tower
Firefighters Raul Angulo and Erik Lawyer explained the holes in the narrative on Redacted, yet they are withholding important evidence about their fellow firefighters.
Neat little bomb!!
Thank you from the bottom of my broken heart.
Excellent overview. Yes, like Covid, a planned event. And the gain was achieved, tbo at great price. It was called the Patriot Act, the legislative approval of the surveillance state which Trump is amplifying daily. A few minor Quibbles...
"If directed-energy weapons were indeed used on 9/11, that event sent a chilling signal to the world: the United States possesses these capabilities"
Two problems. Lasers would have visible evidence and particle beam technology (supposedly) couldn't do what happened - likely an internal controlled demolition of structural members. More important, if it were a show of our technical abilities - and the Govt Media has always denied anything other than kerosene fueled fire (ha) - there is no "show".
As for all dust, we know tger were large building materials found intact like structural steel beams. That said, so much dust is possible from the gravitational force of collapse from 1340 feet to ground. Not much left survives with terminal velocity materials collapsing on itself.
Sorry, but no lasers were required.
Let Bob Greenyer explain it to you - from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion"), the Hutchison Effect and how his research explains the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11.
The Navy Dustification patent: https://rumble.com/v70cfss-us-navy-dustification-patent.html
Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
Lastly - Have you ever listened to any of Dr Wood's presentations, or read her book?
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance. - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Just because someone disagrees with everything in your theory (yes, until proven in court of law, everything is hypothesis) doesn't mean they agree with Govt OR that you are necessarily correct. Both sides may may be partially or wholly accurate. You would do so much better listening to others, not condescending or implying ignorance and following another Einstein Quote:
"…A dictatorship means muzzles all round and consequently stultification. Science can flourish only in an atmosphere of free speech.“
Albert Einstein
BTW - not disagreeing just pointing out possible flaws. I appreciate the links and will look further.
You are obviously new to my Substack and have not read any of my articles and you've not confirmed whether or not you've watched any of Dr Wood's presentations or read her book, so I'm probably safe in assuming you have no clue what her presentations or her book contains... Correct?
Scroll back up, read the article containing information from a 30+ year demolition expert and then also the comparative article with the structural collapse in Myanmar and be sure to leave comments in the comment sections of those two articles.
For good measure, here is a third one for you to work through.
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
Lastly, let me have you realize the following, as Patricia ALSO pointed out in het letter above...
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-controlled-demolition-vs-forensic
Hey Lionel, just wanted to pop in here, I hope you don’t mind me jumping in.
I'm going to assume you are an eager, honest truth seeker.
Assuming you are that, please understand that many people who visit the 9/11 Revisionist's substack are NOT honest and eager truth seekers. There are constant spam comments, trolling comments, comments to distract and mislead eager and honest truth seekers.
Assuming you are an eager and honest truth seeker, you know from experience that the room gets (metaphorically) hot when someone is hovering over the target. In plain English, the closer one is to revealing gov dishonesty and crime, the more one encounters BAD-intentioned people. People with no other mission than to waste the truth seeker's time.
I've seen so many trolls on this page, so many distractions and junk thrown at the 9/11 Revisionist, that I felt compelled to respond here. Thank you for visiting this page, and I hope you do some further reading. The 9/11 Revisionist's substack is a gold mine of information for anybody honestly seeking the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Thank you Rachel - But the true hero's are Dr Morgan Reynolds, Dr Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson, Richard D. Hall, Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes Research and Chris Hampton with his brilliant 3 part series - 9/11 Alchemy.
I'm just shining a light on what they have proven and exposed, through the last 20 years.
Again, thank you for your support.
Still, however, he is correct in one aspect, that all of us may be totally or partially correct, including you, no?
Want to discuss this face to face?
You got it girl
Judy Wood’s book is like an encyclopedia.. absolutely unbelievably well researched. It is a brilliant book and one all of us, knowing we were lied to, should have on our bookshelves.
Why?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_deception
https://corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/
www.democracynow.org/2007/2/8/cheering_movers_and_art_student_spies
https://odysee.com/@ThoughtCrimeChannel:7/General-Wesley-Clark---7-countries-in-5-years:2
Revelation 3:9. Amen.
Suggested additional reading for you Martin.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
What hit the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001?
The ongoing 25 yearlong argument should have been put to bed in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-hit-the-twin-towers-on-september
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
The 9/11 Hoodwink at Shanksville, PA
No Jet Fuel, or a plane at the Flight 93 Crash Site
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hoodwinked-at-shanksville-on-911
The PentaCON on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia, MSM and the 9/11 "truth" movement, for 20 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
Did you see the images from the recent tragic aircraft accident at LGA? The photos depict the immense damage that was caused to the airplane when it collided with a fire truck. Hard to unsee the contrast vs 9/11 physics. https://nypost.com/2026/03/23/us-news/air-canada-flight-firetruck-collide-at-laguardia-reports/
You'll appreciate the article and the documentary.
What hit the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001?
The ongoing 25 yearlong argument should have been put to bed in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-hit-the-twin-towers-on-september
Here is a 9/11 "crash course". In my opinion the best researched documentary, currently on the events at all three sites on September 11, 2001
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
This is a great letter, but one sentence in it stands out to me as dubious: "Claims of nano thermite/controlled demolition, CGI plane projections, missiles at the Pentagon, or mini-nuclear devices have been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked by a series of distinguished scientists, engineers, pilots, and researchers."
(1) The use of nanothermite has been debunked by only a few researchers as far as I know, and I don't know that the debunking has been conclusive, though it may yet become so. Likewise, I don't think the use of at least some controlled-demolition techniques has been definitively ruled out.
(2) Ms. Casazza erroneously conflates CGI and 3D projection, neither of which – at least in my view – has been conclusively debunked.
(3) I don't think anyone has ever suggested there were more than one missile at the Pentagon, and what proof exists that there wasn't just one?
(4) Mini-nukes as generally understood may have been debunked, but DEW technology itself, believed by Ms. Casazza to have been used in the destruction of the Towers, can involve nuclear processes, and so it may be a bit hasty to rule out the use of some sort of nuclear technology completely.
I would hope for at least some revision of this sentence in a possible further edit of this document.
Thank you for your opinion Roy.
Some notes that people can work through, to help them see the disinformation that has been peddled over the year, that has been challenged and NOT answered by those putting out said disinformation.
1. "Thermite in the dust sample study" by Niels Harrit, Steven E. Jones et al has been heavily criticized as soon as it was published, and the ongoing doubling down as if it stands alone as proof, by AE911, Richard Gage et al, is disingenuous to say the least..
I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone
Link: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
Dr Denis Rancourt: 2010 Death Blows to the 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis
The 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis and over 15 years of lies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/denis-rancourt-2010-death-blows-to
Dr. James Millette's 2012 WTC Dust Analysis
Dr. James R. Millette, a forensic scientist and president of MVA Scientific Consultants, conducted an independent analysis of World Trade Center (WTC) dust samples in late 2011 and early 2012.
This work was commissioned by skeptic Chris Mohr to investigate claims from the 2009 paper by Niels Harrit et al., which suggested red/gray chips in the dust were "active thermitic material" (nano-thermite).
Millette's study examined chips from four dust samples collected near Ground Zero and concluded they were consistent with primer paint used on steel structures, not thermite.
Find it here: https://internationalskeptics.com/forums/index.php?threads/wtc-dust-study-feb-29-2012-by-dr-james-millette.231314/
9/11 & Thermite - BUSTED - 2020
Thermite debate between Dr Denis Rancourt and Dr Josh Mitteldorf
Video clip: https://rumble.com/v3ujhqh-911-and-thermite-busted.html
2023 - 9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-controlled-demolition-vs-forensic
Thermite Revisited & Demolished in 2024
Aerospace Engineer discusses the truth about thermite and September 11, 2001
Presentation: https://911revision.substack.com/p/thermite-revisited-and-demolished
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe in 2025
With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
2. Your view of wanting to kitchen sink CGi and 3D Volumetric Projections feeds into your own bias, as you were personally involved in translating the erroneously error filled September Clues by Simon Shack, who has been called out on the disinformation contained in his documentary, and addendums, by Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes research and Shack refuses to revise the mistakes made.
9/11 Planes Research has a whole series picking September clues apart - Up to 10 articles, which people should study. https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
The Loose Change & September Clues 9/11 PSYOPS
The most important thought experiment to date
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-loose-change-911-psyop
Simon Shack "Misrepresents" Plane Flight Path in 9/11 Video
Independent Analysis: Exposing Falsehoods of Simon Shack
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shack-misrepresents-plane-flight
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part One)
Exposing The Disinformation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception
September Clues - Addendum - Deceptions - Part One
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions
3. Re: The PentaCON - Patricia might have just mis typed - When she records her reading of this document, she'll revise this statement.
The PentaCON on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Pentagon False Flag Exposed: From Cleanup to Cover-Up
Adam Eisenberg's In-Depth Testimony – Zero Aircraft Evidence, a Person of Interest's Ties to Black Ops and Global Intrigue, Plus Exposing Disinfo Agents in the 9/11 Movement
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/pentagon-false-flag-exposed-from
4. If you studied Dr Wood's book, you would have been made aware of what Dr Wood describes as Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions, taking place due to the energy that was weaponized on September 11, 2001.
Let's have Dr Wood explain it to you: https://rumble.com/v5xxydh-magnetic-electro-gravitic-nuclear-reactions-on-911.html
What hit the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001?
The ongoing 25 yearlong argument should have been put to bed in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-hit-the-twin-towers-on-september
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
Here is a 9/11 "crash course" for you. You're welcome.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
It’s the fucking Jews. Wake the fuck up.
It's Zionists, rogue elements in the US government, the US MIC, and corporate interests, time for you to do some actual research, instead of shouting slogans that have no bloody substance - You sound woke.
Here is the team behind 9/11 - https://rumble.com/v6u8p8z-who-is-the-team-behind-911.html
Then your trusted experts in the 9/11 "truth movement" are level two of the cover-up.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Sems this whole open letter went over your head. No wonder the cover-up is still going strong, because people like YOU just can't think for themselves!
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 page NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialize in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
I would like to reassure you, son that I’ve been doing this truth thing for many many decades and I have forgotten more than you’ll ever know. When I say it’s the Jews, I mean read Revelation. Have you heard of Henry Kissinger and the destruction of Cambodia? There are so many fucking data points of death and destruction caused by Jews to list them all is a waste of my fucking time in my life. Jews are from the beginning mass murderers. It’s in their culture. It’s in their blood. It’s in their DNA. The reason this goes on and on is because insecure people like you who have no sense of their own intellectual powers are always trying to add more data to the picture. How much fucking data do you need?
II am well aware of ol Henry, thanx.
It's a pity you still think Richard Gage is an upstanding guy and he won't lie, what a bloody laugh... Unfortunately you are easily fooled. Caught, hook, line, and sinker...
Don't fret. You're not the only one. He once had me convinced too, once I broke free of the 2nd layer of the cover-up.
Suggested reading.... Letter penned on 23 March 2026.
9/11 Jersey Girl’s Explosive Plea: “A Half-Truth Is Still a Whole Lie”
Jersey Girl and 9/11 widow breaks her silence in a raw open letter to the US Government and the entire truth movement: drop the egos, stop the half-truths, confront ALL evidence
Open Letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girls-explosive-plea-a
Judy Woods theory is total bullshit. There’s no way directed energy could deliver enough energy to blow up the buildings. Directed energy was used in Lahaina to start the fire as it was used in pacific policies to start the fires, it cannot blow up the World Trade Center. Judy Woods is full of shit. And yes, it was done by Israel and the Jews. It was a commercial operation. The World Trade Center is a commercial twin tower. It has biblical origins, the entire buildings were built to be blown up. They were blown up with nano thermite. Believe whatever you wanna believe.
O, dear - can't even get the person you are trying to insult name right.
Failing on the get go.
Did you even read this letter from Patricia Casazza, or did you just come here to troll?
9/11 Conventional Controlled Demolition vs. Forensic Facts: Judy Wood's Devastating Takedown of Richard Gage
No refutations to her evidence in 15+ years, yet endless hit pieces — Wood demands accountability and exposes what she calls Gage's deceptive game in the fight for 9/11 truth.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-controlled-demolition-vs-forensic
do the math. how much energy does it take to blow up three WTC buildings? how much energy comes from air borne DEWS? it does not add up. Judy Woods is retaraded. u r an idiot
@johnvishner is either a troll or a person of such colossal stupidity it is pointless to attempt any communication with him.
Impossible to tell between the two and pointless anyway.
Captain Mute removes the silly-billies.
Hi there Jimmy Vushnad Thanks for your pile of excrement! Can you do “Bill Gates” is the second coming next please. I reckon you could pull it off sir. You have an admirable disregard for reality, evidence and truth. 👍
Revelations ...really??
"when this is all over we are going to need a new bible"
Another question: what happened to the passengers? If the planes didn’t crash that day, what happened to them.
I am in the Uk, and a local man was on the second plane.
Hi Lyn
- They were collateral damage.
We know they never came home, and at the end of the day, a plane crashing into a Tower, could NOT cause what we saw at the WTC, and we know Shanksville and the PentaCON were stages scenes.
If you want to read more on the crew and passengers, see the work of Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes Research, here on Substack - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Maybe not collateral damage at all, why would you say that when you gave us evidence that the planes never crashed into the towers or the Pentagon? Have you ever thought that maybe since the planes were well below capacity that day, they could have been populated by none other than government operatives or crisis actors??
As a non subscriber to my Substack, you have missed quite a lot.
Here is your homework.
Go study the writings of 9/11 Planes Research, here on Substack - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Also, here is a 9/11 "crash course" for you, that covers all three sites on 9/11.
In my opinion, the gold standard of investigative citizen journalism on the internet, in a documentary form, that cuts through all the bullshit put out in the last 24 years. You're welcome.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Profound, had never heard @ the D.E.W. theory,, which would fit the free fall in it's own footprint collapse. I was convinced of the thermite/ cording, demo, theory as it spoke of 3 months of molten steel pools. & demo explosives " finger prints".
Keep up the presdure, thank you.
Hi Rachel. If you’ve never heard of the conclusive body of evidence, that points to a non-thermal, non kinetic mechanism, as the destructive mechanism, I will suggest the following…
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
90 Minute documentary;
The Best 9/11 Explainer Documentary You'll Ever See
Link: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
It's hard to believe the public has not demanded a complete, fair investigation of every question that cuts against the official tale.
In using DNA to identify the remains of the victims, I wonder if anyone on the two airplanes was identified. They would have been in the rubble just like the building's inhabitatants, if the government narrative were accurate. I know a forensic scientist who spent quite a bit of time helping with the DNA identification effort in New York City, and it was a huge project.
If the government had a hand in orchestrating the event, in covering up the evidence, a farcical 9/11 NIST and Commission Report, how much of the DNA evidence do you think can also be fraudulent.
NOTHING solid hit the Towers, and Shanksville and the PentaCON were staged scenes, as we can prove ALL FOUR planes were still airborne, WELL AFTER the alleged crash times.
Illusion of Reality and the 9/11 Planes
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/illusion-of-reality-and-the-911-planes
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
What hit the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001?
The ongoing 25 yearlong argument should have been put to bed in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-hit-the-twin-towers-on-september
The 9/11 Hoodwink at Shanksville, PA
No Jet Fuel, or a plane at the Flight 93 Crash Site
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hoodwinked-at-shanksville-on-911
The PentaCON on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Recorded this past Saturday, 28 March 2026.
Pentagon 9/11 False Flag: TWO Old Guard Soldiers Speak Out
The PentaCon on September 11, 2001: No Plane, No Missile — Exposed!
Discussion: https://911revision.substack.com/p/pentagon-911-false-flag-two-old-guard
Correctamundo!
There were no "two planes," have you not been keeping up w/the evidence that the planes were seen on radar as having flown past the towers? One was shown to have continued on their flight westward & was last seen over KS I believe, while the other was seen on radar, flying past the WTC towers! No plane hit the Pentagon or we would have been furnished footage of it by the corrupt FBI!
There were no "two planes," have you not been keeping up w/the evidence that the planes were seen on radar as having flown past the towers? One was shown to have continued on their flight westward & was last seen over KS I believe, while the other was seen on radar, flying past the WTC towers! No plane hit the Pentagon or we would have been furnished footage of it by the corrupt FBI!
Wait, who are these women & why are we only now, 25 years later, just getting this story? I question some of their data, such as there having been 200 jumpers that fateful day; if that's true, what happened to the obvious footage that would have surfaced by now? While I agree with their assumptions about KSM, involvement of ppl like Silverstein, Giuliani, Lutnick, et al, and their reference to Dr Wood's famous book & report on DEW having brought down the towers, I must question such an elaborate presentation by these ladies because, as we've seen so many times before, the best way to control a narrative is to get in front of it by leading it, by appearing to be on the side of the "common folk.". Why do they claim to have seen a beloved husband & father "murdered before their very eyes," were they standing by the WTC towers that day or do they mean they saw it on TV, & is that the same as seeing it "before your very eyes?" Sorry, but I'm highly skeptical of such "outing" reports such as this, especially when we're chastened upfront by accusations that we may not want to see the truth, sorta like, "if you don't believe our sincerely, then you're not a decent human being.". Who are these ladies?
Sincerity, that is, damned autocorrect!
Hi Bernard, if you have subscribed to me when I started writing in 2023, you would have come along for the ride on the expose of the official narrative and that of the false counter narrative pushed by Architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage.
You have much catching up to do with my over 200 articles.
Now, pertaining to the 9/11 Jersey Girls - Have you been living under a rock for the last 25 years?
Of the many faces and names to emerge after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, few were more evocative to Americans than the “Jersey Girls”.
They were four women from New Jersey whose husbands were killed in the tragedy and went on to campaign for a national commission of inquiry into the attacks.
In eventually winning their battle to be heard in Washington, the four transformed themselves into powerful representatives of the 9/11 victims.
For a long time, the Jersey girls were among the most outspoken people on the attacks. Each had lost a husband in the most awful circumstances.
Van Auken’s spouse, Kenneth, was a bond trader at Cantor Fitzgerald on the 104th floor of Tower 1, the South Tower and called his wife to tell her he loved her after an aircraft hit.
Breitweiser’s husband, Ronald, was a senior vice-president for Fiduciary Trust International. Investigators found his wedding ring in the ruins of the World Trade Centre, but not much else.
Patty Casazza’s husband, John, also worked at Cantor Fitzgerald on the 104th floor of Tower 1, the South Tower, who also managed to call to say goodbye and was just 38 when he died.
The final member of the quartet was Mindy Kleinberg, whose spouse, Alan, was another Cantor worker.
The four banded together and, in the face of official intransigence, campaigned with other victims’ relatives to set up the 9/11 commission.
9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza speaks with 9/11 Revisionist
The 9/11 Commission Report, life after the commission, and the 9/11 truth movement
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girl-patricia-casazza
The Forgotten Jumpers of 9/11
Over 1100 people seemed to have vanished into thin air...
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-forgotten-jumpers-of-911
Where did all the people go on 9/11?
Over 1100 people seemed to have vanished into thin air...
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/where-did-all-the-people-go-on-911
The Forgotten Firefighters of Stairwell B of the North Tower
Firefighters Raul Angulo and Erik Lawyer explained the holes in the narrative on Redacted, yet they are withholding important evidence about their fellow firefighters.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-forgotten-firefighters-of-stairwell