14 Comments
User's avatar
Rachel Girshick's avatar

Dear Patricia. Thank you for keeping up the pressure to expose the truth.

I was a staunch supported of A&E, until seeing your info on Dr. Judy Wood's work & then watching her exemplary, thorough, clear, unbiased, analysis of the TT+ demo job.

I am in the midst of reading "Where Did the Towers Go?", which, to anyone, regardless of educational level, can easily grasp the truth presented.

It was truly disheartening to realize that A&E ( and other professional groups), are, to me, clearly a COINTEL type coverup, supporting the perpetrators agenda. However, given the profound level of deception we find the world in, it is completely plausible.

I have written to A&E & removed my support of their organization & misguiding stance on the truth of that horrific day, which, I believe was, among other reasons, a key element for the setting of the stage we now found our country & the world in.

Sincerely

Rachel H. Girshick

User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 17Edited
Comment removed
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Still waiting for you to take up the offer of Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes Research, Aidan…

Richard Gage Calls Out 9/11 Revisionist – But He Just Debunked Himself

Gage cites Dr Judy Wood’s pages to attack her — those exact pages destroy Gage's claims.

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/richard-gage-calls-out-911-revisionist

9/11 Evidence Beyond Half-Truths: An Open Reflection

An Open Letter: The importance of open, motive-aware conversation in the 9/11 community

Open letter: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-evidence-beyond-half-truths-an

Mark Conlon's avatar

I am up for face to face debate with Aidan. I have all the visual evidence and slides which I can present to a viewing audience also. I am not the type to hide behind my keyboard, and have no problem putting my name and face to my research.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 18
Comment removed
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

The truth is only seen as division by people spreading lies Aidan.

Still running from a face to face with Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research?

Richard Gage Calls Out 9/11 Revisionist – But He Just Debunked Himself

Gage cites Dr Judy Wood’s pages to attack her — those exact pages destroy Gage's claims.

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/richard-gage-calls-out-911-revisionist

Mark Conlon's avatar

Aidan,

You started the division by trolling my Substack, with your derogatory comment. It escalated from there. Take responsibility and grow a pair, or shut up.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 18
Comment removed
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

A Presentation Discussing the Official Evidence & Telemetry Data of Flights AA11, UA175, AA77 & UA93

An Independent Investigation

https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/a-presentation-discussing-the-official

Mark Conlon's avatar

Aidan, you were derogatory in your comments from the start. Here's what you said with your first three below:

26th Jan 2026:

"Unscientific Disinformation."

27 Jan 2026:

"The Death Star Did It".

"Sounds Like A Bad B-Movie - Plausible Enough To Dupe Fools, Absurd Enough To Bring Ridicule To Anyone Associated With It.

(Which Is Perhaps The Objective)".

27 Jan 2026:

"Just as the filming of Star Wars was concluding 50 years ago this year, Death Star death-rays and R2-D2 type hologram projection propaganda is commencing just ahead of the 25th anniversary of 9/11."

Aidan, You have been very troll like in your behaviour. Straight off the bat with "unscientific disinformation"? Where is that feedback? How about you be specific about the points in the article, about the technology, or crash physics etc? That would be more welcome. You know, like me and Norman did about your remoted controlled planes, and autopilot. In fact, I praised you for your FOIAs.

I thought you had more about you, but I was wrong. That is not feedback, you were derogatory toward the article out of hand. I doubt you know much about the technology aspects what was in the article anyway. But all the same, some decent feedback would have been welcomed.

Regards!

MYSTIC BAZAAR's avatar

Well Patricia makes a lot of excellent points in this new letter!! The funds being received by certain non profits aren't being used for the right reasons. No proper investigations, experiments or testing are being conducted. Too many personal appearances with expenses being done but these appearances aren't raising proper awareness to the actual EVIDENCE that needs to be investigated!! I'm sure the non profits don't give a full list of what they spend their funding on & the salaries for the last 10years are really high!! Now Gage's new site isn't a non profit organisation but still asks for donations, fees for appearances, sells merchandise with one Mug being sold for $500 last time I checked, so for him to say he isn't profiting, why isn't he registered as a non profit? He lied to Patricia saying he doesn't profit off 9/11 and the way she was treated in the war room was disgusting!! I admire Patricia's strength to go up against these people and she has my full support and backing in fighting for a fully independent investigation, that acknowledges ALL evidence, to determine the truth about 9/11 as its about time the world knew what really went on.